The problem is how many of the new shitcoins are going to pumped hard, especially compared to the ones that are going to lose value and go to 0 fast. I hope that woman, assuming she is a woman, gets thrown in jail soon for scamming. For that she better recommend people to play the lottery directly. She is telling people that a good way to earn money is to play the lottery, but in this case buying shitcoins.

Lol. Ask a mathematician who specializes in statistics applied to games and you will see how he tells you that luck does not exist. What we call luck is a shorthand for variance, or statistical deviation of average outcomes.


It does not make sense. If you mean on a given day, it may be 1 or it may be 10, but in the long run, the larger the sample, the more towards the average the results tend.


Any supposed correlation in this sense is the result of pure imagination.


Of course not.

What you say is not accurate, shasan. If you see the negative feedback I left LL, I refer to the delay in processing large withdrawals. And in a thread on Reputation where we talked about it I said:


But in the end, people who have certain habits, a personality, it is impossible for them to change it when they have reached a certain age, and I don't know how old LL will be, but I'm sure he has reached the age where one no longer changes his personality.

I agree with you, and that's the first thing I thought when I read the OP. However, I think this is going to become more popular than we would like. Just like people use custodial wallets and buy Bitcoin on centralized exchanges, they will buy Bitcoin in their 401k or equivalents when the option is implemented. I have a pension plan, not a 401k exactly because I don't live in the USA, and I don't have Bitcoin there. The Bitcoin I do have is managed by me with my private keys. It makes the most sense.

I don't think it is a question of should or shouldn't. In general, someone wealthier is going to tend to play at higher stakes as a matter of percentages. A multi-millionaire can lose tens of thousands of dollars in a one night session and not bat an eye, as what he lost is a small percentage relative to his wealth. There would be no point in playing smaller stakes because it would not be exciting enough and a multi-millionaire is not going to find it exciting to walk away with $100 profit if he has a good session and wins that night.


Less risk in absolute terms but not in relative terms. Let's say that someone with an annual income of $0.5M can leave in the casino with little risk to his finances 1% per month, which would be $5K. Someone with an annual income of $50K should leave a maximum of $50, which is much less in absolute terms, but still 1% of their annual income.

Well, it's also good for the network, since a higher hashrate means more security. What I wonder is whether increasing the energy level for mining won't fuel the narrative that Bitcoin consumes too much energy and is not environmentally friendly.


Most of us believe it is most likely. It is certainly not a sure thing, but like everything in life and in investments, there is always a risk you have to take, a level of gamble that you don't know if it will work out. That double price would mean reaching $90K and I think all of us in this think it will reach and pass $100K, otherwise it's going to be the most catastrophic cycle by far since Bitcoin was launched.

Well, if you look at the site of the best investor in the world, it looks like it's on ftp or something. It's laughable:

https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/

So, if freebitco.in has a business that is doing very well, with increasing revenue every year, I don't see why they have to change the design. What they have been doing over time is implementing more functionalities, some of which worked and stayed and others didn't (I'm thinking of cloud mining for example). So I don't see it as a priority to change the design.

I see two things here. One is that unfortunately it is not the first time I have seen an addict say that he has requested to close the account or be self-excluded to then be able to freely access the site. It seems to me that at least in some cases there may be an intentionality on the part of the room, which I am not saying it is in this case.

The second has to do with owlcatz's comments. In cases like this I see the addict complaining a lot about the site, and forgetting about himself. Here the most likely scenario is that if the OP had not been able to access Rollbit he would have gone to another room where he would have deposited and most likely lost the money as well. So better to focus on curing the addiction.

Well, here I go to my point, and that is that there are people who have an income thanks to gambling, although it is a little more difficult to be steady and regular, but playing poker for example, if you play cash it is more regular than if you play tournaments. What I'm getting at is that some people's income is poker, or sports betting. But for most of them it is a complement, an extra income and it is important to have another stable income to be able to afford expenses. Apart from that, good bankroll management and good personal finance management in general is also necessary.

As a general rule, economic downturns are fabulous opportunities to buy on the cheap. I know people who struck gold in the 2007 crisis by buying Real Estate at bargain prices. If stocks and shares are your thing, you can take advantage to buy cheap when there is a downturn. Or buy Bitcoin, the recent inflation crisis coincided with a drop in price to $17K. When there is panic in the streets and everyone is selling it is an opportunity to buy.

As far as I can see, nothing has changed. Again with delays in processing withdrawals, just like one of the signature campaigs has been paused, again, after the other one was paused recently, because it hasn't refilled the escrow and doesn't give signs of life. It seems like groundhog day all over again.


Yes, this is the most normal thing that can happen, but this is not the way a serious person and a serious business operates.

Without knowing too much about the subject, I understand that this is due to pure statistical variability. An improbable but not impossible event that ends up happening, just as there are people who hit the lottery jackpot, however improbable it may be. As of today I see that they are the first mining pool, so it is not so strange.

I don't usually tag the newbies in this section for asking for a loan without collateral, but I come here from time to time and in this case I did because as much as it is a sobbing story it doesn't hold up.



Source: Education and Living Cost in Bangladesh.


I'm also not going to do much research on how the university system works specifically in Bangladesh because I'm sick of seeing these kinds of sobbing stories that are nothing more than covert scam attempts but I find it very hard to believe that you're going to lose the subjects you've passed simply because you can't pay. I mean, if you are studying a 4 year degree and you have passed 3 years, with those 3, even if you can't pay now, when you can pay in the future you should be able to enroll in the fourth year again, if not in that university in another one where you can transfer your transcript after a transfer procedure or credit recognition.

Well, it is clear that as has been commented, if someone asks you to give him money to win a bet you can be sure that it is a scam. But there is one thing that is not so clear to me.


Oh no? And where did it pay for it? Out of thin air?

I would appreciate an explanation on this, if possible with link to back it up, because it seems quite counter-intuitive. In modern slots this is clearly not the case, and some time ago I saw a program on Las Vegas in which they explained it but the statement you make seems to me too counterintuitive not to question it.

Well, considering that 20K nigerian naira is $14.5 at the exchange rate, yes, yes I have taken risks of that amount and higher. Nigeria being a low GDP per capita country I understand that that $14.5 may feel like higher amounts in other parts of the world, but it still doesn't seem like a crazy bet to me either. It all depends on one's personal situation, that is, income, job stability, savings and investments or dependents. With that in mind I guess that's why the OP experienced it as a high risk situation.

Well, no, this summary is not correct. Reputation is not teleported by default, you can pay to have it done, but I don't think anyone is dumb enough to have negative reputation (at least clearly negative, with more negative feedback than positive from DT) and pay to have it teleported.


Source: Altcoinstalk shop.

Sounds pretty much like a made-up story to me but for the sake of argument I will respond. Personally no, I don't go inviting around with the profits I get from playing poker. I consider it as one more source of income that is added to my total monthly income, with the difference that at the beginning of the month when I make the budget I don't know how much I am going to make that month (not even if I am going to have a profit, but in most months I get some). With that total income I make a forecast of expenses that includes donations and money for leisure where I can buy dinner or drinks. This is how I do it.

Personally and as of today I would not leave feedback on any account on this forum because of what happens on another one. If something happens in that forum it is a problem there, as several members have said.

I think in fact that what the OP raises is less of a problem than the opposite: people with a bad reputation here being teleported there, as they don't put problems to people with several red tags to be teleported. But in any case that's that forum's problem, not ours.

I will agree with the comments of my colleagues that the website has a lot of room for improvement.


It is simply a site with affiliate links, if you scroll over the casino banners you will see it. 


That's it. The faucets give you free money but it is so little that you can't even withdraw it, unless you spend months with the faucet until you accumulate the minimum amount. It is the way they have to attract people to deposit and bet. freebitco.in is very successful precisely because of that.

That and having a minimum idea about how the markets work and the returns that can be obtained, in order to be able to detect right away scams just by the profitability offer. Someone who offers you $400 a day profitability for investing $4,000 is trying to scam you. Period. I'm offered that and I don't think anything else, I know it's a scam. That's why I think we need more education in that sense.