The best you could ask for is that Casino's clarify in what cases KYC would be requested.
This will suffice, and for obvious reasons, they will never do this unless they are somehow forced to it. and i think this is the main point of this topic. They don't do it exactly because there is no requirement for them to do it. I don't think I've seen a single site that has this laid out somewhere? and if the community does feel the need for such clarification regarding KYC from casinos that use the forum to advertise their services, then i expect and old member like you to lead the battle  I'm sure you can fight your own battles, besides I won't side with either party because of all the usual leftist bullshit #bias, #abuse, #harassment, #thinkOfTheChildren, #FjShill.  |
|
|
|
So every time an exchange asks me for documents to withdraw, I'm being extorted? .
most known exchanges, make things quite clear. Take Binance for an example , they literally tell you that if you decide to withdrawal anything above 2BTC per day, you will need to provide a,b,c documents. Wrong. You are mixing up normal vs. irregular situations. Once you hit some random trigger, you may be asked for extra KYC even if you are fully verified already. The best you could ask for is that Casino's clarify in what cases KYC would be requested. Other than that I see this witch-hunt leading nowhere unless you want to go after every single exchange as well (some other services probably apply too) and in that case I wish you best-of luck. |
|
|
|
Could you separate the list of connected accounts from the evidence?
Check #1 and #2 posts of this thread, that's a good start. You don't say? It's literally mixed in with everything, which is what my post was about. |
|
|
|
You can't do anything about this unless you want to tag most casinos. This is a problem outside of the scope of the forum.
but we do tag account sellers , and i assume they are more in number than the casinos ? if we all agree that the casinos are performing unethical behavior that could even be considered scam or at least extortion - why shouldn't they be tagged? technically, Cloudbet extorted documents from Swofty and refused to pay him the initial deposit until the extortion was finished. So every time an exchange asks me for documents to withdraw, I'm being extorted? Keep in mind that you don't get asked anything for deposits/withdrawals under certain amounts (or unless something triggers alarms). I have issues following this logic. |
|
|
|
|
Could you separate the list of connected accounts from the evidence?
|
|
|
|
-snip-
TL;DR ; when you deposit a huge amount of bitcoin, no questions asked, no KYC b.s, but when you win, clouldbet plays the KYC card, do you guys think this is ethical ? should cloudbet get away with such actions?
You can't do anything about this unless you want to tag most casinos. This is a problem outside of the scope of the forum. |
|
|
|
UPDATE
Thank you CLOUDBET thank you BITCOINTALK!!! They paid me my whole 330 BTC!!! I LOVE YOU GUYS!!! CASE IS RESOLVED!!
Swofty
I echo the congratulations, luckily this nightmare is now over. |
|
|
|
- The account holder is NOT the person that he/she states it is, nor are they in the location they state.
This matters why exactly? You've said it yourself, if they're from a restricted country then you return the balance. The user has proven that the originating addresses are owned by them, and that is sufficient. Here we have it, yet another delay. Just send them their money to the addresses where it came from and ban/delete them permanently. This takes very little time. |
|
|
|
|
Open a chat with me @GrumpyKitty; that way you will stay safe from all the usual nonsense (fake emails, fake TG accounts, etc.).
This method isn't new FYI.
|
|
|
|
|
Your negative is appropriate; if others talk you out of preventing this scam, I will tag him myself.
|
|
|
|
Lauda Lauda Lauda
You forgot to mention "pill addict" and "witch". You can't be trusted if you're deliberately hiding important details. 
At some point this turned into petty envy; they are nobodies anymore especially in the crypto sphere outside of the forum. Gotta love delusional leftists. #Harassment, #Abuse, #Blacklist |
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a good idea. Watching.
|
|
|
|
Online casinos which are in their local country ilegal.
AFAIK they are perfectly legal under my jurisdiction, which is Mars. Try again. |
|
|
|
Please stop interfering with TECSHARE's political campaign by digging into boring specifics. All that matters is that it sounds great. "Standard of Objective Evidence". "Take Back Control". "Drain the Swamp".
Everyone look at the harassment, also how they are trying to control the narrative. Is this the manifestation of democracy? |
|
|
|
Hey Lauda, Do we have a update on when Twitter and Facebook are to be paid? I can supply my Vivid address that I used for the telegram bounty if needed. I have held back asking this question in Vivids Telegram and Discord channel https://discord.gg/uTw2Rpr but I'm wondering if contacting a vivid admin would resolve/complete the payment due. Sorry to be annoying but just would like to know how this last section of the bounty payment can be settled. Thank you for your time. It would be best to contact the admin on Telegram and ask for a manual swap of those remaining tokens into coins; it will save everyone involved time. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Wait... Hold on a minute... I just got TECSHARE Bingo on this thread! BINGO!
I'm getting cryptohunter vibes here, but I guess this statement is also harassment/abuse.  |
|
|
|
They wont stop creating bounties until their accounts are all banned..red trust wont stop they need permanent ban..
Correct. They will juse use more shill accounts to create more projects and bump them again. |
|
|
|
This gold belongs to Venezuela so UK can't forbide them to return their own gold. Even though UK doesn't support Maduro's policy, it's not fair to use such sitiation as a political weapon The gold belongs to Venezuela but Maduro is not recognized and therefore has no authority over it. You really are a delusional normie, aren't you? Now wonder the US media machine easily manipulates the mass folk when individuals are of your type.  Do you have any remote idea how many people have to die every year because of the current regime? 20k+. No, much more than that. Worldwide, it's in the 100's of thousands per year, and that's the low level genocide. Millions were killed in Syria, millions were killed in Iraq, millions killed in Libya, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Korea... Millions and more to come until the $ collapses. |
|
|
|
This should not work that way. He legally won every single penny with them. That's his money. This will encourage other casinos to bring an end like this of big winnings and settle with only the deposit.
TBH I don't really care about any other stance in this case given the lack of information. I am only sure of the following: 1) The deposit is the user's. 2) The deposit can be returned to the originating address. There is no reason to delay the return of the deposit due to any potential "fraud". Technically speaking if the deposit is valid, it implies the case that the winnings also are. That's what I said in an older post, they shouldn't just send back the deposit to the initial address used, just send the winnings as well. Regardless if they claim the account is in the wrong hands, the simple solution remains the same. Honestly any excuse is just a reason to further delay the payment in hopes of it never being done. No, that is wrong. There are certainly cases in which the implication does not hold true, e.g. if the player abused a bug in order to win the game. Not to say that this was the case here, but the implication does not hold. They should have returned the deposit ages ago, then handle the dispute but only regarding the winnings, which is what would have been far more acceptable to me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
