There are lot of scammers we had encountered from the past and I'm pretty sure that we will still encounter scammers in the future. But in this topic we will focus on Scammers from Signature Campaigns. We are just participants, when we found an interesting signature campaign. We apply immediately without hesitation, and that's the common problem why we are getting scammed. Because we are careless, but is it really our fault? Or those fucking scammers who made those fucking scam Campaigns? We just wanted to earn bitcoin and because of our excitement we didn't even notice that the campaign is suspicious. Besides that, we will be called "shitposters" because we apply in suspicions campaign. Im just thinking that maybe we can do something to avoid these scam projects. For example, in a particular campaign. Why it is hard for the Manager to escrow the funds? What's the problem? Are they scared? Or because they can manage a campaign without escrow? I know that some signature campaign still pays their participants although they didn't have escrow. But usually those are trusted Managers. But how about those Campaign managers with "Newbie" accounts. They know that they're untrusted but still they don't want to have escrow. Then they will say that "we are not scam, we dont force you to join if you dont want". If they are really not a scam. Let's somehow prove it by having an escrow. I think we should add "Having Escrow is required " to the rules of our Forum for Every Signature Campaigns that will be made here in Bitcoin Forum>Economy>MarketPlace>Services and also for other campaigns here (I'm not including Signature Campaigns and bounties in the Altcoin Section as they give tokens not Bitcoins) . This is to avoid scammers only, not to destroy their images. Every single campaign should have escrow except if the Manager is a trusted member of the forum. Guys What do you think?  I still need your suggestions about this idea. We should act immediately. That is a good idea, having escrow is required will reduce scam bounty campaign. But before getting into a signature campaign, its our job to study first and research the project of the ICO if its good to promote the campaign and not going or less likely to be a scam campaign. Yeah. That's right. It will definitely reduce scam Campaigns and actually, if ever that a campaign has been escrowed. There's a possibility that it is not a scam project. Sometimes escrow also take time to review their project to determine whether it is a scam or not. And having an escrowed campaigns leave us relieved from worrying. |
|
|
|
Hi Manager. Is this campaign really doesn't have avatar? Because it is just Signature campaign (obviously). But if you want to let the participants to wear an avatar of bitflyers if they want. I provided a avatar here |
|
|
|
|
Well, I think there's no more suggestions about my idea. But I still wish for this one to be implemented to the forum's rule. I hope someone from the Moderators notice this little idea of mine.
|
|
|
|
I would like to apply. But, I think you need to atleast have an Escrow. Since you looks like new in Managing a campaign. Please provide escrow. Thanks. I will fill up my application when campaign is escrowed. I'm really willing to join.
I want to participate. Please have time to review my post if I'm qualified. Bitcoin Talk Name: Silent26 Bitcoin Talk Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1091163;sa=accountRank: Full Member Post Count (including this post): 367 BTC Address: 3JxvYBTV3mFiWpQADUe3xUHJspYPr5ncDF |
|
|
|
Btctalk name: Silen26
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 366
BTC Address: 3JxvYBTV3mFiWpQADUe3xUHJspYPr5ncDF
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes (Loading)
Hi Manager, I will remove my Signature and Avatar now Since I'm not accepted to participate. Thank you. I wish to work with you soon if I will be given a chance. |
|
|
|
|
Btctalk name: Silen26
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 366
BTC Address: 3JxvYBTV3mFiWpQADUe3xUHJspYPr5ncDF
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes (Loading)
|
|
|
|
|
Good day Manager. I'm just asking when exactly is the payment day for our signature. It's already 2 weeks ago but still don't have updates about the payment. Please, Manager, Respond immediately.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Hi Sir. I just want to ask if I'm accepted to participate. Because I'm not included in the spreadsheet  Please respond. Thank you. |
|
|
|
I don't understand this topic.
Someone asked you password and wallet ID, you gave it to him and you are warning everyone not to do this?
Why would anyone share password and ID?
I just don't get it.
I think this topic is somehow helpful. Yes you're right, he gave his password and Wallet ID but it's a new wallet. It's just fine to send it to anyone since there's no bitcoin in it. It's just for testing if the person he encountered is really going to give him 1 Bitcoin. Luckily, he noticed that the bitcoin in his wallet is not received and just a fraud. He made this topic just to warn everyone, and it is a good idea.The lesson from this topic is, don't trust someone easily. Most of all are people from social medias. Because fraud is everywhere, just waiting for their right time to victim us. |
|
|
|
I think this suggestion will only work on Bitcoin, Because in altcoin section they are only paying you altcoin, even if they escrow it, we still unsure if this token really has value after the ICO. That why we call it as Shitcoin in the altcoin section.
I know that bounty hunter need an assurance in order for their work to not wasted, I think the reason of some of the Campaign Manager
to not have an escrow, is to prove that they can become a trusted member even though they are only newbie, like strawbabies, When Strawbabies started his Campaign Manager business here in the forum, he is only a Newbie , if I'm not mistaken (Note: He is also the Escrow of that Campaign), and I'm one of the participants of his first campaign. Although many people have doubt about him, he still continues that campaign and became one of a trusted member that I know.
Yuph. That's right Silent, Like what I said, It will be good for campaigns with Bitcoins as their Payments. But I'm sure that we can still find solutions to avoid scam in Altcoins too in the future. Also, a Newbie Member can still gain trust although his/her campaign is escrowed. By having escrow is just a proof that he/she is worth to trust. I'm sure that anyone wants to earn people's trust here but, this idea is just to make it's participants calm about their payments. What do you think? Ps. I've learned something to your post  . So those tokens are the one called "Shitcoins". I already heard about this "shitcoins" before and wondering what it is. But I'm just too busy to find out what it is and forgot to search it through internet. Thankfully you mentioned it |
|
|
|
There are lot of scammers we had encountered from the past and I'm pretty sure that we will still encounter scammers in the future. But in this topic we will focus on Scammers from Signature Campaigns. We are just participants, when we found an interesting signature campaign. We apply immediately without hesitation, and that's the common problem why we are getting scammed. Because we are careless, but is it really our fault? Or those fucking scammers who made those fucking scam Campaigns? We just wanted to earn bitcoin and because of our excitement we didn't even notice that the campaign is suspicious. Besides that, we will be called "shitposters" because we apply in suspicions campaign. Im just thinking that maybe we can do something to avoid these scam projects. For example, in a particular campaign. Why it is hard for the Manager to escrow the funds? What's the problem? Are they scared? Or because they can manage a campaign without escrow? I know that some signature campaign still pays their participants although they didn't have escrow. But usually those are trusted Managers. But how about those Campaign managers with "Newbie" accounts. They know that they're untrusted but still they don't want to have escrow. Then they will say that "we are not scam, we dont force you to join if you dont want". If they are really not a scam. Let's somehow prove it by having an escrow. I think we should add "Having Escrow is required " to the rules of our Forum for Every Signature Campaigns that will be made here in Bitcoin Forum>Economy>MarketPlace>Services and also for other campaigns here (I'm not including Signature Campaigns and bounties in the Altcoin Section as they give tokens not Bitcoins) . This is to avoid scammers only, not to destroy their images. Every single campaign should have escrow except if the Manager is a trusted member of the forum. Guys What do you think? I still need your suggestions about this idea. We should act immediately. That's a good idea, but this requires more attention from the moderators of the forum. And the Bounty Managers have to be informed about it, after all, they are the ones making profit out of it. Another problem though, some ICOs only generate the tokens during the ICO, that would be too late for an escrow to actually get the coins, as most Bounty campaigns begin 2-3 month earlier since the ICO has been launched. Yeah you're right. But In this thread I'm pointing at Campaigns made in Bitcoin Forum>Economy>MarketPlace>Services and also for other campaigns here (I'm not including Signature Campaigns and bounties in the Altcoin Section as they give tokens not Bitcoins)
Because you're right, Campaigns that offers tokens can only pay participants after they generate tokens during their ICO, and it's really hard to get Escow in this kind of situation. But I'm talking about is Campaigns that will pay BTCitcoin. We must prioritise having an Escrow to campaigns with Bitcoin as payment. We are just starting to develop (Actually this is still just an idea of mine) this solution that's why we don't have to rush, we must focus on a certain place first. We will find solutions about avoiding scam in Altcoins too after this one has been confirmed or implemented by our Moderators in our forum's rules. |
|
|
|
There are lot of scammers we had encountered from the past and I'm pretty sure that we will still encounter scammers in the future. But in this topic we will focus on Scammers from Signature Campaigns. We are just participants, when we found an interesting signature campaign. We apply immediately without hesitation, and that's the common problem why we are getting scammed. Because we are careless, but is it really our fault? Or those fucking scammers who made those fucking scam Campaigns? We just wanted to earn bitcoin and because of our excitement we didn't even notice that the campaign is suspicious. Besides that, we will be called "shitposters" because we apply in suspicions campaign. Im just thinking that maybe we can do something to avoid these scam projects. For example, in a particular campaign. Why it is hard for the Manager to escrow the funds? What's the problem? Are they scared? Or because they can manage a campaign without escrow? I know that some signature campaign still pays their participants although they didn't have escrow. But usually those are trusted Managers. But how about those Campaign managers with "Newbie" accounts. They know that they're untrusted but still they don't want to have escrow. Then they will say that "we are not scam, we dont force you to join if you dont want". If they are really not a scam. Let's somehow prove it by having an escrow. I think we should add "Having Escrow is required " to the rules of our Forum for Every Signature Campaigns that will be made here in Bitcoin Forum>Economy>MarketPlace>Services and also for other campaigns here (I'm not including Signature Campaigns and bounties in the Altcoin Section as they give tokens not Bitcoins) . This is to avoid scammers only, not to destroy their images. Every single campaign should have escrow except if the Manager is a trusted member of the forum. Guys What do you think? I still need your suggestions about this idea. We should act immediately. Those are some good ideas to implement on the form. Usually scams adapt to the situations they have to go through. As much escrow would be a good solution, scams will find a way around it. :| Hmmmmm. Nope, there's no other way for them to scam us once a campaign already hired an escrow. There's no doubt that they can still make fraud if the funds are being escrowed by our trusted Escows. At least, knowing that a campaign is already escrowed is a relief to every participants. A campaign that doesn't want to escrow their funds will be suspicious and even considered as a scam. Except if (Like what I said in my thread) the Manager is a trusted one. You know, its pretty obvious if a manager didn't want to hire escrow. The question is, why they don't want to prove if their project really is not a scam. The fees for escrow is not too expensive right? But why can't they even do it for their project's sake? |
|
|
|
I do know how the system works. When a campaign happened to be a scam it will be reported directly to the scam accusation right? But with this idea, we will somehow prevent a scam project/campaign before it starts. So that no one will be a victim of scam Campaigns in the end. What do you prefer? 1. Joined a campaign>Been scammed>Reported to scam accusation. Or 2.Prove that the campaign is not a scam by having Escrow as a requirement of every campaign before it start>Get Paid. |
|
|
|
|
Hi Manager. When is the payment for first week?
Edited: The Manager is still not responding. Im worried about the payment for this past week. It's already been a week later but there are still no update about the payment. Please respond Manager.
|
|
|
|
Well, there's no doubt that you are Good Quality Poster besides from being a camgirl. Your merit also proves it and I think it's enough for you to participate signature campaign although your just a Jr.Member. I'm pretty sure that you will rank up too so soon. Your participation will be a good contribution to a campaign who will scoop you up. Well, Good luck Lady |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
