However, all I see in this thread is posts from Techy (contents ignored) trying his best to deflect and muddy the waters. Exactly. Guilty or not, there is a lot of distracting stuff in this thread. It would be best to ignore him and a couple of others and try sorting this out. |
|
|
|
OG twists the shit out of things at times too, sometimes Trumping others into corners over their words like a genius, sometimes just embarrassing himself over the whole pedo link bullshit..
Otherwise, I very much trust OG..
EDDIE!!! Trumping others into corners over their words is NOT FUCKING GENIUS ---- it's a way to draw attention away from the point someone is making. Fucking politician. I don't think you'll be able to convince that guy of anything, regardless of what you show or argue. Interesting join via an alt though. |
|
|
|
|
Someone is actually buying shitcoins as an investment?
|
|
|
|
lol 3000 volume is good value? it's very bad, it doesn't even touch the price of 1 bitcoin. that's right even the price is very far from ico price, there should be no hope for something like this.
they don't focus on building on price, it's quite strange.
Stop shitposting here because of your signature campaign. You will get banned. Focusing building on the price is entirely wrong and leads to nothing. |
|
|
|
mosprognoz you made the mistake of siding with too many times in fighting the vile, and now they're after you with "legitimate concerns". Good luck with the witch hunt. 
The plagiarism thing is not plagiarism if it quotes proper, which it does. Don't know about forum rules with signatures, and don't care either. |
|
|
|
I've advised OP to ask others to escrow it because I have no time to read into all of the bullshit accusations any-more. To make this worse, the selective enforcement of consequences against this exchange is clearly evident. What they're being accused of, is what most exchanges are doing themselves or of that what is happening on most exchanges. Data and metrics clearly show this, with only a couple of exchanges having near 100% real volume. Sadly, this is also done by people who have excellent track-records for busting down actual problems (whether this one turns into or or not I don't care after this post). Can't be arsed to fight with misguided good doers, nor will I teach them. I wish OP the best if they are truly genuine in resolving all of their issues, and as well as their escrow of choosing. My rating on eddie13 is stays up until he stops posting lies and starts apologizing. Mission accomplished. Any and all false counters (wrong references, reasoning, etc.) will be countered unless theymos PMs me to withdraw the rating. As a courtesy to you, I'm not going to threaten you with consequences (similarly to how I'm being threatened here and there) for supporting a fraud and liar like eddie.
This is not the old trust system any-more. Learn and adapt and don't waste your time. Thanks.
Missed this segment: Their is conflict of interest in your opinion of their scamminess now that you are in business with them..
I'm not in business with anyone. You are lying yet again whilst pretending to try and do good, yet again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Did you not take the position of escrow for them? I have not ever been in business with these people, nor did I know anything about them before I was approached. I have delayed accepting it while I looked into it. Delaying accepting or rejecting is not "being in business with somebody". |
|
|
|
|
Update: Escrow transferred to Hhampuz.
|
|
|
|
No. Bring your observable instances I am looking forward to everything this thread is going to involve. His scammer protecting and attempted silencing of the truths run right back to you scammer.
Bring it here.
Stick to what you can corroborate with observable instances and we welcome you here lauda worm tongue.
Seems you just tried something similar on eddie13.
Those double standards and the scenarios listed there are going to need to be analysed in depth. Under cover agent lauda.
Who better than you to come for a nice long chat here in public
Why are you censoring TMAN and possibly others then? You are afraid of discussions, that's why this thread is self-moderated so that you can delete OBSERVABLE INSTANCES and facts about your schemes. Stop deleting posts, then maybe we can talk. |
|
|
|
|
Why self-moderated though? Are you afraid of me bringing out OBSERVABLE instances of your instability and maliciousness?
|
|
|
|
OgNasty returned the forked coins when asked. Lauda didn't return the forked coins (BCH) when asked.
That is incorrect. Forks were liquidated and merged into the pool, therefore returned. Don't pull in the fake accusations against me into such a well-documented case otherwise the attempt of misdirecting the topic is going to succeed.  "Held bitcoins" in the agreement is ambiguous as to what a "bitcoin" is, but due to the whole context of the agreement, and especially because of the full-reserve requirement, I claim that the most supportable interpretation is that all forkcoins (ie. coins forking from Bitcoin's block chain and calling themselves "Bitcoin") were forum property from the beginning. (I do not claim this for airdrops.)
Fun. |
|
|
|
So just to recap... Lauda's known gang have BULLIED a project to use LAUDA's escrow service? is this correct?
I wish that were the case, would have definitely been more fun. Sadly it isn't. Good luck with your theories, stay creative! |
|
|
|
But he never risked any of the money to multiply it! Oh wait nevermind: It's annoying because:
- Not asking was unprofessional.
- Taking a private key out of cold storage always has some amount of risk.
- I now have to spend time on this drama.
Exactly, plus evident double-standards depending on who we are talking about. "No risk" my ass.  |
|
|
|
|
Done. Too lazy to flag this one.
|
|
|
|
Do you think we are stupid in this thread?
Creating a whole bunch of newbie accounts and then have a debate with yourself, and believing we wouldn't figure that out? Get the fuck out of this thread or I will cut you.
dude can you do your account farming somewhere else please?
we're busy here
^^
What he said.
If OP doesn't moderate them to zero, I'll just tag them all and the problem quickly resolves itself. That was way beyond obvious. |
|
|
|
Can I have more threads? But make sure to include my name in the title please next time, that gives me even more fame. Thank you so much for this!  |
|
|
|
Many financial experts would even further argue that it's the sign of a competent treasurer if he can make the assets entrusted to him multiply with reasonably risk-free activities ... Yes, and the very same financial experts that are rotting in prison you mean? Really? Multiply the assets for himself, or for the one who has entrusted him with the money?
Both illegal unless agreed and intended upon before.
Double standards. |
|
|
|
I think @Lauda the sooner you remove it, the better it will be for you, before I, or anyone else, takes a stand against it..
Nope. Double-standards in forum escrowed forks, and the same is happening yet again here against me. Once you stop being a lying cunt and stop selectively applying your "values" depending on who the target is, then I might consider you to be non-malignant. They would run that sig campaign WITH or WITHOUT escrow. So now they are forced to escrow funds. WHICH one is better?
Again, it's a double standard. They'd scream and shout for the option that can cause less damage, assuming that I was not the one who was asked/was about to help them. Their is conflict of interest in your opinion of their scamminess now that you are in business with them..
I'm not in business with anyone. You are lying yet again whilst pretending to try and do good, yet again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
I forced them to start an escrowed campaign.
they found Lauda as an escrow
Yeah, it should start any day now and that's the very least that I can do. This could be interpreted as facilitating a scam or at the very least now a conflict of interest.. There is no conflict of interest other than you trying to attack me for calling you out on your bullshit virtue-signalling on everything. to accept escrowing their campaign
Just because they might in future run a scam-free bounty campaign does not make it a scam-free project because the bounty campaign is directly related to p2pb2b being promoted.
p2pb2b2 have been selective scamming users
Hmm.... There is absolutely no proof of this inasmuch there is no proof of other exchanges doing this. Only half-baked accusations, of which there are plenty for pretty much every exchange.
What's the point of this system if you don't encourage accused parties of resolving their misdeeds or "claimed misdeeds"? Oh right, if someone else was to escrow this you'd keep quiet as always. |
|
|
|
|
Somehow the thread slipped through my fingers when it was created. Interesting developments. Watching.
|
|
|
|
Elon seems kinda dumb to me about the truck. The reason why the design is so edgy, is that the tough steel plates can't be bent or somehow formed in any way.
Like hardened cars for diplomats, he could have hidden the edgy enforcement beneath a curvy layer of common sheet metal.
This would have made the thing look really good, like in your renderings.
You're the dumb one though. This is a genius marketing move. Think about it. If/when he releases a v2 Truck later down the road, it's going to be better than this one in pretty much every conceivable way especially the design. They won't be able to produce as fast as it sells, not that they'll be able to do it with v1 either. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
