Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2024, 11:09:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 158 »
1821  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 30, 2015, 12:21:23 AM
I wonder how many real accounts are left on hashtalk since it's likely a good majority of them are fake accounts considering there is so much banning going on. My guess would be about 30 real people?

Sounds about right. But don't tell Mr. Coins that, he is still claiming "thousands of people" are active on HT.
1822  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 11:26:35 PM
We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

1823  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 10:58:42 PM
The HT braintrust is at it again, this time with the brilliant idea of defacing Federal Reserve Notes with a Paycoin advertisement.




This is directly from the "Where's George?" Wiki, the same one that Wildfirebill quotes as saying his scheme of advertising Paycoin on Federal Reserve Notes is legal. In fact, it says the OPPOSITE. Typical dumb as fucking dirt HashTaker anti-logic at work.

But hey, who cares if the Secret Service says advertising on Federal Reserve Notes is illegal, right? I mean if this caused yet another branch of the government to start investigating Paycoin/GAW that would make Paycoin all that much more legit, according to the douchebags on HT, anyways.  Roll Eyes

Specific law forbidding advertising on money:


Edit to add: And now this effing imbecile Wildfirebill is encouraging others to do the same in other countries, based of course on his"investigation" that he concluded said advertising on US currency is legal, when in fact it is not.

The pathetically stupid and blind leading the pathetically stupid and blind.
1824  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 09:24:47 PM
So, you mean that ~2,000,000+ XPY were not withdrawn by Paybase users since 3-27? But, but, ikeboy says that is what is going on, and he is known to be consistently right. Oh, wait a second, no he isn't. I figured that some HT user would come forward saying that some address was theirs, but ikeboy managed to spot one that is real and not just a shuffle or accumulator address. That leaves all of those that are connected to each other, which accounts for the vast majority of transactions going on. So the mix/shuffle> send to exchanges is being done right along side of the actual Paybase transactions from the same GAW wallets.
1825  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 09:06:32 PM
OK, finally traced that group all the way back to it's origin. It went in then out of this wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PSBP8BgUUBUhmkrsBRAVy5FpQVy2B7ro9m.htm

and that transaction leads back to this transaction, where the source group of that 50,000 XPY was derived from a group of 71,014.729 XPY, with the remainder going to this address where they still are. You know, because someone happened to make a 21,014.729 XPY withdrawal into a brand new wallet, leaving EXACTLY 50,000 XPY in that group that went on the Paycoin Shuffle. What luck , huh?

 And where did the 71,014.729 XPY come from? Why, the #1 wallet that had ~5,000,000 XPY in it recently (~3,800,000 now), of course. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PDzubEnhb45Gz8zBNq9zsPi9UohwzUhniP.htm

 
1826  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 08:34:09 PM
Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the  mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explaination of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

You said that zero transactions went to customers, I disproved that. Many addresses have been in use for months, but don't show up in google searches other than blockchain results. Those probably belong to individuals who didn't post it online. It's not possible to prove one way or another who such an address belongs to, and note that what I said above was that it's possible for it to be matching withdrawals, not that it was definite. They could be skimming off also.

And as for paybase being down, which I didn't test at the time, there could have been a backlog that was approved while it was down. Was it down during the entire range of transactions?



Incorrect, I said that of those that I personally checked I did not find any. Thank you for finding one. That does not change the fact that damn near all of them still go to accumulator addresses, and certainly does nothing to explain why all of these transactions continued even when Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!

You said you checked thousands. I checked much less than that and found two, so if you really checked thousands you should have found at least one.

And even many of the ones not tied to accounts were still used for a while. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by accumulator, but if it just means an address that never sent out coins, then it isn't true that most transactions went to one of those for the bunch I looked through.

And I did give an explanation for why there could be withdrawals when paybase was down.

You are quite welcome to believe what you like. I checked many , many addresses and all of them that I checked all lead back to accumulator addresses. Why exactly are you not posting any of those? And, for the record, your explanation of how Paybase transactions continue  while no one has access to their accounts at the same rate as when Paybase was open is amusing and shows how desperate you are to try to make your scam dog hero Homero look like something other than the scam dog scammy scammer that he is. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!
1827  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 08:23:05 PM
Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the  mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explaination of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

You said that zero transactions went to customers, I disproved that. Many addresses have been in use for months, but don't show up in google searches other than blockchain results. Those probably belong to individuals who didn't post it online. It's not possible to prove one way or another who such an address belongs to, and note that what I said above was that it's possible for it to be matching withdrawals, not that it was definite. They could be skimming off also.

And as for paybase being down, which I didn't test at the time, there could have been a backlog that was approved while it was down. Was it down during the entire range of transactions?



Incorrect, I said that of those that I personally checked I did not find any. Thank you for finding one. That does not change the fact that damn near all of them still go to accumulator addresses, and certainly does nothing to explain why all of these transactions continued even when Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crypto scammer, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!
1828  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 08:08:37 PM
Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the  mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions that go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explanation of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

Again: Thank you for making sure all of this comes up on every search of GAW, Paycoin, PayBase, XPY, Josh GArza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, GAW Scam, fraud, fraudster, etc. Please, continue!
1829  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 07:58:27 PM
Fascinating, yet wrong. These mixing transactions continued while Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions. That eliminates the possibility that these are normal Paybase transactions with 100% certainty.

Again, thank you for helping drive this discussion of the Paycoin Scam, XPY scam, GAW,  Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam scammer , fraud, fraudster, creep, to the top of search results!
1830  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 07:47:19 PM
Again, sending small amounts to exchanges is consistent with people withdrawing from Paybase. Why do you think it isn't people who had funds on paybase? Asserting that you are right doesn't make you right, and neither does insulting people. You've offered zero arguments to support the claim that it's impossible for these transactions to be withdrawals from paybase.

I don't have to offer a damn thing. The evidence already was and you choose to ignore the work of PR. Insults? Nah. Just telling it like it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fTAXVr8N40

I directly responded, and all he could say was "you're so stupid, so i don't have to prove anything". That's not a valid argument. (He since offered another argument, that the transaction volume was higher than usual, but that wasn't true.)

And sending a single coin from an output with 500,000 coins creates volume of 500,000. Paul doesn't seem to understand the system very well, and his response is proving it. The transaction behavior is consistent with an exchange servicing withdrawing, and anyone who knows how transactions work understands this.

Hell, Paul claimed a couple pages back that some transaction didn't get confirmed for a few days, while linking to the confirmation. If you know anything at all about what's going on, you'd realize that's wrong. He's screenshoting pages he doesn't understand.

(If vancefox is around, could you weigh in on this and how well it fits exchange patterns?)

I would have to agree with the last lot of photos , it looks like a standard hot wallet with multiple addresses belonging to an exchange , the top one is withdrawal, the second is the remaining coins in that wallet going back to bittrex or paybase or whatever

But there are other screenshots Paul has provided that are correct , there is a clear trail of funds getting skimmed off the top of the prime controllers  whenever they collect massive amounts of coins and they are getting deposited into exchanges

but the long most recent list of transactions shown can be explained by an exchanges hot wallet functioning normally

That theory was dismissed as bullshit. Please read before quoting a shill full of stupid.

I believe GAW is a massive useless pile of steaming shit and Josh is a useless cunt , What makes people believe someone who has systematically failed for 3 months straight is suddenly gonna pull some magic out of his ass and suddenly deliver products in quick succession.


But from those last screenshots provided, that is exactly how every single hot wallet for every single coin, using every single currency works when withdrawing funds .

now i would say its completely crazy having such a constant and frequent number popping up so often , but looking at the data on the block chain , seeing 500 other crypto currencies behaving in the same way............

Fascinating, yet no proof was given. It is also fascinating that these supposed withdrawals also occurred while Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions of any type. That alone eliminates the possibility that this coin mixing is customers doing transactions.

Again: Thank you so very much for making sure this gets on the top of the search engines when any one searched for GAW, Paybase, , XPY, Paycoin, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, fraud , etc etc. Please, keep it up!
1831  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 07:32:34 PM
Sometimes it is hard to tell if ikeboy really is that stupid or is pretending just to continue to shill for his hero Homero. When you see an extremely large amount of coins (~2,000,000) being endlessly bounced through hundreds of brand new addresses that are all used exactly once, with small amounts being sent to exchanges or to accumulator addresses that are ALL connected to eachother by inputs and outputs, it is obvious to most that these coins are being mixed, or "laundered", but ikeboy wants to pretend that this is standard operating procedure. Good for you, ikeboy, have fun in your delusion, but even your hero Homero the fraudster says this is coin mixing.

The 2 million coins were in a block that took 45 minutes to mine, which usually contains more transactions than average. It's not significantly more than the amount that moves in other periods of the same length.

Can you explain why this can't be a single wallet that's constantly paying off withdrawals? That would look pretty much exactly like this.

If you think it would look different, can you identify the actual hot wallet paybase uses and show the difference in the pattern?

YES, for the hundredth fucking time: The amounts that are siphoned off go to one of two places, in the THOUSANDS of transactions of these groups I have checked. Literally thousands.
A: They go directly to exchanges.
B: They go to accumulator addresses that are all linked to each other and are controlled by the same person.

Where they NEVER go is to Joe XPY holder's wallet. NEVER. If these were "withdrawals" MOST of them would go to long established wallets and addresses, and NONE of them do.EVER. Period. End of fucking story. Deal with it.

Edit to add: Thank you for making sure this discussion climbs high on the search engine rankings by repeating the same thing over and over so more people get to see it.
1832  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 07:17:09 PM
Sometimes it is hard to tell if ikeboy really is that stupid or is pretending just to continue to shill for his hero Homero. When you see an extremely large amount of coins (~2,000,000) being endlessly bounced through hundreds of brand new addresses that are all used exactly once, with small amounts being sent to exchanges or to accumulator addresses that are ALL connected to eachother by inputs and outputs (if these were XPY holders wallets they would not all be controlled by the same person), it is obvious to most that these coins are being mixed, or "laundered", but ikeboy wants to pretend that this is standard operating procedure. Good for you, ikeboy, have fun in your delusion, but even your hero Homero the fraudster says this is coin mixing.
1833  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 06:54:34 PM
Brilliant Blockchain detective work, as usual Paul Revere.

Thanks for the ego boost my friend, but I am only someone with a basic knowledge of this stuff that has the patience to click through all of this to trace things. Speaking of which, I decided to try to trace backwards from the associated groups of 30,000-40,000XPY in that 2,100,000XPY block. Something I can say for sure is that all of those groups in that block (accounting for ~90% of the block) are controlled by the same person, and ALL of them are being endlessly shuffled, with about every 10th transaction sending a small amount to an exchange. I chose one that showed some being siphoned off and going directly to Bittrex:

Tracing backwards this group sends small amounts to accumulator addresses (which link all of these groups together) and about every 10th transaction some goes to one of the exchanges:





I gave up counting shuffle transactions at 200, I think I am about 500 back now. Here is where I currently have traced this group backwards to, this being on the 27th: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474669.htm The group has 42,571 XPY in it at this point, so ~11,000 XPY have been siphoned off from this point forward, about ~1,000 going directly to exchanges, and the rest going to accumulator addresses, some growing real large, others being reshuffled and sent to exchanges already. I have a lunch to cook, and then I will try to find the source of this ~42,000 XPY group. Any guesses as to where this will lead? Roll Eyes

A bunch of small transactions to exchanges is likely people withdrawing from either zencloud or paybase.

Wrong as usual, imbecile GAW shill, ikeboy. These groups of XPY are being shuffled in and out of hundreds and hundreds of addresses that are used exactly once and then never again. The amounts siphoned off and NOT sent directly to exchanges are all directly linked to the rest of the huge amount of XPY being laundered in various accumulator addresses. The small amounts sent to exchanges are taken directly from the large group, most of them being extremely small amounts, many being less than 1 XPY. This is precisely what your hero Homero described as "mixing" to hide the origin of coins less than a week ago.
1834  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 06:36:52 PM
Brilliant Blockchain detective work, as usual Paul Revere.

Thanks for the ego boost my friend, but I am only someone with a basic knowledge of this stuff that has the patience to click through all of this to trace things. Speaking of which, I decided to try to trace backwards from the associated groups of 30,000-40,000XPY in that 2,100,000XPY block. Something I can say for sure is that all of those groups in that block (accounting for ~90% of the block) are controlled by the same person, and ALL of them are being endlessly shuffled, with about every 10th transaction sending a small amount to an exchange. I chose one that showed some being siphoned off and going directly to Bittrex:

Tracing backwards this group sends small amounts to accumulator addresses (which link all of these groups together) and about every 10th transaction some goes to one of the exchanges:





I gave up counting shuffle transactions at 200, I think I am about 500 back now. Here is where I currently have traced this group backwards to, this being on the 27th: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474669.htm The group has 42,571 XPY in it at this point, so ~11,000 XPY have been siphoned off from this point forward, about ~1,000 going directly to exchanges, and the rest going to accumulator addresses, some growing real large, others being reshuffled and sent to exchanges already. I have a lunch to cook, and then I will try to find the source of this ~42,000 XPY group. Any guesses as to where this will lead? Roll Eyes
1835  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 05:18:09 PM
Amazingly, someone on HT is actually looking at the Paycoin Blockchain and noticed that there was not a block in more than a half hour- now about 45 minutes:
https://hashtalk.org/topic/35268/no-xpy-block-for-past-30-minutes
Archive: https://archive.today/kHwKn


LOL?

Update: Moving again, it appears that Josh suddenly decided to move 2,000,000 XPY and that big turd clogged up the Blockchain.
1836  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 04:00:22 PM
Man, check this out
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/block.dws?113807.htm
20,000 XPY generated in a single Proof of Stake Block! 60,000 generated over 3 consecutive Blocks!!

This is the "catch up" hyper-staking after having had that Prime Controller offline for 2 weeks. Maybe it is on someone's laptop who is traveling somewhere, like, oh Europe, maybe. Not sure who this PC belongs to though, this could very well be one of the 15 that Adam Matlack did not purchase but possesses. Here is the wallet address where that 20,000XPY stake transaction occurred. I will post only snippets with the important part to save space, along with the corresponding link to what is being pointed out.

Just your regular Hyper Inflation, but now lets follow the money. On 3-25 all 167,528 XPY was pulled from this PC address in this transaction: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?467209.htm

First, we see that 21,094XPY was shaved off and sent somewhere. Note that even though this transaction occurred 4 days ago, it is not yet confirmed- so much for Paycoin's instant transactions. Roll Eyes Anyways, it is showing up on the blockchain at it's new destination here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PCA2HUtRHqfmtvXR3JgeXkkePVkf87wDUT.htm

Fresh address on 3-10 with massive amounts being paid from various Prime Controllers, adding up to 1,242,772 XPY 16 days later, making it #2 on the Rich List. Nothing fishy here at all. I have not had time to trace the source of all of these inputs to this address. At face value it seems that they come from 20 addys on the 10th, 27 on the 25th, and 23 on the 26th. There may have been shuffling though, so the actual source addresses could be fewer or even more. Any way, we will now follow the bulk of that batch of XPY, the 146,434 sent here, which is an in-out shuffle, and leaves in this transaction: which sends 21,433 more to that #2 on the rich list address on the 26th. This leaves exactly 125,000XPY in that group, which is sent in that same transaction to this address, where it stakes 2,367XPY in two days! Scweeet! Cheesy

And then this Prime CONtroller address is completely emptied out on 3-28 in this transaction which is shown below:

Tisk, Tisk. It seems that these brazen fraudsters are getting lazy and not even bothering to do the Paycoin Shuffle to try to confuse the path of the massive amounts of XPY that Josh&Co get for free and dump into the exchanges every day. Just taking the Hyper Stake from the Prime Controllers and dumping it straight to Cryptsy!  Shocked THERE is your proof you naive fools who still believe that Josh&Co are not the ones doing the dumping , ya effing morons.

From there this group hits a shuffle address here and immediately leaves in this transaction. Read it and weep, fools:


503 MORE XPY sent directly to Cryptsy from that group THIS MORNING 3-29! The bulk (exactly 126,000 XPY)now rests in this new Prime Controller address: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PRDWXfEdx31L7aRL2m9mKLvxZbVzhSRwPA.htm

 The proof is everywhere you look, hell, these fraudster assholes are getting lazy and not even bothering to try to hide their tracks anymore. Figure it the fuck out already! H. Josh Garza and has team of fraudsters are playing all of you investing in XPY for FOOLS! H. Josh Garza (aka Homero Garza aka Josh Garza aka GAWCEO aka Mr CEO) lured people into investing in Paycoin with various promises, one of which is that he and GAW would NOT and have not dumped XPY into the open market. There is 100% conclusive proof that they are in fact doing exactly that and have been all along. Promising investors something and then intentionally doing the opposite is called FRAUD.


1837  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 03:42:13 AM
Another gem for the museum:



And recently "acquired" by BTCLend, run by Cmilian, the dumbest lender on the planet that accepts Paycoin as "collateral" , but does not actually take possession of this collateral that will likely be worth half what it was when the loan was made by the time the loan is due. Pure genius, it is like taking fresh fish as "collateral". Perhaps the XPYstaker Ponzi site will actually give them some positive cashflow until that Ponzi reaches the cut and run stage.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/35032/latest-news-btclend-acquires-xpystaker-com
1838  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 29, 2015, 01:26:53 AM
Plenty of LOLs to be had in this one:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/35227/crazy-idea-for-josh

I'm pretty sure tony54 is well aware that CAF doesn't exist and is trying to solicit some kind of reaction from MrWhateverTheFuckRemainsOfGAWCEO. Which will likely be a short irrelevant phrase or nothing at all.

He sure does. I do not recall his handle here, but a couple months ago he was posting here and seemed to be aware of the general gist of what is happening with Paycoin and was posting non-allowed questions on HT. Here is another good one from that same thread. There are still a lot of idiots on HT that are absolutely convinced that a merchant accepting Paycoin will make them go bye byes.

1839  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 28, 2015, 06:17:25 PM
So, now the story with the Paycoin.com "hack" is that the coins moved to exchanges, and it just so happens that most (all?) of the hacked wallets were the people running the exchange, and now the coins have been replaced with "foundation coins". And, everyone else had their funds (BTC and XPY locked up for over a week. WTF? What kind of a nincompoop would believe such bullshit?




My inner Columbo says that this was likely an inside job, stealing coins from the foundation and having the added bonus of locking everyone elses funds up so they are not competition as they are dumped on exchanges, and of course there is the very real possibility of doing some naked shorting with the clients coins and replacing them with coins repurchased at lower value after dumping them, pocketing the difference.

WWJD?
1840  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: March 28, 2015, 01:57:04 PM
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 158 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!