Any "admin" can make up anything they want.

Allow me to announce right now that if you ever see my account "teleported", it's not me. I can't help what an untrusted third party website does, but rest assured I have nothing to do with it.

I already store many gigabytes of Ordinal spam in my copy of the blockchain
I think I said it in 2017 already: I don't care how Bitcoin scales, as long as it scales. Bitcoin is almost twice as old now, and we're still looking at the same problem: the blockchain can't handle more data.
Makes you wonder what would have happened if blocks were a lot bigger: at very low fees, the Ordinal spammers could have filled hundreds of megabytes per blocks for the price they paid in some months. As a rough estimate, given big enough blocks they could have doubled the current blockchain size just by spamming in the past year. So big blocks aren't really a solution either, although at least it would keep transaction fees low for the rest of us.

So that's -71 vMB in a week? That's the problem indeed: even without new Ordinal spam, the backlog takes forever to clear. Based on your date it'll be a month to start confirming 10 sat/vbyte. We'd need a monthly 1 GB block to clear mempool.

One thing still isn't clear to me: does the coinjoin coordinator see which input belongs to which output? If so, they know everything. If not, I'm curious how it works on a technical level (but don't really want to spend time on it since I'll never use them anyway).

Kraken supports LN withdrawals. But you'll need either a custodial wallet (not recommended for larger amounts), or your own LN wallet with enough incoming capacity.

As an alternative, you could use an instant exchange to convert a low-fee altcoin to Bitcoin LN when needed.

Let me put it this way: if there's a forum that I like and where I can earn money, I may actually join. But I may join a forum I like without the money anyway (and I've done that many times).

Really? Like what? I'm thinking of games, but that won't work well in a VM anyway.

Copying a file doesn't mean you're going to execute it.

Obviously, you shouldn't run untrusted software outside the VM. If you do that, you could just as well not have used the VM.

That's tricky: there are hundreds of MBs of Ordinal spam waiting at 23 sat/vbyte. They used this amount to be able to abuse ViaBTC's transaction accelerator. So if you use 23 sat/vbyte, chances are it won't get confirmed any time soon.
Pay a tad more, mempool.space recommends 25 sat/vbyte for medium priority.

I've never seen mempool so "united": anything under 22.1 sat/vbyte gets purned, and a few percent more is enough for a quick confirmation. I hate spammers

How about Jr. Member goodbed? He's trying to get Merit and his posts contain a lot of generic blabla:

I noticed him when he "answered" my post on the tech board with generic blabla:

This guy looks like an AI chatbot spammer.

Ext4 can be mounted on Windows. I was more thinking about encrypting the entire filesystem to avoid accessing it.

I've never seen the word "proprietary" used for an open source filesystem.

Even worse, according to mempoo.space 23.2 sat/vbyte is the purging limit. Take a look at Johoe's graph: it looks like the 300 MB mempool is almost completely filled with 23 sat/vbyte transactions, and if you zoom out a bit, you'll see most of them are most likely all created by Ordinal spammers. So you can choose: pay a bit above 23.2 sat/vbyte, or wait weeks.

Of course they know, they just don't care. And even if they use different passwords, chances are they're very alike anyway. Password1234 and Password4321 for instance. It would be more useful to promote a password manager, because most people have more accounts than they can remember.
And even if they use different passwords, chances are they forget which one belongs to which site. To enter, they "try" all passwords they know, thereby compromising all of them

With this setup, malware installed on Windows can still access your Linux partition. I have no idea how likely this is (but I wouldn't want Windows to ever touch my partitions).

It's funny how you mention 3 centrally controlled shitcoins and then say I'm the one with issues. Is that the best argument you have?

Wouldn't it be more likely for all privacy minded users to abandon Wasabi entirely? Even if the current bad reputation isn't enough, that will end the moment it's bought by a blockchain analysis company.

From now on, I'll delete posts from Newbies who ask to whitelist accounts. If you don't read the OP, there's no point responding.

Dude!

None of that is relevant. When it comes to handling passwords, it comes to trusting the forum owner does what he says he does. Your "evidence" is a link to your own site, that doesn't prove anything. And it's impossible to prove.

You're turning a serious thing into something ridiculous. Is that to distract the reader?

I've seen it many times: wannabe scammers respond to serious concerns with name calling. Honest people would do all they can to convince readers with facts.

Of course it's suspicious! Just like altcoins, ICOs, NFTs, DeFi and Ordinals, your forum is also created to make money for the creator. And like many others, you need Bitcointalk to promote your little scheme.
Let's try the other way: the fact that I don't like your forum doesn't mean it should be trusted.

Why? Are you assuming your users are that dumb? Everyone knows by now not to reuse passwords, and reading it again won't make the people who do it change their ways.

Revenue without needing the money. Right.

I know I'm not the average forum user But I also know I wouldn't join a forum just to earn money. When I joined Bitcointalk I didn't even know signature campaigns exist.

In this scenario there's a bigger problem: Bitcointalk's mission is "to be as free as possible". If the forum loses more and more of it's freedom, it may be time to move on to a place that's closer to this mission again.