|
For the record, for a price to go down 200% from a given point, it would first have to go down 100%, at which point the price would be zero.
After that, it would wander off into negative value.
So we can safely assume that no coin has dropped by 200% thus far. :-)
|
|
|
|
You're right that a level price is not what we wanted or expected for XC.
On the other hand almost every other project's price has decreased, so relatively speaking we've done very well.
To my mind this speaks of the confidence that XC investors have.
Not exactly. Price is still off about 80% since the initial pump. I'm not sure what that remark implies. Not implying anything. The price of most coins have gone down as much. The XC price hasn't done any better than other comparable coins over the last 4 months or so. DRK is down about the same from it's highs and might have performed a little better than XC. Fair enough. I suppose we're parsing the data differently. The initial pump is a different phenomenon to the seasonal price action for coins. After the initial pump XC has stayed mostly flat. In comparison, most coins this season have gone down. |
|
|
|
You're right that a level price is not what we wanted or expected for XC.
On the other hand almost every other project's price has decreased, so relatively speaking we've done very well.
To my mind this speaks of the confidence that XC investors have.
Not exactly. Price is still off about 80% since the initial pump. I'm not sure what that remark implies. |
|
|
|
it seems that BTC are growing slow and steady, we need good news about XC
I think XC has plenty of good news. It might just need to be explained and presented. It's closed source but had credibly stayed in the top 20 coins market cap wise for quite a while. We have a solid foundation. the problem is we are staying at this level since june. Hopefully the price will rise in future and not dump instantly again You're right that a level price is not what we wanted or expected for XC. On the other hand almost every other project's price has decreased, so relatively speaking we've done very well. To my mind this speaks of the confidence that XC investors have. |
|
|
|
Jus updated to the latest version - strange bug noticed. Can not change my chat address:  Yes this will be changed pretty soon. |
|
|
|
Please make an option to leave a group chat, because if you leave now you just get put right back in one where you can't respond because the public key is missing.
Yes this is a good idea. |
|
|
|
got another one from another address ...Who is trying to conmtact me ? same error
[snip]
That was Mountaingoat I think. |
|
|
|
Just got a message from Battbot (and replied).
I was chatting to Dan earlier too.
Cryptico and Mountaingoat, I get your messages but you don't seem to get my replies. Weird...
Mountaingoat, the message you sent lacked a pubkey.
do you need same router settings as mixer to be able to chat? Not that I know of. |
|
|
|
|
Just got a message from Battbot (and replied).
I was chatting to Dan earlier too.
Cryptico and Mountaingoat, I get your messages but you don't seem to get my replies. Weird...
Mountaingoat, the message you sent lacked a pubkey.
|
|
|
|
made a group with you and mountain do you see it?
No, I made a group with you and synechist, do you see it? I also can't seem to be able to delete people out of my address book. Did you just update to the latest wallet version (released today)? Yes, but it doesn't work properly. I send you a message, but I think you haven't received it. I can't delete people out of my address book, or at least, sometimes I can and sometimes I can't, it is random. I received your messages and replied. It seemed to be lacking a pubkey though, which is weird because it would've come in with your message. |
|
|
|
made a group with you and mountain do you see it?
No, I made a group with you and synechist, do you see it? I also can't seem to be able to delete people out of my address book. Did you just update to the latest wallet version (released today)? |
|
|
|
anyone wants to test group chat??
I do, but I don't think it works for me. Count me in! |
|
|
|
This just reinforces the fact that it's important to get varying perspectives in code reviews  . Does XC have an idea of who will be performing its pre-launch reviews? Yup ;-) |
|
|
|
The only logic I see, is the fact that XC's tech is cutting in edge in both anonymous transactions and secured communications (XCHAT)...
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
There's a reason people don't use microsoft products when they want to be anonymous though. Also, Security through obscurityYeah, we're not aiming at security through obscurity. |
|
|
|
Now that the air is clearer, who's up for a bit of Group XChat testing? Woohoo! |
|
|
|
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
Robinwilliams, your logic is plain to see and I do get it. However I also get your tone, and I get the types of topics you bring up. You: - almost always - if not always - post negatively about XC - harp on about issues that have been resolved and that you've already discussed here previously - try to find reasons to put a negative spin on news - patently ignore facts central to the topics you discuss that invalidate your cases against XC. This is trolling. You are *not* "just kinda letting [your] thought process all hang out;" you are wilfully ignoring facts contrary to your negative view of XC. As you well know, trolling is not allowed on Bitcointalk. As such, this is to notify you that you are banned. Do not post here anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Let's treat even trolls with politeness.
|
|
|
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people Since no funds will change hands, what exactly would need to reviewed anyway All that needs to be checked is the allocation of shares POST and that is easy to do. However, reputation of the Dev is impeccable anyway, regardless of the FUD that has been thrown about  A third party's involvement will bolster the legitimacy of the ITO regardless of how little is at stake. Not everyone knows or trusts XC; the stronger our case, the easier it is for everyone. |
|
|
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people please tell me ur going to open source before you try to do a stock offering? you do realize you are promising something is under the hood that no one knows is even THERE for a coin. and now you are selling a company based on that promise? most people are going to laugh their asses off at you if you do a closed source "anon platform" company (for whatever reason) that can be bought into all built around software that nobody has seen? or just a few people have seen? Something about your tone is unnecessary. That said, we've been clear (moreover in a press release, which you should've read) about how we're bringing XC into the public: internal testing and consultations, public reviews, bounties, then open source. This is the plan, and everyone knows it; nobody is wandering in blindly. Lastly, XC Inc is *not* based on the code, since it's a private company developing various *other* technologies, mostly based on and extending the usefulness of the currency. So even if we keep the code entirely unreviewed, it'll make little difference to XC Inc. |
|
|
|
well if the bug is real i don't care for an XC Atlas review one bit anymore.  Same, maybe we should get the guy who found the exploit to review our code, maybe not the official reviewer, but one of the reviewers. The more code reviews the better. Yeah. How about we offer him a bounty when the time is right? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
