I agree with these, seems like banning Newbies and Jr. Members permanently is just a waste of time as these people are still free to create new accounts and losing Newbie and Jr. Member ranked account is not a big problem to them. I will agree more if we make Newbie and Jr. Member ranks completely useless. Remove signatures, can only post 5 or less per day (just a suggestion) and don't allow these ranks to join any bounties. Of course, the account will be useful after reaching Member rank as Signatures will be available again. Making Newbie and Jr. Member rank completely useless will make spammers to give up what they were doing.

If you're worried about "if your message will be read by the recipient" then you don't need to worry too much. Whenever someone receives a message from PM here in Bitcointalk, there is a notification that will be sent to the email address associated to the account of the receiver containing your message and when browsing Bitcointalk, a pop up notification will show up saying "You got new message" or something (sorry can't provide screenshot) so it means it makes sure that the recipient will see and may read your message.

One more thing, not because the recipient didn't reply to your message doesn't mean s/he doesn't read it.

Don't worry, that guy is just wasting his time. No matter how many times and how many accounts he create even though he use different names as long as he is posting shits, he will definitely end up banned over and over again. The problem is he is violating "Ban evasion" just like what @mdayonliner said.

At cases like this, we can't do anything to stop user that is banned permanently from making another account again because they will surely make another account again and again whenever they're account is banned. The best way we can do is to report them. Their account won't achieve anything.

Actually I think even spammers are reading the stickies and the rules here in Bitcointalk. The problem is even though they've read it, they're still not following it and they are still violating it because they know that what they were doing (posting spams for bounty quotas) are against the rules. Almost all forums in the web has its own rules even fittotalk, reddit and stackoverflow etc. so it means it's impossible that these spammers didn't know that such rules exists.

Okay okay, you got me there. I'm just having fun with ya  
Well you're right. It's a little bit rude in my opinion too and it's not right. Anyway about that, I asked Zapo first if it's just fine to switch to this campaign and I don't plan to leave IOU without his confirmation.
I just wanted to maintain the 0.012 btc I'm earning every week to buy a laptop (expecting) in this coming October. My laptop's spec is low and cannot even perform programming applications (it lags and crashes sometimes). I'm working on a thesis (software project) that will end before Christmas and I'm expecting that I can still make it. Anyway it's just fine for me to work with IOU as long as I'm working on a great manager  

It seems like I'm a IOU soldier messing up the BQT base.

Woah, don't be so serious bud. Seems like you didn't get the sarcasm. You looks ridiculous now  
So you mean we have no rights to support other/another project?  

---

What is this guy's talking about anyway?

I'm not also expecting the changes of rules in IOU campaign but I can still work with it as long as I'm working with Zapo. But if BQT campaign didn't change its rules as well, can I switch and work in here Zapo?

I will apply if its affirmative  
Thanks.

I really wish that the rules in IOU will be applied here too, so that it will be fair for IOU participants  

Well this is unexpected. Just recently I'm helping this guy to resolve his problem but it went even worse when this possible accounts has been added. Anyway, nice catch @Veleor, but we still need to prove it.

Well OP, to prove that the conversation you had with that extortionist is real, then I will be waiting for the result of this. Also, @mdayonliner is not a DT but I trust him as well. You can safely entrust your credentials to him just to verify that the conversation were real.

OP looks like you have two cases to prove..
1. The conversation with the extortionist.
2. Those possible alt accounts of yours.

Confirmed. Thanks Zapo.

Anyway, new rule accepted  

Edit. Just a question, is this new rule was also applied in BQT signature campaign?

Hey, it's a tradition, and tradition is something you cannot just break.

~Vance Wilder 

Yuph, the reporters badge are not even released yet (or not yet even implemented) so it means theymos doesn't have much time to do the implementation of these ideas.

I think he just don't have much time, let's just leave it to him as I assure he is working on it by now. But some problems may get even worse if those idea took too long before implemented.

Actually that's what I really don't know. I don't know what kind of evidence to suggest you to provide but one thing is certain, there is still something you can do to prove it than this story of yours that will be impossible for Mods to believe. For now, let's just wait for Moderators to response here in your thread and let's just wait what kind of evidence they can suggest you to provide. I'm sure there are still some way.

I'll leave it to the Mods for now.

There's no any consideration to unban an account once it is permanently banned except if you appeal to the link provided/sent to you by the forum and you're no even allowed to make an account again here in Bitcointalk because that would be another rule violation.


So sorry about your on going bounties but it's the end of the line. Your part is done here.

First of all I'm not accusing you as a scammer. Actually I'm helping you to this extortionist. I didn't said that you scammed the manager and I didn't said that you're a scammer either. I just want you to provide evidence whatever evidence you can provide to prove that it is not really your alt account.

Even yahoo62278 told you as well to provide evidence.

About this extortionist, I gave him/her Negative Trust as well.

There's nothing wrong about that I presume. What's wrong is why you've used your father's address if you knew that it will cause you trouble? That is the fishy part of your story.

Just like what you said in here
You've said that you're not a fool to use multiple accounts with the same address but you have done it already. I though your wise enough.

I don't really care and know what evidence can you provide to prove that it is really your father's account. But an evidence is a must in cases like this.

Also, the blackmailer will also receive enough consequences I guess. Maybe a Red tag. 

One more thing OP. Why don't you just posted this in here Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q3)?
If you think these accounts were connected then you must provide a clearer evidence that will prove your theory and please next time when you're going to post information like these, just use the link I've provided above. It is created to discuss known alt accounts of anyone.

So you mean the owner of this account ajqjjj is your father?

By looking at the case, this guy lapongetiasuu is blackmailing you. Though you need to provide some evidence that it's not your alt and is your father's account (which is difficult I guess, how can you prove it?)

About this blackmailer guy (which is pretty obvious that he/she is blackmailing you), what s/he were doing is wrong. I'm also not certain if blackmailing is Moderated or not.

That's a bit sad. But even though future companies and etc. stole your name and copyrighted it. The one and only Jet Cash that Bitcointalk knew is the legendary member who wear an avatar of cat with a hat. I mean in case that you've changed your username in the future, you will still be the same and people here will still recognise you. Just like Vod, whenever I see the guy in his avatar around in internet (even it's not licking his boobs) the one who came to my mind is Vod. You guys are really lucky to have your avatar

If ever that you ask theymos to change your username, maybe you can just remove the "Cash"  

Well I agree.

There are already some smart bounty managers that uses Google form as a way of reporting status of their participants "Twitbooks report" (those massive links that we can see in bounties) but seems like even though it is much better to use Google form to somehow lessen spam posts, most of those bounty managers still want their participants to post the links of their reports. Maybe because they also want their bounty thread to be bumped by spammer.

About banning Twitter and Facebook, well I've no idea if it will be a good move. No comments for now.

Oops. Sorry for the off-topic.

Then I will not be able to call you Sir Jets again  

Anyway, I didn't really know that your username was associated with anything. I thought it's just a username. Sometimes it made me think why "Jet Cash" is the username you've chosen to use, I'm confused of the "Cash" hehe.
Actually I don't see anything wrong with it. I think it will be just fine even though your name was associated with something. It's just a username and everybody can put any username they want. Also you already used the username before they even know it. But, if you're really serious about changing your username, may I know what username will it be?