Maybe you got me wrong: I mean whether there is a newer binary version of cgminer available for the openwrt platform, ie. as a opkg-package.

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?

But why did the software do that? Isn't that a bug?

Not all who have the desire to learn have the capacity to learn....

while solo mining I got this log entry:

At 2017-07-06 19:56 UTC:
$ bin/bitcoin-cli getdifficulty
  708659466230.332

Does it mean I missed it by the decimals??? :-(

Summary of runtime statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Started at [2017-07-09 17:04:34]                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Pool: http://37.139.71.2:8332                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Runtime: 0 hrs : 27 mins : 6 secs                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Average hashrate: 177583.4 Mhash/s                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Solved blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Best share difficulty: 26.5K                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Share submissions: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected shares: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted difficulty shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected difficulty shares: 708659466230                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Reject ratio: 100.0%                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Hardware errors: 30                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 2480.90/min
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work items generated locally: 69978                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] New blocks detected on network: 2
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Summary of per device statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] S1A0 (30s):180.8G (avg):177.6Gh/s | A:0 R:708659466230 HW:30 WU:2480                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41]                     


# cat share.log
1499619895,reject:high-hash,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000308d010000000000000000,http://37.139.71.2:8332,S1A0,0,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,200000020829b3bff0c10fd348e41756aea13ad0d504ba28003d3b630000000000000000af3e784c5bfedc4b79b6f07c32e663759b2a9fc9755887d283e893ba5d7343ea5962622618018d3000000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Can the author or anybody else please tell me why and what's going on here? Thx

Sounds a bit pie in the sky to me, so I guess the period of July 21 to 29 may be interesting to verify what the fuck is going on besides merely stating an intention... and do you not think that some kind of poll could be helpful to see what members think will happen?  I personally don't feel sufficiently knowledgeable to understand even how to frame such a poll.

We already seem to have some shifting in core by the release of BP148 code, correct?

Hello all.  I have my measly 7Ths pointed at pool.ckpool.org:3333.  Been here for a few weeks.  Just thought I'd say hi.  I'm a total noob when it crypto currency.  I plan on expanding my hash rate in the future and picking up more mining gear.  I read somewhere that "bitcoin is meant to be traded like currency, not mined".  Well I disagree.  I say finding a coin in a pile of blockchain must produce the same feelings that old time pan miners felt when they struck gold.  I'm looking forward to the first block.  It's all very exciting to me.  Probably because I'm a nubblet.  May the force be with us all!   
Cheers,
cg132

Throwing my 580 TH here to help crack the block.

I have my miners pointed at miningrigrentals and mine through there and when I added this pool, it gave me an error message that they were unable to authenticate but I ignored that error and miners seem to be mining fine at this pool. Not sure if the problem is at their end or yours. I haven't seen this error for any other pools that I have there.

SegWit2x intention peaked at 89% today. I hope it gets activated soon. This drama is reaching diva proportions.

Can you be sure?

Obviously those that ask the same questions didn't search, but it's possible that thousands or millions of others searched and got the answer they were looking for, and therefore never asked.  How would you know?

Segwit2x with more than 80% majority has already shown the intent to start signalling Segwit2x by July 21, with the current situation it is  obvious that Segwit would get activated through Segwit2x before August 1 so would BIP148 still be deployed on August 1with a low majority?

So if I hold BTC on Bittrex and Poloniex I can be sure they'll be the same BTC a year from now? The BTC we see now will be 148 by default and the fork Bitcoin will be nuBitcoin?

I am a total noob when I comes to this miner, I tried to follow the instructions to the best of my ability but it tells me it is a 32bit program and I have win10 and 64 bit.  does anyone have this program completed and runs on a 64bit