Install and run p2pool. It lets you merged-mine the whole set, including bitcoins.
(For example I am currently using it on BTC, NMC, DVC, GRP, IXC, I0C and CLC all at once.)
-MarkM-
same goes for me (and another MMable coin)
|
|
|
This new *coin is not made for be traded, sell/buy. It's just for "fun".
remind this... Yeah and XRP are not a currency, just an anti-spam device. Naive much? -MarkM- wrong thread
|
|
|
the graph clearly shows its dieing/dead.
|
|
|
This new *coin is not made for be traded, sell/buy. It's just for "fun".
remind this...
|
|
|
u can edit the other post too
|
|
|
Hey everyone. I made a Bitcoin paper certificate for my niece last week. What do you guys think? This is a low resolution version. I'd be happy to upload the source file if people were interested. [note: I took out the photo of my niece and replaced it with a stock photo of an almost as pretty girl, and of course the private key is a dummy]
---snip---
2000x1104 is low res? OK!
|
|
|
Oh boy. Maybe it is forked into more than one network?
I have only two connections, how many do you have?
Also what block number does yours show, mine says 608697
-MarkM-
610148 addnode the same ip i did send u for a public node 9 cons atm
|
|
|
I0coin is a merged-mining coin, Terracoin is not. The merged-mining patches need to be updated to work with the new bitcoin version once the new database type and so on in bitcoin is all in place.
I just updated my bitcoin to use the new type of database, it took a long time but seems to be working. Maybe allow a little more time for any problems to be found then look at updating the merged mining patches. Then all the merged mined coin types will be able to upgrade using those patches.
Meanwhile i0coin difficulty is now so low even CPUs can mine it, difficulty right now is only 7.47686009
Its a good time for people who usually cannot mine anything to snap up some coins, as once all the altcoin upgrade to new code i0coin is probably not going to go away.
-MarkM-
according to i0coind its difficulty is 95 atm
|
|
|
another donation, 1LTC d480aebacc71f2c73a49dd4cea3808da13c4186a1ddc8e509f602f955abf013c
|
|
|
so can i make now a wallet.dat with ~46M keys?
I made one a while ago with keypool set to 100M I don't know how many it actually made but I stopped it at ~100MB of wallet.dat, it felt like it took a few extra seconds to open but seemed to work fine past that is there a way to import a huge list of privkeys? pywallet dosnt work for that nor for the new wallets You could make a script that parses the list of private keys into separate importprivkey commands every import means chainrescan, maybe i should do this on a offline bitcoind, otherwise its going to take longer than im alife i guess I did not know that, If offline doesn't work (still scanning the blocks you have), I guess you could set up a closed circuit of clients that only connect to each other and only have early blocks nah was talking about a fresh (no blocks, beside the genesis one) and offline bitcoind, as soon everything is imported move the wallet to a online bitcoind or just let it sync.
|
|
|
so can i make now a wallet.dat with ~46M keys?
I made one a while ago with keypool set to 100M I don't know how many it actually made but I stopped it at ~100MB of wallet.dat, it felt like it took a few extra seconds to open but seemed to work fine past that is there a way to import a huge list of privkeys? pywallet dosnt work for that nor for the new wallets You could make a script that parses the list of private keys into separate importprivkey commands every import means chainrescan, maybe i should do this on a offline bitcoind, otherwise its going to take longer than im alife i guess
|
|
|
winblows users, ROFL
|
|
|
rZfxS46vgb29R83CU7yGsvJvEsKNWxj2Pj, ty
|
|
|
so can i make now a wallet.dat with ~46M keys?
I made one a while ago with keypool set to 100M I don't know how many it actually made but I stopped it at ~100MB of wallet.dat, it felt like it took a few extra seconds to open but seemed to work fine past that is there a way to import a huge list of privkeys? pywallet dosnt work for that nor for the new wallets
|
|
|
i would even request higher conditions to get out of the newbie section.
|
|
|
so can i make now a wallet.dat with ~46M keys?
|
|
|
It works for me.
Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed. Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it. Hmm? Email address can have spaces? I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them. "John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it. no, this is against the RFC I've never personally had an email address like that, but I know people who did. Organizations in the day used quoted names as email addresses. I guess even if the RFC bans it, people still use those addresses and they should not be banned. I've never seen an email address with a space in it. Hell, I didn't know it was possible. Learn something new every day, I suppose. good to see, so my postfix got another spamfilter -> filtering emails from retards
|
|
|
just found out the scrypt cgminer crash, if compiled with -O2 the optimations lets it segfault, with -g it works fine. gonna send u the core + binary per PN.
Can't debug something unless it's with -g as well. -g shouldn't change the risk of crashing, but going from no optimisations to -O2 might. sry, forgot to add the -g
|
|
|
|