|
SmiGueL
|
 |
May 29, 2013, 10:03:26 PM
Last edit: May 29, 2013, 10:45:40 PM by SmiGueL |
|
For the chart fans (and because I don't want to spam the thread full with it..)Which one of the last 3 should I use on the live stats website?  Reply with PM is Ok Anyone noticed the 20 blocks in the last 12h, and 11 in the last 6?  AM now 2nd on blockchain.info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
May 29, 2013, 10:47:18 PM |
|
Crazy....so many coins. |
|
|
|
|
|
VJain
|
|
May 29, 2013, 10:51:49 PM |
|
For the chart fans (and because I don't want to spam the thread full with it..)Which one of the last 3 should I use on the live stats website? Reply with PM is Ok Anyone noticed the 20 blocks in the last 12h, and 11 in the last 6? AM now 2nd on blockchain.infoJust checking... but we're up to an estimated 29TH/s now - based on last 6 hours? Did our overall hashrate increase, or is the 6 hour estimation not a good indicator of our hashrate? |
Making Apps and Websites for people. I charge reasonable rates ($30-40/hour in BTC).
|
|
|
|
radiumsoup
|
|
May 29, 2013, 11:25:05 PM |
|
For the chart fans (and because I don't want to spam the thread full with it..)Which one of the last 3 should I use on the live stats website? Reply with PM is Ok Anyone noticed the 20 blocks in the last 12h, and 11 in the last 6? AM now 2nd on blockchain.infoa bit confusing since some of those have axes which are read left to right AND right to left in the same chart. I get what you're getting at, but it took more than a passing look to figure out what the hell was going on there. I was going to tell you they were broken at first, but sat and stared a while to try and read your mind. Call me psychic, I guess, but I finally figured it out after the second beer. |
PGP fingerprint: 0x85beeabd110803b93d408b502d39b8875b282f86
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:28:53 AM |
|
For the chart fans (and because I don't want to spam the thread full with it..)Which one of the last 3 should I use on the live stats website? Reply with PM is Ok Anyone noticed the 20 blocks in the last 12h, and 11 in the last 6? AM now 2nd on blockchain.infoa bit confusing since some of those have axes which are read left to right AND right to left in the same chart. I get what you're getting at, but it took more than a passing look to figure out what the hell was going on there. I was going to tell you they were broken at first, but sat and stared a while to try and read your mind. Call me psychic, I guess, but I finally figured it out after the second beer. No, I think they're all as labelled. It's just that "Hashrate" should be a line and found blocks bars. Or both lines. Found blocks will be lower for shorter time periods, even as hashrate increases (unless the hashrate doubles each time period). |
|
|
|
Thujone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2013, 04:23:58 AM |
|
Has anyone seen their ASICMINER-PT divs come in yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aureum_Coffee
|
|
May 30, 2013, 04:30:12 AM |
|
Has anyone seen their ASICMINER-PT divs come in yet?
No. BTC TC is working on a software glitch with dividend payment. |
|
|
|
|
Thujone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:43:03 AM |
|
Has anyone seen their ASICMINER-PT divs come in yet?
No. BTC TC is working on a software glitch with dividend payment. Hadn't seem any news on the full shares so I thought I would ask. I hoped that was what was going on, no need to deal with even more double divs. Hopefully everyone is being honorable and leaving their second div in their wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:49:59 AM |
|
I'd suggest anyone who hasn't, and refuses to return the double div, be blacklisted from btct.co.
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
|
puck2
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:50:11 AM |
|
Will the new bitcoin client cause a problem for ASICMINER by limiting dust transactions or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
|
May 30, 2013, 05:51:36 AM |
|
or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
^ this |
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
May 30, 2013, 06:52:36 AM |
|
Will the new bitcoin client cause a problem for ASICMINER by limiting dust transactions or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
Well, they can, but they should really stop spamming the blockchain regardless :/ |
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
May 30, 2013, 07:36:06 AM |
|
Has anyone seen their ASICMINER-PT divs come in yet?
Got mine |
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
fiaskow
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2013, 07:51:44 AM |
|
Has anyone seen their ASICMINER-PT divs come in yet?
Got mine Got mine too. |
|
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
May 30, 2013, 08:59:51 AM
Last edit: May 30, 2013, 09:16:43 AM by aahzmundus |
|
Will the new bitcoin client cause a problem for ASICMINER by limiting dust transactions or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
Well, they can, but they should really stop spamming the blockchain regardless :/ Spamming the blockchain? Asicminer do it once a week, in a big transaction... go blame SDice for spam. Asicminers usage of satoshies/dust at least has real utility. |
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
May 30, 2013, 09:50:41 AM |
|
I'd suggest anyone who hasn't, and refuses to return the double div, be blacklisted from btct.co.
This is totally nonsense. One of the biggest piles of nonsense I've ever witnessed. The whole point of "returning the funds" is that you return them at your own will, as opposite to forcing you to return them. So you are suggesting that you do "at your own will OR ELSE you get banned"... lol I'm astonished on how utterly broken this "suggestion" is. I mean, I know this problem has been solved now, but noticing such an enormous amount of broken-ness in just a single post amazed me, I couldn't refrain from replying. |
|
|
|
|
physalis
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:14:13 PM |
|
Will the new bitcoin client cause a problem for ASICMINER by limiting dust transactions or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
Well, they can, but they should really stop spamming the blockchain regardless :/ Spamming the blockchain? Asicminer do it once a week, in a big transaction... go blame SDice for spam. Asicminers usage of satoshies/dust at least has real utility. It's a matter of principle, and regardless of how often it happens, it's spam. The blockchain isn't supposed to transmit arbitrary data like "you own that many shares" or "it's xx degrees here in florida". |
|
|
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:19:02 PM |
|
Will the new bitcoin client cause a problem for ASICMINER by limiting dust transactions or can ASICMINER now relay their own Satoshi size transactions?
Well, they can, but they should really stop spamming the blockchain regardless :/ Spamming the blockchain? Asicminer do it once a week, in a big transaction... go blame SDice for spam. Asicminers usage of satoshies/dust at least has real utility. It's a matter of principle, and regardless of how often it happens, it's spam. The blockchain isn't supposed to transmit arbitrary data like "you own that many shares" or "it's xx degrees here in florida". I'd argue the blockchain is supposed to do whatever people can do with it. Anything unwanted is a design flaw, not a user flaw. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:47:56 PM |
|
I'd argue the blockchain is supposed to do whatever people can do with it. Anything unwanted is a design flaw, not a user flaw.
+1 if this kind of transaction bothers anyone, he should press for mandatory fees or something like that, but as long as the protocol allows it, then you should blame the protocol. |
|
|
|
|
bitfair
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:58:38 PM |
|
Looking forward to today's update, looks like deployment has progressed the last week and sales are strong.
Would also be interested in hearing where in the process the 200TH order is, and how far the planning for next-gen chips has progressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
