Got it, while looking at https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC I was not able to locate ckpool under the pools... is there a ckpool view of blocks, aside from the ones listed on ckpool.com ? No, no one has informed blocktrail of how to recognise ckpool. ORG blocks. There is no ckpool.com. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain the way the pool works stats work?
I see it refreshes regularly but new block "height" changes along with the rewards amount...
That is the height of the block we (and the rest of the network) are current working on and the exact amount our total reward (including tx fees) will be if we find a block at that exact moment. Figured that much however since it shows one block and then it refreshes after a few mins to another block does that mean these are blocks we will confirm over time in sequence? should there be a working list of said blocks? Is there a URL to reference such blocks and see how many confirms are pending per? I speak from my experience on slush and understandably the stats are a big focus there so when using the current stats here I am not 100% sure of what it means as these blocks keep changing on that stats view... Excuse my learning curve here but I am new and happy to be here. None of those blocks are OURS. There are blocks being found on the bitcoin network all the time. Watch them match up here: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC |
|
|
|
Again, while slush is a good pool compared to antpool, leaving out all the smaller pools with a lower fee than slush makes the results misleading. |
|
|
|
If you don't care I will make a little front for better reading in ES7.
I do care. As I've said numerous times before, I'd be happy for someone to do a front end for me. However so far no one has come through after offering  |
|
|
|
Note how the xnonce1 is returned as empty string, while xnonce2_size is 4, which is Ok.
It's allowed to be zero length. So how do I regard it when I calculate the coinbase tx? as "00000000" or simply as "" ? Note I said zero LENGTH, not zeroes, so "". |
|
|
|
JSON is the frontend? {
"hashrate1m": "12.5G",
"hashrate5m": "11.5G",
"hashrate1hr": "11.5G",
"hashrate1d": "9.4G",
"hashrate7d": "2.61G",
"lastshare": 1515443185,
"workers": 1,
"shares": 419680,
"bestshare": 4228452.0,
"lns": 419680.1,
"luck": 1.03,
"accumulated": 0.0,
"postponed": 0,
"herp": 433572.8564268946,
"derp": 1.16e-6,
"worker": [
{
"workername": "",
"hashrate1m": "12.5G",
"hashrate5m": "11.5G",
"hashrate1hr": "11.5G",
"hashrate1d": "9.36G",
"hashrate7d": "2.59G",
"lastshare": 1515443185,
"shares": 419680,
"bestshare": 4228452.0,
"lns": 419680.1,
"luck": 1.03,
"herp": 433572.8864267946
}
]
}
Cool, i Have more questions. Where I can't find some values definitions? I don't found SPS1m or how to read herp/derp value. A lot of thanks -ck It sure is, JSON is beautiful isn't it? SPS is shares per second. Herp is your proportion of the pool's work. Divide it by the pool's herp and you can figure out your contribution to the pool (and what proportion of the reward you should be entitled to.) Derp is your payout in BTC if you've made it into the payout queue, should a block be found now. |
|
|
|
is everything working right with the payouts?
on the jan 5th block i got a payout and i havent mined here for months.. ?
it was pretty significant too about 18$ .0012 btc..
the thing i was only mining here with 5 compacs so my hash rate would have been about 60ghs..
thats like almost a whole years worth of bitcoin mining on that hash rate in one block?
if everything is working ok, maybe i should put them back on this pool haha.. they are solo mining on solo ck now.. for a slim to non chance of a block..
Working fine. It's the reward for being one of the first in the pool while stats were building up, along with the high rewards from transaction fees. Rewards haven't even started decaying from 5 blocks' worth yet. Your share is reducing only as a proportion of total shares still so you have maybe a couple of blocks to go. |
|
|
|
Quick question about the payouts.
I'm nowhere near the top 100, but moving up the list slowly with my four little 2pacs. I've been mining here four a week or two, and a block was found here on Friday. My "postposed" is still at 0 (zero). Is that because I haven't mined here very long and I get passed up by the system on this most recent block? I'm just trying to fully understand the system.
Thanks.
The user postponed value is the number of times you've been postponed from receiving a payout from the moment you've earned enough to be entitled to one. |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I wish I could say I read the whole 844 pages of this thread, but I don't have that time or patience. Please forgive me?
I have CG Miner installed on a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.9.5 and a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04. The terminal window shows properly on the Mac, but in the Ubuntu terminal window, the approved/rejected notices show, along with the recent activity (5s, 1m, etc), but the HW and WU line doesn't show. Is there a configuration flag I'm missing? Something I did wrong in setup?
Thanks in advance.
The Nerdy Type
Sounds like you're missing the curses dev library. |
|
|
|
I am sending the following stratum message to p2pool: {"id":1,"method":"mining.subscribe","params":["myclient/0.1"]}
And I am getting back: {"error": null, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "result": [["mining.notify", "ae6812eb4cd7735a302a8a9dd95cf71f"], "", 4]}
Note how the xnonce1 is returned as empty string, while xnonce2_size is 4, which is Ok. I opened the code of "p2pool-master\p2pool\bitcoin\stratum.py", and I found this. which kind of explained why xnonce1 is empty, regardless of the way I subscribe: def rpc_subscribe(self, miner_version=None, session_id=None):
reactor.callLater(0, self._send_work)
return [
["mining.notify", "ae6812eb4cd7735a302a8a9dd95cf71f"], # subscription details
"", # extranonce1
self.wb.COINBASE_NONCE_LENGTH, # extranonce2_size
]
So, is Stratum not supported yet by p2pool? It's allowed to be zero length. |
|
|
|
I did write a little script to help automate the math work a little. If Ck doesn't mind the extra hits on his web server, I can run the script once a week and post the results. This will be a great stat to have access to along with the payouts to show the hash per user payout. Everyone loves stats... ck please consider adding and thx for your contribution puntpasskick and others whom have posted these manual lists... nicely done! I was thinking of it myself after the recent posts, but it will require a little bit of code and a pool restart. I'll keep you posted if I have time to do that in the near future or not. |
|
|
|
Antpool port 3333, 443 and 25 are all dead for 3 days so far. Any idea？
Get the fuck out of this shithole pool? |
|
|
|
Is there a solo.ckpool for BCH? Or, a BCH pool.ckpool?
No, and I feel safe in assuming never.  Word |
|
|
|
So you cannot spend a bech32 to a 'standard' address? If so, I was not aware. Maybe that's not what you said....
I get that '3' addresses are segwit-compatible-multi-sig addresses.
Anyways.. would you not be spending to a bech32 adddress upon a block found/payout? Is the finding address not a '1' or a '3' address?
Yes a bech32 is neither a 1 nor a 3 address; it's a new format that starts with bc. You can spend from any address to any other address. The bech32 addresses are not nested P2SH addresses, they are native segwit addresses and thus 10% smaller than 3x segwit addresses. Each wallet that has a bech32 address will have the private key to a corresponding 1x address or 3x address but I don't have code in ckpool to read a bech32 address and then decode it to the underlying address, and we can't actually assume that wallets will know to look for the 1x and 3x counterparts of their bech32 addresses should you send coin to them instead of the actual bech32 address. Sending directly to bech32 is something I have not investigated so I don't even know if you can generate directly to them. This pool does all payments through generation transactions which by nature are not segwit transactions. |
|
|
|
please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool
Why is this? Just not popular enough to add support? The 'standard' has been around for a while now. I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now. No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only. So we've not successfully mined a block to a native SewWit address? I'm a bit fascinated by the (lack of) SegWit adoption. Segwit address yes we have, plenty. Bech32 is a unique segwit to segwit only address format. Virtually all segwit in use today is using the 3x address format though. |
|
|
|
please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool
Why is this? Just not popular enough to add support? The 'standard' has been around for a while now. I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now. No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only. |
|
|
|
Anyone else notice that folder 4.10 is empty? Not sure where the current 4.10 arm version is but I can't seem to find it
They're all in the top directory for cgminer but I fixed that now. which one is for ARM? the only one i thought might be it is a bit too large? edit-... let me rephrase... i'm looking for the binary for arm not source. There's never been a binary for ARM. Why would you want that? I'm not aware of any ASICs in production today that have an ARM controller and don't come with a binary. to replace the 4.9 with 4.10 like other folks have done. EG.. the d3 or l3+ As expected, you're in the wrong place. The official cgminer only mines bitcoin on bitcoin ASICs. You need to seek out whoever maintains your fork of cgminer. |
|
|
|
Anyone else notice that folder 4.10 is empty? Not sure where the current 4.10 arm version is but I can't seem to find it
They're all in the top directory for cgminer but I fixed that now. which one is for ARM? the only one i thought might be it is a bit too large? edit-... let me rephrase... i'm looking for the binary for arm not source. There's never been a binary for ARM. Why would you want that? I'm not aware of any ASICs in production today that have an ARM controller and don't come with a binary. |
|
|
|
Anyone else notice that folder 4.10 is empty? Not sure where the current 4.10 arm version is but I can't seem to find it
They're all in the top directory for cgminer but I fixed that now. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
