If you want to store your coin with a Ledger Nano s, try this:

I've been using https://ledger-cp.herokuapp.com/

Read the fag before you use it though.

How is the fund, funded?

IOTA promises 0 fees.

What is to stop someone from spamming gigabytes of tx data or billions of transactions a second into the IOTA DAG?

What is broken?

This is why dollar cost averaging is your friend.

Funny thing is, if Litecoiner's could hold their coin and actually build an ecosystem, it could easily be worth several billion dollars.

It has everything in place, Seqwit, LN works almost out of the box, then they can add side chains and drive chains and actually start leading development that is currently only possible on Bitcoin testnets.

But nope, they won't do that as every Litecoin holder is weak, they don't believe in their own coin!

They can't develop and they can't hold their coin.

So what do you expect?

Instead of stupid chicken memes maybe they should be setting up LN nodes and building side chains?

Now Litecoin is technically in front when it comes to technical ability as compared to Bitcoin. Now this the time to steal back 2nd place.

Where is all this innovation?

Litecoiners spent years watching Bitcoin grow and complaining that they couldn't grow too. Thing is they wanted to grow with no work.

Now they are in front and this just shows that they haven't got the balls to lead.

What is wrong with their distributional method? I really like it.


Ok but with what differences?

For example, that's like saying Bitcoin is interesting, but Litecoin will be out soon.

It took years for there to be an Ethereum to challenge Bitcoin.

How many years before another DAG crypto is as revolutionary as the differences between ETH and BTC?

I don't want to wait for the LTC of the DAG world.

It seems that both IOTA and BB are advancing quite well and building up strong communities.

Litecoin has never been a crypto of strong holders.

Most litecoiners sell at the first sign of red and can't hold their coin.

It has always been this way.

From my research so far they are apples to oranges, they are both strong contenders and probably going to end up as duel kings of DAG crypto.

IOTA = Internet of things.
Byteballs = DAG for people, smart contracts.

At the moment IOTA is worth $116 million, essentially a top ten crypto in terms of market cap. To me this tells me the marketcap is mature.

I have bought a few IOTA although not too many as the marketcap is already huge.

IOTA is designed for the internet of things and attempts to allow the internet of things to transfer value fast and without the scaling limits of a blockchain.

Then we have Byteballs which isn't aimed at IoT but rather being a DAG crypto for the people with smart contracts.

Importantly the marketcap of Byteballs is quite small and not as huge as IOTA.

I would say that Byteballls is an early stage DAG crypto and IOTA a late stage fully mature DAG crypto.

If you have good reason to believe in this coin / token then dollar cost average.

Haha, oh how I miss the well constructed argument, "everything is scamcoin, scamcoin!!! scamcoin!"


Isn't development alive and well? This coin doesn't seem dead to me.

Is this like Bitcoin offline tx where another service provides the exchange until you commit to the blockchain?


Could this be a competitor to the Signal protocol?


And for anyone? How does one make an anon tx?

Is there a way to get historical data?

Correct me if I am wrong.

I understand that 1% if the currency has been held back by Tony as part of his investment for building Byteball and I totally 100% agree with that.

Now what about a dev fund? I don't think that the 1% is apart of a dev fund and I don't think it should be, if Tony builds this up he deserves that 1% as his reward for building this system.

However, Byteball should have a dev fund for the purposes of hiring more developers over the next 10 years, rewarding contributors, bug bounties etc..

I think this is something that the community could vote for.

I vote that an extra 1% or even 2% of the currency is withheld for the sole purposes of development outside of Tony's contributions.

This would be for other developers/bounties/etc. that Tony leads.

What is the communities opinion on this?

If successful it would take the total premine up to 2% or maybe maximum 3%, still far lower than most premines and ICO's.

The fund would allow Tony to eventually start getting more people on board.

It's not an issue now but imagine in 2 years and Byteball is worth $1 billion USD and being used by actual businesses and people.

He will need more than himself working on this project.

This is just my opinion feel free to tell me it's shit if you want.

Right now it's market cap is four times lower than IOTA, a coin with different goals but similar technology, just to put that in perspective.

How much of the supply does the dev team hold?

What is peoples opinions on the marketcap? Is this a bad time to buy in?

Marketcap = $116 million

Sweet, all setup now. Thank you very much.

Sorry if already asked, is there a light wallet?

Thanks for that.