Bitcoin is about to RALLY UP again.

The misadventure of the so called alternative chains is over. Those who ran from BTC because for... 2 or 3 days... it was more profitable to mine/trade solidcoins found themselves stuck into an actual "ScamCoin wormhole" and their "profit" resumed to a total loss.
What ended up to be somewhat funny, as solidcoin creator was claiming to be "solving bitcoin issues", whereas was his rigged thing which got hacked, cracked and bashed. To add injury to the sorrow he even goes to do a sort of roll-back and come up with a new chain with 1 million coins ready to go (to garbage).

If you check the dates, bitcoin started to this low by the IXCoin entrance, kept low this far. However ixcoin, namecoin and i0coin trade is now a flat line, solidcoin is gone. Time for the one that remains powerful: BITCOIN

Back on 29th August I would put some to it, today I just feel like a fool about it.
Sorry, bumped the wrong topic while announcing improvements on my multi-coin graphs.

Added a LIVE graphic banner for forums with BTC last from MtGox and a live chart:

The code:

Here's what I want to pull in the first place.

Just made a few readjusts:

- 1 minute checks
- Refreshing is now done using jquery's ajax.
- Solidcoin removed.

Wrong thread pulled up...

I would go by explaining the time vs value logic at such time, but why bother.
Anyway, this was from the time I was still believing in solidcoin (yes... there was a time...)

Just made a few readjusts:

- 1 minute checks
- Refreshing is now done using jquery's ajax.
- Solidcoin removed.

Fix'd
He isn't talking about attacks on BITCOIN, but on forks.

1) It's also a statement that the network can be started with X pre-mined coins. This X can then be arbitrary - let's say "the community" decided it should be 2 millions instead.

2) Listen to half-dozen of forumers is far from "a global Solicoin users' votecast".

3) If I get it right, the issue with ArtForz was that he said to found a bug, CH told him to "take a hike" and... well... he took.

4) Claims like "we decided to switch of the blockchain" is the same as saying that solidcoin has what bitcoin hasn't: A CENTRAL entity able to pull the plug on it. For that I will use Euros or USD, much more trustworthy than forumers with nicknames. Well... by making it proprietary CH already stated he "owns it", so let it run as his scam and let whoever wants to fall for it... but by such rules and capabilities, solidcoin becomes nothing but a utter scam.

Who cares?

Those attacks are just possible against forks because they either lack hashing power or their chains are fucked up by "improvements".
Bitcoin has nothing to do with it nor is under attack, and that's what matters. This is BITCOIN, not "MY FREAKING SCAM FORK" forum.

Sorry, I don't even give a F for your currency to even look at it. The previous 4 fuck ups were enough for me to stick to bitcoin ALONE for a (good) while.

OK... from these first fork attempts we'd hit an almost 100% fail score.

Namecoin: Not a currency. Currencies are not attached to any particular service, they're meant to be neutral.

Solidcoin: its developing team just outscored all the possible fuck ups one can go against! From having the blockchain hacked, to input a proprietary license over a forked MIT licensed software, to do a sort of "restart" with 1 million pre-generated (why not generate 100 or 200 million instead? It's just a number.). Also trust-chain is broken. Who tells us if CoinHunter finds a bug in the future and jumps to "solidcoin 3" or "solidcoin 4"...? Impossible to have such postal developing projects! Solidcoin must be deemed a Russian Roulette.

i0coin: Dead on the way. It was just a joke about ixcoin. Returned but not much use.

IXCoin: 1 fuck up in the account with two "mandatory updates", still better than solidcoin but for how long?

Let's see what future brings and forget about those fails.

What future?! What you're saying and doing is so retarded that I'll feel sorry for any idiot who downloads your software.

Like the "standard TCP/IP" touch. I might assume that over non-standard TCP/IP you already can punch people in the face...

Hold a second! WTF is that "SC 2.0"?!
Start over?!

Solidcoin goes straight to my shitlist! Could be interesting but its developers are totally postal, erratic and pathetic.

 

Nobody.

If I was up to start cherry picking users, I wouldn't be coming to this forum on the first place.

You mean exec and it's cat not vi. Vi would open the file to edit, cat shows its content.

What's retarded about using a forum?! Supposedly there's no financial data here, nothing but baloney and chit-chat. So nothing to worry about, let the "hacker" be happy.

That "this" was what made PHP insecure. After that "java-like piece of crap" came along magic_quotes_gpc defaults to off and "deprecated", as many don't seek this settings in php.ini their sites become vulnerable to SQLi.
PDO is the typical piece of "paranoia-security", deem all unsafe because a paranoiac found something else more "safe"...

grod, setting a mining rig requires tech skills, and still the dificulty will go up if hashrate goes up, so the risk is high. I wonder how many already got sink in useless hardware thinking such way...

funny, I don't use php ready made software (the open in open source doesn't stand for open for the right folks amd I'm no lego maker.) and still a "full featured forum" falls under the easy category. My "medium difficulty" cat starts at FB and hard when things like socket_listen() comes to the scene.