MICRO is very judgemental, and for some reason he hates me too. Oh well, it's a giveaway after all.

Every bully has an excuse. You could've just said sorry and not made any. I do forgive you anyway though, but please be nicer to me.
On a more positive note, good luck to everyone tonight!

Please tell me this is purchasable?

Dude, did you really take him calling you a f seriously? You think staff would do something like that? Holy mother of lord, you can't be for real. Tell me you aren't.

stunna you doing ok? its been 7 hours 

Oh really 

Those eyes.. demoneyes!

The response from the developer you quoted is hard to understand, but it sounds as if they're saying that after the incorrectly settled bets you went on to double one or two more times before winning, and that at no point did the incorrectly settled bet cause you to bust a martingale sequence.

So by refunding you 0.14 rounded up to 0.2, they're giving you more than they needed to.

You could argue that if you bet like this:

0.01 (incorrectly settled as loss)
0.02 (loss)
0.04 (loss)
0.08 (win)

Then your profit should have been 0.01, and it actually WAS 0.01, and so they don't owe you anything. Or could you argue that if the first bet was settled correctly, your bets would have gone:

0.01 (win)
0.01 (loss)
0.02 (loss)
0.04 (win)

and so your profit would have been 0.01 + 0.01 = 0.02, and so their error cost you 0.01 which they now owe you. It's hard to say what the right thing to do is.

But your main point (other than the delay in resolving this whole mess) seems to be that they can't prove that you didn't go:

-0.01 (incorrectly settled)
-0.02
...
-1
-2
-4

at some point.

I don't see how they can prove that to you now. You don't have a record of your bets, and they could in theory make up anything they want. What if they give you a list of all your bets, with betids, and just edit the bit where you busted? You wouldn't be able to tell the difference, because you don't have a record to compare it to.

If it was me, I would just give you a database dump of all your bets, with betid, stake, roll, seeds etc. and let you look through it for yourself and verify everything. That seems like the simplest solution here.

Here is my one.


Username: NeringaJ
Why is everyone posting photoshoped pics? I think it is meant to be your pic.

It should be done today (I hope so).

just tried new link still cant log in. i would use a new browser but cant remember the password. checked google saved passwords and i didnt save it

Best TA I've seen in a long time, but for the life of me I can't remember if the alpaca formation is supposed to be bullish or bearish

$357.33 - Coin Desk

Patterns exist in random numbers in the same way that patterns exist in the decimal digits of pi or in the clouds.

The thing about them is that you can only spot them after they happen, and they have no predictive power.

You can look at the clouds and say "that one looks like a dog", but you can't go on to justifiably say "therefore tomorrow there will be a cloud that looks like a big mac". Maybe you'll say it anyway, and maybe you'll be right, but the dog cloud had nothing to do with it.

Maybe you'll see the dog cloud followed by the big mac cloud a few times, and you'll start to believe in the predictive power of the dog cloud, but you would be fooling yourself.

So it's Friday, and I'm keeping my word.  I was pretty nervous doing this one and don't like showing up on high rollers. 

What Hufflepuff did was something like a 2% chance. Unlikely, but not unreasonable. He had a 1 in 50 chance of doing what he did.

The screenshot that was posted was something like a 1 in a quadrillion chance. Unreasonably unlikely.

We can say that it's plausible that Hufflepuff wasn't cheating, and that it's incredibly likely that the screenshot of 9 losing 98% bets in a row was fake.

A 1 in 50 shot is many orders of magnitude more likely to happen than 1 in 2 quadrillion.

We rely on math and probability for Bitcoin itself. There's a small but non-zero chance that I can guess the PD cold storage private key, but math tells us that's very unlikely, and so we trust that it won't happen.