Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 12:57:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 ... 236 »
1321  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 14, 2013, 12:22:19 AM
I also saw that ghash.io pool size. Does make you wonder, 0 fees and growing at a quick rate. If you are getting rewarded the same amount, is it loyalty that people stick around? Just trying to understand, as we all hate fees. I also don't know how a pool operator makes money. Are the pool fees how The Guild makes money? If yes, then how the heck the other 0 fee pools keep servers going with no fees? Scratching my head.




Lower performance, less support, less time spent upgrading and maintaining servers (both frontend and backend).  Ghash.io's stability is abysmal by any reasonable standard.  The only reason they're so big is more than 50% of their speed is a private farm of ASICs since they're acquiring them basically at cost from BitFury.
1322  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 14, 2013, 12:20:30 AM
Hi eleuthria, I have been mining at BTCGuild for sometime, not with alot of hashing power, but enough. Now I have some cubes and alot of others do too. Sells have increased and we need a "getwork" service. It's turned off, will you set it back up so we can mine at the best pool, it's a service that is in need. Will you help us? jesse11

You should ALWAYS use a Stratum Proxy for ASICMINER Blades/Cubes.  They are not designed for working on remote servers via getwork and you will lose a significant amount of performance doing so.  Run a stratum proxy on the same local network as the blades/cubes in order to get maximum performance.

What I'm asking, will you setup a Stratum Proxy as a service for Blades/Cubes users? Small fees or donations? It's a service that is needed. Something like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292170.0
jesse11

Running a remote proxy has the same problem as trying to use getwork on a remote server.  You are losing performance if you attempt to do so.  Proxies are not difficult to run, and can be done on virtually any level of hardware.
1323  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 13, 2013, 07:36:56 PM
Hi eleuthria, I have been mining at BTCGuild for sometime, not with alot of hashing power, but enough. Now I have some cubes and alot of others do too. Sells have increased and we need a "getwork" service. It's turned off, will you set it back up so we can mine at the best pool, it's a service that is in need. Will you help us? jesse11

You should ALWAYS use a Stratum Proxy for ASICMINER Blades/Cubes.  They are not designed for working on remote servers via getwork and you will lose a significant amount of performance doing so.  Run a stratum proxy on the same local network as the blades/cubes in order to get maximum performance.
1324  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 13, 2013, 04:48:10 AM
All is one with the force now. Mining away, I don't know if you did something Mike or the gods of bitcoin just had mercy on me but it is working.

Again, sorry for the port scan, it was a last resort to see what was wrong. 

Absolutely nothing has happened in the last few weeks, so...you're welcome? Tongue

The only thing that has happened since your last post about the problem is I drove 450 miles with a car full of electronics and 2 cats.
1325  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 12, 2013, 04:01:31 PM
eleuthria,

Are any stats on pool luck available on the web interface? Are the 24 hour earning stats accurate?

There's a giant graph on the PPLNS Stats page for luck.  24 hour earnings for PPS are accurate except for the first 24 hours after a difficulty change.  24 hour earnings for PPLNS are accurate, except they're on an ~8 hour delay (uses the last 24 hours worth of closed shifts since open shifts are not done getting paid).


I'm having problems connecting too, maybe it's some DNS server or something being wacky. I also had issues connecting to the website (I got forced into a redirect via cloudfire for a good 10 seconds) Also Bitcointalk.org was down for a while for me.

I concur. Had the same issues earlier on the day too.

There was a 5 minute outage roughly last night due to a backup script on the DB server eating up all the space on the drive.  Most mining software should have automatically reconnected. 
1326  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 12, 2013, 12:51:28 AM
Good evening,
  It *is* on your end, otherwise I'd have an inbox with a couple hundred emails and a pool with a ton of speed missing.  My only guess is your system doesn't like the redirect DNS, since you're connecting to the verification server, it's sending you the redirect, and then 1 second later it's complaining about not responding with the old pool URL in there.

  Try connecting directly to the redirection server?

Still shows dead. Even tried 198.245.63.145 and it will connect then drop. Changed my dns to google and still the same. My last share was 20 hours ago, so it happened last night and I can't get for the life of me try to get it to connect.

198.245.63.145 is the verification server.  You're only on that server for the very first submission.  Set your miner to connect to the URL it's redirecting you to instead and see if that fixes it.

You're talk about "stratum-lb-usa48.btcguild.com:3333", tried it, same result connect then dead.

Are you sure you're using the right worker name?  Not using a '.' instead of a '_'? or something like that.  There is absolutely nothing wrong on the servers (~24,000 connected users).  Nothing has changed in weeks either.
1327  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 12, 2013, 12:24:51 AM
Good evening,
  It *is* on your end, otherwise I'd have an inbox with a couple hundred emails and a pool with a ton of speed missing.  My only guess is your system doesn't like the redirect DNS, since you're connecting to the verification server, it's sending you the redirect, and then 1 second later it's complaining about not responding with the old pool URL in there.

  Try connecting directly to the redirection server?

Still shows dead. Even tried 198.245.63.145 and it will connect then drop. Changed my dns to google and still the same. My last share was 20 hours ago, so it happened last night and I can't get for the life of me try to get it to connect.

198.245.63.145 is the verification server.  You're only on that server for the very first submission.  Set your miner to connect to the URL it's redirecting you to instead and see if that fixes it.
1328  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 11, 2013, 11:50:58 PM
Good evening,
  It *is* on your end, otherwise I'd have an inbox with a couple hundred emails and a pool with a ton of speed missing.  My only guess is your system doesn't like the redirect DNS, since you're connecting to the verification server, it's sending you the redirect, and then 1 second later it's complaining about not responding with the old pool URL in there.

  Try connecting directly to the redirection server?
1329  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan+NMC, Stratum, Private Servers on: December 11, 2013, 06:39:56 PM
So I have noticed a problem using slush's proxy that started sometime yesterday. I keep getting not connected error.

I can verify it is only on btc guild, I move to another pool and it is mining away, have I been black listed or is there a glitch somewhere?



Definitely a problem on your end.  A significant number of users use the slush stratum proxy with BTC Guild and the speed has been stable/growing consistently for weeks.  Either you have a bad username and it's kicking you off, or you're not authorizing a worker and it's disconnecting you after a while of holding open an idle connection.  Other problem would be routing issues on your end between you and Chicago.
1330  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 11, 2013, 04:06:10 PM
eleuthria,

Have you considered lowering PPLNS fees to attract more miners?

GHash.IO appears to be growing at an alarming rate.

https://blockchain.info/pools?timespan=24hrs

A huge majority of GHash.IO's speed is from their private farm.  They are the largest single miner in the network at this point.  Their service has been unreliable and support is non-existant, mostly because they have no incentive to actually keep their public pool operating smoothly.  BTC Guild isn't going to compete with someone like that.
1331  Economy / Economics / Re: 927 People Own Half of All Bitcions on: December 11, 2013, 02:18:26 AM
These articles miss the point.  They're calling addresses people.  This would be the equivalent of saying 90+% of all US dollars are owned by 100 people (probably fewer), because BANKS are the ones holding the dollars for the vast majority of all currency.

A huge number of those stockpiles are likely wallets for exchanges.
1332  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Ban getwork completely on: December 10, 2013, 09:12:54 PM
Doc,

Any reason not to block getwork requests completely?  Seems it would be a good move to force everyone into the current age.  Other pools have phased out getwork.

I could understand why not to, if I person has a single blade he /she can connect straight to bitminter without the need for the proxy. That is one thing that puts bitminter ahead.

Except running a blade on remote getwork is inefficient and costs you a few % of your speed since they aren't able to multi-task when submitting shares.  They also submit every diff=1 result regardless of server requirements, eating up even more time.  If you have a blade and do not run a local proxy, you're losing out on your potential.
1333  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ASIC vs CPU pool on: December 10, 2013, 07:14:34 PM
One KNC Jupiter is likely more powerful than every CPU miner combined (including botnets).

Probably true. A Core i7 3930K can get to 66.6 MHash/s, but almost nobody has one of those. At 6.7 MHash/s (mining speed of a Core i7 2600K), it would take over 82,000 CPUs to match the Jupiter's 550 GHash/s. Although the largest botnet ever had 30,000,000 bots...

There is no "vs".

Which is faster a bicycle or a jet airplane?

Not a good analogy. 100,000 bicycles are still slower than a jet airplane, but 100,000 CPUs could match a Jupiter.

Most botnet computers don't even hash at 1 MH/s, just FYI (speaking from significant experience dealing with the damned things).  Most people with i5/i7 computers know enough to see their computer is running slow as dirt and the fan is always spinning fast.  Not saying they're immune to it, just saying the vast majority of high end CPUs are not in botnets, they're mostly made up of low end.

Also was only referring to *active* CPU miners, rather than all the infected computers on earth.  Most botnet operators aren't touching BTC because a CPU miner is not worth as much as a spambot/ddos slave anymore at modern difficulties.
1334  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ASIC vs CPU pool on: December 10, 2013, 06:34:59 PM
One KNC Jupiter is likely more powerful than every CPU miner combined (including botnets).
1335  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 10, 2013, 04:15:24 AM
NMC payouts are now back and running.  They've been updated to now payout the highest multiple of your threshold (IE:  Set your threshold to 0.10, if you have 0.23, it'll pay 0.20).  BTC payouts will *offer* this method of automatic payouts in the near future, but the default will still pay the amount you set as your Auto Payout threshold.

NMC earnings are expected to return in roughly 24 hours.

Michael, did you see my post about the possible addition of payout settings. Didn't know you were already in the mix of changing code, this is along the same lines.



Specific time payouts aren't currently on the list of things being tweaked.  It may come later.  I'm in the process of moving over the next week and a half, so I'm trying to pick my battles carefully.
1336  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 10, 2013, 01:32:46 AM
NMC payouts are now back and running.  They've been updated to now payout the highest multiple of your threshold (IE:  Set your threshold to 0.10, if you have 0.23, it'll pay 0.20).  BTC payouts will *offer* this method of automatic payouts in the near future, but the default will still pay the amount you set as your Auto Payout threshold.

NMC earnings are expected to return in roughly 24 hours.
1337  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Free cloud-based stratum proxy for Slush & BTCGuild (beta) on: December 10, 2013, 12:53:07 AM
Thanks guys.  I did not have time to mess anymore with it today.  I put the test blades back on proxy. 
I am wondering if using this cloud proxy method increases the bandwidth needed on my connection.  It seemed when I had 10 blades on the cloud proxy some of my miners slowed down.  Is that possible?

I'm now remembering something Luke-Jr mentioned.  Blades do not multitask, so when they submit a share/complete a getwork request, they are not hashing until a response is received.  This would likely cause a somewhat noticeable impact on overall performance (few percent at minimum) since blades also send back every diff=1 result.
1338  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 10, 2013, 12:48:37 AM
3 batches of NMC payouts were just sent out to see if that has any affect on the payout node getting stuck on an orphaned chain.  Additional namecoin earnings are still disabled for at least 24 hours to keep an eye on the status of all the nodes.
1339  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Free cloud-based stratum proxy for Slush & BTCGuild (beta) on: December 09, 2013, 08:51:21 PM
It was running good for a while but now my speed is down to 2-3 Gh/s per blade.  Any suggestions?

Which server/port are you connecting to?

Check your internet speed at speedtest.net as well.
8885,8886

Called Centurylink and had them run diagnostic.  Says I'm getting full speed.  PC directly connected to the router are running fine.
Other miners running fine.  Very odd.

Since those are BTC Guild ports, have you tried resetting your stats on the dashboard?  BTC Guild's speed estimates are based on an hour if you've been mining that long.  If you had issues, it takes a full hour for those issues to stop affecting your average speed estimates.
1340  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1900 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+Orphan, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: December 09, 2013, 05:58:34 PM
Hi,
I noted that the last 4 shift are reporting 0 block in the PPLNS page:
https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=pplns

Is this normal? Also, it seems that the reported block sometime rise between 20 and 23, but then it
drops to between 9 and 16.

Is this normal o is because of the difficulty, luck or roaming/hop users?

Thanks
Oliver

It's normal. Look at the luck chart on the bottom of the PPLNS Stats page.
Pages: « 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!