Its not about English, nor about ranks, but about the contribution a post adds to a discussion/thread. It won't be unfair for the ones who can find at least one valid reason to post something which is what the forum lacks now a days and that is why the system has been implemented. Have as many accounts as you like, but none of them would be of work if you can't compel the users to reward you with Merits for your posts.
By the way, posting twice in a row is against forum rules. You did it just now.

P.S: You got a Merit by someone, which you asked for in your post, indirectly. No offense. 

You can't, if you don't even know what their function is, or even what their name is. 
Read the OP properly before posting anything.

Hi.
These 2 users are also exchanging Merits for their posts in the same topic. I'm not very sure if they have discussed it before, but I have a doubt, because they have agreed to the same point while giving Merits to each other for it. Well, though it can be mutual thinking, but, I have also checked the other Extra Merit Points they got, and I thought they are not genuinely earned Points, atleast not all of them. You should have a look.

Here are the links to their profile and screenshots to their Merit summary:
User 1: Adioliver
Merit summary: https://imgur.com/8VxXYQz

User 2: Sasuke102001
Merit summary: https://imgur.com/tuWvM7M

I'm definitely happy with the new system. By close observations, a person can clearly see that the majority of the people on this forum don't even know what a quality post is. Most of them think "more characters = higher post quality", and just because of this false assumption they start making much more longer and way more useless posts to make them look like quality posts, while the quality of a post has nothing to do with its quantity of length.
Merit system can be (if not used with partiality) a permanent full stop for all those accounts created for nothing else but joining Signature Campaigns. And that thus leads to less spam, IMO.


People creating duplicate or useless threads in order to get Merits would not get any, because that is why this system is implemented. If the duplicate or spam threads start to get Merits then there is no use of the system as there is no restriction for anyone from any rank on creating threads.


Hopefully in future the campaigns will require Extra Merit Points (Beside the ones already given for each rank on implementation of the system) to join along with the rank. And if that happens, there will be no use of Meriting well-known signature campaign managers to get into their campaigns if you yourself have none.
About newbies and jr. members with high quality posts; you can already find them having Merits. My profile is an example of that. So yes, we can rank up if we deserve to, and if we don't, we won't.

Though it can be done if someone wants to do it, but I don't think anyone would do it as long as they are not willing to get their accounts neg tagged. Because you cannot hide it if you you are giving Merits to someone. If a person gives Merit to a post which is not constructive and deserving, it will be clear that it was decided before, and if a person can do constructive posts he doesn't need to buy any.
And, there is a one more thing that prevents selling Merits, it is that you cannot generate Merits out of nowhere. Before, people used to create a lot of accounts and used to increase their activity points to reach a certain rank and then sell those accounts. Now if you create an account, it has 0 Merits, and it cannot go higher than Jr. member without getting any Merits. And I doubt if someone creates accounts for the only purpose of selling them later on can make quality posts to get Merits from other members.

Boring? I don't think entertaining people was the idea in Satoshi Nakamoto's mind when he thought of creating Bitcoin. His purpose was to make a decentralized currency to provide a better mode of payment with lower fees and faster transaction times to the people. Today if people take Bitcoin as a source of earning money, that is totally a later-made concept and was never the primary focus of the currency. And no matter how stable it becomes, it will always be the same for the one's who are using it for all the advantages it provides beside its price.

We don't even need to discuss this over the baseless accusations of him. He did this only because we questioned a few things from the service he is running, and that's all. He should be warned for accusing us without any proof.

Lmao 
I can bring hundred such cases to accuse them of having multiple accounts if it is to give such nonsense references. You can't accuse someone without having any proper proof against them. Just because I quoted him to say something you think I'm his alt? Very well.
By the way, I was kind of taking your side by providing your ANN thread link in my reply which he said is not found anywhere.

Not sure about other things you said, but their ANN can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2586410.0
It is in Announcements (Altcoins) section, if you did not check there.
You are right about the exchange though. An exchange that trades in FLS (Fuloos Coin) only. Maybe it is made by themselves as well.

Every person has a different way of doing the same thing. No matter how many people make the same signature, but all of them will look different, and I'm sure my work will be different from others. And about the account, no one needs to worry about that as long as there are escrows on the forum for keeping the deal safe for both sides.
Anyway, Thank you for wishing me luck. 

Sorry to say, but only being a Legenday member is not enough to attract advertisers. You need to have a good post quality and a good enough grip on English as well. Your grammar is not up to the mark, and your posts are also not too attractive to make someone pay you for them.

Available.

 

I don't see any need of writing all this. He (the manager) can obviously see through your posts if you are a spammer or not, and this rather makes you look like a spammer, IMO.

Hi jacee!
I love your work. 
Actually, I'm also into signature designing but I'm new to this and I find it quite hard to draw logos most of the times. Some tips from a senior like you would be appreciated.
Thank You.

Mostly Bounties targeting social networks require the accounts being used to have real followers/friends and won't accept them if there are more than 20% fake followers/friends in an account. As long as the account has real friends & followers, you can use them in any campaign. But some campaigns also demand crypto related friends and followers, so you may have problems joining those if you buy an account which would probably not have crypto related friends or followers.

Well the only problem is that governments don't see it as we do. We have nothing to lose if it becomes mainstream, but we would rather be happy to get something extra to use beside the traditional money that we have been using for centuries. But governments see it somehow as a threat, as they know they won't be able to control its growth nor its supply at any cost. If they regulate it for the protection of people not killing it, and if people start using it more often then the economy which is in their hand, it will be a disaster for them, and that is what they don't want.

There is no point of such theories at all. We all know that no one really knows the creator of Bitcoin except the name 'satoshi' which is widely spread to be the creator of Bitcoin. Considering the fact that the creator have not been seen by an eye yet, anyone can make a theory or claim it was created by this or that. The only thing that we care about is we have Bitcoin, and who the hell had created it is not our concern as long as we are not being harmed by it. Sure the ones finding it harmful for them will try to raise those questions, but individuals won't be affected by this.

Bump for today.

Bump.