I think basically the same.


Yes, today most pay for at least part of the weekly required posts on local boards, and some pay for posts on local boards without limit. So, as you say, local merit sources can also encourage people who are not fluent in English to create constructive content and they can also get paid for it in their local section.

I'm not surprised to see some of these threads on the forums but this one takes the cake. The OP worried about a supposed liquidity crunch to sell his two bitcoins, when the bitcoin market is extremely liquid, more for those amounts and open 24/7. There was liquidity crunch in 2008, what there is now with some rate hikes doesn't even remotely resemble it, just look at inflation is still rising.

So, if you want to sell, OP, sell, because at the end of the day we cannot be 100% sure how the price will go, although it will most likely go up over the next year, but not because of a supposed lack of liquidity that does not exist. sgbett has given you good advice as well.

The bankroll is used to avoid the risk of bankruptcy in the face of bad streaks, which is usually achieved with a good mentality and downgrading when the money in the bankroll reaches a limit. As mentioned, there are more aggressive or less aggressive strategies, and, in particular, as I do not usually play sports betting I can not give specific advice but the only one is to downgrade, if you can, when you reach half bankroll. That is, if you start with $100 and are going to make $5 bets, if you lose a total of $50, leaving you with a bankroll of another $50, you have to reduce the size of the bet to $2.5, if you can. You should always lower the bet size when your bankroll reaches half, unless you are already at the lowest level.

But you can also increase the bet size when you reach double bankroll, that is until you reach a level where you are comfortable that it is worth your while to make withdrawals. Then you don't go any higher - you can set a 200x bet as your bankroll and withdraw anything over that.

I'll try to remember for next time as I agree that it is surely better to understand what happened chronologically. Although I don't think it is too bad to delete the previous one and I have seen it done in other cases. The bad thing is that once you delete the feedback you can no longer restore it on the same temporary location, but in any case in my new one I refer to the old one.

I have heard about it, and especially in case 1:


This is something I keep repeating. Patterns are human constructs that we plot to understand random series of events, and they are patterns that get shattered as we get more data from the series.


In order for this not to happen to you, apart from understanding about patterns you should understand about mathematical expectation. If there is any “pattern” there it is that you were having too much luck, to put it in colloquial terms, not that you were on a streak that could continue.

No, I don't consider it and in terms of poker they are not usually the best. 2plus2 is much better than the Pokerstars forum, for example. I imagine that the houses do it to cover the social component but if you want to look for the best information you better do it outside the house.

That's what I don't understand. Aren't small amounts like this, considered as dust can't be sent in a valid transaction?

Regardless of this, paying that much seems like bullshit to me, and the assumption is that the one paying is because he expects that fucking satoshi to be worth more in the future.

First, thanks to NotATether for letting me know about this. I am always open to change my feedback and more so if it is in a blatant case like this. Apart from changing it I have also supported the flag.

Hey dkbit98, on the other forum you say the only positive they had was mine. I don't know if it's a matter of your custom trust list but julerz12 is on DT2 and had also left positive feedback for them. Maybe someone should let him know about this too.

It is not whether it is necessary or not. Good inflation indicates economic growth but what we have today is high inflation due to the devaluation of the currency and the indebtedness of the states.


This is false. Already since Roman times the rulers found a way to devalue the currency by introducing copper alloys and other metals, but people soon realized it and prices went up.

For me, learning what a bankroll was and managing it was the step prior to establishing a budget in my life and managing it as well. It was like the background of my personal finances and getting my financial life in order.

What is clear to me is that if Samourai wallet were to somehow become able to operate it was not going to be able to have an Ann thread on Bitcointalk, nor a signature campaign either. For sig campaigns there are only exchanges and casinos. And let's hope they don't go after them in the future as well.

There is one other thing I saw in the DoJ report that you don't cite, that they were bragging about working for “grey and black markets”, so they were acknowledging working for illegal activities. If you simply defend privacy and work for it, surely you can defend yourself better when you are accused of money laundering, at least with that of plausible deniability, saying that you offer privacy and you don't know if any of your many honest customers is a criminal.

When I read the OP I already knew it was going to be a quote taken out of context like this. When I read the OP I already knew it was going to be a quote taken out of context like this. The title will be true, that every day there is a growing interest but little by little and from very low levels, as hugeblack says. From there to the image that the OP had painted for himself (and for us) is a long way off.

Well, yes, but because poker gives me income on a regular basis. If you bet in a casino and plan what to do with the jackpot money, it is not a very serious planning because you don't know when you are going to win, and by the time you win you will surely have spent more money in that game than the one you win, so it would have been better for you to save it.

That's not the point, it's precisely the possibility of winning money that makes gambling fun. The problem is not so much getting money from it as being aware that the odds are against you and that, although in some sessions you may end up positive, in the long run you are going to lose money. Nobody should sell you a system to beat the house, such as Martingale, because they are bullshit.

What a load of bullshit. The OP does not understand basic economic issues, such as that a product cannot cost the same in a country where the product is easily and abundantly produced as it does in a country that does not produce it and has to import it. Nor in a country where it is in high demand than in a country where it is not.

I don't know the specific case of Canada but I'm sure it happens like in most of the world: the moment you use bitcoin to buy something else, be it cryto, gold or whatever is a taxable event. It does not happen like in investment funds in some countries that you can make transfers without paying taxes until you convert the funds to money.

I see that the fees have dropped below 100 sats/vByte, which is a relief but affects those depositing low amounts, such as between $10 and $50. But I think if we wait a little longer they will become even more reasonable, although I would not rule out more spikes in the future.

That's wrong. From the moment he earns money in the casino, a taxable event is produced for which he will have to pay taxes, unless where they live they do not tax casino winnings for taxes. And when he spends it, a taxable event is also created on the difference in price when he won it and when he spent it.

I suppose that since it is in El Salvador it will be given a lot of hype but there have been cases of hackers obtaining data even from ministries in other countries.


I think the same. The company had an obligation not only to develop good software but to keep it updated securely.