Guys i got XDN in polo. How do i withdraw them to Bittrex? At bittrex it says that i need a payment ID? Anyone can help?
You need to withdraw to your own wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Don't be a knucklehead - Bitcoin doesn't have a premine.
|
|
|
|
Maidsafe.
What's up with all the smart shitcointalkers who don't understand the concept of greater than/less than? Let me enlighten you, maidsafe has a market cap of $42M, OP requested coins under or less than $1M, 42 is more than 1, so it fails this criterion. I know it's complicated, but I know you guys can do it. My picks: Myriadcoin, Nyancoin, and Vertcoin ($880k right now, think it bumped over 1M couple days ago tho). |
|
|
|
This is what one of the top 3 alt coin developers had to say about Segwit. Gulden has already update to latest code base but left Segwit disabled. ...
Lol one of the top three altcoin developers. Gulden added a new diff retarget algorithm so he's a top three developer? Satoshi, Nic Saberhagen, and MaNI...Riiiiiiiiiight  Besides, segwit has additional benefits besides extra block space - eliminating malleability which I think makes implementation of payment channels/lightning easier for instant payments, easier integration of side chains, and easier cross chain transactions. I'm not saying it's a great idea or not, but even if it never activates on Bitcoin it still might be good as then Litecoin would have some distinguishing feature. |
|
|
|
|
If inflation was the flaw with PoS then why aren't NXT and NEM dominating. Granted, NEM is the only PoS coin in the top ten of market cap, but it's at #9. Dash is kind of PoS I guess at #7. The top six coins are all PoW except ripple, which isn't really a coin imo. There are lots of PoS coins with inflation between zeit and NEM though. Steem is at #11 and don't they have like super high inflation? Are you sure that's really the key issue?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't hold any zeit, but I also think this is a big mistake. Can you think of any coins in the past that have slashed emission and then went on to become more successful? Maybe darkcoin/dash, but that's all I can come up with. I think you will taint your project with the smear that coin emission was halted to benefit early adopters. No one wants to buy into something owned by a small number of people where no more will ever be created; just look at NXT, they screwed themselves over from the beginning using this no inflation logic, and there were probably more people in NXT ICO than there are zeit knights right now.
But, like I said, I don't own any and an not voting, so will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Also, why didn't you make people sign large addresses to cast a vote or something, to prove that you actually have some skin in the game. There's probably people in altcoin section with more sock puppet accounts than you got total votes in your poll...just sayin...
|
|
|
|
It seems like XMR and BTC will break out at the very same time. How could you prepare if you only have XMR and some cash? I'm still resisting the temptation to sell all the cash for XMR and most probably I'll be sorry for that decision, but still wondering what you guys think about that?
Apparently GUI is here, if that factors into your decision. From monero-dev on freenode this morning: [06:17:27] <medusa_> hyc: win x86, x64 are good. os-x is good too
[06:17:32] <hyc> so that means we can finally do a public release?
[06:19:15] <fluffypony> yes
[06:19:24] <hyc> yay
[06:19:47] <fluffypony> we've been able to release for a few days, just been finalising environmental stuff and so on
[06:19:55] <fluffypony> (beta release) Honestly I think there is going to be some dumping when the actual release is available and announced. Seems like that is always the case for some crypto release that has been built up for a while, and this is like that times one hundred. But, I'm typically wrong, so there's that, too. |
|
|
|
So what's the future plan of XDN after delisting? It should be also included in the announcement.
It still trades on bittrex, cryptopia, hitbtc, and maybe elsewhere. I don't think any future plans have changed. |
|
|
|
i think the people behind poloniex are invested in XMR, it was the exchange that gave XMR its break too (there is not even a LTC market). expect other cryptonote coins to be delisted too, poloniex is a big exchange now so expect a lot of low volume coins to be delisted in 2017. i guess that exchange will focus on new innovative and high volume coins from now on.
The first part of this is probably true. Poloniex was first exchange to trade Monero (or Bytecoin or any other cryptonote) besides TheKoziTwo's cryptonote.exchange site, afaik. And it did generate massive volume on the first Monero pump for them, and they have continued to be the dominant exchange for Monero since then, so I wouldn't be surprised if the owner and others are holding more than a couple XMR. However, they do seem pretty loyal to some older coins which have low volumes, but have been on their exchange since the start or close to it, such as Huntercoin, Vertcoin, Myriadcoin, Quatloo, Noblecoin, Riecoin, and probably a few others. I believe these all have some level of active development, and I'm not sure about Noble or Quatloo, but the rest have some defining feature that makes them unique. Anyway, I do find it a bit odd that they kicked off the ducknote, which does OK volume and clearly does have some ongoing development, but they let Bytecoin and Boolberry stay. I think BBR has similar volume, but practically no development. And Bytecoin is basically dead with a worse distribution than XDN, but I guess it was the originator, so maybe that's why. |
|
|
|
Quote from donslip that he deleted for some reason while I was replying: Quote from: jwinterm on Today at 08:34:28 PM
Also afaik your mobile wallets and the latest desktop GUI with linking feature is also closed source.
The source code of our latest desktop wallet is right there on our github. Seriously do you ever get tired of being wrong? Maybe spend 2 seconds checking facts before randomly spouting off?
Quote from: jwinterm on Today at 08:34:28 PM
I asked about linking feature a few pages ago, nobody could explain how it works, so I went to look, but it's closed source.
Right, if by "asked" you mean "Repeatedly made completely false statements and assumptions about how it works" and by "closed source" you mean "the code is right there on github"...
Anyway enough playing with obvious trolls for me, I'm going to go do some more constructive work now, thanks for the free entertainment though you really would make a great jester.
Perhaps for the new year you should challenge yourself to go an entire day without making obviously false statements Wink You're right, desktop one has had source code released. I didn't bother to check. I'm lazy. Sue me, or call me troll, whatever floats your boat. I guess mobile wallets are not open source though since you didn't bring that up? |
|
|
|
How do you get down off a ducknote?
Just wait for it to hit one sat then you can hop right off. |
|
|
|
|
If I had to guess the coin I'm most associated with is Monero, having written and supported a GUI wallet for two years while waiting for the official one to get done, but whatever. Also afaik your mobile wallets and the latest desktop GUI with linking feature is also closed source.
Edit: The guy above asked you directly about the mobile wallets twice and you ignored him, so I'm assuming that's a no. I asked about linking feature a few pages ago, nobody could explain how it works, so I went to look, but it's closed source.
|
|
|
|
I guess I just like triggering overly sensitive developers with innocuous questions  Really I own lots of different coins and follow some others, so I browse the altcoin sections occasionally, then once I make a comment that thread will keep popping up on site unread replies, so I will check it once in a while. This isn't your Ann thread anyway - the topic was a question. Shouldn't people be free to come in here and put forth arguments both in favor and opposed without being immediately attacked as a troll or shill? Personally I wouldn't buy gulden or characterize it as a good "investment" because: - I very rarely would touch any coin with a premine (I think one exception is decred where I got most of what I hold from airdrop), but especially one that is basically a Bitcoin clone. - I don't use closed source software for anything cryptocurrency related. - I'm not Dutch (I think it was a mistake to attempt decentralized country coins). - I think it was a bit misleading to launch with a premine that was mostly supposed to be for an airdrop to Dutch people then being like, "maybe we'll just keep this for development fund..." If it bothers you so much to see me ask a question or give my opinion maybe you should request OP to make thread self-moderated and change the title to "Reasons you should buy gulden". Have a holly jolly Xmas  |
|
|
|
I will give the Gulden development team some credit after looking into this new release. Technically they might be the best in crypto but they have dreadful marketing, the marketing is so bad that you have to wonder if the entire community lives under a rock or is non existent and made up of bots.
Jared would of made this update look 100 times better then what these devs did. MaNI next time take the fucking offer. Your dev skills with Jareds marketing.
Let me put this in simple terms you can understand, I would never ever work for a con man like Jared, not for any price. I work for Gulden because they don't have a con man like Jared. If Gulden were to get a con man like Jared I would leave, instantly. Coins like that will -never- have a proper development team, because absolutely no legitimate real programmer would risk tarnishing their reputation to be involved in such an obvious scam. Paying to appear in a few conferences is not marketing, utter outright lies is not marketing, you don't know what real marketing is, you probably never will. Now go away please you have no idea what you are talking about, go stick to your precious scam and stop trying to involve me in it. I have no interest whatsoever in what you are selling. Clearly you have no interest in real projects with a long term vision so this project is not for you, go back to Jared and go worship him, we don't want you here. You and your sockpuppets were crying about 'marketing' when were at 300 sat, your are crying about it when we are at 3000 sat, and you will still be crying about it when we are at 30000 sat one day in the future, meanwhile you are oblivious to the only things that really matter, real user growth. Where I come from we have a single word for people like you: clueless. Why exactly is dgb a scam and gulden is not? Doesn't gulden have a much bigger premine that is currently a much much bigger share of coins in circulation now? I don't own any gulden or digibyte, just curious about the choice of language re: scam. Afaics it seems like the blacker pot calling the kettle black, but maybe I'm missing some part of the story. |
|
|
|
Without getting into personal attacks or specifics in the spirit of keep things civil: There's been a major disagreement between the two co-founders of the coin Poramin Insom (Lead Dev and Co-Founder) and Gary Le (Co-Founder) as to the direction of the coin and as to how funding is being utilised. Poramin has done 100% of the coding for Zcoin and will continue to maintain Zcoin at the current github at ( https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin). The new website will be at zcoin.finance, the @zcoinofficial twitter at https://twitter.com/zcoinofficial and the BCT thread and Telegram chat room will remain the same. Gary has started his own Github of the coin forked from Poramin's version at ( https://github.com/zcoinproject/zcoin) and will retain control of the Twitter @zcoinproject, Reddit and Zcoin.tech domain. The differences between the two for the moment will be in as to who the founder's reward is distributed to. Further details can be obtained from our slack at https://zcoinofficial.slack.com and get yourself an invite at http://invite.zcoin.finance:3000/All coins prior to the fork will be recognized by both Poramin's and Gary's versions of Zcoin so if you maintain both wallets, you will get coins in both. As to who will the exchanges and pools will recognize, that is yet to be seen and we will keep you posted on updates. I understand that Gary's version will contain some modifications as well to his founder's reward from the existing one so exchanges and pools cannot just be stagnant with the current version and will have to make a choice between the two. If you wish to support Poramin's version of the coin, you can obtain the updated release at https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/releases. Thank you for your patience in the matter and I will continue to update you guys on any news here! I know it's a frustrating and tough rode but we believe some short term sacrifices are necessary for the long term growth of the coin. Thank you! You didn't even say who you are or who is controlling this thread (let alone what cause the disagreement and why it escalated to a split). Thanks for clearing things up |
|
|
|
|
I don't get the whole asset thing. Buy burst to buy assets that pay out in more burst. I mean, I guess...it just seems like the whole economy and community is kinda too small to have one let alone many interest or dividend paying assets.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I asked a while ago and didn't get a response:
Can anyone explain the benefits of cryptonite mini blockchain scheme compared to just running a pruned node for Bitcoin or a clone?
|
|
|
|
...
And just out of curiousity, how big is BBR blockchain atm?
Just synced up on Ubuntu - about 3.5 GB. |
|
|
|
Did you just call me a prick? Merry xmas to you too, Spoetprick Seriously though you're just raging against strawmen. You're like the retarded Don Quixote of shitcointalk. Who cares what is on a sweatshirt? If someone wears a magic internet money sweatshirt about Bitcoin does that mean literally only wizards can use it? Also, thanks for (not) clarifying about what bcx did or didn't do, you 1337 hax0r you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
