I have to say that I almost fell off my chair laughing when I saw this Default Trust rating on my trust page:
~
How these kind of users end up in DT is beyond my knowledge. My guess: Someone on DT1 is targeting Lauda. This morning, Lauda was at +33 / =6 / -4, now it's +32 / =6 / -11. https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx shows that peloso (DT1 strength (2)) has added many users to DT2 today, and several of those have left Lauda negative feedback in the past. It could be the real target is someone else (or multiple users), but I guess Lauda is the most likely scenario. Peloso has also increased his own positive feedback by adding users who left him positive feedback to DT2 ( Trust Selfscratching). I'd say this is Trust abuse. I only now see morvillz7z beat me to it.Funny situation we have here. Did I not warn about this very early? The number of bad members is growing faster than even I had anticipated. |
|
|
|
@Kalemder is one of the rare people who received an award from the forum. He is not insulting in discussions, calm, knowledgeable member ... let him make the management decision. You can apply to be the merit source! anybody stop?
Anyone cooperating with mr. Kalemder will be treated as part of his gang. Rejected from campaigns and depending on behaviour tagged and flagged. |
|
|
|
Turkey does not get to make its own rules. No source, not even a quotation; I will just put " : " and I have not plagiarised? Do you even realize what you are saying? Time to stop defending intellectual theft and for you to go back to your other activities.  |
|
|
|
i think Lauda no more wants to be in DT
because she cant get orgasm ( may be another reason )
DT1 material: Bitcointalk.org edition. ―\_(ツ)_/― |
|
|
|
I'm surprised how large the effect of a new random selection on DT1 is
Very interesting, innit? You have answered it yourself: It's going to be interesting though when it comes to the point where "the baddies" outweigh "the goodies".
We are getting there at a steady pace.  |
|
|
|
 Source: https://twitter.com/sasurobert/status/1256265242771894272
Last week in summary
📺 Beniamin Mincu @ Buhnici - blogger /w 1M subs 🇷🇴RO
🚀 15.000 TPS /w 100% cross-shard TXs on public testnet
🌇 Dubai Blockchain: Fast Payments & SC Frameworks
💹 Binance Savings: "14 days" gone in 7 minutes
🔏 Wallet launched, test with free xERD
💱 Fiat onramp Transak & CryptoCoin.pro
|
|
|
|
I wanted to write the story right. The defect seeker definitely finds it. As I said, I respect the decision to be made. You respect too  1) You wrote it wrong. 2) You stole work. 3) Unlike you, I do not respect double standards so no.  |
|
|
|
I'd suggest that you start a separate thread including the formal definition of the project and related announcements, letting this thread to be a place for casual discussions, new ideas, etc. I think there is a need for such a formalism. You can lock the thread and bump it regularly and use its link in the signature, Very impressive signature by the way.  Agreed with this. Maybe even get a thread designer on it. |
|
|
|
I wrote the red ones
I searched the internet to write the second story correctly, already looking at the content "12000 gulden in 1629" etc..where can i know this?
When I started I said "another story"
":" I put the sign but I did not put the ".." sign
I forgot to include quotes in this section, but if you translate it is stated that this is a story at the beginning of the article. At the end of the article, it is clear that he is quoted by saying "dear readers".
I mentioned the correlation between two stories ....
It's 2017 and I'm a new member then ...It has been clearly stated in other links.
you can ban my membership if you wish
I'm tired of endless discussions...
This does not change that fact that this is not how attribute the work properly (which would have been trivially easy but you decided not to do it). This is intellectual theft nevertheless. EFS is a special case of a shady baboon, so your statement works against your case not in favor. |
|
|
|
Tl;dr version? Hehe, hard to give  It's a conversation from November 2019 until February 2020. It covers IOTA Foundation internal things like nepotism, political agendas, power abuse, monthly costs. You have hints about shady things with token reclaims, clean addresses, lots of money (IOTA tokens) changing hands. Discussions about the IOTA protocal in general and how companies/partners are more and more disappointed with non-results from IF. You can read how David wants/wanted to push his private companies; what role JINN plays in this whole construct. And last but not least two friends splitting up, where one (David) comes over as mature, while the other (CfB) acts like a child. It's really an interesting read overall, because it gives an insight what happens behind the curtains of a crypto project. And I guess this does not only happen inside IOTA, but with lots of crypto projects - and in "real life" companies & politics. David is a greedy and shady baboon, and CfB is a try-hard child that lacks the required expertise for cryptography related projects (although he just may be hurt from his friend succumbing to greediness). Got it. Thanks.  I guess I will read it some time. |
|
|
|
That's not true, if Lauda would be on DT1, Lauda would be excluded. Lauda has 20 inclusions and 28 exclusions from DT1, but because 8 of those DT1-members have more exclusions than inclusions from other DT1-members, their vote for DT2 doesn't count. However, since their vote for DT1 still counts, it means Lauda wouldn't be on DT if (s)he'd be on DT1.
I didn't know that many bad people infiltrated DT1 already. |
|
|
|
What happened now? Less exclusions or more inclusions  |
|
|
|
Flags opposed, ratings removed, removed from list. |
|
|
|
1) It is expensive because your transaction it big. Two main conditions affect the payment of the fees: recommended current fee-rate (based on the conditions of the mempool) * the size of your transaction. Your transaction is 5140 bytes. 2) Status pending has nothing to do with Bitcoin. That status is part of your service provider (you are using custodial wallets). 3) Consolidate outputs when fees are low: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2848987.0. 4) Stop using custodial wallets and start using wallets where you control your own keys (and fee-rate). Ethereum transactions somehow were easier for me...
1) Faster block times. 2) Less security. 3) Less users. 4) See 2). Transacting with Bitcoin is the same if you understand what you are doing.
I will likely wipe this thread clean one day. It has too many support questions. |
|
|
|
You are all making a big mistake because i'm really not one of Polar91's farm accounts, and my wallet is not the same address with his farm accounts. And as you can see my posting style is not also the same as his farm accounts. I also don't experience to be part some of signature campaigns that he have participated and he abused because i am inactive user for a long time that i am busy in taking care of my family and my studies. I recently check my profile and i saw the red flag, so if you please can you disregard me from being one of his farm accounts because to be honest i am not one of them and remove the flag.
It is trivial to fix this later. Instead of complaining you should be supporting the efforts here. This is not surprising because you are a classic shitposter and do not care about anything else. |
|
|
|
He claimed rates that are clearly impossible, but that is because his measurement methodology is flawed. He was not lying or trying to misrepresent anything. He was just wrong.
Insisting that you are right or that you are providing knowledge when you have been proven wrong is malicious, therefore the rating. The fact that I challenged him to find 16 specific private keys in a 264 range and he succeeded clearly demonstrates that he has accomplished something.
Yes, and I am Santa Claus.
Don't try to teach me how to use the trust system, you have no idea what you are talking about in that aspect. |
|
|
|
In fact, I just shared information and nothing more, and adequate people explained to me that this is not new, but long known.
I will rather consult monkeys from the local zoo before I consult you. Please do not post any more of your "information". |
|
|
|
Please support the new flags!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
