Bitcoin Forum
March 31, 2020, 08:07:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW!  (Read 290783 times)
bojax
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 20, 2017, 07:54:40 PM
 #3061

Quote
I don't think it's quite time for all the players to boycott the site until we've gotten compensated for yet another error, but I think it's something that has to get answered this month, at the very latest.

Agreed.  The ambiguity of the released statements by the representative is silly at best and is downright willfully ignorant imo.  It's almost as if they didn't release any statement at all. 

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1585642021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585642021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1585642021
Reply with quote  #2

1585642021
Report to moderator
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 20, 2017, 10:49:14 PM
 #3062

Quote
I don't think it's quite time for all the players to boycott the site until we've gotten compensated for yet another error, but I think it's something that has to get answered this month, at the very latest.

Agreed.  The ambiguity of the released statements by the representative is silly at best and is downright willfully ignorant imo.  It's almost as if they didn't release any statement at all.  


They asked the players who found out about it to not mention it to the other players.  Not only did they release no statement, but they deliberately concealed it from their customers.  Whether they pay or not, they've already lied by omission.  Under current site ownership, their reputation will never fully recover.
marlais
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 111


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 12:26:33 AM
 #3063

Posted five days ago :

Over-Raked Pots Update

SwC Poker has prioritized this and will make automatic refunds to affected players. Refunds will include a corresponding amount of Bitcoin Cash, credited as SwC chips. We must ask player patience while we complete the investigation and calculation of refunds.

This information is meaningless unless they attach a date to it. Right now, I can only tell you that it wasn't enough of a priority to be addressed in 5 days. I heard that multi-platform support, a new Windows client, and an Android client were also priorities, but they were obviously using a different definition of "priority" than the one I am familiar with.

I get that they don't want to put a date on anything because they've been burned so many times in the past for missing deadlines they set for themselves, but this should result in a more realistic approach to setting personal deadlines rather than an excuse for setting no deadlines in perpetuity and leaving customers in the dark.
RoKSeouljah420
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 03:17:13 AM
 #3064

Not sure why you guys really expect answers to any of your questions. They've been ignoring my questions, and suggestions, for the better part of a year now. This thread is nothing more than a place for them to try and save some marketing face by posting the same meaningless few sentences over and over again, i.e., we're working on it, it's being looked into, etc.

Also, mrcuzamano, if you hate seals so much, you might wanna change your sig from your SWC referral link. It makes look you even more retarded than usual when you're flaming the site you're advertising.

Regards,
BttB
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 03:42:21 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2017, 03:52:22 AM by RUchamp
 #3065

SO, the script is now fully functional, it searches through hand history and outputs hand numbers with missing money, and the winners of that hand. Since the hand history lists blinds posted in their sequential order relative to all blinds posted instead of the actual chip amount e.g. "xxxx posts small blinds 1234567" (uhh derp?), the script cannot tally up all the missing chips from those specific pots.

The output looks like this:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349034196670480404/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349031935164809218/unknown.png

So there you have it. If you are interested in having the script run through your hand history contact me either on private message here, on the various discord channels, or on the swc trollbox, though you're most likely to get a prompt response on discord.

If I like you ill run it for free, if you're a random I am charging 5 chips for the service, and if I don't like you... then wtf are you reading this for, shithead. Angry  Grin Grin Roll Eyes Kiss

*note

Some hands are missing the name of the player who won, im looking into it but it seems to be infrequent enough to not bother adding a fix as its probably just another type of SWC patented ShitWare(tm). If SWC holds true to their word of making available full (non-corrupted) hand histories, this script will serve as an even stronger auditing tool (which is why im charging for the service in general, as there is value in being able to audit these sorts of things, especially in this sort of volume; one mistake or missing hand could be 20+ chips!)

Some hands are false positives (from more SWC software bugginess) and show the beginnings of one hand and the end of others.

EDIT: https://discord.gg/X8pSrVm <-- link to SWC officially unofficial discord room
marlais
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 111


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 03:52:14 AM
 #3066

SO, the script is now fully functional, it searches through hand history and outputs hand numbers with missing money, and the winners of that hand. Since the hand history lists blinds posted in their sequential order relative to all blinds posted instead of the actual chip amount e.g. "xxxx posts small blinds 1234567" (uhh derp?), the script cannot tally up all the missing chips from those specific pots.

The correct SB and BB values are in the first line of the HH, so it shouldn't be hard to substitute the correct values for the garbage SB/BB values in the HH, e.g.:

Code:
Hand #15435592: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2017-04-06 08:29:27
Table 'Deep Giant 1' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: player1 (179.06)
Seat 2: player2 (75)
Seat 4: player4 (136.47)
Seat 5: player5 (137.14)
Seat 6: player6 (75)
player5: posts the small blind 8960060
player6: posts the big blind 8960032

RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 09:48:50 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2017, 10:00:32 AM by RUchamp
 #3067

To give players perspective, here are the results of some hands I found in two players' hand histories that showed where I am owed chips. Unfortunately I don't have my own hand history, which really puts this into perspective, as this is just a small amount pieced together.
Code:
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-14\Sorrel - 0.05-0.10 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 7846975, RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-15\Sorrel - 0.05-0.10 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 7853031, RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-18\Humongous 3 - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 7928466, RUchamp (.2)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-20\Garlic - 0.10-0.20 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 7984503, RUchamp (.2)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-20\Garlic - 0.10-0.20 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 7984703, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-21\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8023857, RUchamp (.9)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-02-25\Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 8120812, RUchamp|btcpokerfund (.75)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-04\Wide Gauge 1 - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8302658, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-08\Finger - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Courchevel.txt, 8425322, RUchamp (.2)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-16\Gangster - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 8591854, kook|RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-20\Rude Boy 1 - 0.02-0.04 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 8685846, RUchamp (.06)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-24\Zoot - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 8788726, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-30\Beige 1 - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Omaha.txt, 8914755, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-30\Giant - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8912200, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-03-31\Giant 2 - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8931192, RUchamp (4.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-01\Colossal - 2-4 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8955577, RUchamp (14)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-01\Giant - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8951904, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-01\Giant - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8951914, RUchamp (12)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-01\Giant - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8952242, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-01\Giant - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8952589, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-14\Wide Gauge - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9209897, RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-19\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9305616, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-21\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9342221, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-21\Wide Gauge - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9345684, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-27\Gangster - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 9449502, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-28\Square - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 9480954, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-28\Wide Gauge 2 - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9482319, kook|RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-04-28\Wide Gauge 2 - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9484489, RUchamp (.05)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-05-11\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9733419, RUchamp (.2)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-05-20\Iron - 0.10-0.20 - No Limit Omaha Hi-Lo.txt, 9924056, RUchamp (2.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-05-20\Square - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 9925159, RUchamp (.35)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-05-22\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 9951857, RUchamp (.8)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-06-29\Cyan 1 - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Omaha.txt, 10671720, RUchamp (2.4)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-06-29\Spearmint 1 - 0.01-0.02 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 10667682, RUchamp (.31)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-09-25\Bay Leaf - 0.25-0.50 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 12238569, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-09-25\Gangster - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 12250151, RUchamp (.2)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-09-26\Deep Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 12257024, RUchamp|embah (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-09-26\Octopus - 1-2 - Limit Mixed 8 Game.txt, 12255664, RUchamp|BertBert (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-09-29\Wide Gauge - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 12322775, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-10-30\Deep Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 12828531, RUchamp|kapitaaal (1.75)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-10-30\Finger - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Courchevel.txt, 12835171, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-11-01\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 12857320, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-11-15\Rude Boy - 0.02-0.04 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 13117771, RUchamp (.02)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-11-21\Deep Monster - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13234095, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-11-23\Deep Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 13278319, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-11-24\Deep Immense 1 - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13301033, RUchamp (.9)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-12-09\Nose - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Courchevel Hi-Lo.txt, 13565712, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-12-18\Savory - 0.25-0.50 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 13703333, RUchamp (1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-12-19\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13725663, RUchamp (.9)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-12-24\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13808041, RUchamp (1.75)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2016-12-25\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13811239, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-01-09\Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 14083910, RUchamp (5.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-01-11\Square - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 14071979, DontForgetMe|RUchamp|ambulando (.07)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-01-11\Wail - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 14118968, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-02-02\Humongous - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 14479463, RUchamp (.1)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-02-06\Glance - 0.02-0.04 - Pot Limit Courchevel Hi-Lo.txt, 14538987, RUchamp (.04)
C:\Users\DAVE\kook hand history\2017-02-22\Square - 0.05-0.10 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 14788172, kook|RUchamp (.03)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-03-05\Giant 1 - 0.50-1 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 8346226, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-03-09\Weekday 1 - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Courchevel.txt, 8428828, RUchamp (2.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-09-27\Deep Cover - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 12287694, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-09-27\Deep Cover 1 - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card.txt, 12277910, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-10-24\Bay Leaf - 0.25-0.50 - No Limit Holdem.txt, 12720462, RUchamp (.5)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-11-01\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 12857752, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-11-02\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 12875719, RUchamp|TheTranny (.13)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-11-11\Humongous 1 - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13048805, RUchamp (1.4)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-12-07\Heavy Duty - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13535291, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2016-12-18\Heavy Duty 1 - 0.25-0.50 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13710623, RUchamp (.25)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2017-01-02\Humongous 1 - 0.10-0.20 - Pot Limit Big O.txt, 13945362, RUchamp (.7)
C:\Users\DAVE\Games - Copy (1)\Games - Copy\2017-01-23\Cello - 0.10-0.20 - Dealer's Choice.txt, 14314934, RUchamp (.2)
This is 69.01 chips in total.
thehalosniper
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 01:21:36 PM
 #3068

Sure would be nice to hear from SWC to calm this hysteria and give us the truth.
RazzleDazzle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2017, 09:28:31 PM
 #3069

I'd like to start by saying that I'd happily pick Donk4u or RUchamp to be godfather to my future children.

@swcpoker, please release hand histories so that we can independently verify the discrepancies.

I would also like an official statement from SWC as to whether they encouraged players to discovered this bug to keep quiet, thereby tacitly permitting them to exploit it and cheat other players.
notserp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 01:35:49 AM
 #3070

I'd like to start by saying that I'd happily pick Donk4u or RUchamp to be godfather to my future children.




lolol

damn 2.5 years that was happening im prob owed some chips from playing with u donks
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:21:13 AM
 #3071

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 04:46:43 PM
 #3072

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 05:10:25 PM
 #3073

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 05:49:58 PM
 #3074

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.

kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 06:01:38 PM
 #3075

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 08:09:44 PM
Last edit: August 22, 2017, 08:30:46 PM by kookswc
 #3076

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.

Sorry, are you having the same conversation as I am? It almost seems as you have blanked on ways to address my claims, and you have resorted to attacking my 'character' even though I am a widely loved and respected seal. Want to test that? Go ahead, get an opinion poll and post results. Do literally anything that confirms anything you say, and you will run into fewer people like me.

I am sorry for hurting the sales of your "bad hands, trust us" script. I love sealnut blubber

The thing about truth, though, is no matter how ugly it's expressed, it's self-evident, and doesn't require your acceptance of it to be truth.

So you go ahead yourself, and get an opinion poll filled out.  I'm sure you'll find a plethora of liars, idiots, and uninformed people blinded by their loyalty to a site that does not deserve it.  Lelz @ establishing truth from an opinion poll.

Two of the largest krillers on the site have told me that since I started posting on this forum, site traffic has plummeted.  I am proud of this inverse correlation between my efforts and the amount of ring traffic SWC now has.

Keep spinning your web of lies, though.  The more you tell, the more you'll have to maintain as they invariably will be in contradiction to known truths.  All I have to do is keep stating the truth, and you will exhaust yourself trying to maintain your falsehoods.

I would worry that your lie in the trollbox asserting that I multiaccount freerolls would hurt my reputation, but the accusation of someone with as bad a reputation as yours doesn't work against my reputation, rather, it works for it.  If a scummer gives you a bad rep, it's a mark of credibility.  Welcome to the dynamics of trust.

I have nothing to gain by RUchamp charging players for use of his script.  He did it for me for free.  He did it for several others for free.  If you're not a scumbag, he won't charge you.  He only asks 5 chips from scum like you who are not deserving of a favor.  The free market sorts it all out, socialist scum.  Hillary Clinton lost.  Get over it.
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:05:54 PM
 #3077

Sorry about all of the spam from myz and kook everyone, the rest of us aren't this addled. To address your point myz, the reason I didn't post the raw data is because there's a 64k character limit on this forum, though I will post some of it now because you apparently think its necessary.
Code:
Hand #7846975: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 01:23:50
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (27.90)
Seat 4: exanano (10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.61)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
exanano: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [4c Qd]
RUchamp raises to 0.35
SlowGrowth folds
kook folds
IanBarns1188 folds
exanano calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [9h Ks As]
exanano checks
RUchamp bets 0.74
exanano calls 0.74
*** TURN *** [9h Ks As] [7c]
exanano bets 1.06
RUchamp calls 1.06
*** RIVER *** [9h Ks As 7c] [3h]
exanano bets 2.10
RUchamp calls 2.10
RUchamp wins pot (8.29)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 4: exanano (5.75) -4.25
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.65) +4.04
Rake 0.21
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7853031: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 05:44:31
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 2: kook (59.71)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (42.89)
Seat 6: RUchamp (44.75)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [5c Ac]
kook raises to 0.35
IanBarns1188 folds
RUchamp calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [Ts Tc Jh]
RUchamp checks
kook bets 0.69
RUchamp calls 0.69
*** TURN *** [Ts Tc Jh] [3h]
RUchamp checks
kook checks
*** RIVER *** [Ts Tc Jh 3h] [6c]
RUchamp bets 2.03
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (2.03)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (58.67) -1.04
Seat 6: RUchamp (45.74) +0.99
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7928466: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-18 05:43:13
Table 'Humongous 3' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (58.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (16.32)
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.14)
Seat 6: Mamma (252.89)
ZhonRobear: posts the small blind 6270828
Mamma: posts the big blind 6270800
BrokeNeck folds
TheWho_ raises to 0.60
RUchamp calls 0.60
ZhonRobear folds
Mamma folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 8s 7h]
TheWho_ checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [5h 8s 7h] [Ts]
TheWho_ bets 0.80
RUchamp calls 0.80
*** RIVER *** [5h 8s 7h Ts] [7c]
TheWho_ bets 2.26
RUchamp calls 2.26
RUchamp wins pot (7.24)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (54.44) -3.66
Seat 4: RUchamp (19.90) +3.58
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.04) -0.10
Rake 0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984503: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:13:49
Table 'Garlic' Seat 9 is the button
Seat 2: kook (33.05)
Seat 3: laobeh (21.41)
Seat 4: Krixe (7.10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (87)
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
kook: posts the small blind 6273836
laobeh: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [9d 2d]
Krixe calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Orcfi folds
ronco folds
kook calls 0.90
laobeh folds
Krixe folds
*** FLOP *** [As 6c 7d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.95
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (32.15) -0.90
Seat 4: Krixe (6.90) -0.20
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.05) +1.05
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984703: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:34:57
Table 'Garlic' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (4.51)
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.07)
Seat 6: Ruckuss (22.31)
Seat 8: Orcfi (20)
Seat 9: ronco (55.90)
Ruckuss: posts the small blind 6273836
Orcfi: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [3d 7h]
ronco raises to 1.10
kook folds
Krixe calls 1.10
RUchamp calls 1.10
Ruckuss folds
Orcfi folds
*** FLOP *** [9c 6c Ts]
ronco bets 3.51
Krixe folds
RUchamp raises to 7.02
ronco calls 7.02
*** TURN *** [9c 6c Ts] [Ah]
ronco checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 6c Ts Ah] [7s]
ronco checks
RUchamp bets 8.55
ronco folds
RUchamp wins pot (17.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (3.41) -1.10
Seat 5: RUchamp (101.06) +8.99
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.80) -0.20
Seat 9: ronco (47.78) -8.12
Rake 0.43
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8023857: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-22 01:59:31
Table 'Humongous' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 2: Jdot (41.23)
Seat 4: ribeye (43.93)
Seat 5: kook (50.07)
Seat 6: RUchamp (87.81)
kook: posts the small blind 6339236
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6339208
Dealt to kook: [Qs As Ah Qd Kd]
donkyalater folds
Jdot calls 0.20
ribeye raises to 0.90
kook calls 0.90
RUchamp calls 0.90
Jdot calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [2h 5c 2c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 2.80
Jdot folds
ribeye calls 2.80
kook calls 2.80
*** TURN *** [2h 5c 2c] [9s]
kook checks
RUchamp checks
ribeye checks
*** RIVER *** [2h 5c 2c 9s] [3d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 5.85
ribeye folds
kook calls 5.85
RUchamp wins pot (22.23)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 4: ribeye (40.23) -3.70
Seat 5: kook (40.52) -9.55
Seat 6: RUchamp (100.49) +12.68
Rake 0.57
[MISSING CHIPS: .9]

Hand #8120812: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.25/0.50
2016-02-26 03:24:12
Table 'Wail' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.67)
Seat 2: w22 (134.41)
Seat 3: Grundle (56.56)
Seat 4: RUchamp (55.41)
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (14.87)
FishLivin: posts the small blind 6339508
w22: posts the big blind 6339480
Grundle calls 0.50
RUchamp calls 0.50
btcpokerfund calls 0.50
FishLivin calls 0.50
w22 bets 1.50
Grundle calls 1.50
RUchamp calls 1.50
btcpokerfund raises to 8
FishLivin folds
w22 calls 8
Grundle folds
RUchamp calls 8
*** FLOP *** [7s Td Qs]
w22 checks
RUchamp bets 23.89
btcpokerfund calls 6.87, and is all in
w22 calls 23.89
*** TURN *** [7s Td Qs] [Ah]
w22 bets 77.65
RUchamp calls 23.52, and is all in
*** RIVER *** [7s Td Qs Ah] [Jc]
RUchamp wins side pot 1 (80.70)
btcpokerfund wins pot (43.99)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.17) -0.50
Seat 2: w22 (79) -55.41
Seat 4: RUchamp (80.70) +25.29
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (43.99) +29.12
Rake 1.50
[MISSING CHIPS: .75]

Hand #8302658: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-03-04 05:33:30
Table 'Wide Gauge 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Thrudaroof (10)
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (9.25)
Seat 5: RUchamp (36.07)
Seat 6: kook (175.34)
kook: posts the small blind 6273348
Thrudaroof: posts the big blind 6273320
Dealt to kook: [Ts Kd 4c 7d Jc]
hardtime folds
Goatlumps calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
kook calls 0.45
Thrudaroof folds
Goatlumps calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [3c 9h 8h]
kook checks
Goatlumps checks
RUchamp bets 1.32
kook calls 1.32
Goatlumps folds
*** TURN *** [3c 9h 8h] [8c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 3.90
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.90)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (8.80) -0.45
Seat 5: RUchamp (38.20) +2.13
Seat 6: kook (173.57) -1.77
Rake 0.09
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8425322: Pot Limit Courchevel - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-09 03:48:03
Table 'Finger' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: newmoney (6)
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (191.44)
Seat 6: Mamma (20.72)
Mamma: posts the small blind 6274356
newmoney: posts the big blind 6274328
*** 1ST FLOP CARD *** [9d]
DrowRanger folds
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Mamma calls 0.70
newmoney folds
*** FLOP *** [9d Jd Td]
Mamma checks
RUchamp bets 1.56
Mamma folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (192.11) +0.67
Seat 6: Mamma (20.02) -0.70
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #8591854: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-16 05:15:31
Table 'Gangster' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (20)
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.04)
Seat 4: RUchamp (14.40)
Seat 5: Lethal (46.30)
Seat 6: BonxBonxBonx (14.21)
BonxBonxBonx: posts the small blind 6274404
BrokeNeck: posts the big blind 6274376
Dealt to kook: [4c 6h Jh 2d 3d]
PaperTrails folds
kook calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Lethal calls 0.90
BonxBonxBonx folds
BrokeNeck calls 0.90
kook calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [Qh 8d 2s]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** TURN *** [Qh 8d 2s] [4h]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 8d 2s 4h] [5c]
BrokeNeck checks
kook bets 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Lethal folds
BrokeNeck folds
kook calls 0.70
kook wins (2.44) from pot
RUchamp wins (2.44) from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (19.10) -0.90
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.88) +0.84
Seat 4: RUchamp (15.24) +0.84
Seat 5: Lethal (45.40) -0.90
Rake 0.12
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #8685846: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.02/0.04
2016-03-20 07:11:19
Table 'Rude Boy 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: BirthdaySuit (6.33)
Seat 4: Bethany (8.99)
Seat 5: RUchamp (10.93)
Seat 6: Gilthunder (5.72)
Gilthunder: posts the small blind 6274316
BirthdaySuit: posts the big blind 6274288
Bethany checks
RUchamp raises to 0.18
Gilthunder folds
BirthdaySuit folds
Bethany calls 0.18
*** FLOP *** [7d 5h 5d]
Bethany checks
RUchamp bets 0.28
Bethany folds
RUchamp wins pot (0.36)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: Bethany (8.81) -0.18
Seat 5: RUchamp (11.11) +0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .06]

Hand #8788726: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.50/1
2016-03-24 21:29:58
Table 'Zoot' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (104.37)
Seat 4: RUchamp (136.23)
Seat 5: D1R1 (47.50)
Seat 6: BertBert (107.19)
grimswootn: posts the small blind 10860908
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10860880
D1R1 calls 1
BertBert calls 1
dontgetomaha folds
knapp folds
grimswootn folds
RUchamp checks
*** FLOP *** [3c Kh 5h]
RUchamp bets 3.42
D1R1 folds
BertBert calls 3.42
*** TURN *** [3c Kh 5h] [7h]
RUchamp bets 7.28
BertBert folds
RUchamp wins pot (9.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (103.87) -0.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (140.92) +4.69
Seat 6: BertBert (102.77) -4.42
Rake 0.23
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8914755: Pot Limit Omaha - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 11:44:46
Table 'Beige 1' Seat 8 is the button
Seat 4: hardtime (236.85)
Seat 6: RUchamp (129.91)
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (100)
hardtime: posts the small blind 10862452
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10862424
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Kuschelbaer raises to 3
hardtime folds
RUchamp raises to 9.50
Kuschelbaer calls 9.50
*** FLOP *** [9h 3d Qd]
RUchamp bets 19.02
Kuschelbaer folds
RUchamp wins pot (18.53)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 6: RUchamp (138.94) +9.03
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (90.50) -9.50
Rake 0.47
[MISSING CHIPS: .5]

Hand #8912200: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 07:33:43
Table 'Giant' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Gusset (156.43)
Seat 3: Jdot (19)
Seat 4: RUchamp (100)
Seat 5: Mamma (419.22)
Seat 6: recursion (306.37)
recursion: posts the small blind 10862452
Gusset: posts the big blind 10862424
Jdot raises to 3.50
RUchamp calls 3.50
Mamma calls 3.50
recursion folds
Gusset calls 3.50
*** FLOP *** [4d 6c Js]
Gusset checks
Jdot checks
RUchamp bets 10.92
Mamma folds
Gusset calls 10.92
Jdot folds
*** TURN *** [4d 6c Js] [4h]
Gusset checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 6c Js 4h] [2d]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 27.96
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (34.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: Gusset (142.01) -14.42
Seat 3: Jdot (15.50) -3.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (120.53) +20.53
Seat 5: Mamma (415.72) -3.50
Rake 0.89
[MISSING CHIPS .5]

Hand #8931192: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-31 06:56:45
Table 'Giant 2' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BertBert (238.80)
Seat 2: sooperdooper (30)
Seat 4: RUchamp (509.44)
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (142.06)
donk4u2: posts the small blind 10862452
BertBert: posts the big blind 10862424
sooperdooper calls 1
RUchamp raises to 4.50
BrokeNeck folds
donk4u2 calls 4.50
BertBert calls 4.50
sooperdooper calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [9c 5s Qd]
donk4u2 checks
BertBert checks
sooperdooper checks
RUchamp bets 17.55
donk4u2 folds
BertBert calls 17.55
sooperdooper folds
*** TURN *** [9c 5s Qd] [2s]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 5s Qd 2s] [Td]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
RUchamp wins pot (47.39)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BertBert (216.75) -22.05
Seat 4: RUchamp (534.78) +25.34
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (137.56) -4.50
Rake 1.21
[MISSING CHIPS: 4.5]

Hand #8955577: Pot Limit Big O - 2/4
2016-04-01 20:29:50
Table 'Colossal' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 2: michaelproia (692.25)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (392)
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,021.61)
Seat 6: Gusset (360.44)
AMphnx: posts the small blind 10796188
Gusset: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
michaelproia raises to 14
BertBert folds
RUchamp calls 14
AMphnx folds
Gusset calls 14
*** FLOP *** [Jc 2c 7h]
Gusset checks
michaelproia checks
RUchamp bets 34.32
Gusset calls 34.32
michaelproia folds
*** TURN *** [Jc 2c 7h] [6s]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 109.83
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (96.18)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (439.86) +47.86
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,019.61) -2
Seat 6: Gusset (312.12) -48.32
Rake 2.46
[MISSING CHIPS: 14]

Hand #8951904: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:05:15
Table 'Giant' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,533.65)
Seat 3: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (984.57)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 11.50
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 11.50
*** FLOP *** [Tc 5d Jd]
RUchamp bets 18.72
BrokeNeck calls 18.72
*** TURN *** [Tc 5d Jd] [9s]
RUchamp bets 43.50
BrokeNeck calls 43.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc 5d Jd 9s] [9d]
RUchamp bets 115.55
BrokeNeck calls 115.55
RUchamp wins pot (375.54)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,719.92) +186.27
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (795.30) -189.27
Rake 3
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8951914: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:08:55
Table 'Giant' Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,732.81)
Seat 4: tmoney82 (484.65)
Seat 5: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (803.85)
tmoney82: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 12
tmoney82 calls 12
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 12
*** FLOP *** [Qs 7s 7c]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [Qs 7s 7c] [Td]
tmoney82 bets 36.08
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp calls 36.08
*** RIVER *** [Qs 7s 7c Td] [5d]
tmoney82 checks
RUchamp bets 85.15
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (94.74)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,779.47) +46.66
Seat 4: tmoney82 (436.57) -48.08
Seat 5: veganhippie (99) -1
Rake 2.42
[MISSING CHIPS 12]

Hand #8952242: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:37:05
Table 'Giant' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 2: tmoney82 (309.44)
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,069.45)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,705.78)
Seat 5: doesdo (93.50)
Seat 6: Marauders80 (96)
doesdo: posts the small blind 10796188
Marauders80: posts the big blind 10796160
tmoney82 calls 1
BrokeNeck raises to 4.50
RUchamp calls 4.50
doesdo folds
Marauders80 folds
tmoney82 calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [Ts Qd Qs]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp bets 13.65
tmoney82 folds
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp wins pot (13.65)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: tmoney82 (304.94) -4.50
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,064.95) -4.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,714.93) +9.15
Seat 5: doesdo (93) -0.50
Rake 0.35
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8952589: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 16:14:08
Table 'Giant' Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (239.89)
Seat 3: GottaGig (59.87)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,382.19)
Seat 5: doesdo (195.50)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
doesdo: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
BingoBob folds
tmoney82 calls 1
GottaGig calls 1
RUchamp raises to 5
doesdo folds
tmoney82 calls 5
GottaGig calls 5
*** FLOP *** [2s 4c 4d]
RUchamp bets 12.48
tmoney82 calls 12.48
GottaGig folds
*** TURN *** [2s 4c 4d] [Kc]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** RIVER *** [2s 4c 4d Kc] [4s]
RUchamp bets 19.48
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (38.97)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (222.41) -17.48
Seat 3: GottaGig (54.87) -5
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,403.68) +21.49
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
Rake 0.99
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #9209897: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-04-15 01:06:53
Table 'Wide Gauge' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: kook (20.95)
Seat 4: RUchamp (24.65)
Seat 5: shipitdoit (93.91)
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (57.44)
shipitdoit: posts the small blind 6273572
inv1nc1ble: posts the big blind 6273544
Dealt to kook: [2c Tc 9h 7s 5s]
kook calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
shipitdoit folds
inv1nc1ble calls 0.45
kook calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [Kc 9s Qh]
inv1nc1ble checks
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.05
inv1nc1ble folds
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.32)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (20.50) -0.45
Seat 4: RUchamp (25.52) +0.87
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (56.99) -0.45
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #9305616: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-04-19 23:54:24
Table 'Humongous' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Jdot (69.48)
Seat 3: portice (59.25)
Seat 4: RUchamp (17.99)
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Jdot: posts the small blind 6274676
portice: posts the big blind 6274648
RUchamp raises to 0.70
BoutCoin folds
Kingjack0726 folds
Jdot folds
portice calls 0.70
*** FLOP *** [9c 2h 8s]
portice checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [9c 2h 8s] [Tc]
portice checks
RUchamp bets 1.37
portice folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: portice (58.55) -0.70
Seat 4: RUchamp (18.66) +0.67
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #9342221: Pot Limit Big O - 0.25/0.50
2016-04-21 21:53:31
Table 'Heavy Duty' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (54.69)
Seat 4: sikatorr (78.33)
Seat 5: RUchamp (48)
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
sikatorr: posts the small blind 6273372
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6273344
Dealt to kook: [Jd 9h 2d Qs Ks]
SchillPuppet folds
kook folds
tmoney82 raises to 1.75
sikatorr folds
RUchamp calls 1.75
*** FLOP *** [7h Qc 6h]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** TURN *** [7h Qc 6h] [7s]
RUchamp bets 2.92
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.42)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (52.94) -1.75
Seat 5: RUchamp (49.67) +1.67
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
Rake 0.08
[MISSING CHIPS: .25]

EDIT: so there's been a misunderstanding somewhere here. This isn't about me or what I am charging to run this script or not (Goldbach, Kook, Brokeneck, BertBert, RedKingcon have already had access to it). This is about SWC and their obvious fault in this entire situation.

Again, sorry about all the spam from myz and kook, its not my responsibility, but if I didn't mention it I'd probably get coupled with those two, and if that were the case I may as well just stop writing now as I'd surely lose all credibility.
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:09:03 PM
 #3078

Sorry about all of the spam from myz and kook everyone, the rest of us aren't this addled. To address your point myz, the reason I didn't post the raw data is because there's a 64k character limit on this forum, though I will post some of it now because you apparently think its necessary.
Code:
Hand #7846975: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 01:23:50
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (27.90)
Seat 4: exanano (10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.61)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
exanano: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [4c Qd]
RUchamp raises to 0.35
SlowGrowth folds
kook folds
IanBarns1188 folds
exanano calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [9h Ks As]
exanano checks
RUchamp bets 0.74
exanano calls 0.74
*** TURN *** [9h Ks As] [7c]
exanano bets 1.06
RUchamp calls 1.06
*** RIVER *** [9h Ks As 7c] [3h]
exanano bets 2.10
RUchamp calls 2.10
RUchamp wins pot (8.29)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 4: exanano (5.75) -4.25
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.65) +4.04
Rake 0.21
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7853031: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 05:44:31
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 2: kook (59.71)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (42.89)
Seat 6: RUchamp (44.75)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [5c Ac]
kook raises to 0.35
IanBarns1188 folds
RUchamp calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [Ts Tc Jh]
RUchamp checks
kook bets 0.69
RUchamp calls 0.69
*** TURN *** [Ts Tc Jh] [3h]
RUchamp checks
kook checks
*** RIVER *** [Ts Tc Jh 3h] [6c]
RUchamp bets 2.03
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (2.03)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (58.67) -1.04
Seat 6: RUchamp (45.74) +0.99
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7928466: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-18 05:43:13
Table 'Humongous 3' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (58.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (16.32)
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.14)
Seat 6: Mamma (252.89)
ZhonRobear: posts the small blind 6270828
Mamma: posts the big blind 6270800
BrokeNeck folds
TheWho_ raises to 0.60
RUchamp calls 0.60
ZhonRobear folds
Mamma folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 8s 7h]
TheWho_ checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [5h 8s 7h] [Ts]
TheWho_ bets 0.80
RUchamp calls 0.80
*** RIVER *** [5h 8s 7h Ts] [7c]
TheWho_ bets 2.26
RUchamp calls 2.26
RUchamp wins pot (7.24)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (54.44) -3.66
Seat 4: RUchamp (19.90) +3.58
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.04) -0.10
Rake 0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984503: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:13:49
Table 'Garlic' Seat 9 is the button
Seat 2: kook (33.05)
Seat 3: laobeh (21.41)
Seat 4: Krixe (7.10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (87)
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
kook: posts the small blind 6273836
laobeh: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [9d 2d]
Krixe calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Orcfi folds
ronco folds
kook calls 0.90
laobeh folds
Krixe folds
*** FLOP *** [As 6c 7d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.95
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (32.15) -0.90
Seat 4: Krixe (6.90) -0.20
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.05) +1.05
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984703: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:34:57
Table 'Garlic' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (4.51)
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.07)
Seat 6: Ruckuss (22.31)
Seat 8: Orcfi (20)
Seat 9: ronco (55.90)
Ruckuss: posts the small blind 6273836
Orcfi: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [3d 7h]
ronco raises to 1.10
kook folds
Krixe calls 1.10
RUchamp calls 1.10
Ruckuss folds
Orcfi folds
*** FLOP *** [9c 6c Ts]
ronco bets 3.51
Krixe folds
RUchamp raises to 7.02
ronco calls 7.02
*** TURN *** [9c 6c Ts] [Ah]
ronco checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 6c Ts Ah] [7s]
ronco checks
RUchamp bets 8.55
ronco folds
RUchamp wins pot (17.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (3.41) -1.10
Seat 5: RUchamp (101.06) +8.99
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.80) -0.20
Seat 9: ronco (47.78) -8.12
Rake 0.43
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8023857: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-22 01:59:31
Table 'Humongous' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 2: Jdot (41.23)
Seat 4: ribeye (43.93)
Seat 5: kook (50.07)
Seat 6: RUchamp (87.81)
kook: posts the small blind 6339236
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6339208
Dealt to kook: [Qs As Ah Qd Kd]
donkyalater folds
Jdot calls 0.20
ribeye raises to 0.90
kook calls 0.90
RUchamp calls 0.90
Jdot calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [2h 5c 2c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 2.80
Jdot folds
ribeye calls 2.80
kook calls 2.80
*** TURN *** [2h 5c 2c] [9s]
kook checks
RUchamp checks
ribeye checks
*** RIVER *** [2h 5c 2c 9s] [3d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 5.85
ribeye folds
kook calls 5.85
RUchamp wins pot (22.23)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 4: ribeye (40.23) -3.70
Seat 5: kook (40.52) -9.55
Seat 6: RUchamp (100.49) +12.68
Rake 0.57
[MISSING CHIPS: .9]

Hand #8120812: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.25/0.50
2016-02-26 03:24:12
Table 'Wail' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.67)
Seat 2: w22 (134.41)
Seat 3: Grundle (56.56)
Seat 4: RUchamp (55.41)
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (14.87)
FishLivin: posts the small blind 6339508
w22: posts the big blind 6339480
Grundle calls 0.50
RUchamp calls 0.50
btcpokerfund calls 0.50
FishLivin calls 0.50
w22 bets 1.50
Grundle calls 1.50
RUchamp calls 1.50
btcpokerfund raises to 8
FishLivin folds
w22 calls 8
Grundle folds
RUchamp calls 8
*** FLOP *** [7s Td Qs]
w22 checks
RUchamp bets 23.89
btcpokerfund calls 6.87, and is all in
w22 calls 23.89
*** TURN *** [7s Td Qs] [Ah]
w22 bets 77.65
RUchamp calls 23.52, and is all in
*** RIVER *** [7s Td Qs Ah] [Jc]
RUchamp wins side pot 1 (80.70)
btcpokerfund wins pot (43.99)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.17) -0.50
Seat 2: w22 (79) -55.41
Seat 4: RUchamp (80.70) +25.29
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (43.99) +29.12
Rake 1.50
[MISSING CHIPS: .75]

Hand #8302658: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-03-04 05:33:30
Table 'Wide Gauge 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Thrudaroof (10)
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (9.25)
Seat 5: RUchamp (36.07)
Seat 6: kook (175.34)
kook: posts the small blind 6273348
Thrudaroof: posts the big blind 6273320
Dealt to kook: [Ts Kd 4c 7d Jc]
hardtime folds
Goatlumps calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
kook calls 0.45
Thrudaroof folds
Goatlumps calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [3c 9h 8h]
kook checks
Goatlumps checks
RUchamp bets 1.32
kook calls 1.32
Goatlumps folds
*** TURN *** [3c 9h 8h] [8c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 3.90
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.90)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (8.80) -0.45
Seat 5: RUchamp (38.20) +2.13
Seat 6: kook (173.57) -1.77
Rake 0.09
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8425322: Pot Limit Courchevel - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-09 03:48:03
Table 'Finger' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: newmoney (6)
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (191.44)
Seat 6: Mamma (20.72)
Mamma: posts the small blind 6274356
newmoney: posts the big blind 6274328
*** 1ST FLOP CARD *** [9d]
DrowRanger folds
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Mamma calls 0.70
newmoney folds
*** FLOP *** [9d Jd Td]
Mamma checks
RUchamp bets 1.56
Mamma folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (192.11) +0.67
Seat 6: Mamma (20.02) -0.70
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #8591854: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-16 05:15:31
Table 'Gangster' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (20)
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.04)
Seat 4: RUchamp (14.40)
Seat 5: Lethal (46.30)
Seat 6: BonxBonxBonx (14.21)
BonxBonxBonx: posts the small blind 6274404
BrokeNeck: posts the big blind 6274376
Dealt to kook: [4c 6h Jh 2d 3d]
PaperTrails folds
kook calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Lethal calls 0.90
BonxBonxBonx folds
BrokeNeck calls 0.90
kook calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [Qh 8d 2s]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** TURN *** [Qh 8d 2s] [4h]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 8d 2s 4h] [5c]
BrokeNeck checks
kook bets 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Lethal folds
BrokeNeck folds
kook calls 0.70
kook wins (2.44) from pot
RUchamp wins (2.44) from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (19.10) -0.90
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.88) +0.84
Seat 4: RUchamp (15.24) +0.84
Seat 5: Lethal (45.40) -0.90
Rake 0.12
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #8685846: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.02/0.04
2016-03-20 07:11:19
Table 'Rude Boy 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: BirthdaySuit (6.33)
Seat 4: Bethany (8.99)
Seat 5: RUchamp (10.93)
Seat 6: Gilthunder (5.72)
Gilthunder: posts the small blind 6274316
BirthdaySuit: posts the big blind 6274288
Bethany checks
RUchamp raises to 0.18
Gilthunder folds
BirthdaySuit folds
Bethany calls 0.18
*** FLOP *** [7d 5h 5d]
Bethany checks
RUchamp bets 0.28
Bethany folds
RUchamp wins pot (0.36)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: Bethany (8.81) -0.18
Seat 5: RUchamp (11.11) +0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .06]

Hand #8788726: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.50/1
2016-03-24 21:29:58
Table 'Zoot' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (104.37)
Seat 4: RUchamp (136.23)
Seat 5: D1R1 (47.50)
Seat 6: BertBert (107.19)
grimswootn: posts the small blind 10860908
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10860880
D1R1 calls 1
BertBert calls 1
dontgetomaha folds
knapp folds
grimswootn folds
RUchamp checks
*** FLOP *** [3c Kh 5h]
RUchamp bets 3.42
D1R1 folds
BertBert calls 3.42
*** TURN *** [3c Kh 5h] [7h]
RUchamp bets 7.28
BertBert folds
RUchamp wins pot (9.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (103.87) -0.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (140.92) +4.69
Seat 6: BertBert (102.77) -4.42
Rake 0.23
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8914755: Pot Limit Omaha - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 11:44:46
Table 'Beige 1' Seat 8 is the button
Seat 4: hardtime (236.85)
Seat 6: RUchamp (129.91)
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (100)
hardtime: posts the small blind 10862452
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10862424
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Kuschelbaer raises to 3
hardtime folds
RUchamp raises to 9.50
Kuschelbaer calls 9.50
*** FLOP *** [9h 3d Qd]
RUchamp bets 19.02
Kuschelbaer folds
RUchamp wins pot (18.53)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 6: RUchamp (138.94) +9.03
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (90.50) -9.50
Rake 0.47
[MISSING CHIPS: .5]

Hand #8912200: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 07:33:43
Table 'Giant' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Gusset (156.43)
Seat 3: Jdot (19)
Seat 4: RUchamp (100)
Seat 5: Mamma (419.22)
Seat 6: recursion (306.37)
recursion: posts the small blind 10862452
Gusset: posts the big blind 10862424
Jdot raises to 3.50
RUchamp calls 3.50
Mamma calls 3.50
recursion folds
Gusset calls 3.50
*** FLOP *** [4d 6c Js]
Gusset checks
Jdot checks
RUchamp bets 10.92
Mamma folds
Gusset calls 10.92
Jdot folds
*** TURN *** [4d 6c Js] [4h]
Gusset checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 6c Js 4h] [2d]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 27.96
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (34.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: Gusset (142.01) -14.42
Seat 3: Jdot (15.50) -3.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (120.53) +20.53
Seat 5: Mamma (415.72) -3.50
Rake 0.89
[MISSING CHIPS .5]

Hand #8931192: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-31 06:56:45
Table 'Giant 2' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BertBert (238.80)
Seat 2: sooperdooper (30)
Seat 4: RUchamp (509.44)
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (142.06)
donk4u2: posts the small blind 10862452
BertBert: posts the big blind 10862424
sooperdooper calls 1
RUchamp raises to 4.50
BrokeNeck folds
donk4u2 calls 4.50
BertBert calls 4.50
sooperdooper calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [9c 5s Qd]
donk4u2 checks
BertBert checks
sooperdooper checks
RUchamp bets 17.55
donk4u2 folds
BertBert calls 17.55
sooperdooper folds
*** TURN *** [9c 5s Qd] [2s]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 5s Qd 2s] [Td]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
RUchamp wins pot (47.39)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BertBert (216.75) -22.05
Seat 4: RUchamp (534.78) +25.34
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (137.56) -4.50
Rake 1.21
[MISSING CHIPS: 4.5]

Hand #8955577: Pot Limit Big O - 2/4
2016-04-01 20:29:50
Table 'Colossal' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 2: michaelproia (692.25)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (392)
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,021.61)
Seat 6: Gusset (360.44)
AMphnx: posts the small blind 10796188
Gusset: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
michaelproia raises to 14
BertBert folds
RUchamp calls 14
AMphnx folds
Gusset calls 14
*** FLOP *** [Jc 2c 7h]
Gusset checks
michaelproia checks
RUchamp bets 34.32
Gusset calls 34.32
michaelproia folds
*** TURN *** [Jc 2c 7h] [6s]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 109.83
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (96.18)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (439.86) +47.86
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,019.61) -2
Seat 6: Gusset (312.12) -48.32
Rake 2.46
[MISSING CHIPS: 14]

Hand #8951904: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:05:15
Table 'Giant' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,533.65)
Seat 3: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (984.57)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 11.50
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 11.50
*** FLOP *** [Tc 5d Jd]
RUchamp bets 18.72
BrokeNeck calls 18.72
*** TURN *** [Tc 5d Jd] [9s]
RUchamp bets 43.50
BrokeNeck calls 43.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc 5d Jd 9s] [9d]
RUchamp bets 115.55
BrokeNeck calls 115.55
RUchamp wins pot (375.54)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,719.92) +186.27
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (795.30) -189.27
Rake 3
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8951914: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:08:55
Table 'Giant' Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,732.81)
Seat 4: tmoney82 (484.65)
Seat 5: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (803.85)
tmoney82: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 12
tmoney82 calls 12
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 12
*** FLOP *** [Qs 7s 7c]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [Qs 7s 7c] [Td]
tmoney82 bets 36.08
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp calls 36.08
*** RIVER *** [Qs 7s 7c Td] [5d]
tmoney82 checks
RUchamp bets 85.15
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (94.74)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,779.47) +46.66
Seat 4: tmoney82 (436.57) -48.08
Seat 5: veganhippie (99) -1
Rake 2.42
[MISSING CHIPS 12]

Hand #8952242: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:37:05
Table 'Giant' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 2: tmoney82 (309.44)
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,069.45)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,705.78)
Seat 5: doesdo (93.50)
Seat 6: Marauders80 (96)
doesdo: posts the small blind 10796188
Marauders80: posts the big blind 10796160
tmoney82 calls 1
BrokeNeck raises to 4.50
RUchamp calls 4.50
doesdo folds
Marauders80 folds
tmoney82 calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [Ts Qd Qs]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp bets 13.65
tmoney82 folds
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp wins pot (13.65)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: tmoney82 (304.94) -4.50
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,064.95) -4.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,714.93) +9.15
Seat 5: doesdo (93) -0.50
Rake 0.35
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8952589: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 16:14:08
Table 'Giant' Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (239.89)
Seat 3: GottaGig (59.87)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,382.19)
Seat 5: doesdo (195.50)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
doesdo: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
BingoBob folds
tmoney82 calls 1
GottaGig calls 1
RUchamp raises to 5
doesdo folds
tmoney82 calls 5
GottaGig calls 5
*** FLOP *** [2s 4c 4d]
RUchamp bets 12.48
tmoney82 calls 12.48
GottaGig folds
*** TURN *** [2s 4c 4d] [Kc]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** RIVER *** [2s 4c 4d Kc] [4s]
RUchamp bets 19.48
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (38.97)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (222.41) -17.48
Seat 3: GottaGig (54.87) -5
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,403.68) +21.49
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
Rake 0.99
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #9209897: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-04-15 01:06:53
Table 'Wide Gauge' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: kook (20.95)
Seat 4: RUchamp (24.65)
Seat 5: shipitdoit (93.91)
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (57.44)
shipitdoit: posts the small blind 6273572
inv1nc1ble: posts the big blind 6273544
Dealt to kook: [2c Tc 9h 7s 5s]
kook calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
shipitdoit folds
inv1nc1ble calls 0.45
kook calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [Kc 9s Qh]
inv1nc1ble checks
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.05
inv1nc1ble folds
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.32)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (20.50) -0.45
Seat 4: RUchamp (25.52) +0.87
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (56.99) -0.45
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #9305616: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-04-19 23:54:24
Table 'Humongous' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Jdot (69.48)
Seat 3: portice (59.25)
Seat 4: RUchamp (17.99)
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Jdot: posts the small blind 6274676
portice: posts the big blind 6274648
RUchamp raises to 0.70
BoutCoin folds
Kingjack0726 folds
Jdot folds
portice calls 0.70
*** FLOP *** [9c 2h 8s]
portice checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [9c 2h 8s] [Tc]
portice checks
RUchamp bets 1.37
portice folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: portice (58.55) -0.70
Seat 4: RUchamp (18.66) +0.67
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #9342221: Pot Limit Big O - 0.25/0.50
2016-04-21 21:53:31
Table 'Heavy Duty' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (54.69)
Seat 4: sikatorr (78.33)
Seat 5: RUchamp (48)
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
sikatorr: posts the small blind 6273372
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6273344
Dealt to kook: [Jd 9h 2d Qs Ks]
SchillPuppet folds
kook folds
tmoney82 raises to 1.75
sikatorr folds
RUchamp calls 1.75
*** FLOP *** [7h Qc 6h]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** TURN *** [7h Qc 6h] [7s]
RUchamp bets 2.92
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.42)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (52.94) -1.75
Seat 5: RUchamp (49.67) +1.67
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
Rake 0.08
[MISSING CHIPS: .25]

Hey RUchamp, let me ask you something.

Do you understand the difference between arbitrary plaintext and functional source code?
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:31:55 PM
 #3079

This isn't about me selling a script, and I'm in no way saying I'll release the source code, this is about SWCs inactions and omissions, and separately about glitch's inactions and omissions. I'm sorry you are too [drug] addled to follow simple lines of logic myz, but I've now ignored you on this forum and on SWC as I've nothing further to add to your nonsense. I would urge anyone with a brain to hit that ignore button as well. Without Myz spamming this thread, it actually turns into a pretty well put together post.
Marauders80
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 10:19:07 PM
 #3080

Hey guys,

From what I've been told, support is almost finished calculating the refunds.  They will process these refunds (BCC included as swc chips) within a matter of DAYS - not weeks, months, or years, which would be unacceptable.

My initial reaction to this situation was pretty negative.  It doesn't matter whether I felt like I had a good rapport with their support/management or not.  But I'm pretty sure that they will continue to keep their word, as they have done every time I have brought concerns to them.

Obviously, every player will look at this situation thru their own lens.  But I'm concerned with results.  And if we get these refunds within a matter of days (money that those affected are certainly owed, but probably weren't expecting, simply out of ignorance), that's what will be of the utmost importance to myself.  The basic unwritten contract between operator and player, in any gaming environment, is that player will be made whole by operator in EVERY circumstance.  While time has passed, we have not been made whole yet. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't believe we would be made whole within the stated timeframe.

So hopefully a positive outcome will result in a plethora of games once everybody's accounts are pumped up with some extra chips.  Hope swc will come thru again for us and hope to see some of you on the tables (at least the ones I can beat lol).

gl all - Marauders80

ps - maybe it's just the nature of this forum/thread, but some of you guys seem to be really going after one another.  It can be funny sometimes, but might be distracting us from our ultimate goals in this instance.  But I've never been one to stop a fight so . . .
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!