Wrong decisions coming from the third umpire is really annoying. The team that played at the start wasn't able to perform when there is fall of wickets. The wicket of Shakib Al Hasan disturbed the entire scoring of Bangladesh. Somehow they managed to score 127 runs, which isn't enough against team like Pakistan.
Followed by the innings, Bangladesh began the bowling with Taskin. The fielding and drops came from the beginning have kept the Pakistan openers strong. Anyhow this is going to be a win for Pakistan. Pakistan at the end of 3 overs have scored 15 runs.
What is the responsibility of the third umpire? They will provide better decisions than common people without any doubt. In this case, if there is a situation that cannot be understood by looking at the screen, it is a different matter. But it is certainly not acceptable for the third umpire to make a mistake where the spectators could easily find the actual result. If cricket is for spectators, it is a natural thing to give correct decisions in any important match. And if it fails here, the general public's reaction will be different about cricket as well as ICC. The luck of the Bangladesh team is always bad. There is no chance to say that Bangladesh played badly in this World Cup. Bangladesh also fought hard to win against India. And Bangladesh might have won if the umpires had not taken bad decisions. The ICC wanted to give India a chance, and so Bangladesh lost. Bangladesh is also unlucky in today's match. If the field umpires cannot decide, there are TV umpires. However, in a platform like the World Cup, it is very difficult to accept such wrong decisions by umpires again and again. I do not see any possibility of the victory for Bangladesh. But they played well. Their performances against India and Pakistan must be commended. |
|
|
|
Hi. I'm a newbie and I'm just learning about this topic. There are many questions that I would like to understand, maybe this one has already been discussed, but I didn't find the thread, sorry. How reliable is Bitcoin, what will it be if someone will generate a new blockchain or another digital currency, will it make bitcoin fall down, and how fast?
It can be said that bitcoin is the birthplace of the crypto market and currently bitcoin has a capitalization of half of the total market capitalization and we have more than 21000 different coins, showing that bitcoin is too big to replace or compete. Also, another thing that makes bitcoin famous is that bitcoin is decentralized and cannot be controlled by anyone. In contrast, altcoins are centralized and controlled by a single person or company. So it's safe to say bitcoin is safer than all the rest of the market. |
|
|
|
Share with me your story and the reasons why you switched from crypto investing to nft? 🙂
What was the reason behind it? And what was interesting about it? 😉
There is no reason because I never switched investing into NFT at all. NFT is just another wave on the ocean which is going to hit the shore and get dissolved back to its primary place and vanish. That’s the thing here about NFT and you can also sense the same with the current key word search about it over the Google or other platforms. The crypto currencies is always going to be perfect investment since it’s in existence since long as compared to the NFT and they will always have organic volume all the time. So my trust and efforts still goes into bitcoin and other currencies. Are you sure NFT just launched recently and crypto was born before NFT, let's see what @nuthildah already mentioned. Looking there, you can also see that the idea of NFTs has been around since 2011, which means they predate both ethreum and topcoins today. NFT was simply unpopular at the time and it was introduced into the cryptocurrency market recently. NFTs have existed in our lives before being introduced into cryptocurrencies to create hype. It is not profitable for you but it is profitable for others, it's useless for you but useful for many people. |
|
|
|
I just think like; when Bitcoin comes up to the world for the first time, they don't care about it instead of thinking that Bitcoin will "attack" fiat money. Then users are still growing, so they are thinking this is a "war". But finally, they can see that Bitcoin still can give huge benefits to their country, so the "main leader" is saying "let's regulate them". Banning bitcoin has twofold problems: 1. Putting a ban on something like bitcoin means cutting down electricity and internet to a region, because these two things are essential to run a wallet and transact. This leads a lot more problems than solutions. 2. Banning something in general only raises public curiosity about it. Coming to regulating bitcoin, government want to generate taxation from capital gains, so regulation is the two pronged sword here, it is a method to monitor the gains and keep launderers at check. Therefore average honest users will not face big problems with regulation. Majority of the people who are against regulation have illicit bitcoins at hand, and hence they want to save their asses. I agree with you that since the government wants to tax bitcoin there will be regulations instead of outright ban, outright ban is not in their favor either. But those who are against regulation are not the ones who are holding bitcoins illegally, there are some who prefer privacy and not being controlled by the government or anyone. There are many cases where assets in banks are sometimes frozen, confiscated for unknown reasons and take a long time to get back, causing them to miss a lot of their plans or many cases of not getting their assets back despite doing nothing wrong. So they want a private space that no one can invade. |
|
|
|
The current economic conditions are very difficult and these 2 choices are also difficult, when we work base jobs, the salary given is also small, but when the economic conditions are still recession like this, I think Commission Job is more worth trying than salary base jobs.
The economic crisis will cause spending and shopping to drop sharply, so commission jobs will be difficult to reach customers. With the jsalary base job, the working time will also be cut and the salary will not meet the daily demand because the items have increased by 15-30% while our salary has not increased. In this case, both are not dominant. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, gold might see one of two long-term changes: it could increase by $30,000 or decrease to $50 or $100 per ounce. On the other hand, if we experience another severe slump in the long term—say, let's 8 years—gold prices may decline. It is based on supply and demand, though. Therefore, I doubt there will be any left to sell in 8 years, gold will be valuable, which should raise prices rather than lower them.
Although many people say that gold has no aggregate supply, which is true, it is also difficult and expensive to mine gold so it is unlikely that gold will decline in price over time. Gold as well as bitcoin will always increase in price in the long run but will be much more stable than bitcoin. Currently, the gold price is also falling due to the impact of the economic crisis and the appreciation of the US dollar also causes the price of gold to decrease. But the countries are collecting gold in huge amounts, once everything is back to normal, gold will go up and my prediction will be at least x2 from here. I strongly believe that in the future, gold will remain a sought-after and top-of-mind commodity. |
|
|
|
Main parts of this puzzle are study, proper job , marriage, smart housing move and retirement plan! We shall Live like economist and study each step economically.
Is marriage really a requirement to life for most? Maybe for some but I still believe there are others that lives a more fulfilled life for themselves without getting married. There are also a few religious persons that there region or tradition forbids them from getting married or birthing a child. Life, life is just as complicated as that. It's never fair to anyone nor does it present to some an advantage over the rest. Even the rich have got places that irritates them too. We've just to keep trying and figruing ourselves out with every step, making mistake and correcting them. I think marriage is the most important thing - the life of the people revolve around. Without love and marriage people find the purpose of the life incomplete. But that too brings so much trouble in the life of people but then again they would not want to live without their partner Not that much but majority of us would be ending up on getting married and having kids but i couldnt say that this is the most important thing but of course having your wife is what we are really hoping for or getting along on someone you do love on forever.  This doesnt only revolved around on marriage life or aspect but also in other factors as well which you would really be needing to face up and trying out to make up things which you do know that it could significantly affect the way of living. When you are young you will think it is not the most important thing, but marriage is indispensable if you want to have a full and happy life like everyone else. And after getting married, it can be said that marriage is the most important because it affects your future as well as your children. I am a married person and according to my feelings, marriage is probably the most exciting and wonderful thing I've ever done and have never regretted. |
|
|
|
It may be that the person traded at a wrong time. When covid started there was a lot of panic in the market.
A lot of panic selling was happening and the market had a lot of uncertainty. Seeing this that person should have closed all his trades.
But he continued to eventually lose all his money. We can't really say if he was bad at trading but may be the time he started trading was bad.
OP is not talking about trading he is talking about binary options and it is a form of gambling disguised as trading, so his friend or any other player losing is natural. I have not tried with binary options but I know many people who play it and I can assure you that no one can win. In my opinion binary options don't need any knowledge, you just need to use your luck to make profit, we only have 2 options: increase or decrease in a certain period of time. |
|
|
|
New fed rates announced , Share market shaked very red colour. over 500Billion wiped. But when we come to BTC. BTC not react aggressively. BTC on his own way.
Most people put short positions on exchanges but liquidated because BTC pumped at that moment. its a hunt.
my conclusion is BTC decouple most of the equity markets. BTC has own way. So lets trust the timeline
Both are correlated but that doesn't mean they will always move the same in all cases, we all know the market is unpredictable so don't look at the market that way. And as you said it's a hunt, the market still has certain manipulations at some point, so the best way to avoid losing money is to limit trading while waiting for the big news to be announced. |
|
|
|
The price of Bitcoins won’t depend on months. Rather it will affect depending on the demand of the coins. If this month we witness great events regarding Bitcoins, or any bit nation adopting Bitcoins, then only the price will rise. These all events will eventually grow the interest among the people to buy more Bitcoins and hence the demand for the coin will increase and due to the limited supply of the coin, it will lead to the price boost. As we have witnessed November isn’t a bear time, so definitely we gonna see a bull run this time.
If according to your prediction, we will take into account the economic situation as well as the ongoing war situation. Yesterday the Fed continued to raise interest rates at a high level which means that the crisis is not over anytime and the war is still raging, all of this will cause the demand to invest in risky assets will continue to decline. Therefore, we are yet to see any bullish signal in November. My prediction there will be no growth this month and bitcoin will continue to move sideways from 18k-22k like previous months, maybe we have bottomed in this bearish season and we are entering the accumulation zone |
|
|
|
Today's match between Zimbabwe and Netherlands is extremely crucial for the former. If they manage to win, then there is a chance that they will finish within the top-4 in Group 2. And that will enable them to secure automatic qualification to the next T20 world cup. Even if either Bangladesh or Pakistan fails to finish in top-4, there is no threat for these teams. Because they are in top-10 of the ICC T20 rankings, they will also get the automatic qualification slot. If this happens, then Ireland will be the team failing to secure automatic slot.
Zimbabwe is not batting well. But Sikandar's king is still at the crease. They still have the opportunity to give big targets. Zimbabwe lost 5 wickets after collecting only 77 runs in 12.4 overs. However, Sikandar Raja, the most important player in the Zimbabwe squad, is still unbeaten. If he can play big innings then Zimbabwe will be able to collect 140-150. And 140 will be a big enough target to win against a team like the Netherlands. We got good performances from the Zimbabwean bowlers in the last matches. So it can be assumed that if Zimbabwe is able to give a target like 140 in today's match then the match will be controlled by the Zimbabwean bowlers. Sikandar Raja's batting was decent. After collecting 40 runs off 24 balls, he returned to the dressing room. Apart from Sikandar Raja and Sean Williams, none of the players played well. No player could even score 10 runs. Zimbabwe's innings ended with 117 runs. They lost all their wickets in 19.2 overs. I think there is no possibility of winning with such a low target. The Netherlands need less than 6 runs per over to win. Every bowler of the Netherlands performed well today. Zimbabwe bowlers had a lot of trouble facing Netherlands bowlers today. Is the pitch bowling friendly? Although I don't think the pitch is bowling friendly. So I expect the victory of the Netherlands in this match. |
|
|
|
<...>
This is the last post that was deleted today, I can't see any single reason for deleting it.
According to his post history, @len01 is a clear case of a signature spammer. Your post history looks much different, so you shouldn't be comparing your posts to his. You'd better open your own topic and ask the moderators for their opinion, because I don't see any particular reason for deleting your posts. It's possible that the moderators made a mistake in their assessment. They're only human, after all. Kudos to you for daring to speak against the tide. Likewise, thanks to Lucius and UmerIdrees for talking about something constructive instead of making baseless arguments. To be honest, I have no intention of spamming the forum. I post 24 to 25 a week and don't go above 3 to 4 daily as I try to maintain overall quality. While it is not rare to find many campaigners making 50 to 80+ posts a week. I will refrain from opening a new thread while there is already one. Hopefully, this thread will be noticed by the moderators and everything will be normal. |
|
|
|
Now coming to our particular case, do you mean to say that (for example) you did 20 posts from 10th October to 17th October and none of those posts gets deleted? However, did your old 20 posts prior to 10th October get deleted? If this is the case, then there is something wrong i guess.
Yes, you got it now, last two weeks I've made 25+25 posts, and none of those have been deleted. However, I cannot agree with all of len01's statements. He acknowledged that his posts might be unproductive. However, I cannot see anything unproductive or spammy in my case.  This is the last post that was deleted today, I can't see any single reason for deleting it. If it wasn't bot behavior, if they checked manually, then none of my posts would have been deleted, if they deleted my post for spam/off-topic reasons then they should also have deleted others' posts who replied to me. I'm not sure if moderators use bots or any automated software these days. But it should not be, this is not the right approach to stop spam. Their activity seems spammy to me. |
|
|
|
There's nothing is unfair, if you think it's unfair you can show the post that shouldn't deserve to get deleted.
i'm not saying that i feel unfair that my post has been deleted. but i said i feel unfair with the way of deletion I do believe it is not moderators activity, it could be Bot behavior. I have made a total of 27 new posts from October 24 to October 27 - and exactly 27 old posts were deleted in the same time frame. Every day the number of posts I make and the number of old posts getting deleted are the same. Moderators cannot monitor my activities for 24H/7 days to find me online and delete old posts within an hour or half hour after posting a new discussion. |
|
|
|
Not a bug, your posts are reported, seen as spams by moderator and got deleted.
If so, then if I do not make a new post, why is the old post not being deleted? Also, I don't make more than 4/5 posts daily, so how can it count as spam! It seems the posts are being deleted by an automated bot |
|
|
|
The same thing is happening to me since last week. If I make 5 new posts today then the old 5 posts are getting deleted. If I don't make any new posts then the old post is not getting deleted. I don't understand if it's a bug or something.  |
|
|
|
Yes Real Madrid failed to win the game, although not a defeat but a draw is an unexpected result when meeting an opponent like Girona. But that's the game of football that always surprises every game. Of course this result is the result expected by their rivals, Barcelona. Because with this result the distance between their points is getting closer. Vinicius goals they could not defend until the last seconds of the game.
I didn't expect Madrid to draw. It was an interesting match, Girona played well. Girona piled up a lot of players at the back. They made a tight lineup that made Madrid a little frustrated. It's the reason why Kroos got a red card, he was frustrated that it was difficult to break through Girona's defense. In addition, the problem of Benzema's absence also makes Madrid's attacking line weak. They need Benzema's figure when opponents stack players at the back to increase attacking creativity. Tchouameni's absence in midfield also left Madrid without a hardworking figure. The outcome of this match was completely unexpected for everyone. Everyone expected Real Madrid to win this match. Because Girona is a team in the relegation zone. And their performance is very poor. However, Madrid did not earn full points in this match. Madrid's attack and midfield players attacked a lot, but they could not win. I really missed Karim Benzema in this match. Had he been with the squad, the result of the match might have been in Madrid's favor. Because, Vinicius and Rodrygo are very talented, they are not yet experienced enough. And they make a lot of mistakes. Having an experienced striker like Benzema in the squad would have made their overall gameplay more organized. Benzema is injured. So now Madrid has to perform very carefully every match, otherwise, Madrid will lose more points. |
|
|
|
For Newcastle, actually, since being owned by Mohammed Bin Salman, my expectation is that they will buy a lot of new star players. They certainly have a lot of money. But my thoughts are wrong, they only bought a few players and last season managed to get out of the Relegation zone. Today Newcastle had better they were able to make the top five.
I think Newcastle would still buy alot of stars; the situation can be likened to a phrase that says good things take a while to happen. Which means Newcastle need to climb up the ladder gradually before they are able to attract top notch footballers. If Newcastle can get europa league football ahead of next season; then they would go atleast 3 leap forward in the calibre of players the clubside can attract, knowing fully well money is never a proble, Newcastle will be a top team in few years Premier League qualification was challenging for Newcastle even a few seasons ago. Such a team is now fourth in the Premier League points table. This is truly commendable. Although they are performing well. But they do not have star players in their squad. If they had tried to sign star players in previous seasons, no player would have been interested in joining Newcastle, because they had not any future. Newcastle has solidified their place in the Premier League this season. Now they can offer to bring in star players. They have a lot of money, their performance is now stable. If they can get the players they need in the squad now, they will strengthen themselves and compete for titles in the next few seasons. |
|
|
|
Poor performance has displayed by Lorient yesterday that they were continue their poor results from Nice that playing at home Lorient cannot break the defense of Nice although on the first half Lorient was able to scoring goal but during second half Nice was playing more better than them and the result is really unexpected me because before the match i thought Lorient can beat Nice however during the match Kasper Schmeichel has succesfully to managed his performance with very well even he has blocked several attempts from Lorient players and i think he has deserved as man of the match and next week will be hard match for Lorient because they have to fight against PSG
I must say that Nice played very well in this match. Playing for the visitors did not frighten them in the slightest and continued to provide fierce resistance against Lorient. The result they can turn things around by creating 2 goals to ensure victory. This gives the impression that the teams that are in the top 4 and trying to put pressure on Paris Saint Gemain are not too strong to do that. It was not easy for Nice to win against Lorient. Lorient was a strong team. And their performance this season is quite good. And Lorient was expected to fight PSG for the title this season. But they lost 2-1 against Nice. While Lorient's performance was not bad, Nice's players performed well. The match was competitive and enjoyable. The players of both teams performed well. And Nice's players took advantage of the weakness of Lorient's defenders to score two goals. Nice's performance at the start of the season was not good. But their performance in the last four matches is quite good and stable. Perhaps they will continue to try to move higher up the points table. |
|
|
|
The Europa League is getting competitive. Renowned teams like Barcelona, Manchester United, Arsenal and Ajax will play in the Europa League this season. This will increase the quality of the Europa League and make the league more competitive. So the Europa League cannot be neglected this season. It is impossible to predict which team will win the Europa League title.
We can add Juventus to those teams. This year, the European league has become a more challenging league as a result of the teams coming from the Champions league. At this stage, it is more important to finish the group leader in order to stay in the last 16 rounds. No team in the European league wants to be matched with teams from the champions league. I am feeling Juventus position is not compatible for having any positive performance in Europa Cup as they are badly struggling in Champions League because right now there around 10 to 12 players are in injury list, so they are bringing few new players which are not having experience of playing into big matches with yesterday they have hardly won against relegation zone team but good thing now they are having 3 wins streak in Italian league with most chances they could be knocked out from this Europa Cup quickly for having better results in their domestic league and for the chance of Champions League spot. The same can happen with Barcelona and Atlético Madrid because they are feeling better results in Spanish league instead of having good results in Europa Cup as we watch in last year. Inevitably it has to be done by Juventus coach Massimiliano Allegri, playing young players from their academy, even though it is risky at least it gives the coach confidence in Juventus youth players, because Juventus' young players had a good game in yesterday's match against Lecce , even though it was just a point win at least it gave an opportunity and confidence to the easy players from Juventus, it really helped to strengthen the void in the Juventus first team.. I agree with you. Juventus' entire team situation is now fragile and unstable. They lack enough talented players in defence, midfield and attack. And their match strategy also needs a change. Since they need a lot of players, Juventus management will not be interested in spending such a huge amount of money. So coach Allegri should use young players. Juventus have a lot of talented young players. If coach Allegri can make these players experienced and guide them properly then he will be successful. And Juventus' performance will stabilize. But I doubt Allegri will take such a risk. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
