|
Posting just to bump it up, so maybe someone who missed it get chance to apply
|
|
|
|
Can you tell me what happened with voting on Kucoin? As I know a week ago or so they had voting and Essentia took part in this voting. Essentia lose this voting or why not listed there? Where I can see results of this voting? What about Other exchange listing? They planning some listing soon?
https://news.kucoin.com/en/storiqa-wins-the-2nd-kucoin-telegram-action/Essentia placed at 15th position, meaning not many users wanted to invest in kucoin coins that "enhance" your voting strength |
|
|
|
How can you call Russia agressor? The history of this country is full of wars, you are right. But did you think how people feel during this taugh time? German attacked Poland and Ukraine and only Russia could resist... Russia lost in this 2 world war more people than other countreis together. More than 20 million Russians. They saved YOU from fashists. But your media fool you and you do not know the truth. Americans think that they won in the 2nd world war, but it's not true. Russia did it.
It wasn't so simple, though...but Americans played it cleverly, pitted Germany on Russia, then helped Russia, all for their profit, while bleeding both Russia and Germany...I hope new generation of Russia and Germany politicians are more smart As someone said somewhere, in Battle for Berlin, Russians drove Studebaker trucks, Americans used Ford, and Germans used General Motors |
|
|
|
The situation in the world is now such that the United States, although imposing its will on the entire planet, has in fact subjugated Europe to itself. Resistance to this pressure is a natural process.
The annexation of the Crimea was caused by the threat of Ukraine joining NATO and the deployment of military bases in Crimea. By this time, Ukraine was seized by anti-Russian nationalists. And since the peninsula is a strategically incredibly important object, opening access to the trade routes of the Black Sea, it was necessary.
At the same time, the referendum was not rigged. The absolute majority of the inhabitants of Crimea are Russians, who were concerned about the anti-Russian policy of the new government of Ukraine and the destabilization of the economy due to the power change of power. Also, residents of Donbass are mostly Russians and the secession is caused by the nationalistic policy of the new government in relation to the Russian-speaking ones.
Your justification for the occupation of the Crimea is very similar to the justification by the Russians of the war with Finland for being located close to Leningad. With this logic, any country has the right, if it wishes, to start a war. Actually, two completely unrelated events, and not similar in any way. Crimea was given as gift to Ukraine by Khrushcev, while Finland was never part of Russia. Attack on Finland could be better compared with USA attack on texas, although USA actually achieved goal and took Texas from Mexico forever |
|
|
|
.
I think this is the comment of the year.
Since my last post, situation changed a bit:
"There are 18525 unique holders of ESSENTIA now on total amount 749 560 429,00 ESS"
So it looks like someone is "mining" coins, as there is 520 000 new coins, but its also interesting
that theres no new holders at all, which could mean that promotion is not working and Essentia is not gaining new users
This is problem? I think that when the project launches their own network, this number will increase. As for any project, this is trust from the community. The result of actual implementation of plans by the team. Just a hint that maybe CMC have problem with that...Essentia team say 614m to them, they check and find much more on explorer. What else could be the reason for insane delay, they say they sent info to CMC 3-4 months ago |
|
|
|
will be great if one of the devs will answer here to clear this question marks....
Devs can not provide an answer concerning the continuation of mining on the legacy chain ... Simply put, a chain lives as long as there are people mining (on) it. A chain lives means that there is a coin. So, either the non-obelsik miners stop mining and then the legacy chain will die, or they continue mining and it will live. Obelisk miners will mine on the hard forked chain (the new main chain). Given the fact that I don't think non-obelsik miners will be willing to throw away their equipment, it's highly probable they will continue mining on the legacy chain. There will be only one chain, not two Sia will still be blake2b coin https://blog.sia.tech/sia-fork-faqs-c6b3e0e73ce0 |
|
|
|
There could be a new coin if a part of the community continues mining on the legacy (before the fork) chain. The fork is going to invalidate blocks mined by equipment that is currently holding ~45% of the hashrate, I don't see this mining equipment just going to trash and miners using it just accepting to throw away their now main-chain-useless miners, so in my opinion, there is a very high chance the legacy chain will be maintained hence giving birth to a new coin.
Keep in mind that, unlike , for example, Bitcoin Cash, Sia coin has very special purpose, and for that purpose team that would make new coin would also have to build software for storage network, too Otherwise they'd mine coin that noone actually needs |
|
|
|
If anyone wants to find out, what extremely delusional people look like, go to the Expanse discord channel. It's a goldmine.
And if anyone want to find out what butthurt means, he should check your post history? |
|
|
|
this fork news is helping Sia raise prices/value
Most of the coins that will have a fork brings more demand and its starting to cause panic buying. what will be after the fork? I hope that will ATH again   Only two things, SIA will be pumped and the fork coin will be sold after claiming. All money that came from the fork will be moved to SIA or any valuable coin. You got it all wrong...fork not necessarily means new coin...and in this case, if there will be new coin at all, it won't be given by SIA...but lets not tell everyone, maybe its better they stay uninformed and keep pumping price |
|
|
|
Hello GUYS!
I have searched like idiot, really Reading every line of every page, googeling line retard and still havent found something good.
I use 'One click straps' on Polaris Bios Edition and modded my cards.
Running on 1200/2200 and can get only about 800 h/s on Crytonight Heavy when others get 1000 h/s+ with lower settings like 1150/2000 and RX 470/480 or something. ( I dont know what i do wrong )
I have tried everything, but it seems there is a diffrence between ETH and XMR mining timing straps? (Cuz i have ETH i Think)
I have tried to copy 1750 to 2000.. or 1500->2000 but still I dont manage to go over 800 what ever i do.
My ASCI percentage is around 70-75% on those GPU's and i run them at 1150-1250 and 2200-2300 without any errors but it gives like same results what ever i do, cant manage to go over 800.
I have one rig with 8x Sapphire RX 580 8 GB.
3 with ( K4G80325FB, Samsung - H5GQ8H24MJR, SK HYNIX )
5 with ( MT51J256M32, Micron )
If you can please PM me some timing straps, or I can send you BIOS file you can mod it for me that would be awsome.
I wouldn't be asking this from you if I found my self. Ty guys
Sounds like its not straps that are your problem, but your cryptonight miner settings |
|
|
|
snip
Theres NO 10-15 TIMES MORE COINS NOW THAN THEY PLANNED. You can repeat it 1000 times, it won't become truth. Actually 2 years ago you could calculate exactly how many coins would be circulating now, with 2-3% accuracy. well there is a hell of a lot more difficulty out there than there was.... thus there has to be more coins out their than they planned IF they were the only asic's in town as they planned to be at this point in time in 2018. difficulty goes up ..you run thru the coins faster and put them into the world? right? still confused...clarify....if coin price determined by how many exist vs equip costs of the network etc? not trying to slam here...but all them 4/5's of NON obeblisk blake2b miners got some kinda benifit from all this.....so i'm confused if what you say is true...why the fork? It should make no difference in price etc from what you say....4-5k of obelisks after the fork are not gonna generate enough to effect any of this...thus why fork? where is the profit in doing so? why bother? again, not a slam...use small words... brad 4-5k obelisks will generate exactly the same amount of coins as million of innosilicon asics would. Difference is, your Obelisk would get 1sc per month in that scenario, this way your obelisk will get 1000 per day (totally made this number, but if you want, I can calculate excat profit for exact number of obelisks because amount of sia coins per day is a constant number Difficulty is magic wand here, the more ASICs(hashpower if you like) the bigger the difficulty...it auto-adjusts to make number of coins per day constant Pretty good explanation can be found here (and in better English, as its my 4th language, lol): https://siasetup.info/learn/mining_and_forks |
|
|
|
snip
Theres NO 10-15 TIMES MORE COINS NOW THAN THEY PLANNED. You can repeat it 1000 times, it won't become truth. Actually 2 years ago you could calculate exactly how many coins would be circulating now, with 2-3% accuracy. |
|
|
|
I find the "rants" to be more informative than the pure astroturf you find on reddit  SC is worth owning just to read Vorrick's blog... But until I see a proper analysis of the ways Amazon would attack p2p storage if it ever hits 1-2% market share... I'm going to assume that p2p storage is NOT commercially viable... Except maybe as scratch pad for IoT devices or deep web mass storage. But how to take him seriously if he thinks (over and over) that increased network hash rate means we're mining more coins over time? I explained about how adjusting difficulty to keep block time constant works, but he keeps ignoring it |
|
|
|
|
It would be nice if we could have progress bar on main web page showing how good
is ICO going (percentage or amount collected)
I can understand if there are business reasons to hide it, though
|
|
|
|
Sorry, small issues (kinda yet) 1) 10-15x of more siacoin that they expected is in the wind, when they thought they'd be the only blake2b ASIC at this point in time, much, much, more than they needed for the supposed You still think number of coins mined is dependant on network hash rate?  |
|
|
|
Zasto bi neko razjebavao mobitel of 500 eura za par dolara mjesecno?
Zašto bi neko komentirao, a da se nije uopće informirao o čemu se radi, to je pravo pitanje Zato sto uz danasnje asice i difficuty, se nikakav mining osim karticama i mozda threadripperima za određene coinove ne isplati. A sve drugo je neka vrsta scama ili navlakuse koja ti obecaje neki gain, a u pozadini mina nesto sasvim drugo za developera aplikacije Eto vidiš da sam dobro pogodio da si počeo pisati odgovor bez da si uopće pročitao o čemu se radi. Naravno to ne znači da će od ovoga išta biti (kao i od 90% ostalih ICO-a), međutim evo da naglasim poantu pisat ću velikim slovima: RADI SE O POTPUNO NOVOM POW/POT ALLGORITMU KOJI NEMA NIKAKVE VEZE SA FKIN GPU-IMA, ASIC-IMA, THERADRIPERIMA NI IČIM DRUGIM NEGO JE RAĐEN SPECIJALNO ZA MOBILNE PROCESORE I OS-OVE. |
|
|
|
Well, IMHO, IF they really did incorporate an ASIC hardware solution in their Siacoin Obelisk miners and the
Obelisk decred miners, I think they need to have that as an option in firmware for a new algo and coin
to take advantage of this. Ideally, that coin/token would be used to run the siacoin network and/or
allowing only Obelisk hardware to be the backbone from the get-go.
If not that, at least opening up this hardware to other algo options would be something.
Again, if that actually exists, as they state or it was just a 'false flag' attempt to slow Bitmain down
back in the day.
Likely, as much as the devs say the price of siacoin does not matter to their cloud storage project, the
probably are as heavily invested as everyone else. But again, IMHO, if they were ONLY a hardware
manufacturer, they would already have used that asic hardware option in firmware to try and develop
a different algo and encourage developers to use such on their coin
Anyway, decred miners are doomed, you'd think at least they would use such for the decred miner or at
least do what the innsilicon folk have done with their firmware to allow HCASH coin mining.
If nothing else, that seems to be a firmware fix the could do of note to make their obelisk decred
miner MAYBE float a bit longer, rather than sink. (not sure why I'm bothering got my 1 decred coming
for giving away my 5 1/2 off obelisk coupons back in the day...even that likely will not make over electric
use, by the time I get it..just saying) well, it looks dire....just my 2 satoshi's worth ..we will see I guess
https://blog.sia.tech/sia-proof-of-work-reset-24b5ec439625Happy? I know I am, if I won't have to read long rants anymore |
|
|
|
Zasto bi neko razjebavao mobitel of 500 eura za par dolara mjesecno?
Zašto bi neko komentirao, a da se nije uopće informirao o čemu se radi, to je pravo pitanje |
|
|
|
iphone app ne postoji
a kao "postoji" na njihoovm siteu
over and out
Iznimno bi me cudilo da postoji s obzirom da apple ne da ni virtualno rudarenje na Electroneum aplikaciji. Problem je što kad je sve skupa zamišljeno ni Google ni Apple nisu zabranjivali. Kod androida se to lako riješi instalacijom apk fajla sa treće lokacije, al poznajući Apple tamo je vjerojatno veći problem |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
