He’ll just come back on another IP address with a new account to ruin everybody's experience here once again.
Banning him will just piss him off more & he’ll come back to troll once again with his observable proofs etc.
**Yawn**
This is utter and complete bullshit. Anyone with more experience administrating or managing anything than a 3yr old toddler is able to ban children like CH and its repeated alts, trivially easy. He does not posses any valuable skills whatsoever and poses absolutely NO PROBLEM in comparison to the shit that had to be handled during my former mod days.
Theymos has lost himself in his own liberal confirmation bias, and growing ego makes it hard for him (well, this is the case for most people) to admit that he is wrong (and clearly, even harder to make complete stance changes). Don't worry he isn't special, he's just like 99.9% of the rest of you folk. Sad, but it is what it is. |
|
|
|
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here... It's due to a disease called: modern-day, progressive, liberalism. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Look it up.
Anyone with a completely sane mind would have removed OP permanently a long time ago. |
|
|
|
The twitter user in question is a classic millennial degenerate. What else did you expect? Them to act financially responsible? 
Please learn how to resize images. You can thank me later. |
|
|
|
BAT doesn't even have a proper ANN thread here, does it?
Can't flag it if it doesn't have an ANN, that's the idea behind it.  |
|
|
|
Of course satoshi wouldn't be against supporting other projects. He worked on Namecoin and understood how open source projects work.
He wouldn't, but the one mentioned in specific here by OP he sure-as-hell would. does it matter what satoshi wanted?
Nope not in my opinion. It does not; it isn't even an opinion. Science, not damned religion and authority fallacies. |
|
|
|
Supporting an altcoin which could become a scam in a near future?
Your wording is incorrect: It's either 'is going to become' or 'already is'. Read o_e_l_e_o 's posts. OP is essentially untrustworthy because of this request or just outright stupid. I'm fine with whatever he's tiny brain is willing to accept. |
|
|
|
But Pajeet is just trying to help sir theymos to have additional income? What's wrong  MUH $12 sir, extra free revenue. Finally. Bitcointalk.org doesn't support any altcoin.
Theymos is married to bitcoin already.
This isn't entirely true, what about Grin? Quite a flawed experiment it is, but still better than its alternative Beam or whatever it was called. |
|
|
|
|
Not really, and if it isn't listed there there is usually a good reason why.
|
|
|
|
If he hasn't, I'll be lodging a type-1 flag against him. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure is there any corporate entity behind operating this forum
There isn't. So again, logic is: 1) free extra, passive revenue.
This claim is a lie[1]. There is no such thing as free revenue. Anyone that has any economic background will flap (yes, flap) you in the face for claiming such nonsense. The trade-off for this revenue is very high. 2) if much bigger sites have done it, then so can BTCTalk.
If bigger people have murdered others, then so can you? This is how you try to formulate arguments. It's ridiculous; are you < 14y by any chance? What's next?
[1] Stop spreading misinformation. Worthless and wrong opinions such as the ones that you have are fine, but outright lying isn't. Stop. Extra revenue IS my only argument. Seriously, how did you get this dumb? Sold account?
Quoted for reference. |
|
|
|
He's not anonymous you know, and, to my understanding, he/forum complies with US laws so it's not like he's compromising anything + you don't submit any personal info to verify as publisher. Although you'd need to verify personal or business details with Uphold to withdraw/convert (currently they're the only ones processing payments for brave). There's a massive difference between complying with US laws and sending all the details necessary to steal your identity and ruin your life to some dodgy crypto exchange. Uphold demand your name, address, social security number, a picture of your passport and a selfie. Can you vouch for the security they are using to protect this information and documents? Even the biggest exchanges can't be trusted - Binance have been hacked for user's KYC documents, and Coinbase were selling user's details without their knowledge or consent. Why should we trust Uphold? The forum has at least 1,250 BTC in storage according to this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155000.0. I would be very surprised if theymos risked his identity for the sake of a couple of hundred dollars worth of BAT. If it isn't already, then BAT will (with a likelihood of 99%) sell all of the data that it has gathered on anyone. It (therefore, also theymos) will be "anonymized" so it will all be fine.  Uneducated imbeciles like OP are everywhere. |
|
|
|
-snip derailment-
Do you have anything to say to support your argument or are you just going to keep going solely off-topic? It's bad enough that you're a sig. spamming shitposter. There have been zero argument supporting this other than 'extra revenue', but were that a sole valid argument for anything then BAT being a choice is really terrible anyway. Just go back to the cave you crawled out of and get a proper job. You can thank me later. |
|
|
|
Meaning you support of FED/US Gov when accepting US$? Meaning you supported/endorsed every project/person you took BTC from? Is that your honest policy or just bullshit you came up with for the sake of replying because your ego won't let you to let it go?
Non sequitur. Your pathetic excuse of a meat-bag can't even create a single valid argument for your own case. Don't ask me to fuck-off. Just walk away. It's that easy. Get some fresh air. It's nice.
Royally fuck off. You're an undesirable, just like BAT is. Were it desirable, it would have been added already. Unless thermos really needs the money, he needs to be out of his (flawed) mind to agree with this suggestion. Due to your sig.-based shitposting, I will have to introduce my ad naseum mode on this thread. Maybe The-One-Above-All will support your case. |
|
|
|
OK? How's that a reason not to accept/sell tokens from the ones who do use it?
Yes. Supporting or standing-by evil makes you no better than the evil itself. >Getting this triggered over forum post
You do have some issues don't you? Seriously, take regular breaks from internet sometime. Not even joking.
Seriously, fuck-off and stop shitposting with your signature elsewhere. This thread is worthless; not that anyone has agreed with you. Only BAT bagholders might come to voice their support, that's about it. Cancer, you and BAT both are. |
|
|
|
You do realise that your post has zero substance other than "I don't like it"? BAT being garbage or not is irrelevant to the topic anyway, it has value - that's what matters.
Stop promoting shady shit such as BAT. Anything Chromium based is inherently never going to be as good as non-Google-injected software. He might as well give his parents names and daily routines to Google directly. BAT should have never existed, not the token nor the browser. The alternatives are much better despite being much smaller. The "privacy" browser demands kyc for publishers to receive their cryptocurrency
I think this incoherence is enough reason for theymos to avoid supporting such project.
And this is a Bitcoin forum. This forum has more than enough bitcoins, there is no reason to risk the forum and theymos' reputation supporting such a project
But MUH, you do realise that your post has zero substance? OP is an ignorant wanker hoping to score some cheap-ass merits. Maybe some of those generous-givers that throw merit at low-valued garbage such as Loyce might reward him for this. Theymos has sacrificed enough by introducing that half-arsed garbage called Grin.
Law doesn't excuse ignorance. Maybe flags shouldn't. |
|
|
|
|
Brave and their shit token are terrible. I would avoid getting involved with it. This pajeet revenue is unnecessary.
I've never supported their Chromium-based garbage and have been interested in flagging them ever since this garbage system was introduced. No time to look around yet though.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume you have permission from the author to profit off of this image?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
