One side believes segwit will work, the other side believes it will make very little difference.

Well, I don't see why a miner wouldn't fill up the block to 1 MB with dummy transactions, just to not waste his hash rate, and get the next block while all others are waiting to start to mine until they can fill up a 1 MB block...

A lower limit on block size will never be a problem, because miners can make blocks as large as they want with own dummy transactions.  This makes that miners cannot play games with small blocks as they are now not part of the protocol any more, and all "relative network advantage" between 1 MB and 2 MB is much smaller than between 10 KB and 1 MB.

that means that this segwit2x fork will activate only if miners built a block with more than 1mb? And if not the network will be stall until this happen? lol
What a crap is this

That is impossible using simple mining rig. I am doubtful if the amount you mined is 50 btc or maybe it is not 50 btc after all or other cryptocurrency or just another amount. It could be 50 mbtc or it could be 50 coins of any altcoins. I do hope you can provide us with a screenshot so we can really tell if the is really 50 bitcoins. But if that is really true then you are very lucky and that 50 bitcoin may not be coming from your mining but rather it maybe coming from somebody else. Or possibly somebody has made an error and sent you that huge amount. Well goodluck and congrats, you dont need to be puzzled anymore if that is really btc try encashing it and enjoy your profit.

Antpool is not to deposit it's a mining company and you need to just open account there and use your computer software to mine and you get for mining may be 1 btc per month.

Free of speech as long as the thing that we are say still in the topic,

Am i wrong???

Maybe you got me wrong: I mean whether there is a newer binary version of cgminer available for the openwrt platform, ie. as a opkg-package.

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?

But why did the software do that? Isn't that a bug?

Not all who have the desire to learn have the capacity to learn....

while solo mining I got this log entry:

At 2017-07-06 19:56 UTC:
$ bin/bitcoin-cli getdifficulty
  708659466230.332

Does it mean I missed it by the decimals??? :-(

Summary of runtime statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Started at [2017-07-09 17:04:34]                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Pool: http://37.139.71.2:8332                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Runtime: 0 hrs : 27 mins : 6 secs                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Average hashrate: 177583.4 Mhash/s                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Solved blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Best share difficulty: 26.5K                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Share submissions: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected shares: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted difficulty shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected difficulty shares: 708659466230                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Reject ratio: 100.0%                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Hardware errors: 30                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 2480.90/min
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work items generated locally: 69978                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] New blocks detected on network: 2
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Summary of per device statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] S1A0 (30s):180.8G (avg):177.6Gh/s | A:0 R:708659466230 HW:30 WU:2480                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41]                     


# cat share.log
1499619895,reject:high-hash,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000308d010000000000000000,http://37.139.71.2:8332,S1A0,0,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,200000020829b3bff0c10fd348e41756aea13ad0d504ba28003d3b630000000000000000af3e784c5bfedc4b79b6f07c32e663759b2a9fc9755887d283e893ba5d7343ea5962622618018d3000000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Can the author or anybody else please tell me why and what's going on here? Thx

Sounds a bit pie in the sky to me, so I guess the period of July 21 to 29 may be interesting to verify what the fuck is going on besides merely stating an intention... and do you not think that some kind of poll could be helpful to see what members think will happen?  I personally don't feel sufficiently knowledgeable to understand even how to frame such a poll.

We already seem to have some shifting in core by the release of BP148 code, correct?

Hello all.  I have my measly 7Ths pointed at pool.ckpool.org:3333.  Been here for a few weeks.  Just thought I'd say hi.  I'm a total noob when it crypto currency.  I plan on expanding my hash rate in the future and picking up more mining gear.  I read somewhere that "bitcoin is meant to be traded like currency, not mined".  Well I disagree.  I say finding a coin in a pile of blockchain must produce the same feelings that old time pan miners felt when they struck gold.  I'm looking forward to the first block.  It's all very exciting to me.  Probably because I'm a nubblet.  May the force be with us all!   
Cheers,
cg132