|
About the suprnova estimates (on pool stats): they are always about double what I actually get, please keep this in mind.
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm trying to compile source from pallas github, but when I tried to make the joincoin-qt I got this error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_system-mt
I'm using Ubuntu 15.04 x86_64 and libboost1.55
Thanks in advance.
Edit makefile, remove "-mt". |
|
|
|
Back again,
So, my hashrate is 44mh/s -small equipment- according to whattomine.com I should be mining 27 coins per hour but actually Iäm getting just 18 per hour.. Idk, what could be the reason for that? is it the pool?
thanks,
Maybe whattomine doesn't take orphans into account. |
|
|
|
|
First of all I'd like to say that altcoins, especially those developed years ago, are supposed to be experiments.
The best that comes out from them, might be imported into the "main" coins like bitcoin.
The best ones may get market acceptance but that is really hard, as there are many coins and even bitcoin itself still has a long way to go, in this department.
XCN is experimental in nature, there is a lot of innovation, and despite that, it is still running fine as of today.
I'm pretty sure that catia, the original developer, didn't hope for a life so long of his coin ;-)
About regulation against mining and other consensus methods, well, maybe it's a bit offtopic but we can still talk about it, as a possible future development for XCN.
|
|
|
|
I didn't talk about mining.
I talked about fake orders.
You can easily spot many of them on smaller coins: they are pretty evident as they trade at prices not available on the order book, keeping the daily volume over 1 BTC to lure customers into trading that coin.
pretty standard practice on any exchange if you wanna pump the volume, you can do it thru api no prob, although bittrex is a bit "sensitive" to such activity ) No, that is made by the exchange itself. You can't make trades against prices which are not on the order book (API or non-API), you must match an order with your trade. I've seen that kind of activity on Cryptopia only. ok you make an order and fill it yourself almost immediately, what's the point ? Yes that is possible, I've seen that on other exchanges, and it behaves differently than those orders on cryptopia. Anyways, there is no way to measure trust of an exchange: if you trust cryptopia more than for example novaexchange, you may have your reasons for that. I have mine and from my experience I prefer nova over cryptopia by a wide margin. It's not just those fake orders. While on nova they got hacked and I recovered all my coins in a matter of hours. People will make their own choises. |
|
|
|
I didn't talk about mining.
I talked about fake orders.
You can easily spot many of them on smaller coins: they are pretty evident as they trade at prices not available on the order book, keeping the daily volume over 1 BTC to lure customers into trading that coin.
pretty standard practice on any exchange if you wanna pump the volume, you can do it thru api no prob, although bittrex is a bit "sensitive" to such activity ) No, that is made by the exchange itself. You can't make trades against prices which are not on the order book (API or non-API), you must match an order with your trade. I've seen that kind of activity on Cryptopia only. |
|
|
|
I think novaexchange is better than cryptopia.
Novaexchange is trustable (I had to deal with them and they were professional and cared for my coins).
I don't trust exchanges with fake volume like Cryptopia, how many other tricks may they be using?
times ago similar words been said about topia, it was young ) when nova makes it to a higher circle they'll be every trick you can imagine lol Can't agree about CRYPTOPIA, they are fine since 2014 (I'm with them at the beginning), know the devs, which are very nice and always helpfully ppl..., and to be honest they do (for me) better job than Nova (which I use too from the beginning). About the mining at Topia that's not thru..., they reduce the mining usage and they will close that very soon, isn't them focus on the mining there anymore. And about the users using Topia..., I believe they are even more than Nova xD, and what "tricks" you talking about pallas ? Regards: SHNICI I didn't talk about mining. I talked about fake orders. You can easily spot many of them on smaller coins: they are pretty evident as they trade at prices not available on the order book, keeping the daily volume over 1 BTC to lure customers into trading that coin. |
|
|
|
Dos ccminer 2.0 support X11-Ghost soon for SIB? Can't find that algo in readme of current release  It does for long. Just run "ccminer --help". |
|
|
|
I can't read the file, could you please put it into pastebin or mega? |
|
|
|
Hi Pallas. Thank you. I want to find out: is there is any way to set the diffculty (may using diff factor) either on djm's ccminer or this cpuminer, when mining on suprnova? Thanks Not that I know of. It is usually done by putting the diff value into the worker or password fields in some way, but I believe it is not implemented into xcn.suprnova right now. Maybe you could ask ocminer, cause it depends entirely on the pool. Diff factor or divider is another thing, it just changes the way difficulty from the pool is used, but it doesn't affect its "absolute" value. Thank you for your quick reply. Does ocminer know about the suprnova pool (trying to figure why you said to ask him)? He is the pool owner. |
|
|
|
Hi Pallas. Thank you. I want to find out: is there is any way to set the diffculty (may using diff factor) either on djm's ccminer or this cpuminer, when mining on suprnova? Thanks Not that I know of. It is usually done by putting the diff value into the worker or password fields in some way, but I believe it is not implemented into xcn.suprnova right now. Maybe you could ask ocminer, cause it depends entirely on the pool. Diff factor or divider is another thing, it just changes the way difficulty from the pool is used, but it doesn't affect its "absolute" value. |
|
|
|
Finally, I found block, but there is an issue with nonce distribution across rigs - it seems, that they are brutforcing against the same nonces Forgot to reply you on this one. Getwork is less flexible than getblocktemplate about multiple miners. You can still use some techniques like ntime rolling, in order to avoid crunching the same blockheader on every worker. |
|
|
|
dump and dump - the best strategy ever  Where you one of the guys who mined ethereum the first 6 months and dumped it @ $0.60 a coin ? Then you missed a 500x increase. I think a mix is best.. Keep some and dump some. But spread the risk on more than one coin. I hold because I can afford to hold exactly because I made some nice profits... from holding while everyone else was dumping for a few slices of pizzas worth of profits. And even then I still missed out on a few dozen Bitcoins on stuff like DGB and Verge - because I didn't hold long enough. But I'm not complaining, you can't win them all. Holding is investing. You can hold any coin. Why not mine the most profitable, exchange it for what you want to hold? Holding a random coin and mining something that is subpar hurts you in the long run. You can hold 'more' of whatever coin you want by mining the most profitable and exchanging. There is no coin that is more profitable by mining instead of exchanging unless it's already the most profitable coin. This is fallacious logic miners seem to apply to how they mine. It really doesn't matter. Agree. The only case I can see mining better than buying is if there is no exchange yet for the coin, or the volume is too low. |
|
|
|
Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.
So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.
But I am shocked I am getting less than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)
How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?
The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.
Thanks for all your help.
EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova
It is an old architecture, also probably lower core clock (memclock matters very little). When they will update to pascal based cards it might be interesting to try cloud gpu mining. Thank you for your reply. core clock is 875MHz and I set it on max. the 1070 runs at double that :-) |
|
|
|
Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.
So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.
But I am shocked I am getting less than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)
How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?
The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.
Thanks for all your help.
EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova
It is an old architecture, also probably lower core clock (memclock matters very little). When they will update to pascal based cards it might be interesting to try cloud gpu mining. |
|
|
|
any windows wersion of new wallet?
the windows build available on the site should be up to date with github. |
|
|
|
|
I think novaexchange is better than cryptopia.
Novaexchange is trustable (I had to deal with them and they were professional and cared for my coins).
I don't trust exchanges with fake volume like Cryptopia, how many other tricks may they be using?
|
|
|
|
which exchange for this now ?
Novaexchange |
|
|
|
|
Maybe you could try using --coinbase-sig or --coinbase-addr
EDIT: hmmm not sure they do anything on getwork.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
