Does this mean you were able to successfully recover your password but failed to get the 2FA access? If I follow the discussion above, it seems like Block.io can only help you with 2FA, but not the password. I don't see passwords being mentioned either at https://block.io/faq. I assume the forgot password feature is for an account created on block.io itself, not dogechain.

I think your last shot is your old laptop which you believe at some point store your seeds data. If that is unrecoverable then brute-forcing your password would be the next step.

The add favorite feature is quite difficult to use unless the user spends some time doing trial and error. I think adding a separate page would be better, or making it more user-friendly with additional UI after they click the plus/minus sign. Something like clicking + -> New pair -> save. It's probably unclear just by text but I hope OP can get what I'm trying to say here. I also don't know what the 'Edit' at the bottom left does so you can also work on that.

Also, consider adding a dark theme as mentioned above. I use dark reader/dark them on all of my web browsers and your site looks good with a dark theme. It's definitely too simplistic though, but if your goal is just to provide a quick crypto calculator then it is enough. IMO, at the moment, the current UI and UX feel like it is a custom website for personal usage instead of public use.

Nobody can predict that far to the future. Too many variables to consider starting from mining equipment, electricity/energy cost, Bitcoin price, etc. For example, if we found a new way to generate electricity at a low cost, and there is a new device/quantum device that can do calculations at exponential speed to an existing rig, that number you consider insane might be nothing for them. So, people will just keep mining without any care.

Or, the opposite happens. Electricity becomes more expensive, no more cheap rig is found, BTC tank heavy, nobody no longer uses it and so the difficulty is so low that you can mine with CPU again. I think this is unlikely but I won't be surprised if difficulty falls in the future if the profit becomes too small for small-medium mining farms. At the end of the day, the market will correct itself. If mining becomes too difficult difficulty will get lower, when profit increases more people will mine again, and so on.

If you plan to mine BTC right now, consider buying them instead if you can't play the long game or has cheap electricity. It is probably not worth the trouble to set up a rig if profit is your goal. CMIIW.

Removing the credit/debit card information for registration is a good move. But after the "promo" period is over, will you bring it back? Honestly, I don't think anyone would feel safe if they need to input sensitive data right at the gate just to make an account. You can probably make a "free" tier where people can simply log in and check the last few data, so they will have to pay to access the full data to get the full picture. If that's not possible, then simply removing the credit card for registration would be better.

I'm not sure if it is possible but copying Mullvad's model of business sounds good too. They don't need personal data and just provide an account number to register and log in, and then the user needs to pay if they want to use the service. With how people's awareness of privacy increases, it might be worth a shot to look at it. Just my 2 cents.

According to their latest Tweet, it does not seem like an inside job after they did their investigation. But it is unclear if the lack of evidence is the result of no inside job or simply a good job from the cracker to clean their history. Not really a good look at their image after they told their users that they got phished.

Since then they have posted an update here: https://3commas.io/blog/notice-on-api-data-disclosure-incident. Suggesting their users request new keys is definitely not enough to get back the confidence that the API keys are safe since they still can't be sure if the hacker left something and will just leak the new keys. Might as well stop using them for the time being.

Just a suggestion, if you want to make multiple wallets maybe you can rename them according to the purpose. For example, "cold wallet", "hot wallet", "temporary wallet", signature wallet, etc. I make a mistake in the past where I just name them wallet1, wallet2, etc, and then forgot which one is important and which one isn't. It is not a big deal but a little bit annoying.

Obviously, this might affect your privacy a little bit if bad things happen, so just keep it in mind. Might not be the best practice so if anyone has a better way to manage them you should check them out too. CMIIW.

Saya coba ikut periksa dan totalnya masih sama, 0.00169076 BTC. Dulu saya pernah ingin beli copper membership dan sudah visit ke link tersebut, tapi saya lupa untuk screenshot/buat catatan tentang harganya, jadi ga bisa verifikasi juga. Tapi dari beberapa thread yang ada di forum mengenai membership ini, sepertinya harganya berubah-ubah. Berikut beberapa thread yang saya temukan:

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282467.0
- The cost of copper membership will rise considerably

Mungkin fee yang om Husna bayar itu ada di saat harga BTC sama dengan harga sekarang, atau memang sudah ada perubahan mengenai kalkulasi fee itu sendiri. Terlepas mana yang benar sepertinya harganya dipengaruhi harga BTC, signifikan atau tidak.

Mungkin kasusnya sama dengan fenomena hacking dengan mengirim gambar di WA yang pernah trending dulu om, memanfaatkan eksploit ketika aplikasi WA/Android pada umumnya membaca file gambar atau audio. Terlepas ini bug app atau Android itu sendiri, paling aman ya menghindari membuka file dari orang asing daripada gambling dengan kemungkinan file yang dikirim malware atau bukan.

Saya coba cari update terbaru sepertinya masih simpang siur. Ada yang bilang bug atau fitur yang dieksploitasi oleh hacker tersebut sudah diatasi, ada juga yang bilang tidak.

Agak kecewa juga dengan Telegram mengenai paywall filter pesan ini, karena saya rasa ini bukan hal yang seharusnya opsional tapi wajib mengingat penyebaran malware sangat mudah dilakukan. Untungnya fitur nonaktifkan auto-download masih free jadi masih bisa diakali. Kalau fitur itu juga dijadikan paywall saya rasa waktunya pindah dari Telegram tiba.

Correct me if I'm wrong but even if others play games with stolen money, there is no direct harm to you or anyone. Isn't the real "loser" in this case the casino itself if those users can win big and then never bet again (or complicate them with money laundering issues)? Why do you want them to play with you on "equal ground"? To borrow from a gaming term, this is not a PVP gacha game where more money equals more wins by beating other players (except for getting bonuses when they make profits).

Also, I don't think the "I have nothing to hide so here's my ID" is really a good stance in this case. There are tons of sites that use those data for malicious purposes. I definitely would not prefer a site over another just because they offer KYC verification if the team itself is not clear. This might sound like a contradiction, but it is really hard to "trust" new businesses if they don't show anything that can be traced back to them if things go south. In this case, I'd rather wait and see or use them carefully with less money and always withdraw my money when I finished my business. Which is why I think a trustless platform would be great to have.

That sounds capitalistic. I doubt China loves something like that (the ideology itself, not the economic system). There is so many news on the crackdown on gambling platforms so it makes sense that those players will use overseas platforms if they want to gamble. I don't think this is surprising anyway, people would try to break the law if opportunity arise when they consider it is worth the risk.

Thanks for accepting me. Latest posts count: 8461

Reposting just in case you miss this. I can accept the new payrate.

Agan harus terbiasa untuk tidak membuka file dari orang yang tidak dikenal baik di Tele atau media lainnya. Modus operandi scammer relatif sama, hanya medianya saja yang berubah. Kalau agan sudah punya habit yang baik mengenai perlindungan dari kiriman user yang tidak dikenal dan aneh, hampir pasti agan terhindar dari phishing dengan model seperti ini. Tentu saja, itu hanya bisa meminimalisir risiko, jadi tetap waspada saja.

Kalau agan pake Tele, mungkin bisa dinonaktifkan juga opsi auto-download file medianya, jadi bisa menghindari salah klik di file manajer agan. Kadang di Tele sudah agan blok/hapus tapi bisa saja filenya sudah terdownload, jadi file malwarenya masih ada di HP dan sewaktu-waktu bisa saja jadi masalah ketika HP agan dipinjam keluarga, misalnya. Atau agan sendiri sedang teledor dan malah mengklik file tersebut.

Cara mematikannya tinggal klik Settings -> Data and Storage -> matikan semua opsi di bagian automatic media download, autoplay media, opsi save to gallery (kalau mau benar-benar menghindari download file di Tele secara otomatis termasuk gambar, dst).

Current number of post (Including this one): 8458
Rank: Legendary
Bech32 address: bc1q2e9ekyt5zugaknf0tqw0zhwxnak8ym3u745jnc
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 55

How will you make nostr more accessible though? If the market target changes to your average joe, I think it won't be easy to encourage them to run their own relay, client, etc. What I can expect is another web/project that acts as a centralized social media platform that uses nostr as its backbone. This does not make the project loses its value though, just that the goal probably won't be achieved.

The idea is promising IMO, but mainstream users probably won't use it (those who don't use crypto too often, for example). Probably not a downside but anyone planning to build or run a project using this platform should consider that. I've seen lots of projects that has interesting use cases like jester, so I'll keep following this.

Username: joniboini
Current post count: 8456
BTC SegWit Address: bc1q2e9ekyt5zugaknf0tqw0zhwxnak8ym3u745jnc

Informasi buat pengguna LastPass, atau yang ingin menggunakan LastPass, kemaren baru ada update terkait security incident yang mereka alami beberapa lalu. Lengkapnya bisa dilihat di: https://blog.lastpass.com/2022/12/notice-of-recent-security-incident/

Singkatnya, hacker berhasil mendapatkan informasi personal user seperti e-mail, backup vault (dalam kondisi terenkripsi), dan informasi sejenis lainnya. Kalau agan mendapatkan e-mail, sms, telepon phishing atau model phishing yang lain, bisa jadi sumber leak datanya berasal dari sini. Hacker juga bisa mencoba untuk membruteforce backup agan, yang berarti kalau master password agan lemah password" yang agan simpan di LastPass bisa dibobol. Upaya terbaik untuk mengatasi hal ini adalah mengubah master password plus password situs" penting yang agan miliki secepat mungkin sehingga kalau mereka berhasil mengcrack vault agan, password agan sudah tidak berguna lagi.

Ke depannya agan juga bisa pindah ke manager lain seperti Keepass atau Bitwarden kalau agan perlu self-hosted manager yang bisa merangkap sebagai server password sekaligus. Agan butuh device khusus yang bisa menjalankan docker kalau agan pilih opsi yang kedua, jadi jangan lupa dipelajari juga. Ane sendiri pindah ke Keepass karena kejadian kaya gini bukan yang pertama kali dialami di LastPass, dan jasa cloud password manager juga mungkin punya kelemahan yang sama.

I also think this is true. Your average joe doesn't move their funds regularly because they simply want to save some fees, I don't think that is really greedy behavior, just how people would normally do if they put some trust in exchange. Things might change if they get destroyed by "scam" exchanges like FTX though, so they would learn the hard truth eventually.

I think people should give DEX like Bisq a try if they just need to trade once in a while. It might be a bit more expensive than your regular exchange, but it should give better control over their funds. It is almost impossible to distance yourself from an exchange platform entirely if you are a daily trader, so I don't think we can remove this risk entirely. This might sound like a broken record but the only way to reduce the risk is just to store the money you can afford to lose on exchange if you use them regularly. Store most of your money offline.

I also think this is the case. Lots of systems implement these "early" incentives for users to make sure they get a lot of users on their platform, and then gradually remove them. As long as their service/activity stays the same, the user will generally still use their product. So, I believe as long as the network is still valuable for people (whether they classify BTC as money or an asset/store of value) it will continue to survive.

OP, you might want to search for other threads that discuss this topic. I don't remember which one is it, but I'm sure there are several discussions surrounding this topic in the past. The consensus doesn't change that much afaik, but there might be some info that you might find interesting from the previous threads.

Akhir" ini saya sering melihat PHK kaya gini di beberapa perusahaan setelah akuisisi, misalnya Twitter. Entah apakah sebelumnya jumlah pekerja memang terlalu banyak atau owner yang baru ingin mendapatkan profit lebih besar lagi dengan gambling pada kesetiaan user pada platform yang ada dengan mengorbankan layanan pelanggan. Tempat kerja ane sebelumnya juga melakukan hal yang sama dan hal ini berdampak pada user dan worker itu sendiri.

Untuk exchange sih iklim akhir" ini yang tampaknya bikin exchange sulit dapet profit besar bisa dipahami, jadi kalau ada PHK ga terlalu mengagetkan. Semoga saja ga berdampak ke user atau pelanggan mereka. Ditambah persaingan yang cukup sengit di pasar Indo, mengingat banyak exchange lokal yang beberapa tahun terakhir banyak bermunculan. Ane ga bakal kaget kalau beberapa bulan ke depan ada yang bangkrut dan berhenti beroperasi.

Is there any research or data related to this? I'm always curious to see whether or not ASIC is prone to failure when people run it 24/7 just like GPUs. Some news report that some model has a high failure rate, such as this one[1], but I can't find any reliable info on this.

I think the value of "little money" differs from users, hence why small mining farms probably don't always buy the latest RIG. If they have access to very cheap electricity, I can see the incentive to buy more affordable RIG, since ROI is just a matter of time. Assuming nothing terrible happened of course.

[1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/samson-mow-bitmain-s17-t17-antminer-has-high-failure-rate