Stablecoins like USDT or BUSD backed by USD or government bonds and some other real assets, then I think if there is a big crash with bitcoin, it will barely affect stablecoins. Here we're just talking about bitcoin's price drop, not bitcoin's death or something that makes bitcoins no more. Because bitcoin disappears, the crypto market will also disappear.

USDT losing peg is due to the loss of confidence in stablecoins caused by UST, algorithmically stable coins will suffer if bitcoin or other altcoins plummet as algorithmically stablecoins are backed by the cryptocurrency.

As far as I'm concerned, Nagelsmann was not accused of being a bad coach while Robert Lewandowski was a member of the team. After Lewandowski left the club, this rumor of him being sacked only grew stronger and stronger. There seems to be a connection to be made here, so I think we are on the right track.

It is indisputably true that Lewandowski was their best player and their main scoring machine, and he was the man behind it all. The fact that he has left, even though Bayern has bought Mane, does not make him a lethal striker like Lewa was. As a result, I think changing the coach would not mean anything if they are not able to sign a striker who is effective.

As OP explained in previous comments, it was a joke that went viral on social media. It is a fact and a coincidence that every time Microstrategy buys more bitcoins, it is almost as if the bitcoins will drop immediately after. I've read a lot of such hilarious memes too, and I find it coincidental myself.

The Fed meeting is not only important for the crypto market but it also has a big impact on the world economy every time they make an announcement on interest rates. Bitcoin is an asset, a commodity, a part of the world economy, so its impacts cannot be avoided, every time interest rates rise, the DXY index spikes, then risk assets like bitcoin and stocks plunge.

I believe that back then it was not the right time for women's IPL. The reason I mention this is because women's cricket was not that popular at the time, to be honest.

However, at this point in time, the world has already moved on from the longer formats of the game to the shorter formats. In addition to this, women's cricket has also become increasingly popular over the past few years as well. Recently, there have been some problems in men's cricket as well, and people are actually fed up with the whole thing.

Obviously, if good performance is not enough to convince BCCI to even consider a women's IPL, then I believe a bigger revenue is the number one reason why BCCI is even considering a women's IPL right now.

There was a great run chase by Pakistan in this match. It has been proven that they are capable of achieving the impossible. In addition, it is great to see that Babar Azam is once again in top form. It is worth mentioning that they did not even lose a single wicket. That's how confident they were that they would win this match. There was only one aspect of Liam Dawson's economy that was not very good. Other than that, the economy of every bowler of England was really high as well. But there are still a lot of matches to be played in this series, so there is still a lot to be done. At the moment, the score is tied at 1-1. There are still five matches left to play.

Well, it is a little too early to say that they are going to be as good as their male counterpart. But with all the problems that are going on in men's cricket, I think they are not very far away. In men's cricket, there are a lot of problems because there is the problem of having a big4.  and those for teams trying to hold onto the power that they have over the ICC and not letting the smaller teams play regularly. I think women's cricket is doing quite well right now and even though I don't think women's cricket will also be safe from these types of problems but right now I have hope.


I think a big reason why the BCCI is actually considering giving WIPL  a chance is that The Indian women have performed really well in recent times.  and with the recent win against England in the ODI, the Indian women have proved that they can perform really well against bigger opponents. So I think it is the right time for BCCI to arrange WIPL and set the tempo for the future of women's cricket.

@KTChampions, if I recall correctly, Real Madrid did not have any problems if they lost El Clasico, the last EL Classico of the last season against Barcelona. In fact, Real Madrid had the goal of winning the Champions League as their main goal and they have completely succeeded in that target. There was no point in Real Madrid giving any importance to the El Clasico because at that point it didn't matter, and Real Madrid knew that very well.

Thus, I do not think there is any reason to think that Barcelona will have a good track record against Real Madrid in the future. And honestly, I really don't think Barcelona will be able to win in the upcoming El Clasico.

You have to understand that nothing is 100% perfect. For those who do not care about decentralization, POS will be good for them because POS will help reduce gas fees to a lower level, transactions become faster. For those who value decentralization, they will certainly not like this.
How will POS affect ETH, we can't say at this point, we have to wait a bit longer how ETH will perform.
Switching to POS is bringing some more trouble for ETH, the SEC is treating it as a security. In addition to the OP's information: 46.15% of Ethereum's PoS nodes are controlled only by Lido and coinbase, the SEC also recently requested control of ETH as over 42.74% of the 7,807 Ethereum nodes are located in the US.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-lawsuit-claims-jurisdiction-as-eth-nodes-are-clustered-in-the-us

Looks like Trident Protocol is having a bounty campaign at the forum, right? I see a lot of people wearing signatures of that project. Honestly, looking at the APY it offers, I can confirm this is a ponzi project, nothing out of the ordinary here. We've had projects like this in the past like helena Financial, safuu... all of which were ponzies and didn't have a happy ending.

We are in a bear market so be very cautious with projects like this, the bear season is hard to make a profit for investors so they exploit greed to provide high APY, and they can quickly disappear with our money.

It could be local exchanges, so sometimes it is difficult to tell as they aren't as popular as top exchanges like Binance or FTX. Nowadays, new exchanges are created many, many derivative exchanges that we are not aware of but they are not scams. They have different marketing methods, new exchanges will look to groups with a large number of members and cooperation. It's the team admin's job to verify it's a legit, usable exchange and that they'll be trading on it. they will earn money through referral campaign. In addition to providing signals to team members, they can also earn through referral campaigns. Maybe OP is joining one of these groups: they don't charge to join, but you have to sign up under their link. It's generally still risky to join groups like these.

There is a big difference between a person who loves cricket and one who has the time to watch a whole test match of cricket. As of right now, I do not think that most people have enough time in their lives to watch a whole test cricket match. There is a strong possibility that test cricket is already on the verge of extinction. I agree with you that one-day international cricket is also walking down the same path as the test cricket format. It would not surprise me if in a few years' time the popularity of ODI loses some of its lusters. However, I believe it's a good thing for the long run of cricket. The reason for this is that if less time is required, more teams will be interested.

OP wants short term profit, bitcoin is not a solution for short term profit either. The short answer is that there are no coins that can meet the requirements of OP unless he is willing to take risks in order to gain profits in the short run.

We are in a bear market, so other than risking investing in memecoins, there are no other ways in which you can make quick money. The bear market is not a time for us to look for profits but a time for us to accumulate assets to prepare for the upcoming bull season, the profits will be huge if we know how to seize the opportunity.

That will take away the point of having a toss before the match. Basically, I don't want to see the natural way being disturbed just for the sake of generating some revenue for some people. There is still no chance that people will be interested in watching a 5-day test match, regardless of what happens. In my opinion, this is not the right time for test cricket at the moment. The only way people are going to watch a 5-day test match is if they are paid to watch the whole match. Since that ain't happening, I don't see any reason why the ICC should even be bothered with test cricket.

As a result, if one of the two countries participating in the final is the host of the final match, the match is not going to be neutral. In the event that the field is being prepared by another country, they will do their best to keep things as neutral as possible. There is a possibility that this will not be the case when one of the two finalists is going to be responsible for preparing the field and pitch for the game. The curators are also going to be biased. The choice of having a neutral venue is therefore one that I think is a good one.

However, the question that remains is, why England?

This is good news in terms of Rafael Leao as he has shown that he's very capable of playing at the highest level of football. I also heard in another news that Chelsea did not bid for him as per the director of AC Milan Paolo Maldini. But I think that he is going to be a good fit for Manchester City, as they need a secondary striker as a backup to Erling Haaland. I think this guy has a very bright future in front of him.

As far as I am concerned, Arsenal have been emphasizing the buying of younger players too much,
which has resulted in them losing the depth of their squad.

As a matter of fact, they even sold their captain and star player Aubameyang to Barcelona a few years ago,
and right now they do not have a true Lethal Striker on their team.



I agree with you that they have been fairly consistent so far this season,
but I think that they won't be able to hold on to that,
You know, squad depth matters a lot in the Premier League,
because it is a very physical league, as opposed to other leagues, and injuries happen to all teams on a regular basis.

I think part of the problem is Juventus getting the players who are absolutely needed and not having a good replacement in place as you said. The way they have made those transfers there were not in a situation of bringing extra players into the team.

I think at that point having extra players as replacements were kind of a luxury for Juventus. And another problem might be because they are trying to play really defensive football. They have to be a little more attacking in their approach if they want to have more success in my opinion.

Likewise, I agree that the target is a bit low compared to Sol's potential, but I am not so sure it will ever return to the $260 ATH since what Sol has shown this year is quite disappointing. One more thing, $60 is a pretty low target, x2 from current prices, but it won't be easy if bitcoin doesn't move or worse, bitcoin keeps dumping. So making predictions for 2023 is not possible.
Sol is still one of the top coins and is very active during the bear season so it is still quite a promising coin to invest in, if you want to invest you can buy it at this price, a pretty good price to buy long term for Sol.

Honestly, I also don't have any clear idea about why the WTC final is held in England. The only reason which probably makes a little sense is maybe England being one of the best test cricket-playing nations and also one of the biggest admirers of test cricket.

But a lot of people can sense a lot of conspiracy behind this decision. A lot of people think that the teams in the Asian region or especially India is a great test cricket nations and they took this decision so that India does not have a good chance of winning. But I don't think that is the case. But at the same time, I also don't see any credible reason as well.

I don't think that Arsenal will be able to hold on to their performance until the end of the season because they don't have that much squad depth. Manchester City really lacked a lethal striker for the last few seasons after Sergio Aguero left. But now as they have bought Erling Haaland, they will really try to push for the Champions League title which they have been wanting to win for the first seasons but were unable to do so.

So far Haaland has shown what he is capable of as he scored 10 goals in only 6 matches. So far Chelsea and Liverpool have been playing their game this season so Manchester City might have a really good opportunity to grab this and be the best team in England and possibly Europe.