They really should. The Beermen are being upset by BlackWater Bossing and Converge XFibers this conference and that is something you can't expect on one of the considered top teams in the league regardless if there's JuneMar Fajardo on board or not or let's say even the ball is round.

As Vic Manuel said, other big men should step up while Fajardo is sidelined. This is how complete their roster is compared to other teams as they can easily fill up the position of their missing main player that's why if they lose against a mid-team, the reason for Fajardo's absence should not be mentioned.

Besides, looks like their new import Devon Scott is now slowly forming good chemistry with the team. He's now 2-1 playing as an import for SMB.

Even if people will learn these 3 shared facts from you, the hesitation will still be there as long as, obviously, they are not really interested involving in bitcoin or in crypto in general yet. For us experienced ones, we understand that today's market trend is the best opportunity to accumulate more but even with how positive we are, we can't force others to do the same just quickly.

For me, just let them hesitate. Just let them miss the "opportunity". Just let them ignore bitcoin or what. Just let others think negatively. That's their own will and we should stay away from that. If we want to spread knowledge about crypto, then just do it. Once the interest of other people is now there, they will do the research on their own.

"Long-term hold?" I should say none. Most play-to-earn games are driven by hype no matter how good the development is. You should take advantage right away once the P2E games are now in the hype and do your best to make a profit out of it as once their hype was gone, expect a downfall.

Holding these P2E-related coins or tokens is not really worth it if your purpose is purely for profit.

For me, just enjoy those games if you really like the gameplay and not just because of expecting an x10, x20, x50, x100 in the future holding their coins.

It's not that I prefer online casinos but obviously, easy access is really an advantage and time-saving rather than going into a physical gambling establishment.

I say "physical gambling establishment" because I'm not talking about the usual big casinos. I believed most people think that when we say physical casino, those are the casinos we know that have a luxury look. There's a small one and lots of that nearby in my place. Maybe a 5-6 minutes drive.

Believe me, it's really entertaining to go into such establishments. Prior pandemic, me and my friends actively playing there, especially during weekends. The ambiance is really amusing as long as no person there will start an unnecessary commotion because of frustration.

The technique is something that is supposed to give us a good result at most chances. It shouldn't be associated with lots of "what if". The mentioned example by you is also a luck-based game that's why considering there's a technique on that is not appropriate, at least based on my own view.

I consider that method of yours as a "strategy". But regardless, a luck-based game is literally a game of chance. It's not how to win here but how will you properly manage your profit in making your bankroll last long.

Now going back to the topic, my answer will be based on what I prefer gambling and that is sports betting. No specific technique but just be aware of the league we are betting on as our knowledge there will be the key to increasing the chances of winning on our prediction.

If ever I will end up on that, I will prioritize settling quickly the CC with the high-interest rate then after settling my obligations there, I'll cut it out quickly. Now the small interest is left and it should be fine now to pay those without a big hassle. You don't need much of that number of cards. In case the reason why you are having multiple cards is about the limit, then having several cards at the same is not a good idea. Try to build a good credit quality score and only choose one CC provider.

But before that, ask yourself first, is it really a must that you owned a CC? If yes, it's not wrong to acquire one but getting 5 CC's at the same time is something very risky. Another thing, is your salary can really afford to pay your CC? If yes, then good. If not, then try your best to cut your current CC.

I have my own CC and I don't even feel the interest rate because of proper money management. Of course, a stable income is necessary.

The fight was sanctioned as a professional fight @ 187 lbs although yes, we don't know if there's hidden agenda under the table.

But I'm sure Silva won't be involved in such craps that's why I believed this fight will be seen as fair and square***.

The fight was also listed on bookies now with Paul Jake as the Favorite to win the match.

A lottery is heavily regulated therefore chances of that winner winning the case is possible.

As you mentioned, the lottery itself claimed that the winning has been wiped off their database as a result of a technical error. That's clearly their fault!

The winner just needs to show his winning ticket. It's impossible to create such a ticket intentionally for that purpose that's why it's big proof that the guy won.

Yes, the format in every elimination at each Conference is a single-round robin.

The chances for let's say Ginebra or SMB to face the Bay Area Dragons again now depend on their playoff spot.

Still, several weeks to go before the Dragons will face the Hotshots and later on, against the KaTropa for their final elimination game.

Stephen Fulton shows interest in facing Inoue soon once the latter decides to move up. There's also another champion there, Murodjon Akhmadaliev.

Maybe Fulton against Akhmadaliev unification fight will happen first before Inoue's name will be involved in these two.

That was interesting to see but the recent statement by Bob Arum, Inoue's promoter, might spoil the excitement of everybody if ever Inoue decided to move up:
“I mean, I’d love to do that fight. But, it’s cruel and inhumane punishment to ask anybody to fight Inoue.”

But if ever Casimero loses this match, it just shows that likely, he doesn't have the skills and power to compete at the top rankings or a title match. Casimero is 32 years old and if he will experience continuous loss, it will just put him below rankings or the worst not even considered to be assigned now on any match. It's hard to climb on rank and that will take time as we are not even sure if Casimero can average 1-2 fights per year at the point of his career.

Anyways, let's not talk about the possibility of Casimero losing here because the winning probability for him is decent. However, upset does happen but unlikely not in this match. If this really ends up with Casimero losing this match, I should also say that he needs to hang his gloves now.

I think there's no such thing as some people underestimating Ramirez but it's just that, many witnessed how Bivol turned the table upside down against Canelo with his patience and calm strategy. It's hard to imagine that Canelo, right at the peak of his career just become a punching bag for Bivol that's why the big recognition for him is there.

Not saying Ramirez's previous foes are not that good but no one there can match or even close to Canelo's caliber that's why Bivol here is considered the Favorite to win the match.

Can't believe there are analysis involved in this match lol. Seriously?

It's 100% obvious that this is all about entertainment and both camps are surely talking with each other about how they will behave in the ring. Not reading the whole terms yet but this fight won't even have a declared winner at the end, or anyone can correct me on that. Regardless, the winner of this match is not that important.

As long as they fulfill their promise that part of their profit on this exhibition match will be for charity purposes, then it's good. That might be just the big reason for people to support and pay for tickets to this fight.

Regardless if we won huge or not, we can't control those people who have bitter feelings towards us. The same goes for the people who have bad intentions for us. On that big winning experience and let's say the public became aware of it, we should just try to be careful at all times and as much as possible limit our exposure to the public. But I believed it's not that we will become an automatic target for such actions.

In fairness, we haven't seen much news related to a person that got big winnings but suffered the worst experience after that.

Actually, that Lakers game against the Blazers is really not that bad. They just failed to secure their lead in the end because of several wrong gameplays. In other words, they literally choked at the last minute. Besides, Damian Lillard is really red hot that even his shots were contested, he really drained those.

What's the best thing to do for the Lakers? For me, none. Just go with the flow and play those games until they found that "rhythm". I doubt signing some good shooters or trading Westbrook will even solve their current problem. Their Coach should think outside the box or much better if he will remove the box.

If the goal is to be unified all the Welterweight belts, then I think that would be the case if Crawford got defeated against Avanesyan on his title defense in December. There would even be no need for Spence to call out Avanesyan as I'm sure the latter will do it instead as that was a big break in his career.

Well then, since this fight now failed to materialize I think further discussion about this match is pointless for now.

Let's hope that next year, the much-awaited fight for long will now turn into reality.

I was currently driving during that game but I'm aware of the scores. I'm also one of those who think Magnolia will win. Never seen yet the game highlights on how Ginebra was able to make a rally but I will say, it's really impressive. Who are these players that become a key to their winning?

As I posted here previously before the match, it now happened that Ginebra is the one that gives the current top seed Magnolia their first loss like what they did too against the Bay Area Dragons. Ginebra is really in aggressive mode as always against a tough team even if they are being behind the whole game.

Jokic already cemented his status as a franchise player for the Denver Nuggets. I'm sure that even with no championships, Jokic will retire in the Denver Nuggets jersey. I even think that once his current huge contract expires, he will still be offered a huge contract.

Even though not a fan of the Denver Nuggets, I hope he can taste being a champion. He's just 27 years old after all and has lots of time to precious his prime. The Nuggets should always try to surround him with good role players, especially their bench squad. If possible, they should also consider getting a considered big fish on the free agency if there's any.

Yes, this fight is now "OFFICIALLY FAILED" to happen this year. We don't even know if it will happen next year as that will depend on the result of their respective fight. Currently, Crawford is the first one who moves on with this fight and now officially has the next fight in December. On the other hand, Spence Jr. doesn't confirm yet any details of his next plan either if he will fight this year or not.

The reason for the failed negotiations is unknown and likely they will not disclose it to the public.

Spence blames Crawford. Crawford blames Spence. Much better if they won't do a blaming game and just continue on their next plan.

Sometimes there are flaws in the system, however, instead of abusing it, users should at least notify the site about the bug.

Besides, not all users are having such actions and just doing the usual way of claiming in the faucets. Therefore, those who are aware of the bug are taking advantage of the situation which is already considered as "cheating".


As long as that "smart way" is not considered a form of cheating or related activity, then they are good to go.

In the case of withdrawals being blocked, the site should explain clearly why it happened.


Just for reference as I missed it, may I know what casinos you are referring to?

Just want to see the details of their respective cases so I can give a proper response on this thread about the subject.