It doesn't, indeed it does absolutely nothing, it's a totally useless surgery. But was the initial "belief" at the West.
Still turns out hard to believe someone to be so lifeless to chase or care if others masturbate or not.

It isn't even nearly the same thing! Circumcision is way less harmful than female genital mutilation. Your foreskin isn't that important... really.
Still, the reason why circumcision is so popular at USA is the most funny: To prevent masturbation...

Oh! The Dark Ages! They really insist to stick around!

Why not let this topic die?
Let's sum this up:

Libertarians: let them die and rot.

Socialists: welfare.

Religious: charity.

Which of them solves poverty? In the bad way only libertarians. The others just assume a constant flow of the poor.

Me too and I really don't understand the need those guys have that others share their delusion! Is like if they feel that if nobody else believes in their imaginary friend they will look like plain retards or something,

Apparently gays can't share their happiness... aren't humans or something like it. 

So, if you don't go peek your neighbor's private life you've nothing else to do? Now that's a sad life!

Why people just read half of statements?
Islamic banking doesn't charge interest... but this ain't all! Islamic bank charges commission for transactions, making it way more expensive than interest-based banking and put the burden at the wrong side - depositors. Basically nobody will want to have an account there.
Zakat is the same as old Christian charity, common during Middle Ages, and it never prevented any poverty, it's just a rudimentary version of welfare.

Get a life!

"Hate Islam" has a broad meaning. It doesn't relate only for immigration problems.
My point for an instance goes around killing and forcing people. In the day Islam becomes rational and stop being a murderous fascist political ideology disguised as religion*, I'll rest my case and leave them alone and happy.

* As I see it, Islam is not more than what we would get if Hitler said Mein Kampf was dictated by God and now we would have the Nazi religion.

Discussing US immigration is way off-topic, but it is a pure display on how hazardous immigration may be.
Regardless if US is a "big country" or not, it isn't for the locals. The locals were replaced by immigrants and exterminated or side-lined.
To add injury to sorrow, these immigrants are now xenophobic... well... in the end they are right. They simply don't want others to pull on them the same trick they pulled on the natives. 

"Civilized" as you say means only that's a society of unrelated people and it has some sort of building. Ancient Egypt was civilized, Sumeria was civilized, Rome was civilized...

Modern means not only civilized, but with rational people. Not folks looking up what two adults with perfect consent do or don't with their lives and their bodies.

But Islam doesn't acknowledge any " modern standards". For them this is still VII Century.

There's no place for people caring for what others do or don't in a modern society.

OMFG! We are in the XXI Century, none of the ancient economic systems are alternative to any of ours. That system is designed for a sort of Mercantilism and usually ends up in Feudalism.

Anyway, don't forget to pay your zakat when your camel caravan passes by the Quairish tribe... 

Wrong! There is, based upon the "example of Prophet". Muhammad married Aisha being him 53 and she 9.

He probably does. That's the issue about ISIS, you see how messed up this guy mind is, he calls himself "Muslim" yet knows nothing about Islam. This is the typical ISIS militant, a blatant ignorant of Islam that can't find his identity and decided to call himself "Muslim".
I said already I've to give this one out to Muslims; ISIS are just ignorant bastards as even for Islam standards (which is already a religion violent as hell) they are way too violent and erratic.

Sorry to re-quote your absurd statement, but it goes like this:

IF you bother with:

- Muslims to praise Allah
- Muslims to pray 5 times each day
- Ramadan

the yes, your statement can be considered true. None of these things provide any harm to others and do whatever you want then.

IF you however bother with:

- Muslims killing people in the name of Islam
- Muslims making constant threats
- Muslims trying to imposed their insane Sharia around
- Muslims killing ex-Muslims
- Muslims killing gays
- Muslims killing women
- Muslims killing... and killing... and killing

then your statement is purely absurd. Nobody should care for the religious side of Islam, but people should care about its' built-in violence.

What blasphemy?! He is clueless about what Shias are!
Let me fill you the blanks in short:
Basically after the death of Muhammad two guys step forward claiming to be his successor; Abu Bakr, father-in-law of Muhammad, and Ali, son-in-law and cousin of Muhammad. Ali was appointed as his successor by Muhammad himself prior to his death, but Abu Bakr became the first Caliph.
Sunnis are the line of Abu Bakr, Shias the line of Ali.
Your statement goes after two of the Twelvers, a Shia sub-sect.
Because the religion of pieces can't provide peace at all, then we've not only these 2 big factions, but within themselves a lot of sub-sects formed by this or that "scholar". Reason why you see Sunnis and Shias forcing other Sunnis and Shias to "convert" as if they were of a separate religion.

Wrong again. People hates Islam because it keeps killing and harassing people out of nothing.

OMFG! He calls the followers of Ali (son-in-law and cousin of Muhammad) idk what about Hassan and Hussain! He doesn't even know where Sunnis came from! Ever heard about Abu Bakr?


WRONG! The Meccans NEVER threat Muhammad's life before he became a robber at Medina. You've the letters the Meccans sent to his uncle to try to put some sense into him.
After he was just a robber who beat the cops...