Bitcoin Forum
November 21, 2017, 10:35:26 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW!  (Read 275408 times)
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 05:55:48 PM
 #3081

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.
1511260527
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511260527

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511260527
Reply with quote  #2

1511260527
Report to moderator
1511260527
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511260527

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511260527
Reply with quote  #2

1511260527
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 06:01:38 PM
 #3082

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 06:06:11 PM
 #3083

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.

Sorry, are you having the same conversation as I am? It almost seems as you have blanked on ways to address my claims, and you have resorted to attacking my 'character' even though I am a widely loved and respected seal. Want to test that? Go ahead, get an opinion poll and post results. Do literally anything that confirms anything you say, and you will run into fewer people like me.

I am sorry for hurting the sales of your "bad hands, trust us" script. I love sealnut blubber
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 08:09:44 PM
 #3084

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.

Sorry, are you having the same conversation as I am? It almost seems as you have blanked on ways to address my claims, and you have resorted to attacking my 'character' even though I am a widely loved and respected seal. Want to test that? Go ahead, get an opinion poll and post results. Do literally anything that confirms anything you say, and you will run into fewer people like me.

I am sorry for hurting the sales of your "bad hands, trust us" script. I love sealnut blubber

The thing about truth, though, is no matter how ugly it's expressed, it's self-evident, and doesn't require your acceptance of it to be truth.

So you go ahead yourself, and get an opinion poll filled out.  I'm sure you'll find a plethora of liars, idiots, and uninformed people blinded by their loyalty to a site that does not deserve it.  Lelz @ establishing truth from an opinion poll.

Two of the largest krillers on the site have told me that since I started posting on this forum, site traffic has plummeted.  I am proud of this inverse correlation between my efforts and the amount of ring traffic SWC now has.

Keep spinning your web of lies, though.  The more you tell, the more you'll have to maintain as they invariably will be in contradiction to known truths.  All I have to do is keep stating the truth, and you will exhaust yourself trying to maintain your falsehoods.

I would worry that your lie in the trollbox asserting that I multiaccount freerolls would hurt my reputation, but the accusation of someone with as bad a reputation as yours doesn't work against my reputation, rather, it works for it.  If a scummer gives you a bad rep, it's a mark of credibility.  Welcome to the dynamics of trust.

I have nothing to gain by RUchamp charging players for use of his script.  He did it for me for free.  He did it for several others for free.  If you're not a scumbag, he won't charge you.  He only asks 5 chips from scum like you who are not deserving of a favor.  The free market sorts it all out, socialist scum.  Hillary Clinton lost.  Get over it.
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:05:54 PM
 #3085

Sorry about all of the spam from myz and kook everyone, the rest of us aren't this addled. To address your point myz, the reason I didn't post the raw data is because there's a 64k character limit on this forum, though I will post some of it now because you apparently think its necessary.
Code:
Hand #7846975: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 01:23:50
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (27.90)
Seat 4: exanano (10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.61)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
exanano: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [4c Qd]
RUchamp raises to 0.35
SlowGrowth folds
kook folds
IanBarns1188 folds
exanano calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [9h Ks As]
exanano checks
RUchamp bets 0.74
exanano calls 0.74
*** TURN *** [9h Ks As] [7c]
exanano bets 1.06
RUchamp calls 1.06
*** RIVER *** [9h Ks As 7c] [3h]
exanano bets 2.10
RUchamp calls 2.10
RUchamp wins pot (8.29)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 4: exanano (5.75) -4.25
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.65) +4.04
Rake 0.21
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7853031: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 05:44:31
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 2: kook (59.71)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (42.89)
Seat 6: RUchamp (44.75)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [5c Ac]
kook raises to 0.35
IanBarns1188 folds
RUchamp calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [Ts Tc Jh]
RUchamp checks
kook bets 0.69
RUchamp calls 0.69
*** TURN *** [Ts Tc Jh] [3h]
RUchamp checks
kook checks
*** RIVER *** [Ts Tc Jh 3h] [6c]
RUchamp bets 2.03
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (2.03)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (58.67) -1.04
Seat 6: RUchamp (45.74) +0.99
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7928466: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-18 05:43:13
Table 'Humongous 3' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (58.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (16.32)
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.14)
Seat 6: Mamma (252.89)
ZhonRobear: posts the small blind 6270828
Mamma: posts the big blind 6270800
BrokeNeck folds
TheWho_ raises to 0.60
RUchamp calls 0.60
ZhonRobear folds
Mamma folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 8s 7h]
TheWho_ checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [5h 8s 7h] [Ts]
TheWho_ bets 0.80
RUchamp calls 0.80
*** RIVER *** [5h 8s 7h Ts] [7c]
TheWho_ bets 2.26
RUchamp calls 2.26
RUchamp wins pot (7.24)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (54.44) -3.66
Seat 4: RUchamp (19.90) +3.58
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.04) -0.10
Rake 0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984503: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:13:49
Table 'Garlic' Seat 9 is the button
Seat 2: kook (33.05)
Seat 3: laobeh (21.41)
Seat 4: Krixe (7.10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (87)
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
kook: posts the small blind 6273836
laobeh: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [9d 2d]
Krixe calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Orcfi folds
ronco folds
kook calls 0.90
laobeh folds
Krixe folds
*** FLOP *** [As 6c 7d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.95
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (32.15) -0.90
Seat 4: Krixe (6.90) -0.20
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.05) +1.05
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984703: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:34:57
Table 'Garlic' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (4.51)
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.07)
Seat 6: Ruckuss (22.31)
Seat 8: Orcfi (20)
Seat 9: ronco (55.90)
Ruckuss: posts the small blind 6273836
Orcfi: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [3d 7h]
ronco raises to 1.10
kook folds
Krixe calls 1.10
RUchamp calls 1.10
Ruckuss folds
Orcfi folds
*** FLOP *** [9c 6c Ts]
ronco bets 3.51
Krixe folds
RUchamp raises to 7.02
ronco calls 7.02
*** TURN *** [9c 6c Ts] [Ah]
ronco checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 6c Ts Ah] [7s]
ronco checks
RUchamp bets 8.55
ronco folds
RUchamp wins pot (17.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (3.41) -1.10
Seat 5: RUchamp (101.06) +8.99
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.80) -0.20
Seat 9: ronco (47.78) -8.12
Rake 0.43
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8023857: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-22 01:59:31
Table 'Humongous' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 2: Jdot (41.23)
Seat 4: ribeye (43.93)
Seat 5: kook (50.07)
Seat 6: RUchamp (87.81)
kook: posts the small blind 6339236
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6339208
Dealt to kook: [Qs As Ah Qd Kd]
donkyalater folds
Jdot calls 0.20
ribeye raises to 0.90
kook calls 0.90
RUchamp calls 0.90
Jdot calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [2h 5c 2c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 2.80
Jdot folds
ribeye calls 2.80
kook calls 2.80
*** TURN *** [2h 5c 2c] [9s]
kook checks
RUchamp checks
ribeye checks
*** RIVER *** [2h 5c 2c 9s] [3d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 5.85
ribeye folds
kook calls 5.85
RUchamp wins pot (22.23)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 4: ribeye (40.23) -3.70
Seat 5: kook (40.52) -9.55
Seat 6: RUchamp (100.49) +12.68
Rake 0.57
[MISSING CHIPS: .9]

Hand #8120812: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.25/0.50
2016-02-26 03:24:12
Table 'Wail' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.67)
Seat 2: w22 (134.41)
Seat 3: Grundle (56.56)
Seat 4: RUchamp (55.41)
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (14.87)
FishLivin: posts the small blind 6339508
w22: posts the big blind 6339480
Grundle calls 0.50
RUchamp calls 0.50
btcpokerfund calls 0.50
FishLivin calls 0.50
w22 bets 1.50
Grundle calls 1.50
RUchamp calls 1.50
btcpokerfund raises to 8
FishLivin folds
w22 calls 8
Grundle folds
RUchamp calls 8
*** FLOP *** [7s Td Qs]
w22 checks
RUchamp bets 23.89
btcpokerfund calls 6.87, and is all in
w22 calls 23.89
*** TURN *** [7s Td Qs] [Ah]
w22 bets 77.65
RUchamp calls 23.52, and is all in
*** RIVER *** [7s Td Qs Ah] [Jc]
RUchamp wins side pot 1 (80.70)
btcpokerfund wins pot (43.99)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.17) -0.50
Seat 2: w22 (79) -55.41
Seat 4: RUchamp (80.70) +25.29
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (43.99) +29.12
Rake 1.50
[MISSING CHIPS: .75]

Hand #8302658: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-03-04 05:33:30
Table 'Wide Gauge 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Thrudaroof (10)
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (9.25)
Seat 5: RUchamp (36.07)
Seat 6: kook (175.34)
kook: posts the small blind 6273348
Thrudaroof: posts the big blind 6273320
Dealt to kook: [Ts Kd 4c 7d Jc]
hardtime folds
Goatlumps calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
kook calls 0.45
Thrudaroof folds
Goatlumps calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [3c 9h 8h]
kook checks
Goatlumps checks
RUchamp bets 1.32
kook calls 1.32
Goatlumps folds
*** TURN *** [3c 9h 8h] [8c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 3.90
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.90)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (8.80) -0.45
Seat 5: RUchamp (38.20) +2.13
Seat 6: kook (173.57) -1.77
Rake 0.09
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8425322: Pot Limit Courchevel - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-09 03:48:03
Table 'Finger' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: newmoney (6)
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (191.44)
Seat 6: Mamma (20.72)
Mamma: posts the small blind 6274356
newmoney: posts the big blind 6274328
*** 1ST FLOP CARD *** [9d]
DrowRanger folds
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Mamma calls 0.70
newmoney folds
*** FLOP *** [9d Jd Td]
Mamma checks
RUchamp bets 1.56
Mamma folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (192.11) +0.67
Seat 6: Mamma (20.02) -0.70
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #8591854: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-16 05:15:31
Table 'Gangster' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (20)
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.04)
Seat 4: RUchamp (14.40)
Seat 5: Lethal (46.30)
Seat 6: BonxBonxBonx (14.21)
BonxBonxBonx: posts the small blind 6274404
BrokeNeck: posts the big blind 6274376
Dealt to kook: [4c 6h Jh 2d 3d]
PaperTrails folds
kook calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Lethal calls 0.90
BonxBonxBonx folds
BrokeNeck calls 0.90
kook calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [Qh 8d 2s]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** TURN *** [Qh 8d 2s] [4h]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 8d 2s 4h] [5c]
BrokeNeck checks
kook bets 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Lethal folds
BrokeNeck folds
kook calls 0.70
kook wins (2.44) from pot
RUchamp wins (2.44) from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (19.10) -0.90
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.88) +0.84
Seat 4: RUchamp (15.24) +0.84
Seat 5: Lethal (45.40) -0.90
Rake 0.12
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #8685846: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.02/0.04
2016-03-20 07:11:19
Table 'Rude Boy 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: BirthdaySuit (6.33)
Seat 4: Bethany (8.99)
Seat 5: RUchamp (10.93)
Seat 6: Gilthunder (5.72)
Gilthunder: posts the small blind 6274316
BirthdaySuit: posts the big blind 6274288
Bethany checks
RUchamp raises to 0.18
Gilthunder folds
BirthdaySuit folds
Bethany calls 0.18
*** FLOP *** [7d 5h 5d]
Bethany checks
RUchamp bets 0.28
Bethany folds
RUchamp wins pot (0.36)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: Bethany (8.81) -0.18
Seat 5: RUchamp (11.11) +0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .06]

Hand #8788726: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.50/1
2016-03-24 21:29:58
Table 'Zoot' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (104.37)
Seat 4: RUchamp (136.23)
Seat 5: D1R1 (47.50)
Seat 6: BertBert (107.19)
grimswootn: posts the small blind 10860908
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10860880
D1R1 calls 1
BertBert calls 1
dontgetomaha folds
knapp folds
grimswootn folds
RUchamp checks
*** FLOP *** [3c Kh 5h]
RUchamp bets 3.42
D1R1 folds
BertBert calls 3.42
*** TURN *** [3c Kh 5h] [7h]
RUchamp bets 7.28
BertBert folds
RUchamp wins pot (9.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (103.87) -0.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (140.92) +4.69
Seat 6: BertBert (102.77) -4.42
Rake 0.23
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8914755: Pot Limit Omaha - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 11:44:46
Table 'Beige 1' Seat 8 is the button
Seat 4: hardtime (236.85)
Seat 6: RUchamp (129.91)
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (100)
hardtime: posts the small blind 10862452
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10862424
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Kuschelbaer raises to 3
hardtime folds
RUchamp raises to 9.50
Kuschelbaer calls 9.50
*** FLOP *** [9h 3d Qd]
RUchamp bets 19.02
Kuschelbaer folds
RUchamp wins pot (18.53)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 6: RUchamp (138.94) +9.03
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (90.50) -9.50
Rake 0.47
[MISSING CHIPS: .5]

Hand #8912200: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 07:33:43
Table 'Giant' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Gusset (156.43)
Seat 3: Jdot (19)
Seat 4: RUchamp (100)
Seat 5: Mamma (419.22)
Seat 6: recursion (306.37)
recursion: posts the small blind 10862452
Gusset: posts the big blind 10862424
Jdot raises to 3.50
RUchamp calls 3.50
Mamma calls 3.50
recursion folds
Gusset calls 3.50
*** FLOP *** [4d 6c Js]
Gusset checks
Jdot checks
RUchamp bets 10.92
Mamma folds
Gusset calls 10.92
Jdot folds
*** TURN *** [4d 6c Js] [4h]
Gusset checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 6c Js 4h] [2d]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 27.96
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (34.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: Gusset (142.01) -14.42
Seat 3: Jdot (15.50) -3.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (120.53) +20.53
Seat 5: Mamma (415.72) -3.50
Rake 0.89
[MISSING CHIPS .5]

Hand #8931192: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-31 06:56:45
Table 'Giant 2' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BertBert (238.80)
Seat 2: sooperdooper (30)
Seat 4: RUchamp (509.44)
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (142.06)
donk4u2: posts the small blind 10862452
BertBert: posts the big blind 10862424
sooperdooper calls 1
RUchamp raises to 4.50
BrokeNeck folds
donk4u2 calls 4.50
BertBert calls 4.50
sooperdooper calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [9c 5s Qd]
donk4u2 checks
BertBert checks
sooperdooper checks
RUchamp bets 17.55
donk4u2 folds
BertBert calls 17.55
sooperdooper folds
*** TURN *** [9c 5s Qd] [2s]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 5s Qd 2s] [Td]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
RUchamp wins pot (47.39)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BertBert (216.75) -22.05
Seat 4: RUchamp (534.78) +25.34
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (137.56) -4.50
Rake 1.21
[MISSING CHIPS: 4.5]

Hand #8955577: Pot Limit Big O - 2/4
2016-04-01 20:29:50
Table 'Colossal' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 2: michaelproia (692.25)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (392)
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,021.61)
Seat 6: Gusset (360.44)
AMphnx: posts the small blind 10796188
Gusset: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
michaelproia raises to 14
BertBert folds
RUchamp calls 14
AMphnx folds
Gusset calls 14
*** FLOP *** [Jc 2c 7h]
Gusset checks
michaelproia checks
RUchamp bets 34.32
Gusset calls 34.32
michaelproia folds
*** TURN *** [Jc 2c 7h] [6s]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 109.83
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (96.18)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (439.86) +47.86
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,019.61) -2
Seat 6: Gusset (312.12) -48.32
Rake 2.46
[MISSING CHIPS: 14]

Hand #8951904: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:05:15
Table 'Giant' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,533.65)
Seat 3: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (984.57)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 11.50
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 11.50
*** FLOP *** [Tc 5d Jd]
RUchamp bets 18.72
BrokeNeck calls 18.72
*** TURN *** [Tc 5d Jd] [9s]
RUchamp bets 43.50
BrokeNeck calls 43.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc 5d Jd 9s] [9d]
RUchamp bets 115.55
BrokeNeck calls 115.55
RUchamp wins pot (375.54)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,719.92) +186.27
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (795.30) -189.27
Rake 3
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8951914: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:08:55
Table 'Giant' Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,732.81)
Seat 4: tmoney82 (484.65)
Seat 5: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (803.85)
tmoney82: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 12
tmoney82 calls 12
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 12
*** FLOP *** [Qs 7s 7c]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [Qs 7s 7c] [Td]
tmoney82 bets 36.08
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp calls 36.08
*** RIVER *** [Qs 7s 7c Td] [5d]
tmoney82 checks
RUchamp bets 85.15
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (94.74)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,779.47) +46.66
Seat 4: tmoney82 (436.57) -48.08
Seat 5: veganhippie (99) -1
Rake 2.42
[MISSING CHIPS 12]

Hand #8952242: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:37:05
Table 'Giant' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 2: tmoney82 (309.44)
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,069.45)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,705.78)
Seat 5: doesdo (93.50)
Seat 6: Marauders80 (96)
doesdo: posts the small blind 10796188
Marauders80: posts the big blind 10796160
tmoney82 calls 1
BrokeNeck raises to 4.50
RUchamp calls 4.50
doesdo folds
Marauders80 folds
tmoney82 calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [Ts Qd Qs]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp bets 13.65
tmoney82 folds
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp wins pot (13.65)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: tmoney82 (304.94) -4.50
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,064.95) -4.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,714.93) +9.15
Seat 5: doesdo (93) -0.50
Rake 0.35
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8952589: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 16:14:08
Table 'Giant' Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (239.89)
Seat 3: GottaGig (59.87)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,382.19)
Seat 5: doesdo (195.50)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
doesdo: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
BingoBob folds
tmoney82 calls 1
GottaGig calls 1
RUchamp raises to 5
doesdo folds
tmoney82 calls 5
GottaGig calls 5
*** FLOP *** [2s 4c 4d]
RUchamp bets 12.48
tmoney82 calls 12.48
GottaGig folds
*** TURN *** [2s 4c 4d] [Kc]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** RIVER *** [2s 4c 4d Kc] [4s]
RUchamp bets 19.48
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (38.97)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (222.41) -17.48
Seat 3: GottaGig (54.87) -5
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,403.68) +21.49
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
Rake 0.99
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #9209897: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-04-15 01:06:53
Table 'Wide Gauge' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: kook (20.95)
Seat 4: RUchamp (24.65)
Seat 5: shipitdoit (93.91)
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (57.44)
shipitdoit: posts the small blind 6273572
inv1nc1ble: posts the big blind 6273544
Dealt to kook: [2c Tc 9h 7s 5s]
kook calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
shipitdoit folds
inv1nc1ble calls 0.45
kook calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [Kc 9s Qh]
inv1nc1ble checks
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.05
inv1nc1ble folds
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.32)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (20.50) -0.45
Seat 4: RUchamp (25.52) +0.87
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (56.99) -0.45
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #9305616: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-04-19 23:54:24
Table 'Humongous' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Jdot (69.48)
Seat 3: portice (59.25)
Seat 4: RUchamp (17.99)
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Jdot: posts the small blind 6274676
portice: posts the big blind 6274648
RUchamp raises to 0.70
BoutCoin folds
Kingjack0726 folds
Jdot folds
portice calls 0.70
*** FLOP *** [9c 2h 8s]
portice checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [9c 2h 8s] [Tc]
portice checks
RUchamp bets 1.37
portice folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: portice (58.55) -0.70
Seat 4: RUchamp (18.66) +0.67
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #9342221: Pot Limit Big O - 0.25/0.50
2016-04-21 21:53:31
Table 'Heavy Duty' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (54.69)
Seat 4: sikatorr (78.33)
Seat 5: RUchamp (48)
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
sikatorr: posts the small blind 6273372
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6273344
Dealt to kook: [Jd 9h 2d Qs Ks]
SchillPuppet folds
kook folds
tmoney82 raises to 1.75
sikatorr folds
RUchamp calls 1.75
*** FLOP *** [7h Qc 6h]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** TURN *** [7h Qc 6h] [7s]
RUchamp bets 2.92
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.42)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (52.94) -1.75
Seat 5: RUchamp (49.67) +1.67
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
Rake 0.08
[MISSING CHIPS: .25]

EDIT: so there's been a misunderstanding somewhere here. This isn't about me or what I am charging to run this script or not (Goldbach, Kook, Brokeneck, BertBert, RedKingcon have already had access to it). This is about SWC and their obvious fault in this entire situation.

Again, sorry about all the spam from myz and kook, its not my responsibility, but if I didn't mention it I'd probably get coupled with those two, and if that were the case I may as well just stop writing now as I'd surely lose all credibility.
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:09:03 PM
 #3086

Sorry about all of the spam from myz and kook everyone, the rest of us aren't this addled. To address your point myz, the reason I didn't post the raw data is because there's a 64k character limit on this forum, though I will post some of it now because you apparently think its necessary.
Code:
Hand #7846975: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 01:23:50
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (27.90)
Seat 4: exanano (10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.61)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
exanano: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [4c Qd]
RUchamp raises to 0.35
SlowGrowth folds
kook folds
IanBarns1188 folds
exanano calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [9h Ks As]
exanano checks
RUchamp bets 0.74
exanano calls 0.74
*** TURN *** [9h Ks As] [7c]
exanano bets 1.06
RUchamp calls 1.06
*** RIVER *** [9h Ks As 7c] [3h]
exanano bets 2.10
RUchamp calls 2.10
RUchamp wins pot (8.29)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 4: exanano (5.75) -4.25
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.65) +4.04
Rake 0.21
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7853031: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 05:44:31
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 2: kook (59.71)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (42.89)
Seat 6: RUchamp (44.75)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [5c Ac]
kook raises to 0.35
IanBarns1188 folds
RUchamp calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [Ts Tc Jh]
RUchamp checks
kook bets 0.69
RUchamp calls 0.69
*** TURN *** [Ts Tc Jh] [3h]
RUchamp checks
kook checks
*** RIVER *** [Ts Tc Jh 3h] [6c]
RUchamp bets 2.03
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (2.03)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (58.67) -1.04
Seat 6: RUchamp (45.74) +0.99
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #7928466: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-18 05:43:13
Table 'Humongous 3' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (58.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (16.32)
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.14)
Seat 6: Mamma (252.89)
ZhonRobear: posts the small blind 6270828
Mamma: posts the big blind 6270800
BrokeNeck folds
TheWho_ raises to 0.60
RUchamp calls 0.60
ZhonRobear folds
Mamma folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 8s 7h]
TheWho_ checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [5h 8s 7h] [Ts]
TheWho_ bets 0.80
RUchamp calls 0.80
*** RIVER *** [5h 8s 7h Ts] [7c]
TheWho_ bets 2.26
RUchamp calls 2.26
RUchamp wins pot (7.24)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (54.44) -3.66
Seat 4: RUchamp (19.90) +3.58
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.04) -0.10
Rake 0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984503: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:13:49
Table 'Garlic' Seat 9 is the button
Seat 2: kook (33.05)
Seat 3: laobeh (21.41)
Seat 4: Krixe (7.10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (87)
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
kook: posts the small blind 6273836
laobeh: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [9d 2d]
Krixe calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Orcfi folds
ronco folds
kook calls 0.90
laobeh folds
Krixe folds
*** FLOP *** [As 6c 7d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.95
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (32.15) -0.90
Seat 4: Krixe (6.90) -0.20
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.05) +1.05
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #7984703: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:34:57
Table 'Garlic' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (4.51)
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.07)
Seat 6: Ruckuss (22.31)
Seat 8: Orcfi (20)
Seat 9: ronco (55.90)
Ruckuss: posts the small blind 6273836
Orcfi: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [3d 7h]
ronco raises to 1.10
kook folds
Krixe calls 1.10
RUchamp calls 1.10
Ruckuss folds
Orcfi folds
*** FLOP *** [9c 6c Ts]
ronco bets 3.51
Krixe folds
RUchamp raises to 7.02
ronco calls 7.02
*** TURN *** [9c 6c Ts] [Ah]
ronco checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 6c Ts Ah] [7s]
ronco checks
RUchamp bets 8.55
ronco folds
RUchamp wins pot (17.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (3.41) -1.10
Seat 5: RUchamp (101.06) +8.99
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.80) -0.20
Seat 9: ronco (47.78) -8.12
Rake 0.43
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8023857: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-22 01:59:31
Table 'Humongous' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 2: Jdot (41.23)
Seat 4: ribeye (43.93)
Seat 5: kook (50.07)
Seat 6: RUchamp (87.81)
kook: posts the small blind 6339236
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6339208
Dealt to kook: [Qs As Ah Qd Kd]
donkyalater folds
Jdot calls 0.20
ribeye raises to 0.90
kook calls 0.90
RUchamp calls 0.90
Jdot calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [2h 5c 2c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 2.80
Jdot folds
ribeye calls 2.80
kook calls 2.80
*** TURN *** [2h 5c 2c] [9s]
kook checks
RUchamp checks
ribeye checks
*** RIVER *** [2h 5c 2c 9s] [3d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 5.85
ribeye folds
kook calls 5.85
RUchamp wins pot (22.23)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 4: ribeye (40.23) -3.70
Seat 5: kook (40.52) -9.55
Seat 6: RUchamp (100.49) +12.68
Rake 0.57
[MISSING CHIPS: .9]

Hand #8120812: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.25/0.50
2016-02-26 03:24:12
Table 'Wail' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.67)
Seat 2: w22 (134.41)
Seat 3: Grundle (56.56)
Seat 4: RUchamp (55.41)
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (14.87)
FishLivin: posts the small blind 6339508
w22: posts the big blind 6339480
Grundle calls 0.50
RUchamp calls 0.50
btcpokerfund calls 0.50
FishLivin calls 0.50
w22 bets 1.50
Grundle calls 1.50
RUchamp calls 1.50
btcpokerfund raises to 8
FishLivin folds
w22 calls 8
Grundle folds
RUchamp calls 8
*** FLOP *** [7s Td Qs]
w22 checks
RUchamp bets 23.89
btcpokerfund calls 6.87, and is all in
w22 calls 23.89
*** TURN *** [7s Td Qs] [Ah]
w22 bets 77.65
RUchamp calls 23.52, and is all in
*** RIVER *** [7s Td Qs Ah] [Jc]
RUchamp wins side pot 1 (80.70)
btcpokerfund wins pot (43.99)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.17) -0.50
Seat 2: w22 (79) -55.41
Seat 4: RUchamp (80.70) +25.29
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (43.99) +29.12
Rake 1.50
[MISSING CHIPS: .75]

Hand #8302658: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-03-04 05:33:30
Table 'Wide Gauge 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Thrudaroof (10)
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (9.25)
Seat 5: RUchamp (36.07)
Seat 6: kook (175.34)
kook: posts the small blind 6273348
Thrudaroof: posts the big blind 6273320
Dealt to kook: [Ts Kd 4c 7d Jc]
hardtime folds
Goatlumps calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
kook calls 0.45
Thrudaroof folds
Goatlumps calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [3c 9h 8h]
kook checks
Goatlumps checks
RUchamp bets 1.32
kook calls 1.32
Goatlumps folds
*** TURN *** [3c 9h 8h] [8c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 3.90
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.90)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (8.80) -0.45
Seat 5: RUchamp (38.20) +2.13
Seat 6: kook (173.57) -1.77
Rake 0.09
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #8425322: Pot Limit Courchevel - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-09 03:48:03
Table 'Finger' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: newmoney (6)
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (191.44)
Seat 6: Mamma (20.72)
Mamma: posts the small blind 6274356
newmoney: posts the big blind 6274328
*** 1ST FLOP CARD *** [9d]
DrowRanger folds
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Mamma calls 0.70
newmoney folds
*** FLOP *** [9d Jd Td]
Mamma checks
RUchamp bets 1.56
Mamma folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (192.11) +0.67
Seat 6: Mamma (20.02) -0.70
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]

Hand #8591854: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-16 05:15:31
Table 'Gangster' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (20)
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.04)
Seat 4: RUchamp (14.40)
Seat 5: Lethal (46.30)
Seat 6: BonxBonxBonx (14.21)
BonxBonxBonx: posts the small blind 6274404
BrokeNeck: posts the big blind 6274376
Dealt to kook: [4c 6h Jh 2d 3d]
PaperTrails folds
kook calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Lethal calls 0.90
BonxBonxBonx folds
BrokeNeck calls 0.90
kook calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [Qh 8d 2s]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** TURN *** [Qh 8d 2s] [4h]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 8d 2s 4h] [5c]
BrokeNeck checks
kook bets 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Lethal folds
BrokeNeck folds
kook calls 0.70
kook wins (2.44) from pot
RUchamp wins (2.44) from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (19.10) -0.90
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.88) +0.84
Seat 4: RUchamp (15.24) +0.84
Seat 5: Lethal (45.40) -0.90
Rake 0.12
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #8685846: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.02/0.04
2016-03-20 07:11:19
Table 'Rude Boy 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: BirthdaySuit (6.33)
Seat 4: Bethany (8.99)
Seat 5: RUchamp (10.93)
Seat 6: Gilthunder (5.72)
Gilthunder: posts the small blind 6274316
BirthdaySuit: posts the big blind 6274288
Bethany checks
RUchamp raises to 0.18
Gilthunder folds
BirthdaySuit folds
Bethany calls 0.18
*** FLOP *** [7d 5h 5d]
Bethany checks
RUchamp bets 0.28
Bethany folds
RUchamp wins pot (0.36)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: Bethany (8.81) -0.18
Seat 5: RUchamp (11.11) +0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .06]

Hand #8788726: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.50/1
2016-03-24 21:29:58
Table 'Zoot' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (104.37)
Seat 4: RUchamp (136.23)
Seat 5: D1R1 (47.50)
Seat 6: BertBert (107.19)
grimswootn: posts the small blind 10860908
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10860880
D1R1 calls 1
BertBert calls 1
dontgetomaha folds
knapp folds
grimswootn folds
RUchamp checks
*** FLOP *** [3c Kh 5h]
RUchamp bets 3.42
D1R1 folds
BertBert calls 3.42
*** TURN *** [3c Kh 5h] [7h]
RUchamp bets 7.28
BertBert folds
RUchamp wins pot (9.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (103.87) -0.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (140.92) +4.69
Seat 6: BertBert (102.77) -4.42
Rake 0.23
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8914755: Pot Limit Omaha - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 11:44:46
Table 'Beige 1' Seat 8 is the button
Seat 4: hardtime (236.85)
Seat 6: RUchamp (129.91)
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (100)
hardtime: posts the small blind 10862452
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10862424
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Kuschelbaer raises to 3
hardtime folds
RUchamp raises to 9.50
Kuschelbaer calls 9.50
*** FLOP *** [9h 3d Qd]
RUchamp bets 19.02
Kuschelbaer folds
RUchamp wins pot (18.53)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 6: RUchamp (138.94) +9.03
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (90.50) -9.50
Rake 0.47
[MISSING CHIPS: .5]

Hand #8912200: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 07:33:43
Table 'Giant' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Gusset (156.43)
Seat 3: Jdot (19)
Seat 4: RUchamp (100)
Seat 5: Mamma (419.22)
Seat 6: recursion (306.37)
recursion: posts the small blind 10862452
Gusset: posts the big blind 10862424
Jdot raises to 3.50
RUchamp calls 3.50
Mamma calls 3.50
recursion folds
Gusset calls 3.50
*** FLOP *** [4d 6c Js]
Gusset checks
Jdot checks
RUchamp bets 10.92
Mamma folds
Gusset calls 10.92
Jdot folds
*** TURN *** [4d 6c Js] [4h]
Gusset checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 6c Js 4h] [2d]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 27.96
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (34.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: Gusset (142.01) -14.42
Seat 3: Jdot (15.50) -3.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (120.53) +20.53
Seat 5: Mamma (415.72) -3.50
Rake 0.89
[MISSING CHIPS .5]

Hand #8931192: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-31 06:56:45
Table 'Giant 2' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BertBert (238.80)
Seat 2: sooperdooper (30)
Seat 4: RUchamp (509.44)
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (142.06)
donk4u2: posts the small blind 10862452
BertBert: posts the big blind 10862424
sooperdooper calls 1
RUchamp raises to 4.50
BrokeNeck folds
donk4u2 calls 4.50
BertBert calls 4.50
sooperdooper calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [9c 5s Qd]
donk4u2 checks
BertBert checks
sooperdooper checks
RUchamp bets 17.55
donk4u2 folds
BertBert calls 17.55
sooperdooper folds
*** TURN *** [9c 5s Qd] [2s]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 5s Qd 2s] [Td]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
RUchamp wins pot (47.39)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BertBert (216.75) -22.05
Seat 4: RUchamp (534.78) +25.34
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (137.56) -4.50
Rake 1.21
[MISSING CHIPS: 4.5]

Hand #8955577: Pot Limit Big O - 2/4
2016-04-01 20:29:50
Table 'Colossal' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 2: michaelproia (692.25)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (392)
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,021.61)
Seat 6: Gusset (360.44)
AMphnx: posts the small blind 10796188
Gusset: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
michaelproia raises to 14
BertBert folds
RUchamp calls 14
AMphnx folds
Gusset calls 14
*** FLOP *** [Jc 2c 7h]
Gusset checks
michaelproia checks
RUchamp bets 34.32
Gusset calls 34.32
michaelproia folds
*** TURN *** [Jc 2c 7h] [6s]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 109.83
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (96.18)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (439.86) +47.86
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,019.61) -2
Seat 6: Gusset (312.12) -48.32
Rake 2.46
[MISSING CHIPS: 14]

Hand #8951904: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:05:15
Table 'Giant' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,533.65)
Seat 3: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (984.57)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 11.50
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 11.50
*** FLOP *** [Tc 5d Jd]
RUchamp bets 18.72
BrokeNeck calls 18.72
*** TURN *** [Tc 5d Jd] [9s]
RUchamp bets 43.50
BrokeNeck calls 43.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc 5d Jd 9s] [9d]
RUchamp bets 115.55
BrokeNeck calls 115.55
RUchamp wins pot (375.54)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,719.92) +186.27
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (795.30) -189.27
Rake 3
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8951914: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:08:55
Table 'Giant' Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,732.81)
Seat 4: tmoney82 (484.65)
Seat 5: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (803.85)
tmoney82: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 12
tmoney82 calls 12
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 12
*** FLOP *** [Qs 7s 7c]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [Qs 7s 7c] [Td]
tmoney82 bets 36.08
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp calls 36.08
*** RIVER *** [Qs 7s 7c Td] [5d]
tmoney82 checks
RUchamp bets 85.15
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (94.74)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,779.47) +46.66
Seat 4: tmoney82 (436.57) -48.08
Seat 5: veganhippie (99) -1
Rake 2.42
[MISSING CHIPS 12]

Hand #8952242: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:37:05
Table 'Giant' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 2: tmoney82 (309.44)
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,069.45)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,705.78)
Seat 5: doesdo (93.50)
Seat 6: Marauders80 (96)
doesdo: posts the small blind 10796188
Marauders80: posts the big blind 10796160
tmoney82 calls 1
BrokeNeck raises to 4.50
RUchamp calls 4.50
doesdo folds
Marauders80 folds
tmoney82 calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [Ts Qd Qs]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp bets 13.65
tmoney82 folds
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp wins pot (13.65)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: tmoney82 (304.94) -4.50
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,064.95) -4.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,714.93) +9.15
Seat 5: doesdo (93) -0.50
Rake 0.35
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #8952589: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 16:14:08
Table 'Giant' Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (239.89)
Seat 3: GottaGig (59.87)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,382.19)
Seat 5: doesdo (195.50)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
doesdo: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
BingoBob folds
tmoney82 calls 1
GottaGig calls 1
RUchamp raises to 5
doesdo folds
tmoney82 calls 5
GottaGig calls 5
*** FLOP *** [2s 4c 4d]
RUchamp bets 12.48
tmoney82 calls 12.48
GottaGig folds
*** TURN *** [2s 4c 4d] [Kc]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** RIVER *** [2s 4c 4d Kc] [4s]
RUchamp bets 19.48
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (38.97)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (222.41) -17.48
Seat 3: GottaGig (54.87) -5
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,403.68) +21.49
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
Rake 0.99
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]

Hand #9209897: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-04-15 01:06:53
Table 'Wide Gauge' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: kook (20.95)
Seat 4: RUchamp (24.65)
Seat 5: shipitdoit (93.91)
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (57.44)
shipitdoit: posts the small blind 6273572
inv1nc1ble: posts the big blind 6273544
Dealt to kook: [2c Tc 9h 7s 5s]
kook calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
shipitdoit folds
inv1nc1ble calls 0.45
kook calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [Kc 9s Qh]
inv1nc1ble checks
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.05
inv1nc1ble folds
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.32)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (20.50) -0.45
Seat 4: RUchamp (25.52) +0.87
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (56.99) -0.45
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]

Hand #9305616: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-04-19 23:54:24
Table 'Humongous' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Jdot (69.48)
Seat 3: portice (59.25)
Seat 4: RUchamp (17.99)
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Jdot: posts the small blind 6274676
portice: posts the big blind 6274648
RUchamp raises to 0.70
BoutCoin folds
Kingjack0726 folds
Jdot folds
portice calls 0.70
*** FLOP *** [9c 2h 8s]
portice checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [9c 2h 8s] [Tc]
portice checks
RUchamp bets 1.37
portice folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: portice (58.55) -0.70
Seat 4: RUchamp (18.66) +0.67
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]


Hand #9342221: Pot Limit Big O - 0.25/0.50
2016-04-21 21:53:31
Table 'Heavy Duty' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (54.69)
Seat 4: sikatorr (78.33)
Seat 5: RUchamp (48)
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
sikatorr: posts the small blind 6273372
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6273344
Dealt to kook: [Jd 9h 2d Qs Ks]
SchillPuppet folds
kook folds
tmoney82 raises to 1.75
sikatorr folds
RUchamp calls 1.75
*** FLOP *** [7h Qc 6h]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** TURN *** [7h Qc 6h] [7s]
RUchamp bets 2.92
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.42)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (52.94) -1.75
Seat 5: RUchamp (49.67) +1.67
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
Rake 0.08
[MISSING CHIPS: .25]

Hey RUchamp, let me ask you something.

Do you understand the difference between arbitrary plaintext and functional source code?
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:15:27 PM
 #3087

Only because I have such a hard time explaining any of the complexities of this situation on SWC without being met by fervent tribalism for SWC/glitch..


For all you shills and shillettes:


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477110588375040/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349477062429507584/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/341035669650407425/349476981177450497/unknown.png


Glitch claims he knew about it for say, a month before the rest of us, yet this is not in any way a justification of him clearly keeping this from players he is so closely associated with (or was), and that players addressed him about the bug.


Infer what you will, people.


These screenshots don't even address the fact that the bug had happened not only once but twice from presumably SWC conception (early 2015) until an undisclosed time, and then reappeared sometime(??) in 2017 until April(??) of 2017. The point of mentioning this is that as many players whether in discord or in SWC chat box had been wholly uninformed whether by glitch (who is a 'man of the people' in those parts) or by SWC themselves. No formal statement, no official time frames, nothing. Glitch didn't say a word to any of us etc. etc.


Again, infer what you will.


** It is also worth noting there was no actual formal statement from SWC until this was brought more into the light by some players (including yours truly) and the players found out not from glitch who did know before the rest of us, but from other players finally either finding out themselves or finally bringing it to light. I could be wrong claiming this as I'm too lazy to go read what they posted originally so for what its worth: I'm pretty sure swc hasn't actually addressed the fact formally that this bug has happened before (2015-?) but only claims it happened the most recent time, and has been patched.

 Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss Kiss


Just last week glitch said if I zipped up my hand histories and shared them with him that he'd analyze them.  He said he was fine doing it as long as I didn't mind him seeing how I play.  Brokeneck witnessed glitch saying this too.  Now he's saying he refuses to release his script until the refund comes.  Just one more lie in a long series of lies from that man.  I have no reason to believe anything that he says ever again.

So you're saying RUchamp's script is not the official solution for determining the existence and frequency of error and reaching an accurate number? You're saying that you don't know anything? How much out of the 5 chip price do you accept as payment?

:O

You're fake news, Myz94.  You're just trying to fill this thread with nonsense and lies to distract the readers from the truth.  RUchamp's script was written by a community of programmers who have more skill than anyone on swc.  I have no profit motive in people using his script.  They are free to use the script that glitch promised to distribute to marlais, brokeneck, ruchamp, myself, etc if only he'd release it as he promised he would.  Glitch lies.  SWC lies.  There is no more doubt to pretend otherwise.

If I'm fake news, tell me this: do you understand how the script was written or how it works? Does the word "script" mean some kind of magical nonsense to your medicated brain?

It was not written by a community of programmers. You and RUChamp have a direct profit motive, as he has already admitted he is sharing the profits with you guys. You are selling a script without providing any information on it, you are simply asking people to commit $20 to receive a 3-line output that is designed to appease them. It's a good way to make money, I give you that, but it's not honest. You are being just as dodgy about your script as SwC is about their analysis. You simply cannot explain what the problem is, and you cannot explain how your script calculates it.


I applaud SwC for not exhibiting the immaturity and unwarranted technical certainty that you seem to live under. I suggest you let RUchamp try to do the talking. No need to dumb it down, as your readers aren't too naive to understand the large spectrum of quality in one-off programming projects from a cheap source. There are a number of ways to confirm the accuracy and functionality of your script without releasing the source for free to everyone, though that's what you would do if you were interested in helping people.

On another note I'm offering my own script. It tells you how many times youll lose with AA in Trump's presidency. It's community supported, and here are some of the commands I use to run it:

cd porn
mkdir swcscriptlol
mkdir handhistoryanalysis
pip install foresight
python manage.py runsupersmarthandanalysisserver

Ok so I clearly have some scripts up and running that analyze hand history and provide you with an accurate value of "bad hands". There is nothing you can say to prove I have not done so. You are simply smearing fake news everywhere if you doubt the validity of the script I just wrote.

I commissioned it. Only charging $10 for mine. Let me know if you want screenshots lmao


RU never said he's sharing shit with anyone.  You're a liar.  I even saw you say shit in the trollbox the other day about me multiaccounting in freerolls.  You make up shit all the time.  Your reputation is shit on SWC and I hope the readers of this forum have that perspective.



Ha, let me know when you'd like to actually reply to my message.

Just keeping people honest on both sides, buddy. I know you're not used to people who pay attention to detail when someone is selling a rogue script without any accountability nor even hint that it's functional and not itself buggy Smiley

Take a deep breath, and remember that saying the word "programming" does not magically give you knowledge and credibility.

You got a lot to lose, "buddy."  That trollbox is your life.  When SWC closes its scammy doors once and for all, where will you take your abusive rants?  You've always been glitch's little attack dog.  I can see that glitch applied peanut butter to his asshole today because your tongue is coated.

Sorry, are you having the same conversation as I am? It almost seems as you have blanked on ways to address my claims, and you have resorted to attacking my 'character' even though I am a widely loved and respected seal. Want to test that? Go ahead, get an opinion poll and post results. Do literally anything that confirms anything you say, and you will run into fewer people like me.

I am sorry for hurting the sales of your "bad hands, trust us" script. I love sealnut blubber

The thing about truth, though, is no matter how ugly it's expressed, it's self-evident, and doesn't require your acceptance of it to be truth.

So you go ahead yourself, and get an opinion poll filled out.  I'm sure you'll find a plethora of liars, idiots, and uninformed people blinded by their loyalty to a site that does not deserve it.  Lelz @ establishing truth from an opinion poll.

Two of the largest krillers on the site have told me that since I started posting on this forum, site traffic has plummeted.  I am proud of this inverse correlation between my efforts and the amount of ring traffic SWC now has.

Keep spinning your web of lies, though.  The more you tell, the more you'll have to maintain as they invariably will be in contradiction to known truths.  All I have to do is keep stating the truth, and you will exhaust yourself trying to maintain your falsehoods.

I would worry that your lie in the trollbox asserting that I multiaccount freerolls would hurt my reputation, but the accusation of someone with as bad a reputation as yours doesn't work against my reputation, rather, it works for it.  If a scummer gives you a bad rep, it's a mark of credibility.  Welcome to the dynamics of trust.

I have nothing to gain by RUchamp charging players for use of his script.  He did it for me for free.  He did it for several others for free.  If you're not a scumbag, he won't charge you.  He only asks 5 chips from scum like you who are not deserving of a favor.  The free market sorts it all out, socialist scum.  Hillary Clinton lost.  Get over it.


Thank you for your thoughtful reply, I'm glad you've decided to continue the conversation with some nuance. This is progress, kook.

I don't need to go out and get an opinion poll completed, as I seem to be getting along with just about everyone except for the two main salesman of this "script" which hasn't even been proven to exist. I don't blame you for being uneducated as to the difference between making technical claims and proving them, just stop claiming that any of this has been verified by anyone, staff or not. Nobody selling the script in chat has even conveyed any hint of programming or data analytics knowledge. This should concern any potential buyers. How are your claims different from that of SwC? Who has reviewed your code for legitimacy, and who's to say BOTH SwC and you guys are wrong about the issue? Why is this worth 5 chips up front, advertised in SwC chat?

If your goal is to decrease site traffic, that's a different story. You can do whatever you set your mind to, I just will maintain that you have the dodgiest history and I trust SwC way before I trust you. That doesn't mean I defend the actions of the site entirely. Hell, I've been banned several times for refusing to shut up about what I believed at the time were major issues.

He stopped asking for 5 chips in some cases due to my efforts in chat every time he announces it. I do not believe in preying on confused users by setting some arbitrary expectation of chips to come in the future. I would encourage anyone considering using the script to think about what they are actually receiving: it's not a promise nor is it any form of leverage for payback. On top of that, worst case scenario it's not even a correct value.

Sorry, kook, I can tell you've "flipped" and now make it your goal to destroy the site. You will not be forgotten for your efforts against it. I believe very strongly in the inherent decisions made in starting SwC and integrity of its mission - however I would love to see a more transparent development team that encourages feedback from users. So call me a shill all you want, but I am sure as hell a supporter and I will happily admit I have made you my enemy in this situation. You are not interested in seeking the truth, you are being stubbornly destructive.
RUchamp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
August 22, 2017, 10:31:55 PM
 #3088

This isn't about me selling a script, and I'm in no way saying I'll release the source code, this is about SWCs inactions and omissions, and separately about glitch's inactions and omissions. I'm sorry you are too [drug] addled to follow simple lines of logic myz, but I've now ignored you on this forum and on SWC as I've nothing further to add to your nonsense. I would urge anyone with a brain to hit that ignore button as well. Without Myz spamming this thread, it actually turns into a pretty well put together post.
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:42:22 AM
 #3089

This isn't about me selling a script, and I'm in no way saying I'll release the source code, this is about SWCs inactions and omissions, and separately about glitch's inactions and omissions. I'm sorry you are too [drug] addled to follow simple lines of logic myz, but I've now ignored you on this forum and on SWC as I've nothing further to add to your nonsense. I would urge anyone with a brain to hit that ignore button as well. Without Myz spamming this thread, it actually turns into a pretty well put together post.


Interesting, so let me break your reply down:

- you no longer interested in discussing the script you are trying to sell for ~$20 to people
- you're not releasing the source code
- you think I'm on drugs
- you want people to ignore me

Does that... does that mean I'm right about everything I said? I'm pretty sure this is what people do when they want to silence an opinion that is damaging to their cause. Why are you so intimidated by my assertions if they are meaningless and wrong?

Also good luck in that overkrill you accepted my stake in. Weird that you continue to support a "scam" site with the explanation "I'm trying to win my money back". I hope you win some of your money "back" using funds from charitable stakers like me Smiley
Marauders80
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 10:19:07 PM
 #3090

Hey guys,

From what I've been told, support is almost finished calculating the refunds.  They will process these refunds (BCC included as swc chips) within a matter of DAYS - not weeks, months, or years, which would be unacceptable.

My initial reaction to this situation was pretty negative.  It doesn't matter whether I felt like I had a good rapport with their support/management or not.  But I'm pretty sure that they will continue to keep their word, as they have done every time I have brought concerns to them.

Obviously, every player will look at this situation thru their own lens.  But I'm concerned with results.  And if we get these refunds within a matter of days (money that those affected are certainly owed, but probably weren't expecting, simply out of ignorance), that's what will be of the utmost importance to myself.  The basic unwritten contract between operator and player, in any gaming environment, is that player will be made whole by operator in EVERY circumstance.  While time has passed, we have not been made whole yet. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't believe we would be made whole within the stated timeframe.

So hopefully a positive outcome will result in a plethora of games once everybody's accounts are pumped up with some extra chips.  Hope swc will come thru again for us and hope to see some of you on the tables (at least the ones I can beat lol).

gl all - Marauders80

ps - maybe it's just the nature of this forum/thread, but some of you guys seem to be really going after one another.  It can be funny sometimes, but might be distracting us from our ultimate goals in this instance.  But I've never been one to stop a fight so . . .
assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 11:19:54 PM
 #3091

Hey guys,

From what I've been told, support is almost finished calculating the refunds.  They will process these refunds (BCC included as swc chips) within a matter of DAYS - not weeks, months, or years, which would be unacceptable.

My initial reaction to this situation was pretty negative.  It doesn't matter whether I felt like I had a good rapport with their support/management or not.  But I'm pretty sure that they will continue to keep their word, as they have done every time I have brought concerns to them.

Obviously, every player will look at this situation thru their own lens.  But I'm concerned with results.  And if we get these refunds within a matter of days (money that those affected are certainly owed, but probably weren't expecting, simply out of ignorance), that's what will be of the utmost importance to myself.  The basic unwritten contract between operator and player, in any gaming environment, is that player will be made whole by operator in EVERY circumstance.  While time has passed, we have not been made whole yet. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't believe we would be made whole within the stated timeframe.

So hopefully a positive outcome will result in a plethora of games once everybody's accounts are pumped up with some extra chips.  Hope swc will come thru again for us and hope to see some of you on the tables (at least the ones I can beat lol).

gl all - Marauders80

ps - maybe it's just the nature of this forum/thread, but some of you guys seem to be really going after one another.  It can be funny sometimes, but might be distracting us from our ultimate goals in this instance.  But I've never been one to stop a fight so . . .


Lmao if this is true then lol lmao reliable swc strikes again
RunGoodFish
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
August 26, 2017, 05:02:17 PM
 #3092

Has SWC made any further updates?

A matter of days as mentioned by Marauders has now passed.

Where are the players' refunds?

Disgusting behaviour from site employees to encourage people who knew about the bug not to tell anybody.

The general shadiness of the poker site has always been there along with the incompetence of site owners, developers and employees so it isn't all that surprising.

RUchamp, thank you for going to these lengths to assist fellow players in the community. Ignore the troll, just another worthless piece of s*** from the swc trollbox.

Funny how the bugs and cheating in online poker have always been exposed by players and never by the poker sites themselves.
RoKSeouljah420
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile
August 27, 2017, 05:35:18 AM
 #3093

Just logged in for first time in months. Couldn't help but notice that all the BIs and any guaranteeds (I use that term very loosely) seem to have been slashed since my last login, yet the minimum withdrawal remains .020, or a little less than $100 at the time of this post.

Given that most of the tournament BI's are less than .005 in BI, and that the only stakes running are .01/.02 and .05/pt ofc at the time of this post, maybe SWC should consider also slashing their minimum cashout to something a bit more reasonable, given the price of bitcoin, which is what they quoted as being the reason for slashing so many other things sitewide.

Then again, if the intent is to make it harder to cashout funds, then keeping the current cashout minimum would seem optimal, almost guaranteeing micro players and freeroll winners can never cash out their funds.

But I digress, I've already spent wasted another 3 minutes of my life on a post that will be ignored by the glorious entity of customer service that SWC 2.0 has become.

Regards,
-BttB
KareBare
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
August 29, 2017, 03:18:05 PM
 #3094

Hey guys,

From what I've been told, support is almost finished calculating the refunds.  They will process these refunds (BCC included as swc chips) within a matter of DAYS - not weeks, months, or years, which would be unacceptable.

My initial reaction to this situation was pretty negative.  It doesn't matter whether I felt like I had a good rapport with their support/management or not.  But I'm pretty sure that they will continue to keep their word, as they have done every time I have brought concerns to them.

Obviously, every player will look at this situation thru their own lens.  But I'm concerned with results.  And if we get these refunds within a matter of days (money that those affected are certainly owed, but probably weren't expecting, simply out of ignorance), that's what will be of the utmost importance to myself.  The basic unwritten contract between operator and player, in any gaming environment, is that player will be made whole by operator in EVERY circumstance.  While time has passed, we have not been made whole yet. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't believe we would be made whole within the stated timeframe.

So hopefully a positive outcome will result in a plethora of games once everybody's accounts are pumped up with some extra chips.  Hope swc will come thru again for us and hope to see some of you on the tables (at least the ones I can beat lol).

gl all - Marauders80

ps - maybe it's just the nature of this forum/thread, but some of you guys seem to be really going after one another.  It can be funny sometimes, but might be distracting us from our ultimate goals in this instance.  But I've never been one to stop a fight so . . .




After today marks a week. I got the same response on the same day you did as well. I was told on Saturday they may issue them today. Now I can't trust what there saying and have to assume they are insolvent.

assiusplay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
August 29, 2017, 03:19:46 PM
 #3095

Hey guys,

From what I've been told, support is almost finished calculating the refunds.  They will process these refunds (BCC included as swc chips) within a matter of DAYS - not weeks, months, or years, which would be unacceptable.

My initial reaction to this situation was pretty negative.  It doesn't matter whether I felt like I had a good rapport with their support/management or not.  But I'm pretty sure that they will continue to keep their word, as they have done every time I have brought concerns to them.

Obviously, every player will look at this situation thru their own lens.  But I'm concerned with results.  And if we get these refunds within a matter of days (money that those affected are certainly owed, but probably weren't expecting, simply out of ignorance), that's what will be of the utmost importance to myself.  The basic unwritten contract between operator and player, in any gaming environment, is that player will be made whole by operator in EVERY circumstance.  While time has passed, we have not been made whole yet. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't believe we would be made whole within the stated timeframe.

So hopefully a positive outcome will result in a plethora of games once everybody's accounts are pumped up with some extra chips.  Hope swc will come thru again for us and hope to see some of you on the tables (at least the ones I can beat lol).

gl all - Marauders80

ps - maybe it's just the nature of this forum/thread, but some of you guys seem to be really going after one another.  It can be funny sometimes, but might be distracting us from our ultimate goals in this instance.  But I've never been one to stop a fight so . . .



 Now I can't trust what there saying and have to assume they are insolvent.




Voice of our generation lol
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
August 29, 2017, 06:59:17 PM
 #3096

It's been a week since SWC said they would pay refunds within days.

It's been five months since SWC discovered this "bug."

This is exactly what exit scams look like in their last days.

A player who emailed them looking for a refund today was told to "play at [his] own risk."

Stealing a huge amount of money wasn't bad enough for this company.  Now, they are going to lie about it as long as they can to keep their faucets running.
RunGoodFish
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
August 29, 2017, 09:10:04 PM
 #3097

SWC's silence is deafening.

They have reportedly stopped responding to emails now too.

Countdown to official insolvency announcement?
rdbase
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136


View Profile
August 29, 2017, 09:46:48 PM
 #3098

They just got back to my e-mail and said:


We are close to sending them.

This is a large task and we want to be certain it is done right.





I'm relieved they aren't being silent on this. I think they'll come through this week
kookswc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
August 30, 2017, 11:14:13 AM
 #3099

"We have excellent poker room and marketing staffs, we just didn't let them do their jobs properly until now. That is all part of the changes that started with the rake reduction. We botched the Krill Roll, now we're making that right. It all starts now."

- SWC, July 07, 2016

____

FOURTEEN MONTHS LATER...
SwC_Poker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175


Official SwC Poker Bitcointalk


View Profile WWW
August 30, 2017, 12:43:19 PM
 #3100

Regarding Over-Rake Refunds
The investigation into over-raked pots has been completed. We are now loading the data to run a payout script. We expect this process to take up to 36 hours to complete. Once paid out, players will notice a transaction with type "Refund" in the cashier screen. Players will also be credited an equal amount of Bitcoin Cash, which can be claimed in the same manner as our BCH distribution process, by emailing bch@swcpoker.eu and following the instructions.

Regarding Bitcoin Cash
Bitcoin Cash claims continue to be processed regularly. If you had a balance at SwC Poker on August 1st, you may email bch@swcpoker.eu to claim your BCH. This regular processing will continue until at least the end of 2017.

Regarding Client Development
After the refund process completes, we will shift focus back to developing our new client software. This new software will eliminate many of the issues experienced by players today. The client will be developed to run on multiple platforms and will greatly improve player experience. We understand this has been a difficult time for SwC Poker, and we vow to improve the platform.


Thank you for playing at SwC Poker

Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!