Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 01:30:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 447 »
1301  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: Bitcoin forks - Versioni con supporto blocchi di dimensione superiore a 1MB on: March 12, 2017, 05:36:20 AM
Aggiornamento al BIP100 da Jeff Garzik e Tom Harding

BIP100: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki
Discussione Reddit: https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5yvc58/tom_harding_weve_worked_with_jgarzik_to_update

Questa modifica richiede che il 75% dei miner voti in una direzione (aumentare o calare), in 2016 blocchi.
L'eventuale aumento o calo della dimensione del blocco sarebbe del 5%.
1302  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / BIP100 updated - By Jeff Garzik and Tom Harding on: March 12, 2017, 05:33:40 AM
BIP100: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki
Reddit discussion: https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5yvc58/tom_harding_weve_worked_with_jgarzik_to_update

Code:
==Abstract==

Replace the static 1M block size hard limit with a hard limit set by coinbase vote, conducted on the same schedule as difficulty retargeting.

==Motivation==

Miners directly feel the effects, both positive and negative, of any maximum block size change imposed by their peers.  Larger blocks allow more growth in the on-chain ecosystem, while smaller blocks reduce resource requirements network-wide.  Miners also act as an efficient proxy for the rest of the ecosystem, since they are paid in the tokens collected for the blocks they create.

A simple deterministic system is specified, whereby a 75% mining supermajority may activate a change to the maximum block size each 2016 blocks.  Each change is limited to a 5% increase from the previous block size hard limit, or a decrease of similar magnitude.  Among adopting nodes, there will be no disagreement on the evolution of the maximum block size.

The system is compatible with emergent consensus, but whereas under that system a miner may choose to accept any size block, a miner following BIP100 observes the 75% supermajority rule, and the 5% change limit rule.  Excessive-block values signaled by emergent consensus blocks are considered in the calculation of the BIP100 block size hard limit, and the BIP100 calculated maximum block size is signaled as an excessive-block value for the benefit of all observers.

==Specification==

===Dynamic Maximum Block Size===
# Initial value of <code>hardLimit</code> is 1000000 bytes, preserving current system.
# Changing <code>hardLimit</code> is accomplished by encoding a proposed value, a vote, within a block's coinbase scriptSig, and by processing the votes contained in the previous retargeting period.<br /><br />
## Vote encoding
### A vote is represented as a positive megabyte value using the BIP100 pattern<br /><br /><code>/BIP100/B[0-9]+/</code><br /><br />Example: <code>/BIP100/B8/</code> is a vote for a 8000000-byte <code>hardLimit</code>.<br /><br />
### If the block height is encoded at the start of the coinbase scriptSig, as per BIP34, it is ignored.
### Only the first BIP100 pattern match is processed in "Maximum block size recalculation" below.
### A valid megabyte value is represented by consecutive base-ten digits.
### If no BIP100 pattern is matched, the first matching emergent consensus pattern <code>/EB[0-9]+/</code>, if any, is accepted as the megabyte vote.<br /><br />
## Maximum block size recalculation
### A <code>new hardLimit</code> is calculated after each difficulty adjustment period of 2016 blocks, and applies to the next 2016 blocks.
### Absent/invalid votes are counted as votes for the <code>current hardLimit</code>.
### The votes of the previous 2016 blocks are sorted by megabyte vote.
### Raising <code>hardLimit</code><br /><br />
#### The <code>raise value</code> is defined as the vote of the 1512th highest block, converted to bytes.
#### If the resultant <code>raise value</code> is greater than (<code>current hardLimit</code> * 1.05) rounded down to the nearest byte, it is set to that value.
#### If the resultant <code>raise value</code> is greater than <code>current hardLimit</code>, the <code>raise value</code> becomes the <code>new hardLimit</code> and the recalculation is complete.<br /><br />
### Lowering <code>hardlimit</code><br /><br />
#### The <code>lower value</code> is defined as the vote of the 1512th lowest block, converted to bytes.
#### If the resultant <code>lower value</code> is less than (<code>current hardLimit</code> / 1.05) rounded down to the nearest byte, it is set to that value.
#### If the resultant <code>lower value</code> is less than <code>current hardLimit</code>, the <code>lower value</code> becomes the <code>new hardLimit</code> and the recalculation is complete.<br /><br />
### Otherwise, <code>new hardLimit</code> remains the same as <code>current hardLimit</code>.

===Signature Hashing Operations Limits===
# The per-block signature hashing operations limit is scaled to (<code>hardLimit</code> rounded up to nearest megabyte)/50.
# A maximum serialized transaction size of 1000000 bytes is imposed.

===Publication of <code>hardLimit</code>===
# For the benefit of emergent consensus nodes, <code>hardLimit</code> is published.  Example: a complete coinbase string might read <br /><br /><code>/BIP100/B8/EB2.123456/</code><br /><br /> which indicates a vote for 8M maximum block size, and an enforced <code>hardLimit</code> of 2.123456 megabytes for the block containing the coinbase string.

==Deployment==

This BIP is presumed deployed and activated as of block height 449568 by implementing nodes on the bitcoin mainnet. It has no effect until a raise value different from 1M is observed, which requires at least 1512 of 2016 blocks to vote differently from 1M.

==Backward compatibility==

The first block larger than 1M will create a network partition, as nodes with a fixed 1M hard limit reject that block.
1303  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: E' uscito Electrum v2.8.1! on: March 11, 2017, 04:47:05 PM
Nuova release wallet Electrum v2.8.1

https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
1304  Local / Gambling (Italiano) / [LISTA] Prediction market / betting exchange on: March 11, 2017, 08:09:23 AM
Questi siti permettono di creare scommesse a piacere, dove in genere chi vince, ottiene i soldi dei perdenti, anche in proporzione a quanto prima ha scommesso.

Sito: https://www.predictious.com/
Discussione: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264443.0

Sito: https://www.betmoose.com
Discussione: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645747.0

Sito: https://www.fairlay.com
Discussione: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=673475.0

Sito: https://bitbet.us


Se ne avete altri da segnalare scrivete pure.


Vi ricordo che la maggior parte dei siti/servizi dedicati al gambling li trovate segnalati nella sezione internazionale:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=56.0
1305  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Competing nodes - List of BTC implementations in competition for the Blockchain on: March 10, 2017, 07:17:44 PM
Bitcoin Core v0.14.0
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.14.0

Bitcoin Unlimited v1.0.1.0
https://github.com/BitcoinUnlimited/BitcoinUnlimited/releases/tag/1.0.1.0

Bitcoin Classic v1.2.1
https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/releases/tag/v1.2.1

Libbitcoin v3.0.0
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/releases/tag/v3.0.0

Bitcoin Knots branch-0.14
https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/releases/tag/branch-0.14

Bitcoinj v0.14.4
https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/releases/tag/v0.14.4
1306  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: Bitcoin forks - Versioni con supporto blocchi di dimensione superiore a 1MB on: March 10, 2017, 07:15:19 PM
Nuova release di Bitcoin Unlimited v1.0.1.0
https://github.com/BitcoinUnlimited/BitcoinUnlimited/releases/tag/1.0.1.0
1307  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Compromise between SegWit and BU on: March 10, 2017, 06:19:21 AM
@DannyHamilton
I think that I can say that mostly all BU supporters agree on enabling all the things of Segwit does as hard fork, after the block size hard fork.

You can already find the specifics to do this Smiley
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/buip037-hardfork-segwit.1591/

There is also a proposal from BC:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0134.mediawiki

So you can be sure that LN and all other good things that segwit is promising to enable, you will still have after a block size fork.
1308  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: E' uscito Electrum v2.8! on: March 10, 2017, 12:30:38 AM
Nuova release di Electrum v2.8.0

https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
https://download.electrum.org/2.8.0/
1309  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: Guida al hard fork di Bitcoin (nel caso capiti) - IMPORTANTE on: March 09, 2017, 10:57:53 PM
UP visto che sembra argomento di discussione di questi giorni Smiley
1310  Local / Italiano (Italian) / Re: Bitcoin Arena - Telegram CHAT - Blocco grande! Si o no? on: March 09, 2017, 01:27:45 PM
Ti consiglio queste due discussioni intanto:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1665779.0
È Partito il soft fork per l'aumento del block size - Pro segwit

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1080573.0
Bitcoin forks - Versioni con supporto blocchi di dimensione superiore a 1MB - Pro fork

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1641827.0
Guida al hard fork di #Bitcoin (nel caso capiti) - IMPORTANTE -
1311  Local / Annunci / Re: Raiblocks - Moneta che punta sulla scalabilità - Conferme istantanee - No fee on: March 08, 2017, 07:15:00 AM
Beh, credo che sia stato segnalato praticamente ovunque Smiley
1312  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]Cryptocurrency's killer app: disrupting web ads via RaiBlocks micropayments on: March 08, 2017, 06:26:43 AM
New version

https://github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/releases/tag/V7.8.2

"This release fixes a bootstrap corruption issue that could cause it to cycle repeatedly. It's recommended for everyone."
1313  Local / Annunci / Re: Raiblocks - Moneta che punta sulla scalabilità - Conferme istantanee - No fee on: March 08, 2017, 06:22:24 AM
nuova versione
https://github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/releases/tag/V7.8.2
1314  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Centurion: The Cryptocurrency for Beginners and Experts Alike on: March 08, 2017, 04:36:11 AM
You can also see from their official explorer Smiley
http://www.centurionexplorer.com/richlist
http://web.archive.org/web/20170308043354/http://www.centurionexplorer.com/richlist

CJnpYkX4mhT74dYhM5C5vnP2oBMrHSPkxG own 42838799.99971000 CNT (79.80% of all the current coins)
And maybe even the second rich address is owned by them.

So the data on coinmarketcap is wrong.
1315  Local / Crittografia e decentralizzazione / Re: Aether - Create community moderated, distributed, and anonymous forums/reddit on: March 07, 2017, 07:10:36 AM
Release prevista in 1/2 mesi pare
https://github.com/nehbit/aether-public/issues/94#issuecomment-284618462
1316  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Moving towards user activated soft fork activation on: March 07, 2017, 03:28:31 AM
@shaolinfry
You are a Litecoin dev, why don't you try this your "great" idea on Litecoin first? Wink
1317  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]Cryptocurrency's killer app: disrupting web ads via RaiBlocks micropayments on: March 07, 2017, 01:06:28 AM
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/raiblocks/
1318  Local / Accuse scam/truffe / Re: CNT Centurion: una scamcoin tutta italiana on: March 06, 2017, 11:15:02 PM
infatti non sto investendo soldi, e soprattutto non sto vendendo o comprando monete...
sono, anzi, dovrei essere un incaricato alle vendite di prodotti digitali, quali corsi di formazione, di marketing ecc ecc..
Non giriamoci attorno, "corsi di formazione, di marketing ecc ecc..." su cosa? Smiley

Anche quelle merde di Onecoin vendono corsi di formazione per trading e marketing, e come premio "regalano" una certa quantità di Onecoin, in proporzione a quanto era stato speso nel corso.

Una schifosa scappatoia logica per girare attorno al fatto che viene venduta merda ad idioti e disperati.
1319  Local / Accuse scam/truffe / Re: CNT Centurion: una scamcoin tutta italiana on: March 06, 2017, 06:48:52 PM
Io non so nulla di crypto ...

Vorrei giusto farti notare che stai investendo tempo e soldi in una cosa che per tua stessa ammissione dici di non capirci nulla Smiley

Se non altro spero che questo possa essere da campannello dall'arme per tutti quelli che magari potrebbero seguire le tue opinioni su dove investire.
1320  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [RaiBlocks] RaiBlocks trading thread on: March 06, 2017, 06:40:49 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's no such thing as confirmations in Raiblocks. Sender signs, receiver signs. The end.
Yes. When you have received it, it is done.
It doesn't change anything on receiving more blocks after.

This is the exactly the first feature of Raiblocks.

EDIT
New version

https://github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/releases/tag/V7.8.2

"This release fixes a bootstrap corruption issue that could cause it to cycle repeatedly. It's recommended for everyone."
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 447 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!