No, actually now we have more proof of how dumb you are and the bullshit you say.

In 2023 suchmoon wrote

8 posts in April 2023
25 posts in June 2023
0 posts in May 2023
10 posts in July 2023

That's because unlike casino games, a poker room is more attractive the more players it has, and in that they can't beat the main fiat sites, mainly PS. Apart from the collusion issue that has been mentioned. As GxSTxV says (without getting into what happened to him):


If you play roulette, no matter how many people are in the room, you can arrive, start playing instantly and continue 24/7 if you want. In poker you have to wait for other players to enter, be it cash, sits, spins, tourneys or whatever. Without traffic they take longer to start if they do start.

PS, apart from the fact that to play there you are identified via KYC, has a whole department dedicated to monitor and investigate possible cases of fraud and collusion.

In this case, a platform via Telegram, it is noted that they are putting dedication and effort to attract customers but unless they change to a self-hosted web I do not think they can get many and in any case as I say I think crypto poker sites have a hard time, unlike the many and very profitable crypto casinos out there.

I guess you don't know much about playing poker in person. In general, if you play the lower levels, which are usually $1/2 or $2/5, you don't need to change your strategy. Usually there are already quite a few recreational players (one way to identify them is that they are drinking alcohol at the table) and versus them playing few hands, for value and aggressively is usually enough to win.

That of changing strategy is for tables full of regs and pros, typical of higher levels but you need a lot of money to get into them in live poker.

Think that in low level tables, for example $2/5, a full stack is $500, and you should have several available in case the variance screws you.

For now, good, because I see that I have increased my merits, the shame is that they do not generate smerits and that tomorrow I will not have them. On the other hand very funny to see some with negative merit.

Edit: lol I see my merits have gone down now.

There's no anger. I am trying to explain to you in a rational way that the merits should be given mainly for posts that have quality, not giving them to a person who you like simply because you like him, while you take it as a personal attack.

It seems incredible that with how long you've been on the forum I have to explain this to you and you don't understand it. I guess it's because of the time you've spent in the WO thread, since everything is different there and is tolerated.

Come on! Merits do not have to be given to someone because you like him, nor because he is a campaign manager who pays his participants, which is what he is supposed to do.

As I said before, if it wasn't you, someone else doing the same thing would have a dozen people telling him what I'm telling you but since it's you you get a pass, which doesn't take away that you are misusing the merits giving them to people because you like them or because they are good campaign managers.

Why am I not surprised?

I agree with Jawhead999 and mindrust.

Coming from someone who participates in a campaign known for the poor quality of what its members write, with a few exceptions, who takes a loan for gambling although when applying for it he says it is for personal use, that he now comes up with this supposedly great idea that involves not knowing anything about what the merit system was created for, well, I am not surprised, as I say.

I think you are a person who doesn't have much money but has a lot ideas about what rich people would do.

So, let's say you bought Bitcoins 100 at $1 and now with your great idea to avoid paying taxes you donate them when they are worth $70,000. The tax authorities in your country will charge you capital gains tax for 6.999.900 (assuming a moderate rate of 20%, you would have to pay 1.399.980). And besides, you would have run out of Bitcoins, so I don't know what you were going to be able to pay with.


In your friend's example, if what he donated was money, capital gains tax does not apply because there is no capital gain, but with Bitcoin it does.

When it is said that the house always wins it is because of the big numbers. For the house, to run casino games that have an HE is EV+. But a casino is a business like any other and to keep it running other factors come into play, such as being able to attract enough customers to spend enough. Plus as mentioned Trump plaza was not just a casino.

In other words, if I wanted to set up a casino, and I bought you for example the Bitz, what else would I need to do to be able to run it properly? At the moment I can think of a good bankroll, to set up maximum bets and hire a couple of people to work on it when I can't so that it can be running 24 hours a day.

I think the minimum investment would be several tens of thousands of dollars.

Do I have to tell you that this is wrong?

That's not what the merit system was created for.

To be honest with you philipma1957, you can say that because you have been on the forum since 2012, you are the human user who has written the most posts etc., otherwise anyone who said that would be severely criticized and I would personally have left a neutral tag on your profile about it.

I also like him but I've never given him any single merit just because I like him.

Besides I don't think it's simply because you like him, more a way to compensate for your stance against him being appointed a merit source.

It couldn't be better summarized. For the average citizen, the best thing to do is not to get into debt, the only exception being to take out a mortgage to buy a house. The rest is best avoided. Consumer loans will only make you poorer and are crazy from a financial point of view. And "good" debt, as advocated by Kiyosaki, most people on the street do not know how to handle it.

Is that Nigerian Naira currency? It's just that I just looked it up and I see it's the equivalent roughly to $1.2, and I imagine the Nigeria cost of living is lower but I don't imagine it's such a large amount to make a cashout.

You don't have much idea what you're talking about. Nowadays there are few "trash players" as you say, even at the lowest levels, and I would like to find tables full of players going all in just to bluff as it happened 15 years ago.

To address the OP's question, everything has its advantages and disadvantages. In general when playing poker in person the opponents are worse but you need more capital, the games are slower and you have to go there. Online you can play comfortably from home, use statistics programs and although the tables are tougher you can play a much higher number of hands per hour, compensating for the lower winrate.

With how poorly you explain yourself, if you are trying to get people to come to your forum you are going to get the opposite, either no one is going to come, or only people who have a similar capacity of comprehension to your capacity of expression are going to come.

Well, I think that as long as you add a human touch and don't just copy-paste, it's not so bad. I consult AI practically every day, and I think that in the near future using it will be as common as using the internet today. In fact, I believe that search engine searches like google are going to be replaced by AI searches.


Without knowing exact data, it has certainly grown, as has the use of AI around the world.

What I fear about this is that the day will come when you will be able to tell an AI: "write a text about X but that it cannot be detected as written by an AI" and it will do it correctly, in an undetectable way. Then account farmers like this will be able to make gold, although I don't know what effect it will have on everything globally. For example, if when visiting a forum you can't be sure whether you are talking to humans or to text massively written by AIs, I don't know if people will lose interest in the forums.

Look, nowadays I don't play poker as much but when I played at least 1K hands every day and there were days when I played 5K, I can assure you that it was common to see plays with a probability of less than 5% every day. Improbable events do happen. Things like a fish paying you on the flop with nothing (other than a backdoor gutshot , a gutshot opening on the turn, and the magic card appearing on the river for him have not surprised me for a long time. That's what you should have a good bankroll for.

But how do you collect all the results? In poker we have programs that collect all the moves and with them we can make statistical analysis but playing slots?

But I think LoyceV already posted that in another thread, didn't he?


Although it's not bad to talk in a separate thread about it. So I understand that under 1.000€ you could transact without identifying yourself with a company in the EU, and P2P I imagine that there are no limits (apart from the fact that they would be very difficult to enforce).