I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again.
Proving that you were previously accepted in signature campaigns barely stands as a proof that your account is of high quality since the advent of merits. You've earned 0 merits at the moment and with that logic, your account isn't as valuable as you think it is. Having said that, taking accounts as collateral should be avoided anyway. This request is unlikely to get filled unless you're selling your account.
They were given as a proof just to show that I still hold that address with me. The first thing I learned here after coming back is merits, and I'll earn them. So please don't be bothered about the same.
Why should lenders avoid taking accounts as collateral?
I know we can't attach any value to them, still these accounts take too much time and work to reach that rank, shouldn't it be considered a valid thing to be taken Bitcoins against? And when I'm giving something that is related to BTC only, why can't I be lent against it?
its more than a proof idiots, he tried ....
Well, if you feel his proof is adequate, go ahead and give him a loan. After all, if he defaults, you would have a fair quality legendary account to add to your inventory. One that has a post history of being a bounty manager.
actually as fact, you being idiot, please quote for refference, a bounty manager is winning just on 1 campaign more than you will ever win a month of work.
so stop being idiot, even if the icos he has mentioned are useless, the user tried to show that he is worth it
I appreciate your support and thanks to you bro but please don't make such offensive comments which may hurt other's emotions. The word "idiots" should not have been used as you tried to explain your point of view, but don't be aggressive.
How am I being an idiot? I suggested that you go ahead and give him the loan.
Sorry, but my broke ass doesn't have .06 BTC to spare ATM. (Besides, as you can tell from the red tag that I gave you, the commerce of bitcointalk accounts aint exactly my bag.)
Sorry on behalf of that user, but I suppose there's no meaning in going paranoid before a user. You gave your opinion in your way, and seeing that he's trying to offend shouldn't really bother you if your intention was just to make users beware (that's what you were trying, huh?) He gave his opinion, you gave yours. That's it.
How am I being an idiot?
Anyone can be marked as an idiot if s/he go against VINSIN. I have been marked as an idiot on the telegram, A little up of your post someone marked as an idiot. I think VINSIN is a great person who can call anyone as an idiot. So, don't be a worry for being called as an idiot by VINSIN.
I see VINSIN didn't say anything to you, so why are you getting offended?
Open loan with me. Do not lend unless sufficient collateral is secured.
You mean there is an outstanding loan with you? Is the repayment date over yet?
It was out of Bitcointalk, partial repayments were made but didn't end up in full. But the loan I'm asking for, has nothing to do with Marco's repayment as I strictly want to use it for trading. I have been in Marco's contact and he's got no objection for this and he just wanted to let everyone know about it and asked everyone to lend only after taking sufficient collateral in possession, you can confirm this with him here, or should I ask him to do it?
I can't sign a message because the address is from blockchain.com's wallet, but I can prove that this address had been in use since 2016.
I guess you can if you still have the access of the wallet.
Get the seeds and recover the account using a desktop wallet then sign the address. It should work.
Aye, how can you be so intelligent? It's clearly written that the address was from blockchain.com (formerly blockchain.info) wallet and they gave me addresses to use but I didn't get any addresses with private key.
What happened: OP is trying to scam!
Why I am thinking that?:
Before your judgment please read my full post where I will provide several reasons behind my thinking.
1. Op has an open loan. See prof from archive link:
https://archive.fo/AYRXG#selection-6175.0-6293.662. Op has taken a loan but there is no proof on his posts:
https://archive.fo/qPdr03. There is a long gap according to op it is for his health issue. See archive:
https://archive.fo/qPdr0#selection-513.0-513.297 But I do not think it is correct I think OP is lying. Why do I think so? Let me describe: Op received negative trust on
2016-09-21 but then
game-protect was not a DT so op continued to use bitcointalk forum. But later
game-protect became DT so op marked as a scammer and stopped to use bitcointalk forum by this profile. And recently
game-protect excluded from DT so O again active and trying to take a loan and then flew away. Where already an open active loan which already told and still trying to take a loan. There might have more reason I will update more once I find them.
4. Op has no staked BTC address or removed those and as a result OP cant proof ownership by signing bitcoin signature.
5. After a long gap, Op started posting and all post to take loan.
6. Op is trying to take a loan by giving the account as collateral or without collateral.
You judging me so easily, huh? Now it's my turn:
1. Your archive has got no proof except that comment by Marco.
2. Yes, I didn't say about it but discussed with Marco and he said that he got no objection with me taking this loan, but will let everyone know about the previous one due to which he commented here.
3. My health related issues were real and you can also confirm about this with Marco. But, when did game-protect became a DT member? I never knew this. And about his trust feedback: I don't give a fuck! That's because we stopped promoting betcoin after seeing many accusations popping against them. And it wasn't just me alone who got that trust, he gave to all those users who were in betcoin signature campaign.
4. It's true that I can't prove my ownership by 'SIGNING A MESSAGE' here because I've lost everything due to hard disk issues and once again, it's not me alone who suffered through such problem. But I've had a username set for my blockchain wallet and I remembered the password which made it possible for me to be able to get loan coins on an address which was used since 2016. Still, you need any proof?
5. Uhmm, I knew that it would look scammy and it really is a stupidity I committed by asking for a loan straight after a comeback. But why are you reiterating that word "post gap" and "long gap"?
6. Never asked for a no collateral loan, but I left it on lender's choice if they want to keep my account as collateral or not.
OP is who he claims to be, I am in contact with him. I don't think he is wanting to scam. That said, he would find it hard to get a loan now.
Okay, then can you please tell why you have no proof of the current active loan? Why there is no post or no trust rating on OP's profile.
That's because it was a loan taken on mutual understanding and it was out of Bitcointalk, so it's meaningless for a trust rating to take place unless I scammed him. He just wanted everyone to know about it, and it is a coincidence that I was not online and he posted it before me. I was going to tell about it and make him confirm about it but I didn't come online.
Waiting on repayment, all good otherwise.
Fair enough - I will add some trust. The loan is from a while ago.
OP is who he claims to be, I am in contact with him. I don't think he is wanting to scam. That said, he would find it hard to get a loan now.
@marcotheminer, I would not be as passive if I found myself in your situation. Here's a member that has owed you money "from a while ago" asking for another loan. If he already owed me money that would bother me, unless... Did you and 2double0 agree he would borrow the money to repay you? Or is there something even more nefarious going on? In all honesty, your behavior is painting you in a suspicious light.
There's a chance he's vouching for his own account. From his most recent feedback:
https://archive.is/fOelrSo, you're doubting him to be me, or me pretending to be him... Any solid proof or puking just to add some more spicy stuff? For only a year that I left the forum, all members have become news reporters, meh... Great for them.
Psssss.... I'm too confused on this. This account is mine, how many times do I need to clarify this? I know I've got nothing to prove, but if you think that a person who lent me has got no objection from me to take another one for different purpose paints him red under your radars, I can't seriously do anything to help you with your mentality.
Ahhhhh... Too much explanation given, now time to rest.
If anyone interested in lending, please let me know.
Others can check my history that except Marco (from whom I took a loan ^a while ago^ outside Bitcointalk), I never had any loans nor issues with anyone out here.
Show Posts
