I had this in my mind for a log time now (cca. 2018-2019). I remember someone told me that theymos appears in a documentary about Bitcoin, but I don't remember movie's name.

All I remember is that it was (could have been?) one of the following titles:

• The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin
• Banking On Bitcoin
• Deep Web
• Bitcoin: The End of Money As We Know It
• Magic Money - The Bitcoin Revolution
• Bitcoin: Shape the Future

Does anyone know which one is the movie starring theymos? Or, in case it's none of these movies, does anybody know a documentary where he appears?

Thanks in advance.

Buna treaba! Multumim, IntimitateG, pentru implicare!


Interesanta observatie... Daca ma uit bine, pe site-ul Atomic se vede chiar si sigla Trezor in coltul din stanga-sus al ecranului. Ce sa zic... e foarte posibil sa ai dreptate. I-am spus si lui 1miau de sugeatia ta. Dar puteai sa o faci si tu, nu musca (In cel mai rau caz, zgarie  )

Aditional, am mai facut o sugestie pentru a comasa un pic mai mult tabelul, astfel incat sa incapa si mai bine in pagina, impreuna cu coloana adaugata de tine. Sa vedem cum iese, poate reusim Sau macar sa reusim in engleza. La romana s-ar putea sa mai fie ceva de bibilit, data fiind diferenta de caractere care constituie cuvintele, dar vedem. Oricum, coloana aceea mie mi se pare foarte utila si ar fi super daca am avea-o inclusa direct in tabeolul principal.

Loooooool but you added Blockchair to the list Yet you talk like someone else rated it only with 8/10 I also believe it deserves a better mark. And, changing it is very simple, as it's only up tp you for 2 reasons: (1) you are topic's author, thus you can change marks anyway (smile) and (2) this explorer was suggested by you, thus you are not changing the mark against someone else's will, if you believe it should have a better mark.

From my perspective I'd go even more far than 9/10 and I'd give it 10/10 for the following reason: it's the best one we have! As a consequence, all other ones will be compared with best one, right? Therefore, if it is best one we have, it actually deserves 10/10, no matter that it can be improved here and there. If another explorer will come up, having all Blockchair features and also some more nice additions then it will be marked with 10/10 and change Blockchair's mark to 9/10. Does this make sense?

---

Oh yes, I know, I know...

---

You are also right "Intimitate" means "Privacy", while "Intimitatea" means "The Privacy". And it is, indeed, a substantive of feminine gender. Unfortunately, the gender of our nyms don't also reveal our real genders Yet I have my reasons for also believing that PrivacyG is a chick   Now it came into my mind to vote PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023.

Ohhhh, shoot, I forgot that icopress took most wrong decision of his entire life (facepalm)  

---

You trimmed it well, padawan! And it's almost there! 99%! I will explain and also propose a solution for having it perfectly fitting the screen!

Take a look at this (this is how it shows on 1080p):



As far as I see, on 1080p, the comments section show only 96 characters (I counted the characters from this string: "movement of our balance. If using no-JS, click a random TX, Block or Address and edi" -- which represents the visible part of the text). The line containing "edit" word has 87 characters. The other truncated line (from BitcoinWho'sWho) has 98 characters (the word "as" is not shown). As a consequence, we are in need of 2-3 more characters for "Comments" column.



As shown in the above picture, I think we can shorten "Usefulness" column with 3 characters, by deleting that emoji. Having "Usefulness" column shortened then, maybe "Comments" column can be expanded with 3 characters.

I hope this helps.

---

Later edit: PrivacyG has one more suggestion but I guess shyness prevailed ()). He (?) said that he believes that Atomic explorer is not actually redirecting to Trezor explorer website. Instead, he believes that Atomic copies Trezor's website and that there is only a very small difference between the two websites.

Danke für die Nachricht,1miau!

Da ich auch glaube, dass unsere ausgewählten Stable Coins ihren Wert von 1 $ behalten werden, sind die Chancen, dass ihre sehr kleinen Schwankungen den Gewinner ändern, fast null. Infolgedessen stimme ich zu, diese Münzen für den Rest des Jahres mit einem Wert von 1 $ zu betrachten und am Ende, wenn wir Gewinner sind, können wir den Preis teilen

Schließlich wollten wir beide einen Stablecoin für einen bestimmten Zweck auswählen, und ich habe mich für meinen entschieden, weil ich deinen nicht auswählen konnte, weil du ihn kurz vor mir ausgewählt hast Aber das ist der einzige Unterschied hier: der Name des Coins . Andernfalls haben beide den gleichen Wert, falls keiner abstürzt oder verschwindet.

I believe this may explain why Lauda was not banned (again) in 2020:


At the same time, when Lauda plagiarized, there was no rule against plagiarism. Yes, believe it or not, there was no such rule:


Therefore this may be another reason for the absence of the ban: there was no such punishment in 2015, when Lauda plagiarized; the anti-plagiarism rule was implemented in 2016.

---

Well, at least, we still have something good from this topic, as you remembered about this user and you decided to remove that negative feedback

That's a good score, considering your rank Here, let me quote your result in full image, as you did not post it correctly:

---

Wow! That's a very good score! Congrats!

---

Welcome! You fully deserved it

---

Congrats for the score you got! I decided to merit you too, although you are very new on the forum, yet I noticed you already received some merits and I believe you are a "real" user, not just an account created inside a farm Good luck with your next rank ups!

And here is your score, in full image:

Ohhh come on, not this clown again!

Yet he is back in action!

I remember I first heard about him last year in September and it seems he is still doing same shady activities here. In a way, he reminds me of saxydev, with his shenanigans regarding free AML checks.

I added him to my distrust list since September 2022 and I also gave him a neutral feedback:

---

I believe that our mr.relax barely knows anything about Trust and feedbacks, as he noticed my feedback only in November last year when, of course, he came to me, very angry, asking me to remove the negative feedback I wrote. I explained to him that it wasn't a negative feedback, but a neutral one and, in case he wants to see how a negative looks like this can be arranged.

If I remember well, he replied, apologized for using wrong terms, but then he sent me a retaliatory feedback though:



It is what it is. In any case, distrusting him is a very good measure.

Avem un concurs nou!

[FREE RAFFLE] 502nd- ฿ECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD-CYPHER HODL PRINTED COIN
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440361.0

Se pot castiga urmatoarele: o moneda Cypher Hodl printata la imprimanta 3D.


Organizator: krogothmanhattan

Poate participa oricine daca s-a inregistrat anterior datei de 1 iulie.
Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat).
Transportul: gratuit in SUA; pentru restul lumii se va discuta cu minerjones.

Concursul este identic cu cele anterior realizate de OP.

---

Hihi! Am fost mai agil!


Hai ca a clarificat acum situatia

Hey there, PrivacyG!

I don't know if you are aware, but there is an avatar campaign running right now (and which is still open for applications): [OPEN| AVATAR OPEN Reward $20/w] SINBAD MIXER Signature & Campaign. Up-to $130/W. By quickly browsing through the campaign pages I see that you were part of it a while ago. Now you left it, but I believe that you can still apply only for renting your avatar. As far as I see, they pay 20$ per week to those renting solely their avatars.

Besides, there is also Betnomi's campaign, which also offers the possibility of renting only your avatar: [FULL] Betnomi.com | Signature Campaign | Up to 0.0025 BTC/W. In this case, the payment is 0.001 BTC/week which, at current value of BTC, represents about 24$. However, this campaign is full at the moment but it won't hurt to keep watching it until a spot will be open again.

I hope this helps.

Avem un concurs nou!

Guess my reload, win 11.11$ . Small giveaway.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5440354.0

Se poate castiga: suma de 11.11$ in LTC, BTC sau XRP.

Organizator: AHOYBRAUSE

Poate participa oricine daca are minim 25 merite si 6 luni vechime a contului. Inscrierile tin pana pe 23 februarie.

Participantii trebuie sa ghiceasca suma cu care isi reincarca zilnic organizatorul contul detinut la Stake.com. Aceasta este una intre 2.00$ si 6.00$. Castiga primul care scrie raspunsul corect. In cazul in care doi sau mai multi participanti pronosticheaza o suma aflata la o diferenta egala de cea reala, premiul va fi divizat intre castigatori. Fiecare participant poate face un singur pronostic.

Nu trebuie postata acum adresa portofelului, ci doar predictia. La final, doar castigatorul va posta adresa la care sa-i fie trimisa suma de 11.11$.

Aaaaaand here is my submission   A delicious apple pie! Yum!





Here's a slice of my apple pie  



Bon appetit!

---

Okay, it's good that things are clarified.

---

Roger that!

I don't think it works just like that...

I believe that should be a decision taken together with moderators, theymos and a majority of users.

If I (or anyone else) would just do it, without consent or approval of forum staff, such move may be considered, in best case scenario, as a double topic. And it would imply questions like "Why haven't you checked first, to see if there is any other topic on this matter"?. Remember, that was the best case scenario. Worst case scenario is to have the new topic reported as plagiarism and actually be considered by mods as plagiarizing the original one, which leads to ban.

For these reasons I am reluctant in doing anything unless a consent is met or until a decision coming from theymos, although seeing a sticky topic written by a scammer in Legal board feels like a kidney stone and when I see the sticky from Scam accusation board also written by a scammer my eyes are bleeding

Lol! I guess there is no way for knowing for sure if the wife made the pie or the participant

---

0.03 BTC? Are you sure? Or you meant, perhaps, 0.003 BTC? I am asking because it is a very big amount... Nevertheless, such donation is certainly appreciated by all users involved and it will also attract more to participate
In any case, if you want to donate, simply stating it here is enough. When winners will be elected, RickDeckard may contact you via PM to let you know how much you should send and to which users.

---

Omg, it's good you stated that! For some reason I had a cake in my mind, although I knew that it's a pie baking contest. Okay, pie it will be

Think about this: BitcoinTalk forum has (should have) very high standards. It cares (through its users and administration) a lot for combating spam, for example. It is one of the very few (if not the only) forums which bans plagiarism. And examples can go on and on. These high standards pushed this forum way ahead of others, like CryptocoinTalk, AltcoinTalk etc. Right? If it is so, then these high standards should be enforced wherever possible. Including in not having sticky topics with obsolete materials or created by authors with no credibility. Picture these sticky topics as landmarks of a particular board. Having a topic set as sticky one makes it practically to be pushed forward in front of all other topics, right? It means it is a topic representative for the respective board. Maybe one of most important topics of that board. And, if that topic is written by someone with -5 Trust what impression does it make about the entire board? I think this thought appears naturally, for many users: "Since most important topic of this board is written by a scammer then this board is full of scammers.".

---

Don't you find ironic at all that a topic which is representative for Legal board (such as List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc.) to be written by a scammer, also involved in account selling and account farming?! Seriously?

Don't you find ironic at all that a topic which is representative for Scam accusation board to be written by a felon arrested for scams?

---

I fully agree here and I also mentioned these materials in the previous posts of this topic.

---

I have no idea... I asked theymos once twice, but I did not receive any answer.

---

Lol! True, there are some having a double personality disorder =)))

I fully agree with you here. It is, indeed, a lot of obsolete information... But this would also imply an entire campaign from administration for revamping all these topics and I am not sure if anyone would be willing to do this entire work. Instead, what I proposed was referring only to a part of the whole which needs revamping, thus being a little easier to achieve.

---

How can I explain this better...? In my opinion, having a good material, but presented by someone with negative Trust is like a stain on the face of the topic or on the face of the respective board. Imagine a corrupt politician presenting a good material in front of public. If everybody knows he is corrupt, that material loses its credibility. However, in our case it also leads to losing the credibility on the respective board, since it contains sticky topics from those which are scammers or which have bad reputation, negative feedbacks, flags against them and so on.

How would it be to have a sticky topic written by CSW or Roger Ver inside Bitcoin discussion board? Would you believe anything from it? Furthermore: wouldn't you ask yourself "How was it possible to have here a sticky topic written by that clown?" -- do you understand now what I mean?

---

Lauda... is Lauda What can I say. Lauda is a different story. For one reason, she is not actually banned... I think it's more appropriate to say that her account was locked. Okay, technically speaking she was banned, but she was banned in same way Satoshi's account was banned


Excepting that, some of her negative feedbacks are referring to her departure:

qwk   2020-12-01   Reference   Farewell Lauda.
Dabs   2020-11-08   Reference   Lauda said Goodbye, world! Account is no longer active.
Vod   2020-11-05   Reference   Do not trust this account should it ever post again.

The plagiarism accusation... if you remember, she was never sanctioned for it, therefore mods / theymos did not consider it plagiarism, although, maybe, it was.

I would not insist more on Lauda as I know opinions are very different from user to user. In any case, she also has some topics which contain obsolete information and they need revamping. One of them is this one: [General] Bitcoin Wallets - Which, what, why?.

In any case, something should be done with all these topics, either if we talk about obsolete ones or about the ones written by scammers or users with shady reputation.

Hello, thank you for these prizes!

I hereby confirm that I am also interested in receiving the prize in physical form.

icopress be like:

A few days ago I found, by pure chance, that the sticky topic from Scam Accusation board containing a scam accusation format was created by a user which has now a -4 Trust score: escrow.ms. Furthermore, the user has also an active flag created against him, after he was arrested for credit card fraud Oo

I thought it's a bit ironic to have a sticky topic teaching how to properly present a scam accusation and the topic to be made by someone involved in a severe scam.

Then I kept looking through the forum and I found other sticky topics which are created by authors with negative Trust:

• Bitcoin discussion/Legal: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. is created by Stephen Gornick, which has a negative feedback from The Sceptical Chymist for account selling, encouraging of scams, spam, and account farming.
• Bitcoin discussion\Legal: this board has another sticky topic created by Stephen Gornick
• Bitcoin discussion\Legal: this board has one more sticky topic created by an author with negative Trust: Guidelines for Press board, created by jgarzik, which has a negative feedback from gmaxwell
• Marketplace\Lending: [EDU] How to spot a scammer (Read this before lending your coins!) is created by Tomatocage , whose account has been compromised

Most likely, the list can go on, as i did not look thoroughly inside each board and child board.

I believe that these sticky topics created by authors with negative Trust should not be sticky anymore, as they do not offer credibility to the boards they belong, to the ones which read them and to the forum as a whole. It's a situation similar to the one related to DT2 users with negative Trust. However, if that situation is difficult to be solved, this one has real chances to be solved, if there is willing about doing so.

Eventually, these topics could be rewritten by someone which does not have negative Trust / bad reputation. Or simply have the author changed, if their authors are not active anymore.

Opinions?

Dear PrivacyG, I feel almost devastated to hear about your medical condition... I read your topic last night, yet when I woke up in the morning I hoped it was just a dream. Sadly, it wasn't and here we are... What makes me even more sad is the fact that you are not 60+ years of age (or so I believe) thus you have all your life in front of you...

If I may, I'd like to share two things about this illness.

First of all, when I moved in the apartment I am owning now, at that moment I rented it. It was the property of a nice old lady which I knew since I was a child. And she was old since I was a child. Time passed, I grew up and she became even older. When I rented the apartment she was already for a few years inside an asylum, as she had Alzheimer and she needed someone to take care of her all day long. I paid rent here for about 9 years. I wanted to buy it but I could not. Her daughters could not sell the apartment as they needed their mother signature on papers and no authority would accept the old lady's signature, since she had Alzheimer. So practically they told me they will sell (me) the apartment but only after their mother will die.

This happened 9 years later and I believe the old lady was inside the asylum for more than a decade, while having Alzheimer for even a longer time. I think she was 80+ when the sad moment happened.

What I'm trying to say, as an encouragement, is that you can live with this illness. Try to fight it, by using your brain, as much as you can. But the most important thing is that you can live with it. Having someone around is necessary, but you can have a normal life.

The second thing I wanted to suggest is this one: do you like to resolve crosswords? Don't take this as a joke, as I am seriously suggesting it to you. I am a big fan of crosswords and I am having this hobby for many, many years, since I was a child. I guess I saw adults around me solving crosswords and, since children imitate adults, this is what I did... Solving crosswords is a way to enrich your lexicon, to become more cultivated and also, a way for training your brain. Some are easier to resolve, some are so difficult that you'll never make it. Yet constantly resolving these innocent puzzles may be a good training for your brain and for your memory as well.

I hope this helps. May you be well, dear PrivacyG!

Sadly, this is true. Yesterday, when I saw PrivacyG's update of the table it looked seemed to look fine... However, today I inspected it again after your reply, as I did not understand why columns should be smaller. I observed now that in its new shape, the column for comments is not fully shown on the screen (at least on 1080p resolution). Practically, in order to see everything written there you have to drag all text to the right... Maybe it is shown fine on higher resolution but most users have 1080p therefore the table should be kept in its actual form.


That also works I added this update to the translated topic as well. By the way, make sure you write PrivacyG's name properly, my dear 1miau. The name should be written between tt - /tt BBCode