Why do you guys keep on fighting?  |
|
|
|
|
Bump, this issue occasionally causes problems for me as well. Sometimes I'm just stuck outside and hope CF eventually lets me in.
|
|
|
|
Red tag isn't visible by default. Its seems to me by rallier (-1). Don't know if he excluded from DT2 recently. But nothing to worry since he is no more on default trust network. And whoever trust him most of them are excluded from DT1 except owlcatz. The reference links isn't appropriate for this negative feedback, means its false accusation in my opinion. However, your neutral feedback is fine for now instead of retaliatory negative.
Current DT situation is not the point, it rotates. I indeed have missed this, and thus have PM'd owlcatz to remove him. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Users just tagged me with the following: Lauda 2020-02-12 Reference He is manipulating the Default Trust system of the forum for his own benefit. Making false accusations. IMHO, I do not recommend to make a connection (or work) with him that who is working as a capital
Reference being: http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h/152486.html, i.e. he tagged me for excluding him.
by rallier's judgement is Trusted by:
1. TECSHARE (Trust: +31 / =4 / -3) (DT1 (-4) 618 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. yussuf89 (Trust: neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. srknbyr (Trust: neutral) (79 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Lydian (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. owlcatz (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (23) 260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. cabsav (Trust: neutral) (68 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ekiller (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1 (-4) 307 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. alpsea (Trust: +1 / =0 / -2) (48 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Aqualung89 (Trust: neutral) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Defloration (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Aceeakell (Trust: neutral) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. otto_diesel (Trust: +1 / =1 / -2) (DT1 (-4) 445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. bobita (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1 (-3) 411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Vispilio (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (DT1 (-2) 824 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. wolwoo (Trust: +2 / =2 / -3) (DT1 (-9) 443 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. AlyattesLydia (Trust: neutral) (455 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Leteravian (Trust: neutral) (158 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. leprakon (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. Bthd (Trust: neutral) (194 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. cryptobenn (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. heyhat (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Stuff like this needs to stop. 
For transparency, my response is a neutral rating: Lauda 2020-02-13 Reference Tagged me for exercising my right of excluding users from my trust list, and therefore shows untrustworthy judgement. I would avoid dealing with such users.
|
|
|
|
I do hope that Vod comes around eventually. I think part of his problem is his ego, specifically him not wanting to ever be wrong (which results in him doubling down when he is wrong), and part of it is other things. Everyone is wrong sometimes, and no one likes to admit they are wrong.
Will you admit you wrong when you posted you knew for a fact I was a pedophile? I should not have said that. I am sorry. Success! Don't forget, we've all made many mistakes and said things we shouldn't have; but forgive and let's move on together.  |
|
|
|
And if the creater of the system says right use of the system is to use it mostly for trade realted purpose,
The creator of the system never had an issue with the amount of negative ratings that Quickseller got, therefore stop posting nonsense about this. You are on purpose refusing to accept the truth, and therefore I can't help you. I nowhere intended to repeat the mistake of engaging is such activities again as it happened while me having limited knowledge about the workings.
You are repeating your mistakes.. right here. Deeply disappointed now. |
|
|
|
Most of this reputation fighting and abusing of trust was really based on grudges between some users in power. QS never did a scam which was unforgivable overall, it was only him not willing to bow down or beg for his forgiveness to the powerful users around which made him suffer through I would say, imotional truma for years.
I am not double siding or something, but most of the user's and specially DTs around should use this thread as an example of how a gang of users with power could wrongly phrases an person's overall character on the forum. I just hope this is avoided in the future by learning from this huge mistake and by nurturing a bit of an forgiveness which could save years of wars.
You continue to post such lies and yet you consistently have asked me to remove your negative trust via PM? Do you not see what you are doing is wrong? This was always correct use of the system, I'm really tired of this "only trade" or "only scammers" nonsense that's being portrayed by others. It is incorrect. There is no gang. There is no abuse in QS's case. I will not repeat myself. |
|
|
|
QS has returned the bitcoins back to me, as requested by me on mutually agreed upon terms. Here is the relevant portions of the email exchange. What is the trans ID? If both parties involved in a trade confirm it's concluded, I see no reason to publish the TXID. This can remain private. I agree, IMO that whole ordeal should be forgiven and needs no further mentioning in this or any other threads. |
|
|
|
That would be nice to build a decent forum. But unfortunately some people always looking for opportunities of criticism, even you tag someone or even you remove tag (Big lol). I don't know what is their intention exactly. If someone against your red tag then they should appreciate current motivation. But I can't see that.
This: Jay-z and Nas used to say the same things and now they're best pals. Beefs get squashed. I think this is just more proof that you can't really win with what you do here. People leave negative to attack others and complain about that. Then people decide to remove it and call a truce and people also complain about that.
I purposely left this thread un-moderated, despite suggestions and warnings from others, so that observers can observe the true nature of people. This peace is not related to any other disputes, nor did this peace happen in one singular day, nor can it happen unilaterally (don't expect my forgiveness to those who (haven't stopped their activities or) run around behind my back and consistently speak ill of me - that is not changing our ways, that is not peace, that is not honesty in peace..). |
|
|
|
Has he apologized anywhere or shown remorse or did he just stop doing the stuff he shouldn't be doing?
I am not aware of about his/her apology. And yes, he has stop doing the stuff he should not be doing (I think its been long time). Most likely he have chosen the way to prove it practically instead of verbal apology. And I think so its more worthy than verbal apology. I don't know about this user, I'll look when I have the time.. Resolved! I believe the purpose of this thread is to further the descalation of the trust system, which is something theymos has been pushing for a long time now. (In addition to the stated purpose of the thread).
I believe many of us have wasted too much time in petty fights between ourselves. This time is better spent fighting actual evils or working together and making this place better. I am curious to see what Quickseller may choose to build on this forum going forward. In this circumstance, I don’t think it’s appropriate for anybody with a Lauda tag to suddenly come crawling out of the woodwork with vociferous complaints in the “peace” thread. Those who do so, are only thus proving that they lack the sincerity that Quickseller has shown, as described below. Indeed, it is trolling with flamebait; and moreover, it is offtopic: What does any of this have to do with Quickseller, or with Lauda’s announcement of peace with Quickseller? It is very narcissistic and unfair to do this to me..if someone has their own issue they can PM me, but without the things mentioned in OP there will be no reason to change anything. |
|
|
|
Has he apologized anywhere or shown remorse or did he just stop doing the stuff he shouldn't be doing?
I am not aware of about his/her apology. And yes, he has stop doing the stuff he should not be doing (I think its been long time). Most likely he have chosen the way to prove it practically instead of verbal apology. And I think so its more worthy than verbal apology. Not being sorry for wrong actions in the past shows potentially compromised judgement (i.e. the user might still believe their actions were justified!), so your claim is actually backwards. An apology (not to me - to be clear) or being sorry/remorseful is the first step on changing your course towards the right path. I don't know about this user, I'll look when I have the time.. |
|
|
|
As far as I know, Lauda is the first person to call me "Switzerland", and the name has grown on me.
I did indeed! Out of that topic, OP will you reconsider to visit jeremypwr feedback? I know he was involved with ponzi previously and that's why he got multiple negative feedback's. But lately he is doing well and out of such as ponzi schemes. Have noticed some DT's already reconsider with neutral feedback. Although I don't have personal relations with him but had worked with him long time on his campaign and he proved that he changed himself (IMO). So suddenly came on mind and expressed it. Hope you will revisit his profile. Has he apologized anywhere or shown remorse or did he just stop doing the stuff he shouldn't be doing? |
|
|
|
I don't see how that's a scam, the gold gilt was originally 110 right? Is my understanding that when payouts are made, that payouts are made to all seat owners/addresses? If this is correct, then how can the above address only have 1 transaction in its lifetime? Do different seats get paid at different times? I do not know, and am hereby asking some of the people that are more familiar with this (and hope I don't get attacked just for asking..). Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
For the sake of cooperation between the community members, you should. However, you are not obliged to do this and nobody can force you to do it.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin has a tough governance, almost immutable via hardforks when it needs, always creating another coins instead of solving or improving the technical rules.
It could be perfect over decades as SOV, but as a softfork's hostage, some basic implements could be impossible to make, becoming it outdated.
You have no idea what you're talking about. There's a very good reason why Bitcoin is hard to change. Any coin that is easy to change will not survive. I highly advise you to start thinking from the perspective of somebody who doesn't own Decred nor Bitcoin and you'll find that your bias affects your beliefs very strongly. Bitcoin governance has shown that in the event of an imminent thread (see inflation Bug 2019), all genuine actors (which represents almost everyone, regardless of politics) will swiftly (and sometimes even blindly - which is bad) act to re-secure the network. Any claims of "being outdated" is also nonsense. - fees & speed
- privacy
Won't shill other coins here but I presume people who think alike know which ones I'm referring to.
I think these 3 areas are main threats for BTC.
No, they are not. The cost of transactions is a deterrent against bloating it to the point of centralizing it. Too much privacy on layer 1, and regulators will throw your coin into the bin. Speed, what speed? All transactions are near instant. Fast confirmations =/= secure confirmations. The former is worthless in comparison to the latter.
Don't read advice from Medium, Telegram, Twitter et. al. "Crypto enthusiasts", they usually don't even have half the knowledge that they claim to. Decred, like only a couple other altcoins which stand out, is a good test bed for new technologies that may work in theory but may not work in practice (we can't know until we try). That's about it as far as to the actual usability and worth of these networks goes (today - may change in the future). |
|
|
|
I am probably the most unforgiving person on this forum; and I respect you all the more for this, Lauda.
Thank you! Thank you. I am out of merit and source merit, so I cannot merit your post at the moment.
I do promise to not repeat previous mistakes and to always do what I believe to be best for the community.
Here, have some of those too!  |
|
|
|
After a long debate with myself while watching for evidence of Quickseller's motives, I have tentatively concluded that he is sincere in his current intentions. Therefore, I have decided to follow the spirit of theymoses advice: Exercise a lot of forgiveness.
In contrast to the accusations of people who just like to criticize me in every conceivable way, I am interested in cooperating with anybody who genuinely wants to contribute to the community. I believe that Quickseller is a highly intelligent individual which is precisely why I previously saw him as very dangerous (in comparison to just some dumb troll, of which there are many). If he put behind him all the things for which I condemned him, then I want to offer him peace, maybe even friendship, so we can each better work to make this forum a better place - despite any differences of opinion that I will gladly agree to disagree about. I most of all credit Quickseller for making the first move here, which was a rather very big move. I did not ask for his recent apology; and frankly, I never expected to see that day come within my lifetime. It was also a thing I think he could not have done with ulterior motives: He had no way to predict in advance if I would accept what he said, or reject it with the same harshness I showed when fighting him for years. Furthermore, I have noticed other behavioral traits consistent with this belief (his apology is only what got my attention and woken up my thought process). Those who know me, also know that I am always vigilant; and out of various criticisms, there's one thing that I have never been accused of: being soft. If there is any repeat of the past mistakes and/or harmful behavior, I do not need to say here what my reaction will be. But I do not expect that to happen! I will support Quickseller's genuine effort toward the long task of rebuilding his reputation; and I earnestly hope to someday see him earn the status of a highly respected member of the forum.
Therefore, I have done the following 2 actions: 1) I have removed any negative ratings on Quickseller, and left a neutral rating referencing this thread. 2) I have withdrawn support for any flags that have been created against his account.
I do not expect individuals to follow me in this peace offering at this time, but I ask and hope that people will be more open towards giving forgiveness where forgiveness is earned - especially given that his arguably biggest enemy (The Catbat Witch) has forgiven him and hereby offers him an olive branch. |
|
|
|
|
It's a coin being used as a test-bed for MimbleWimble i.e. for Bitcoin tech. Nothing else nothing more.
|
|
|
|
I've given this a great deal of thought, considered the possibilities and their related probabilities: - Case 1: They are alts, and he's trying to correct his ways - I will not damage his attempt.
- Case 2: They are not alts - I do not want to damage PN7.
Which case is the correct one, I do not know. I think he is not proved innocent and not proved guilty. I believe this does not require a long explanation, and will not give one publicly either. Therefore, hereby, I retract my rating. If you indeed aren't alts, I am sorry PN7. Signed, Queen of Cats. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
