شكرا اخي لترجمة الموضوع و الشكر كذلك المقدم هذه الخدمة.
الرائع في الأمر أن خدمات الموقع ملائمة مع المنتدى و موجهة خصيصا له. بانتظار ان يتم العمل على تطوير باقي الخاصيات مثل تعديل حجم الصورة و غيرها، التي ستسهل الأمر على أعضاء المنتدى خاصة من ليس لديهم دراية كافية بكيفية استعمال اكواد BBCode.
الخدمة أتت في الوقت المناسب خاصة بعد المشاكل التي لاحظناها مع موقع imgur و هو على حد علمي اكثر موقع رفع صور يتم استخدامه من قبل أعضاء المنتدى.
بالنسبة للدعم، اتمنى ان تقوم إدارة المنتدى بالتكفل بمصاريف الاستضافة و لما لا حجز سيرفرات ثانوية لحفظ نسخ من الصور في حال حدوث اي أشكال.

I'm not going to lie. Although I highly value my privacy, I've sent my documents to multiple platforms in order to complete kyc. I was kinda forced to do so, though.
Personally, I believe that the moment you upload your documents to the internet, you should consider them as compromised since no website/database is 100% safe.
However, you should not send your personal information to any random online service. Do it only with services that you trust.

Many wallets support sending to multiple addresses but few of them (one or two) support the Electrum seed format. Since you already have Electrum installed then better keep using it.
Except some minor bugs, no critical vulnerability has been reported in the recent Electrum versions. If your only goal is to send to multiple addresses, then any version above V3.3.3 should be fine.

This scam website is a copy-paste of [banned mixer] (I knew I've seen it before the moment I opened it), they just changed the logo/buttons color from purple to blue.
It's obvious the scammer is going to great lengths to promote his fake website and spread its link everywhere.
Thank you OP for exposing it and I encourage everyone to report it to the domain registrar.

^^
فقط حتى أؤكد كلامك، تم اعطاء برامج الذكاء الاصطناعي بعض المسائل المعقدة نسبيا و طلب منه حلها. و كان الاشخاص الذين اعطوه هذه المسائل على دراية بكيفية حلها او على الاقل لديهم الخبرة الكافية للحكم ان كان الحل المقدم صحيح او لا.
بعد تقديم الإجابة تبين ان فيها بعض الأخطاء او لنقل العيوب.
من طرح الأسئلة أخبر البوت ان اجابته خاطئة و اخبره العيوب او قام بالاشارة إليها. المدهش ان البوت اتعرف بخطئه و قام بتصحيح الأخطاء و أعطى إجابة صحيحة.
هنا، نكتشف انه لا يجب علينا الاتكال كلبا على هذه التقنية بل فقط الاستعانة بها و معرفة كيفية استعمالها..

الرسالة التي ظهرت لديك هي تقزيبا نفسها التي تظهر عندما تحاول الاتصال بموقع عن طريق http او تكون شهادة tls/ssl قد انتهت صلاحيتها.
لكن اتفق معك. كان على بينانص توضيح الاشكال بشكل أفضل لتجنب سوء الفهم من قبل المستخدمين.
اكثر مستخدمي بينانص ليس لديهم اي معرفة بالتقنية و لا يفرقون بين شبكة البيتكوين و شبكة الانترنات، كابسط مثال. لذلك كان على المنصة ان تبسط رسالة الخطأ او التحذير حتى يتمكن ن فهمها اي مستعمل و يعرف ما عليه القيام به.

شكرا لتحديث الموضوع نظرا لأهميته.
بصراحة لم اقم بإعادة المحاولة منذ فترة كوني اعرف ان النتيجة ستكون هي نفسها. توثيق الحساب عن طريق بطلقة الهوية في بلدي شيئ شبه مستحيل و السبب ليس حضر البلد بل بكيفية تصميم البطاقة.
ساحاول بعد فترة ان اقوم بتثبيت الهوية عن طريق جواز السفر (يجب أن انتظر إلى أن يتم تجديده) او انتظر إلى أن يتم اصدار بطاقات التعريف البيومترية، التي من المفترض أن تحل كل هذه المشاكل.

I'm not saying that I believe OP's story, at the same time am not siding with the casino, but in such cases, it's really difficult for the accuser (OP in this case) to prove his innocence. What kind of proofs do you think he can provide to support his case? How can he prove he doesn't have any alt accounts?
In such cases, the best thing to do is to refer to an independent mediator such as casinoguru or askgamblers then each party can submit their proofs and tell their side of the story.

Sorry for your loss OP!
However, am a bit surprised, disappointed at the same time, that there are users who still fall for such scams. It was obvious from their Ann thread that they weren't serious. They didn't even bother to buy a coper membership and post a proper announcement. Besides, it was also obvious that they weren't serious based on the bonuses they were offering, which were too good to be true.
My advice is to create a type 3 flag against them and wait for dt members to support it.

Sending your coins to a centralized exchange or any custodial service is the same as giving your money to a strange person, that you don't know, and ask him to keep it safe. The only difference, is that with licensed exchanges, there is a slight chance to get some of your money back when the exchange try to pull an exit scam or file a bankruptcy.
Cryptocurrencies started with bitcoin and all bitcoin is about is decentralization and being your own bank. So, better keep it this way and avoid all custodial/centralized services.

No need to over-complicate things, guys.
A custodial wallet is the wallet for which the service provider (usually the wallet dev), be it a web, software or hardware wallet, is the only one who knows the private keys.
A non-custodial wallet is the one for which the customer is the only one who knows/owns the private keys.
What is worth discussing and arguing about are wallets for which both the service provider and the customer know/own the private keys!

This may work but, tbh, it's not worth the hassle. He sent $5 and to cancel the unconfirmed transaction (send the coins back to his wallet), assuming his transaction is flagged as rbf, he will need to spend ~3-4 dollars minimum in fees.
Some may argue that 1-2$ is better than nothing, but what I would do is to contact customer support and see if they can help in crediting the sent amounts to my account balance, even if it's less than the minimum required.

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.

I answered this same exact question in one of my previous replies. It's called a "prediction game" and I quoted the definition from Wikipedia. For reference, it's not gambling. I don't blame you sine I posted my reply days ago and it has been buried under tons of other replies, so you have probably missed it.
I think it's useless to continue this debate as it's obvious no one reads what others say.

I'm a bit surprised by the replies of some members who say that you should leace the casino as soon as you make some profit. This is a bit absurd because what gamblers usually want is to have fun not to make a profit. Besides, according to their reasoning, you are at profit if you don't gamble, so my question is: why do you waste your time and money on an activity that you don't even like and exercising it would, most of the times, result in you losing money?

Back to the main subject, I have a question: can anyone give a clear definition of what is exactly a web3 casino? I read all the of the above replies and it seems that we are arguing about something that we don't even know what it is!
As per my experience, any casino which allows logging in via metamask or any other wallet that supports walletconnect, claims it is a web3 casino. Is this right?

This is your mistake. As I said above, just because a member is part of a signature campaign doesn't mean he can be trusted. You should always keep this in mind! You have been here for too long and am sure you remember the case whan many high ranked/trusted members were busted for being alt accounts. Some of them were part of the highest paying sig campaign, back in the time.
Anyway, I hope some of the defaulters will have some integrity and repay what you owe them.

^^
Am not going to talk about of the drawbacks of the wagering requirement such as addiction that you have mentioned above, since this is unrelated to the main topic. But I want to say that I disagree with LUCKMCFLY when he said that 10x is too high. This multiplier can be considered too high if he was talking about withdrawing without claiming any bonus. But for other bonuses, I'll say that it would be one of the lowest that I've ever seen. It's usually between 25 and 50x.

You are right. Gamblers gave to read the terms of the casino before signing up with them. And if they fail to comply with those terms then there is no one to blame but them. However, fir the sake of transparency, casinos have to make sure their customers are well informed about their terms. Posting them on the tos page is not enough. Gamblers need to read specific terms on each and every page. For example, if they are going to claim a bonus then a notification message warning them that they need to complete 10x wagering requirement before withdrawing is a must. If the casino doesn't do this, then this is a form of deception.

As stated above, they can not do this. They can't simply change their terms of service overnight to win a dispute against one or some of their customers. A scam casino may do it but a reputable one will never do it. Besides, as I said above, even if they introduce some changes to their ToS, the changes aren't supposed to have a retro-active effect. So, it's not going to change anything.