[ANN] AMP - The Currency That Powers Your Attention On Synereo

[metropolit]

Any news of the date and number of AMPs that gonna get burned?
This is the most important news untill the next release in June.

[1713278665]

1713278665

[1713278665]

1713278665

[1713278665]

1713278665

[ACP]

Looks like this may prove to take off eventually. Keep up the work.

[Elokane]

Online Video Meets Decentralised Business Models: What’s Next?

https://medium.com/paratii/online-video-meets-decentralised-business-models-whats-next-24d23d675184

"What we have is basically a handful of organisations trying to reshape an industry a thousand times bigger, from within, by offering alternative services to players of this very industry, at different points of its business chain.

If it all goes right, it shouldn’t be too long until they can videochat over Synereo... "

[Elokane]

"It seems a safe bet to generalise the market potential of blockchain-based online video endeavours as an equivalent of this combined (and rounded up) U$36 billion annual dollars... "

[SynereoCommunity]

Qrator Development Update: A Glimpse into the Action at Synereo
Posted by Oded   

With a clear goal of releasing the Beta of Qrator this upcoming June, the Synereo team is deeply engaged in design and development. In the following weeks, we’ll be giving our undivided attention to perfecting Qrator, the tool beginning to realize the long-term vision of a Liberated Attention Economy.

We concentrate our efforts on two tightly linked fronts: Technology and Design.

On the Technological front, we are close to completing our back-end server, created such that it would be simple to later mirror on the decentralized web. This server keeps user information and identities, identifies interactions with content, generates unique user links, and keeps track of all microtransactions. Our developers are now integrating it with the Omni Protocol-based transaction server, allowing our system to synchronize with the blockchain for the secure handling of AMPs.

In addition, we’re fine-tuning the Attention Economy model to maximize gains for creators and curators alike, in a fair and transparent approach that benefits all. We’ll flesh out its mechanism in an upcoming post.

Encouraged by the alpha testing success, backed by a solid technological infrastructure ready and running, and having a clear vision as for what Qrator should do, much is happening on the Design front as well. We’ve recently joined forces with Reuben Rosh, an acclaimed and experienced designer, helping us craft a sharp user experience with his expertise. As a browser extension meant to be a faithful companion, accompanying you on your various web adventures, we’re designing Qrator to be beautiful and functional, non-intrusive yet immediately available, helpful, informative and friendly. We’re giving special attention to social network functionalities, aiming to make it effortless not only to discover quality content through Qrator, but also to support and connect with the people who create and curate it.

In conclusion, after officially announcing Qrator last week, we’re full steam ahead on our way to realize the vision of a Liberated Network. As our work progresses, we’ll keep you updated at key points of development.

 

We appreciate your attention,

— The Synereo Team

From the latest blog update.
https://blog.synereo.com/2017/04/10/qrator-development-update-a-glimpse-into-the-action-at-synereo/


 

[mishax1]

https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/

1.  For example, there have been concerns over 3 million AMPs given to Dor’s sister, Nor Konforty for design work in the very early stages of Synereo. Synereo clarifies at the time this rate was negotiated, AMPs didn’t exist yet. For reference, 3 million AMPs is only 3.5% of AMPs in circulation today and only .3% of AMPs in existence. The fighting over these issues will get likely ugly. There was considerable confusion during Synereo’s second crowdsale about how many AMPs existed and who controlled them. Synereo ended up burning 731 million AMPs.

Wait, what? 

[jvper]

https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/

1.  For example, there have been concerns over 3 million AMPs given to Dor’s sister, Nor Konforty for design work in the very early stages of Synereo. Synereo clarifies at the time this rate was negotiated, AMPs didn’t exist yet. For reference, 3 million AMPs is only 3.5% of AMPs in circulation today and only .3% of AMPs in existence. The fighting over these issues will get likely ugly. There was considerable confusion during Synereo’s second crowdsale about how many AMPs existed and who controlled them. Synereo ended up burning 731 million AMPs.

Wait, what? 

They changed the whole objective of the project and didn't refund who invested in the original Special-K, RChain, etc. powered by an attention economy, where AMPs would monetize attention. Giving 3 million AMPs for design is nothing compared to this.

[xtyling]

Any good joke this week on this project ?

[cryptohunter]

https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/

1.  For example, there have been concerns over 3 million AMPs given to Dor’s sister, Nor Konforty for design work in the very early stages of Synereo. Synereo clarifies at the time this rate was negotiated, AMPs didn’t exist yet. For reference, 3 million AMPs is only 3.5% of AMPs in circulation today and only .3% of AMPs in existence. The fighting over these issues will get likely ugly. There was considerable confusion during Synereo’s second crowdsale about how many AMPs existed and who controlled them. Synereo ended up burning 731 million AMPs.

Wait, what?  

that does sound very shady I would expect the community should demand 2M of that returned.

if that is how it went down then that is a huge red flag right there.

these tasks are meant to be offered out so that synerio holders get the best value for their money

was that at the time a good price to pay for what was delivered? i  know amps were far cheaper perhaps back then?

[DecentralizeEconomics]

https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/

1.  For example, there have been concerns over 3 million AMPs given to Dor’s sister, Nor Konforty for design work in the very early stages of Synereo. Synereo clarifies at the time this rate was negotiated, AMPs didn’t exist yet. For reference, 3 million AMPs is only 3.5% of AMPs in circulation today and only .3% of AMPs in existence. The fighting over these issues will get likely ugly. There was considerable confusion during Synereo’s second crowdsale about how many AMPs existed and who controlled them. Synereo ended up burning 731 million AMPs.

Wait, what?  

that does sound very shady I would expect the community should demand 2M of that returned.

if that is how it went down then that is a huge red flag right there.

these tasks are meant to be offered out so that synerio holders get the best value for their money

was that at the time a good price to pay for what was delivered? i  know amps were far cheaper perhaps back then?

AMPs were dirt cheap back then and nobody wanted them.  Get over it.

[JoeyDaMan7]

https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/

1.  For example, there have been concerns over 3 million AMPs given to Dor’s sister, Nor Konforty for design work in the very early stages of Synereo. Synereo clarifies at the time this rate was negotiated, AMPs didn’t exist yet. For reference, 3 million AMPs is only 3.5% of AMPs in circulation today and only .3% of AMPs in existence. The fighting over these issues will get likely ugly. There was considerable confusion during Synereo’s second crowdsale about how many AMPs existed and who controlled them. Synereo ended up burning 731 million AMPs.

Wait, what?  

that does sound very shady I would expect the community should demand 2M of that returned.

if that is how it went down then that is a huge red flag right there.

these tasks are meant to be offered out so that synerio holders get the best value for their money

was that at the time a good price to pay for what was delivered? i  know amps were far cheaper perhaps back then?

-1 AMP this post. He's not a believer!

[FandangledGizmo]

So with the release can we expect another crowdsale in June that will wipe 90% off the share price & investors like last time

[Thereisnospoon]

So with the release can we expect another crowdsale in June that will wipe 90% off the share price & investors like last time

Good sarcasm but I guess no more cheep AMP

[FandangledGizmo]

So with the release can we expect another crowdsale in June that will wipe 90% off the share price & investors like last time

Good sarcasm but I guess no more cheep AMP

Not Sarcasm...

Think every investor who bought in their last Alpha release crowdsale never saw the price rise above it and those investors have lost circa 80-90% of their money, if they've been holding since but good luck with this one  (For short term speculators the price will probably rise a bit from here but I suspect they will burn everybody with some fundraising scheme around release time that will lose everyone money that actually invests in it.)

...It's a strategy that will likely end in them being able to sell only a fraction of the AMP they would have otherwise been able too and at a much lower price than the market may have paid. In fact speculative 'Alpha release' capital already invested in AMP may exit too, thus decreasing the current price. (Again ironically they would probably come to the incorrect conclusion they they price fixed too high in this case and not realise it was the act of price-fixing which caused it.)

[xtyling]

So with the release can we expect another crowdsale in June that will wipe 90% off the share price & investors like last time

Yes there will. Not in June but start of next year probably.

You know why ? Because the developers salaries are not that cheap!

Well but i think 4.7Million is worth the chrome add in they made. Continue the good work team!

[FandangledGizmo]

So with the release can we expect another crowdsale in June that will wipe 90% off the share price & investors like last time

Yes there will. Not in June but start of next year probably.

You know why ? Because the developers salaries are not that cheap!

Well but i think 4.7Million is worth the chrome add in they made. Continue the good work team!

If there will be definitely be no crowdsale during the June release then I think the price will do better than last time for the longer term investors.

[SynereoCommunity]

Repeat:
No further token sales are planned.


That S&C post was error filled, paid material coming from the side that started the problem, and lost.
Even when that was posted 4 months ago, the "controversy" they dredged up was over a year old and resolved.  
It had nothing to do with the split anyway.

Please leave the FUD outside of this thread, and leave dead issues in their graves!


This is where we are in 2Qtr 2017:

Synereo Announces First Attention Economy App Called Qrator

There is a lot of excitement regarding the Synereo project, and rightfully so. The team wants to focus on the Attention  Economy, rather than build yet another traditional social media platform that controls user content. The first tool towards achieving that goal has been released under the name of Qrator. An intriguing concept that allows anyone to monetize their content moving forward.

http://www.livebitcoinnews.com/synereo-announces-first-attention-economy-app-called-qrator/

[andyatcrux]

4 hour chart looks great. Next 12 hours should define whether or not we see a big run up. Technically speaking. Fundamentally, that is another factor. Just popping in to say I noticed a nice entry point here. (about 8000 sats) That is all. Good day to you.

[Legcorner]

Is it possible that greg dumps all the amps he will receive due his rdemtion phase?

Is that an issue?

[bitbitch]

getting very ahead of itself now. entering the danger zone for new investors.