PrimeDice down We are upgrading open SSL just to be on the safe side, had to take the site down until this is completed. http://heartbleed.com/Good choice.
|
|
|
Understood. Thanks for looking into it, at least! I feel a bit better already! I am a very paranoid person. It's borderline psychotic.
It's better than being the opposite, that's for sure.
|
|
|
How about coinroyale? Would love to be able to really see the provable fairness for myself as I am very paranoid!
I looked at their site, as far as I can tell, they are provably fair as long as you follow the standard procedure of setting a client seed. I will do my best to look at what they have there and make a verifier, although I can't guarantee anything. EDIT: I looked at the javascript source for the verifier on their page and unfortunately it's a bit over my head. Everything I know has been self taught, and Mersenne Twisters and Fisher Yates still stump me. Sorry that I can't help on this one.
|
|
|
BitVegas isn't/wasn't broke. We/they had enough to keep going for a while.
Indeed, they made a LOT of BTC off of people such as mLiberty Wow, that brings me back, he sent me 1 BTC before on a whim. That was an awesome day.
|
|
|
Very interesting. There are basically two topics: storage and bandwidth. Sounds like this here uses some kind of "proof of storage" but would you mind to talk a bit about the bandwidth part? Is a node with 56 KBit/s and 1 TB storage treated equal as a note with a 10 MBit/s upload and 1 TB storage?
Our development process is very different from most. We want to provide working solutions one by one than promising you the moon, and taking 3 years to deliver. In our first development run, you can run web nodes that sell bandwidth. These nodes sell bandwidth, and shuttle files around the network. Lets say: Node A: Is a node with 56 KBit/s and 1 TB storage Node B: 10 MBit/s upload and 1 TB storage Node A will be treated as a "passive" node, and Node B will be treated as an "active" node. People will want to use Node B because of the faster speed. On the other hand, Node A, has 1 TB of unused storage. So people will upload files to Node B, and Node B will charge for bandwidth and storage. Node B has to maintain file redundancy in case it goes down, so it will buy storage space from Node A, and verify periodically through hashing that Node A is storing the correct data. Node B can also rely on other external services, or another decentralized network such as MaidSafe to physically store the files. Node's B motive is to approach 100% saturation of its resources. So using Dropbox prices and 3x redundancy, Node B could generate about ~$150 a month. About half of this is from selling its hard drive, the other half is from reserving a small cache space and then shuttling uploaded files to other nodes and networks. Node A would earn substantially less. It would serve as a very poor shuttle for data. Furthermore because of the low bandwidth, it would be very hard to achieve full saturation of the hard drive. But wait, we still have a use for Node A. If we could pre-load Node A will files. Let's say tons of small < 100kb files that are slated for long term storage (lets say these are used on a backup application and probably won't really be accessed much at all). Therefore Node A would only have to pass hash verifications, and the occasional file transfer. It can also approach full saturation. Node A seems a bit more my case because being a Time Warner Cable-ian, I have 16 Megabit down and 1 Megabit up. Storing things is no problem for me. Sending them back, maybe.
|
|
|
Ugh, I want this. I have over 2.5 TB sitting empty on my computer that could be used for this.
|
|
|
BitVegas, RIP
|
|
|
Is it intentional that when you scan in a new private key it doesn't ask you to make a new backup?
Yes. The wallet only requires you to verify backups of keys generated internally. Imported keys already have an external source, and are assumed to be backed up already. Makes sense but an option to back up each/all wallets would be nice. I still made a new backup and it included the private key I imported. I destroyed the original copy of the private key, it was a vanity address generated piecewise.
|
|
|
You're right and that's a big question Rosplinpl! RGBKey we are currently developing private key assignment to users as well as escrow and multisig. These are my thoughts at a high level. How you're safe from us: We have the highest level of proof of solvency available. We use the Gregory Maxwell method of showing the total verifiable amount of user funds. Any logged in user sees a leaf icon on their dashboard that shows their individual balance included in the hierarchical tree. Independent auditors are great, we make every one of our users an independent auditor of our funds. Further, we show the public addresses of our cold storage wallets so you can see the money exists on the blockchain. You can see them here. https://bitcoinwallet.com/resource.phpHow we're safe from theft: We mandate all users to have 2FA and user data is encrypted. Our cold storage is actually cold storage. There is no automatic replenishment of the hot wallet. We don't disclose our security at an infrastructure level but we know the pursuit of perfect security in the background never ends. I encourage you to visit our site to see what we're doing, not because we claim to have solved every difficult problem, but because we're trying to make bitcoin more accessible to the mainstream. Price price.bitcoinwallet.com I don't give two shits if you hafe proof of solvency. Proof of solvency would not have stopped what happened at inputs.io from happening. You still have the private keys which means you control the money. You could wait until you store plenty of bitcoins, and then just take them all. Proof of solvency is not going to stop this.
|
|
|
Bounty offered to Mycelium developersWe are developping the BitID authentication protocol. Basicaly it's an open standard to facilitate user's registration in login on a service using its Bitcoin key (it could be compared to "Facebook connect" on the UX and flow). User scans a QRcode which contains a bitid:// URI, it's parsed for validity by the wallet and a confirmation is prompted. After choosing a Bitcoin address, the URI is signed and a POST is made in the callback addres contained in the URI. For the full explication of the protocol, examples and demo please refer to our GitHub : https://github.com/bitid/bitidTo be successfull, BitID must be implemented in most of the popular wallets. We would like to start the development with Mycelium (because it has already the signing message functionality). To motivate developers we are offering a bounty of 1 BTC. What is needed to do :- register the bitid:// scheme (so it is activated in case of click)
- throw a bitid:// intent when scanning a BitID QR code
- decode the URI and verify its format
- display a request for authentication showing the domain name callback and ask for validation
- ask the user to pick up or create a Bitcoin address for the authentication (show the last Bitcoin address used if this is a known callback address)
- sign the BitID URI with the private key
- POST the signature, the URI and the public key to the callback URL
- completion dialog : success/retry/cancel
Please PM me for more details and specifications. Eric I saw this today, and Mycelium, PLEASE ADD THIS
|
|
|
Warning to anybody considering using this, if you don't control the private keys, you don't own the bitcoins. This reminds me too much of inputs.io
|
|
|
Second Life is still a thing? Lol
|
|
|
Is it intentional that when you scan in a new private key it doesn't ask you to make a new backup?
|
|
|
Not really, I'd venture to say competition doesn't exists at this point and may not ever exist. They will all seamlessly integrate through APIs. After all you probably have a Facebook AND a Twitter right? You might have a preference, but still use both.
Actually I have neither, but I get your point
|
|
|
Considering I have over 2 TB of space just on my normal hard drive, i'd love to use this. It looks really cool.
We have removed our whitepaper because we want to refine it a bit more. At least according to those numbers if you sold you hard drive at Dropbox prices you would make $2,000 a year off your 2 TB. You will be a very happy camper when we add proof of resource to Storj. We aren't promising that quite yet as the computer science algorithms need a ton more work, but you might be able to run a web node (if you don't mind doing a decent amount of config) and make a nice sum of coins that way. If there's decent documentation on how everything works I won't have a problem doing any of that stuff. I don't care how much I get paid really, as long as it's noticeable that something is happening. The problem is that the 2 TB is split between being half on my 2 TB hard drive and the other half on an empty 1 TB external. An easy solution would probably just be to partition my main drive. EDIT: If you have any kind of beta for this, please let me know. I'd be eager to help work out bugs and just generally help with this. EDITEDIT: I just looked on the website and entered my email, didn't see that before. Our early supporters will get to play around with the web nodes. Those just get stuff working and allow you to play around with our platform. Should not be a problem when we have our apps for that. We also plan on working with Maidsafe for the whole sell your hard drive part. That's awesome, I seriously cannot wait until this and things like maidsafe are a thing. We're getting closer and closer to a decentralized internet, but I think one problem is going to be too many decentralized platforms that end up just competing with each other for users.
|
|
|
Considering I have over 2 TB of space just on my normal hard drive, i'd love to use this. It looks really cool.
We have removed our whitepaper because we want to refine it a bit more. At least according to those numbers if you sold you hard drive at Dropbox prices you would make $2,000 a year off your 2 TB. You will be a very happy camper when we add proof of resource to Storj. We aren't promising that quite yet as the computer science algorithms need a ton more work, but you might be able to run a web node (if you don't mind doing a decent amount of config) and make a nice sum of coins that way. If there's decent documentation on how everything works I won't have a problem doing any of that stuff. I don't care how much I get paid really, as long as it's noticeable that something is happening. The problem is that the 2 TB is split between being half on my 2 TB hard drive and the other half on an empty 1 TB external. An easy solution would probably just be to partition my main drive. EDIT: If you have any kind of beta for this, please let me know. I'd be eager to help work out bugs and just generally help with this. EDITEDIT: I just looked on the website and entered my email, didn't see that before.
|
|
|
Considering I have over 2 TB of space just on my normal hard drive, i'd love to use this. It looks really cool.
|
|
|
|