1st Half just ended with a total points of 13 which is great as we really have big chances to get a blackjack in 2nd half. I believe this because Belgium will have at least 3 more corners, we will also have 2 more yellow cards and at least 1 goal that brings us to 19.
We also have some chances to get a bust if Belgium starts to get a lot of corners and game starts to be rough as 1st half ended with some arguments between players, so let's hope we don't see red card. For me this is the high class game that everyone expected from this Euro and anything can happen at almost any chance.
Up to 15 real quick as of 55' . Hold on! |
|
|
|
Still waiting for this kraken to emerge...  Joe will be ready if it does.  |
|
|
|
The amount of tax revenue that NY state lost out on is very small, and is probably less than the cost of the investigation, somewhere in the range of $8000 or so per year over 15 years. This is also not to say that the Trump org didn't offset some of this with higher corporate taxes on their end. In 2015, the top tax bracket in New York was 8.82%, and today it is 10.9%. In 2005, when it is alledged this started, the top tax bracket was 6.85%. The allegation is that $1.7 million in compensation was hidden from the tax authorities over 15 years, that amounts to about $113k per year. The indictment claims that Weisselberg failed to pay about $106k in NY state taxes, which works out to be about $7k per year.
Take a look at a copy of the indictment. I think it is pretty shaky TBH. Similarly ridiculous as your claim that only 2 or 3 people breached the Capital and the rest were invited in. So you read this:  And walked away thinking "I know, I'll just tell people the issue is over $8k a year and maybe they'll just believe me. And even if they don't, I'll make sure there's some element of truth in my post and only imply the untrue stuff so I can seem to have a defense" |
|
|
|
It is almost as if the charges are politically motivated. Or almost as if the DA made campaign promises to charge Trump and associates with baseless crimes.
It is almost as if your defense of Trump is politically motivated. Almost as if you're not interested in whether someone is guilty or not as much as whether they have a D or an R next to their name. Almost as if D = Guilty, R = Witch Hunt. |
|
|
|
Congrats on unlocked blue star  The minimum bonus for hitting plat1 is $200 but the extra $170 is probably for losses during gold to plat. The special platinum 3 is more lucrative due to the perm reloads and VIP host. A few weeks ago, VIP host was for plat 2 too but they changed it to plat3 and in few months probably an extra million should be wagered for plat 4 in order to get a host and reloads. Thanks mate Wow just found out about this so it has to be platinum 3 ? I checked the benefits in my stake account is this what is meant by perm reload "Dedicated VIP host'' ? Yes, when you reach it you will have Reload all the time! Now go race, there is a 1 million dollar race going on! Join! I heard form some users with Plat 3 rank, they need to ask VIP host in order to activate reload. Means that it is not all the time since reload wont be active if the users do not ask the VIP host to activate it. Makes me a bit confuse with is the real meaning of "all the time" or "permanent" of the reload for Platinum 3. Is this applied for new Plat 3 only who reach the rank after the changes on the VIP system? You have to contact host once a week to set your reload for the next 7 days based on previous 7-14 days play. It can be every 10 min, hourly or daily. Even if you don't play, you'll still get one - it will just be very small. |
|
|
|
Calling it "defunding the police" is just a stupid way of saying it. It makes it sound far more extreme than it is, which is why if you search "defund the police" you'll find mostly right wing media articles explaining how horrible it is to 'defund the police'. It was a bad choice of words that the right wing has latched on to, and I suspect many who consume it actually believe democrats just want to get rid of law and order. |
|
|
|
Still clown that claims stuff but cant make the bet, hahaha.
Little shit, your degen casino pics mean nothing to me. Why does your mother clean my room if u win that much?
All I needed to see is what kind of a pussy you are, and that 1 you showed.
If you want someone to give you action on a bet you should articulate the terms of the bet as clearly as possible. "How much do you want to bet I back to back got 0?" is ambiguous and makes you look like a troll. Each VIP level does pay a base amount + some loss back depending on how much you're down and how you lost it. |
|
|
|
Trump was an exquisitely crafted and tuned tool against so-called 'left' wingers, and he got stunning results.
Very little lasting legislation and the Dems controlling the House, Senate and White House 4 years later? Stunning indeed. |
|
|
|
Voted once i whole entire life when first became eligible to do so. Democracy = Two school drop outs tell University professor what is the right thing to do with a two-thirds majority.Dominion voting machines have been utilized in countries around the world some on national level others local or part of the municipals https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dominion Govern yourself, dont let a fool lead you astray. Do you still think the pictures of Biden in the White House are from a movie set and he's not really there? |
|
|
|
Inside the mind of BADecker: Except for one major thing. The title is what is happening, even if the particular article doesn't show it clearly.
Mastur of being click baited. |
|
|
|
Haven't been paying too much attention since the site appears to be a ghost town, but not hard to find more shadiness. Guess he has another token going around, and it loosk like anyone with some crypto can just sign a message and be part of the bankroll only being required to send 10%...   |
|
|
|
I don't believe mainstream media outlets.
 |
|
|
|
Thought of suchmoon vs nullius when I heard the news: And it's not like these are tough or questionable decisions... those cases are being tossed for being frivolous. Some disbarments are more likely than this getting past SC, and some of those cases have actually been dropped by lawyers/plaintiffs themselves probably because they realize how much shit they'd be in if they continue to push Trump's lies (keep in mind that Trump is not the plaintiff in any of the cases - it's usually his campaign or some allegedly aggrieved voters). And BTW the reason we have nutjobs like Rudy Giuliani and Lin Wood now on these cases is that reputable law firms don't want to touch this nonsense. You are obviously not a lawyer. You have no idea what the standards for disbarment are. Please stop opining from total ignorance—or else hit up West/Lexis, and show some case law applicable to any circumstance even remotely similar. Every state has mountains of published opinions about its rules of professional conduct for attorneys. Have fun with that. If he ever comes back, someone point him in the direction of this post please. |
|
|
|
As Corbett said, these (usually B&M Gates Foundation funded) 'fact checkers' tend to rely heavily on straw-man arguments. That is to say, take something ridiculous that someone (often one of their own operatives most likely) said and 'debunk' that. They know damn well that 99% of people are just going to look at the color code thingy at the top.
I don't remember ever seeing an open comments section on any of the 'fact checks'. Any source of information without an open comments section is very suspect to me, and I don't use them very much for actual information about critical or sensitive subjects.
One of the few times I actually looked to find information on a 'fact check' site was when someone who claimed to be the family doctor of Bill Gates' family said that the kids were sharp, healthy, and unvaccinated. Did the 'fact checkers' even bother to get a statement from Gates? Of course not. They 'debunked' the story by pointing out that the doctor was not acting ethically by exposing private medical information. Lol! What a joke.
So you rarely look at fact checking sites because Corbett told you to just believe him instead. Gotcha. Nope: Just the opposite. Two of the people I pay the most attention to (and sometime fund) implore people NOT to just trust what they say and do their own research. To back it up, both are also VERY fastidious about providing links to source material for everything they talk about. Check out how it should be done: https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-381-who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/ https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/who-says-children-should-not-be-vaccinated-nanobots-az-vax-has-protein-breakdown-blood-clots/Note the organized sequential links to the source material, then at the bottom of the page a comments section so people can add to or challenge the information provided. You can fact check the fact checkers yourself. They cite their sources. (try clicking on the words that look a little different or have a little squiggly line underneath) |
|
|
|
One of the tools I use to ascertain the weight of a story is how fast the 'fact checkers' respond. When they are on a story within a day, it indicates that there is a 'there there', and it is an important thing.
classic... Yup. It's a fall-out from 'classic' old-school pre-scientism concepts such as observation, research, and critical thinking. Your average 'global citizen' would never think to ask about how the 'fact checkers' came into existence and who funds their pay-checks, much less what that means for their work product. To most people, that they calling themselves 'fact checkers' makes it obvious that they are credible in checking facts. As further proof, Google and Facebook use them! https://www.corbettreport.com/who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/Someones done a very good job of keeping you from realizing that all the quotes and information these fact checkers publish include detailed sources. (try clicking on the words that look a little different or have a little squiggly line underneath) As Corbett said, these (usually B&M Gates Foundation funded) 'fact checkers' tend to rely heavily on straw-man arguments. That is to say, take something ridiculous that someone (often one of their own operatives most likely) said and 'debunk' that. They know damn well that 99% of people are just going to look at the color code thingy at the top. I don't remember ever seeing an open comments section on any of the 'fact checks'. Any source of information without an open comments section is very suspect to me, and I don't use them very much for actual information about critical or sensitive subjects. One of the few times I actually looked to find information on a 'fact check' site was when someone who claimed to be the family doctor of Bill Gates' family said that the kids were sharp, healthy, and unvaccinated. Did the 'fact checkers' even bother to get a statement from Gates? Of course not. They 'debunked' the story by pointing out that the doctor was not acting ethically by exposing private medical information. Lol! What a joke. So you rarely look at fact checking sites because Corbett told you to just believe him instead. Gotcha. |
|
|
|
One of the tools I use to ascertain the weight of a story is how fast the 'fact checkers' respond. When they are on a story within a day, it indicates that there is a 'there there', and it is an important thing.
classic... Yup. It's a fall-out from 'classic' old-school pre-scientism concepts such as observation, research, and critical thinking. Your average 'global citizen' would never think to ask about how the 'fact checkers' came into existence and who funds their pay-checks, much less what that means for their work product. To most people, that they calling themselves 'fact checkers' makes it obvious that they are credible in checking facts. As further proof, Google and Facebook use them! https://www.corbettreport.com/who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/Someones done a very good job of keeping you from realizing that all the quotes and information these fact checkers publish include detailed sources. (try clicking on the words that look a little different or have a little squiggly line underneath) |
|
|
|
With almost 3 billion vaccinated and counting I have a feeling we're in for a lot of these "Vaccinated person died!!!11!111" threads, all chock full of nonsense.
One of the tools I use to ascertain the weight of a story is how fast the 'fact checkers' respond. When they are on a story within a day, it indicates that there is a 'there there', and it is an important thing.
classic... |
|
|
|
 Losers of the world, eh? Speak for yourself moron. What a lovely Father's Day message. I'm surprised he didn't spell it "loosers" or mention his stolen election obsession. Jeeezus, what a jackass ....just pathetic. Every day he's not president is a gift
He seems mad. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
