Right as I might have won something that I already lost - half part of the capital. But who knows if I'd stop there or continue ahead? That again with high bets to risk more in regards to winning more?


I thank my instinct for stopping me against taking any loans to gamble. I was safe at that part and I really believe my sixth sense stopped me from creating extra problems for myself.


I didn't want to generate an income but my greed wanted me to get me and my family a lifestyle where we can live a smooth and happy life without much worries for money. This dropped me down so hard that I decided not to gamble again in my life ever.

Ridiculous how you were just sitting and watching your money going into a casino's hands. I see their games are regulated and you can't really claim that they scammed but tell me who the jerk asked you to bet all you 100 or 200k whatever over slots? You could go for dice, roulette, any other games provided that you were interested. You are very stupid OP so commit it. Making a one hour video trying to prove that you won nothing even after depositing a lot? Well, are they bound to make you win if you are a big whale among so many fishes in their pond?



Don't illustrate your extreme levels of foolishness here by comparing a case where jackpot was won against a case where OP 'intentionally' lost his capital that was worth a jackpot itself.

I had been gambling for years before I met with a very big accidental loss that almost killed me. It took me a lot of time to get out of the shock I got from that loss as it was all I saved for my family that I put as a bet and lose. To me, gambling had the power to drag me in death's mouth by ruining everything for me due to my own false decisions, did you have the same experiences - bitter or sweet, you would want to share? I would point it out like this:

- I started gambling
- Set goals
- Win
- Win again
- Wow, again a lot of wins and I now have enough money to pay for bills and food for 5 full years
- I don't stop there
- I play
- I lose
- I played again with bigger amount
- EV not positive any more
- Still playing
- I made a lot of bets where I lost half of all those wins
- I didn't quit
- I made a single bet where I put the remaining half
- & I lost finally, everything that I made + what I put in it that was mine
- It ruined the lifestyle we were living and I am back to 0.

That's right and I support the same thing, but if OP still wants to hear what he had in mind i.e.; to go the license way then I have something for everyone to give a read:

https://www.softswiss.com/licensing/

A good page to read out and decide where to start their online casino if they want to go for a license if that is their priority.

Wait, I got that term & that's - SchizophreniaDICK

Either believe this or not, but this guy game-protect got what he wanted - a lot of free advertisement. He had been continuously pinching almost every user here to speak against him and bump the thread with some extra added pulp to the whole debate and we are doing the exact part for him. Let's unite and stop this by completely ignoring this guy like he never existed? For God sake?

Like how you have withdrawn your mental state from accepting that you are trying to be over smart taking into account the power to speak here which is making you think that you are the only good shit here and we all stink 'or Lord of the Rings with a Golden ring concocted between the shit hole trying to save yourself from being deceived by men like us as that is what rooted and now stemmed in your mind'.

You are correct at some point when you talk about the safety of bettors who must have complete information about the owner to keep themselves safe but that doesn't mean that owners can't launch a casino. They can start without a license or giving any information about them but it should be a P2P gambling site and they will work as escrow 'where the only condition remains that they don't cheat'. OneHash is the best example for this. How can a decentralized gambling website paying automatically to their customers on each win need to expose about the owners of that business?

Their Government is already behind users and sending a lot of notices to tax-hiding people and tax-evaders. But I don't think Binance will ever produce their US customers' data to their Government even after allowing US users to take part into trading through their platform, though they may go for more strict actions and indulge into getting all the information of users trading there to keep a hold of whom they are allowing to stretch out with their platform.

What does Binance need to register itself as in US to keep their foot safe at that place?

I won't compare Binance to BTC-e as both were a lot different in regards to following laws. BTC-e had been shady in my views whenever I used to trade there as they allowed high-profile trading with least KYC docs required but Binance does not let you trade with bigger numbers without knowing you better. Binance had been working under Malta's regulations and I don't find them to be proven guilty by any Government unless they do commit a crime that gets exposed later.

If we use these exchanges, are we also going to get scrutinized for the same if they [exchanges] are proven to be engaged in money-laundering cases? Will there be any enquiry to innocent traders for being a part of them?

It's his name "actmyname", so you 'Game Protect' please stop acting here.

And consumer service protection?
You should try and protect your self reputation that is being crushed under the foot of all those accusations getting laid with you, so stop spending time trying to prove others wrong and try to show how innocent you are.

And that funny part statement...
Applaud! Out of limits and I think I can't trust you even that 1% that I used to have till now.

If you deal over telegram, you will be held responsible if you get scammed and asking for any help later on will get you nowhere. Don't do that because telegram now allows users to delete everything in the chat for both parties so you will not be left with any proof. I was scammed, so I'm warning you. Like DarkDays told, he will ask you in this way - "Can you send me some coins here? Let's check if you did the job correctly?" He will ask for a minimum amount that can be anything, and then he will run away. Be safe and use an escrow if one chooses to involve himself as a mediator in this deal with you.

Nice try and let's see whose analysis is better.
I see BTC to bounce back high from its current price but it will take a lot of time because $10000 was once an impossible target to breach but they did it. I am hearing a lot of great news for BTC every day, why do you or your analysts feel that way? The dump was done already and I see no sense in selling it below $10k unless buyers get exhausted and stop getting rekt again and again as the history shows that those who go with market trends have the chances to get liquidated much faster than others who trade against the markets but it all goes through a variety of patterns ofc which are not so easy to be found on charts.

In my personal views, KYC is like a condom over a hot and happening pussy like crypto. It gives exchanges the ability to know us in full. Do you want to compromise your private data by giving it to them when you care too much about it when sharing it with an airdrop site just to keep yourself safe?

The way Livecoin responded and said this:


And izooomrud confirming this:


Should livecoin be called as half-guilty and half-loyal?
Which part of this will prove to be true will be based on Livecoin's instant actions and as they are still holding izooomrud's MONA, I don't think that the cost of doing a mistake by using such an exchange which backed off from duly pursuing their responsibilities for their user or users can be $1500 worth. They should compensate him and do their best to prove us wrong, I'm curiously waiting for that day 'but I still don't think that after these intentionally aroused problems, I will be using livecoin ever even if they prove to be not guilty'.

Why no MONA darling sent to him? Even if he accepted the rules then as a service provider, aren't you supposed to sort this out for your users instead of asking them to reach out to MONA devs? What's your role then? If his account will be shut down, how will he become able to withdraw his 720 MONA coins from this exchange? Isn't that shady?

Please, please share his threats he gave you?
Were they regarded to laws and all? Why would any user not act over actions they feel shady about?

Bitcointalk username: 2double0
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153776
Current post count (Including this post): 2033 (including this)
Amount of earned merit in the last 120 days: 11
BTC Address: bc1ql4gn6r75sydqwe99qz6nc44mvkzcfc4hqwqn3y

Must read - https://www.coindesk.com/for-15k-hell-fake-your-exchange-volume-youll-get-on-coinmarketcap

While you are crying like a kid about exchanges cheating on users, see how this guy turned an illegal scene into legal profession, what a progressive mind some people are the Kings of! I am not in favor of these fake volumes but as long as they make your invested alt look more worthy than the others listed, I will support it as we need to get out of our investments with the best possible returns over them because we already lost a lot in 2018.

It was not a lesson for the 'secretary and partner' but your Uncle, OP. He should have known about one more possibility that could ruin his entire investment - greed.

I don't know what was running in your Uncle's mind, but he should have also got the hang of something like his secretary could also cheat him by making such son stories in front of him and keep the money or Bitcoins himself? That's greed, he could have scammed him right there as money is everything for everyone and they can cross any limits without thinking of future consequences and 'what he did, shows that he was half loyal to your Uncle'.

It'll add another problem in their menu just so they didn't come ahead and tell us about it. I was skeptical about being a member of their new campaign (was accepted but deleted my application after knowing that they've got the real reds from many users here) and ofc, no confirmation about the campaign from Livecoin's Officials. If it ends like that 'where there's a one week shout by the participants who didn't leave yet and they don't get paid a damn Satoshi out of it', their efforts to save livecoin 'just because they believe they are going to make some big fat amounts' will go waters. Let's see if that 'Livecoin Manager' sums it up to paying them for real or these guys are going to kill their chances of getting accepted in future campaigns of many managers for their behavior.

Awww my kiddo, 3 merits Ummaaahh!!!!
The oldest and most reasonable cause for getting banhammered these days is plagiarism. Tell me one thing, even if he gets to:

1. Transfer his merits to someone else

Then he would probably misuse them by making a new account and sending all to themselves or to you, maybe?

2. Find and merit good posts

Oh no! But I am banged banned, why would I take the pain of doing that? Get lost you all, I am done (that banned guy's responses).