You two get a room. We actually do have a room. It's right here, in the foxhole  Everything goes on here -- multiple partners involved too  |
|
|
|
Not that I am embarassed, but because she/he/it is not aware that I am a foxpup. I assume you also didn't share that you are in love with me. But it's okay, it'll be our dirty little secret <3  |
|
|
|
Which, if I've done my math right, means next week will be the fifth anniversary. Prepare for celebratory shenanigans. This also means the below part is coming soon All I want is the info regarding the surprise. And I want it desperately  O M G! I did not see that coming though  " Desperately", huh? Now that's intense...
2. I hope that I have included all the foxes. But if not, I am willing to take the responsibility and be publicly beaten, or punished in any other way. Oh sweet Jesus! While I blushed reading all your nice words about all the foxes, I need to ask you this: dear apogio, do you have a thing about being beaten? =))) I see you still keep insisting on this, although I thought we settled once about using a sexting sexed in approach. Are you okay? Or into BDSM perhaps? (Not that there's anything wrong with THAT )
Tier B: writing a love letter to GazetaBitcoin. Don't ask why, I just love this guy Awwww -- blushing <3 I have no idea what's happening here, but in last 2-3 weeks or so I've been kissed (by a forum woman, that is); a Pakistani translator called me their darling and expressed an unconditional love between us (not sure about their gender, but it is not an issue anyway); and now apogio loves me. I think my natural magnetism reached a top level. Is it hot here or is it just me? Tier S: <let's see what can fill this gap> For some reason I could not refrain remembering these lovely words: dark musty holes |
|
|
|
Revin asupra discutiei de mai sus. Nu am primit inca un raspuns oficial de la eXch, insa amicul care a cumparat cu BTC a doua vila la Miami ne-a ajutat oarecum cu niste informatii. Asadar, conform paginii aplicatiei de pe F-Droid, aplicatia utilizeaza urmatoarele resurse:  Nu scrie nimic referitor la retinerea IP-ului... Sa vedem insa ce vor spune si cei de la eXch, desi ma indoiesc ca raspunsul lor va spune mai multe decat pagina aplicatiei. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for this input, logfiles. You are right about Exodus. I only meant to explain how Jaxx users can retrieve their funds using a solution they provided. Of course, after retrieving the funds from Jaxx, everybody should use a more appropriate wallet, not Exodus. Exodus was thou one of the two solutions offered by Jaxx, so there was no other way to obtain those funds. But I agree, there are better wallets than Exodus.
|
|
|
|
If someone were to offer wine from plastic bottles, it would be a real celebration. No worries here, leave that on me 😅 as usual, fillippone will LOVE this! |
|
|
|
S-a dorit a fi un subiect pentru discutie, in ideea sa ne punem mintea la contributie, (si sa ma contrazici unde gresesc) nu o intrebare catre eXch. [...] Dar nu am nimic impotriva sa ii intrebi tu. Chiar sper sa ma fi inselat, de fapt Tocmai am adresat intrebarea si in topicul lor principal. Sunt curios sa vad ce vor raspunde. Anticipez insa ca vor enumera o lista minima de informatii procesate / colectate. Unele sunt inevitabile, fortate chiar de sistemul de operare in sine. Nu stiu daca te-ai uitat vreodata la detailiile unei aplicatii pe Android, dar daca te vei duce la orice aplicatie si vei selecta Apps - Permissions; apoi vei accesa meniul sandwich din stanga-sus, selectand All permissions, vei fi surprins de ce vei gasi (in caz ca nu ai facut asta deja). Printre altele, se gasesc urmatoarele: pair with Bluetooth devices, access Bluetooth settings, have full network access, view network connections, receive data from Internet, view Wi-Fi connections, access [various] APIs etc. Cu alte cuvinte, sistemul de operare in sine permite multe lucruri aplicatiilor, daca dezvoltatorii doresc sa le construiasca astfel incat sa necesite astfel de permisiuni. Partea buna este ca unele permisiuni pot fi restrictionate de utilizator. Insa asa, poate ca unele aplicatii nu mai functioneaza corect. Sa vedem insa ce raspuns primim de la eXch. |
|
|
|
I am coming back on this thread after a small discussion had with NeuroticFish in the Romanian translation of this topic. Among others, were wondering what information is using (and storing) the eXch app for Android. We understand that some information are forced to be accessed by the Android system itself, but other than that what information does the app collect and store (if any)? If OP could come with such details it would be very nice. |
|
|
|
Avem concurs nou! [FREE RAFFLE]553rd - ฿ECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD-CYPHER HODL LOADED BALLEThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5487408. Se pot castiga urmatoarele: un card Cypher Hodl incarcat cu 0.00005 BTC. Organizator: krogothmanhattanPoate participa oricine, daca s-a inregistrat inainte de 1 iulie. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Transportul: gratuit in SUA; pentru restul lumii se va discuta cu minerjones. Concursul este identic cu cele anterior realizate de OP. |
|
|
|
I take this opportunity for thanking a lot for eveyone involved in this contest. To icopress for his very, very hard work for making this contest possible each year since 2020. Now he also made an amazing announcement about the Pizza Baking contest and some incredible prizes too! Chapeau my friend! Plus -- all the organization, finding sponsors, discussions with forum administration -- all these take time, a lot of time, patience and dedication. He is truly admirable! I also want to thank all participants (nominees and those nominating them) for being part of this amazing contest! Thank you also for keeping the contest clean, respecting the rules more than before and for keeping clean the topic with the votes. This is an extraordinary help in counting the votes -- having that topic very clean. I also want to thank to those which voted for me and made it possible to receive these nominations. I was simply astonished seeing all the votes I received! Thank you all for that! I also want to thank to Jambler for their generous sponsorship! That was very kind of them and made the contest very appealing! Same thanks go to the forum administration! I also want to thank to everybody which congratulated icopress or myself for the work done. I thank you all for such appreciations. There are just so many posts with such congratulating messages and I can't quote them all. But I thank to all for such kind words. I really felt touched...
I will address below 2 more aspects, which caught my eye within all the posts made inside this topic. I can't comment on the alcoholic part, but shouldn't the last "2nd" be a "3rd" (for the Golden Feather)? Why not comment on alcoholic part? We all have good expertize in this part =))) Other than that, good point LV, thank you for mentioning this! Both o_e_l_e_o and I had the same number of votes (27): | | |
|
|
| |
Golden Feather |
fillippone (41), o_e_l_e_o (27), GazetaBitcoin (27), LoyceV (26), JayJuanGee (24), DdmrDdmr (23), The Sceptical Chymist (10), theymos (9), LFC_Bitcoin (5), philipma1957 (5), CryptopreneurBrainboss (4), d5000 (4), Pmalek (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| _________________ | _________________ | |
Given the fact that such extraordinary situation occurred (two winners to have same votes), icopress took a very kind decision regarding the prizes and decided the following: Also, users who get the same number of votes will share prizes among themselves (for example, if it is 2nd and 3rd place, etc.). In short, the enumeration could have been done in any order, but this was a sign of pure appreciation for o_e_l_e_o
@GazetaBitcoin: Were you responsible for counting the votes? Yup, that was me. If so, thanks for helping icopress (seriously), but I have to ask: Were you maybe drinking on the job, friend? Too much plastic-bottled wine? Loooooooool! At same time, thank you for the appreciation and also for the good laugh (The reason I ask is that if I count the votes myself I get slightly different results than yours. Maybe I'm drinking too much, I don't know; see below.) I will (triple) check this, thank you for mentioning this to me. I can not in this very moment but I will. What I can say though is the following: (1) Human error is possible. I am not a machine, so it is possible. I counted votes 2-3 times to make sure everything is right. (In some cases I asked icopress too.) However, even if there may be small discrepancies between your calculation and mine, they did not influence the final outcome. (2) As stated by contest rules, some votes may have been not counted. Some nominations could have been simply breaking the rules (and on purpose I disregarded them -- example: I still counted franky1's votes for Antihero, although he merited most of the nominations, for cancelling them) while some did not meet certain criteria. So the total number of nominations within the thread, made by all users involved, is not reflected in the number of nominations shown within the table from OP, as some votes were not counted. Thank you again for asking this question. And, as icopress already said, maybe next year you can give a hand of help too?  |
|
|
|
Friends, I have great news for you! I just saw this post a bit earlier and I already registered the raffle! Thank you eXch and icopress for making this possible! Thank you paid2 as well, for organizing the raffle! I tried to bring a bit more popularity to the raffle by announcing it also in the Romanian translation of this topic. The prizes look very nice and I am sure the winners will be very happy |
|
|
|
Revin asupra acestui thread, intrucat am tot uitat sa raspund la ultma postare, dar si pentru a anunta un concurs Cei de la eXch anuntat, prin intermediul lui icopress, ca vor urma niste tombole saptamanale avand ca premii capsule Cryptosteel personalizate. Prima tombola tocmai a fost lansata, asa ca se poate inscrie oricine doreste
Stiu, lumea cam stie sa isi faca VPN, sa-si asigure datele, sa fie sigur, ... samd.... sau chiar stie?! Eu cred ca vasta majoritate a lumii foloseste telefonul pe date sau cu WiFi-ul de acasa si de la lucru.
Si acum vine intrebarea: este OK ca aplicatia exch sa stie toate aceste detalii? Poate ca nu vrei.
Da, sunt sanse mari sa nu tina minte nimic, doar eventual IP-ul cand faci tranzactii. Dar si atunci, poate ca ai fi vrut sa faci din Tor browser. Inteleg ce spui (si imi cer scuze pentru raspunsul intarziat). MA gandeam insa, oare nu ar fi mai bine sa adresezi aceasta intrebare direct in topcul lor? Cred ca ei pot da un raspuns foarte precis cu privire la ce date retine aplicatia... |
|
|
|
Avem concurs nou! [FREE RAFFLE] - Custom eXch Cryptosteel Capsule (#1)!https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5486999. Se pot castiga urmatoarele: o capsula Crypto steel cu logo eXch. Organizator: paid2Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Transportul: gratuit.
Avem un concurs nou o oportunitate de a castiga, prin munca cinstita, ceva cascaval! [Round 3] Utopia P2P - Official Android Review Campaign (Newbie - Legendary) 💎https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485862Se pot castiga urmatoarele: 6$ in USDT, pentru scrierea unei recenzii de minim 21 cuvinte pe Google Play, pentru aplicatia Utopia. Organizator: joeperrySunt acceptati utilizatori de toate rangurile. Nu se accepta conturi multiple, nu se platesc recenzii multiple. Nu sunt acceptati utilizatorii care au primit recenzii negative. Participantii trebuie sa se inscrie folosind urmatorul formular: Bitcointalk Profile Link:
Bitcointalk Rank:
BTC address for payouts:
USDT address (TRC-20) for payouts: Campania este identica cu cele anterior realizate de OP. |
|
|
|
I'd say you really deserved it. I wasn't wrong when I sent you a merit back in 2019. Thank you nakamura, that was very kind of you. I'd say criptoevangelista is very much like your fan. If so, that flatters me You are humble person for thanking all which made it possible but it doesn't seem that way as I see it. This is what I can say about it, you made it possible because you work hard for it and other forum members saw your potential and the things you can do either a contribution to the forum or a support to someone being taken advantage by supporting a flag (data shows in BPIP that you supported 279 flags and not look at the incredible achievement of reaching 6k merits. nakamura, this is a very interesting point of view and thank you for sharing this. I never thought about it. I also never saw anyone ever making such reference on the forum -- about how many flags someone supported. I don't even know if the number is big or low, compared with other users But the number itself -- 279 supported flags -- seems a big number... Indeed, I involved in supporting flags against scams but I really never thought about how many I supported during time... So thank you for this as well! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craft Master |
Hero of Good |
Discovery |
Bitcointalk Ninja |
SpamBuster |
|
|
|
|
|
|  Miss Bitcointalk ________________________ |  ScamBuster ________________________ |  Bitcoin Geek ________________________ |  Golden Feather ________________________ |  Antihero ________________________ |
Summing up the Bitcointalk Awards 2023, I would like to express my gratitude to everyone who took part in the voting, as well as to everyone who supported this initiative. Congratulations to all the winners (we have thirty winners this year) and thank you to everyone who continues to make Bitcointalk better. Valuable prizes will be sent to all winners (except for the Antihero category) in the near future. In addition, in the very near future Cyrus, as a representative of Cryptios, will contact some of you (a surprise awaits you, information about which we cannot disclose yet). Also, users who get the same number of votes will share prizes among themselves (for example, if it is 2nd and 3rd place, etc.). If you see your name below, congratulations! - Winners [icopress will contact you all very soon]
o_e_l_e_o: 🥇 1st place, 🥇 1st place (Unplanned additional cash prize as a sign of respect!).
Hhampuz: 🥇 1st place
TryNinja: 🥇 1st place
theymos: 🥇 1st place, 🥉 3rd place (Antihero).
fillippone: 🥇 1st place, 🥈 2nd place.
GazetaBitcoin: 🥇 1st place, 🥈 2nd place, 🥈 2nd place (Do you still believe that he is not an alcoholic? Look how many prizes he took!).
Joker_josue: 🥇 1st place, 🥈 2nd place
nutildah: 🥇 1st place, 🥈 2nd place
Foxpup: 🦊 1st place (Just don’t say that this competition was bought ... how can we explain then that icopress is still not in the club().
ETFbitcoin: 🥈 2nd place
PowerGlove: 🥈 2nd place
icopress: 🥈 2nd place
lovesmayfamilis: 🥈 2nd place, 🥉 3rd place, 🥉 3rd place
paid2: 🥉 3rd place
LoyceV: 🥉 3rd place, 🥉 3rd place, 🥉 3rd place (He was very close to taking second place three times!).
AB de Royse777: 🥉 3rd place
BitcoinGirl.Club: 🥉 3rd place (He doesn't seem to realize that he'll soon have to wear a dress!).
- Voting Results [Only those who received 4 or more votes]
| | |
|
|
| |
Hero of Good |
theymos (81), fillippone (21), LoyceV (19), Cyrus (18 ), JayJuanGee (17), o_e_l_e_o (12), philipma1957 (9), Hhampuz (7), DdmrDdmr (5), The Sceptikal Chymist (5), El duderino_ (4), gmaxwell (4), Jet Cash (4)
|
|
|
| |
Golden Feather |
fillippone (41), o_e_l_e_o (27), GazetaBitcoin (27), LoyceV (26), JayJuanGee (24), DdmrDdmr (23), The Sceptical Chymist (10), theymos (9), LFC_Bitcoin (5), philipma1957 (5), CryptopreneurBrainboss (4), d5000 (4), Pmalek (4)
|
|
|
| |
Bitcointalk Ninja |
TryNinja (80), Joker_josue (46), LoyceV (45), PowerGlove (27), DdmrDdmr (12), suchmoon (11), fillippone (9), bitmover (7), Rikafip (7), icopress (5), gbianchi (4), JayJuanGee (4)
|
|
|
| |
Bitcoin Geek |
o_e_l_e_o (40), ETFbitcoin (19), LoyceV (18), gmaxwell (14), JayJuanGee (14), PowerGlove (11), GazetaBitcoin (11), DdmrDdmr (9), pooya87 (9), philipma1957 (9), nc50lc (9), babo (7), JollyGood (5), achow101 (5), Charles-Tim (5), duesoldi (5), fillippone (4), Plutosky (4 ), igor72 (4)
|
|
|
| |
Discovery
of the Year |
Joker_josue (24), PowerGlove (14), paid2 (11), apogio (9), bastisisca (6), vjudeu (4)
|
|
|
| |
SpamBuster |
GazetaBitcoin (69), nutildah (43), lovesmayfamilis (32), light_warrior (14), jokers10 (7), 1miau (7), The Sceptical Chymist (5), bitbollo (4), actmyname (4), Lafu (4)
|
|
|
| |
ScamBuster |
nutildah (57), GazetaBitcoin (35), lovesmayfamilis (30), holydarkness (14), Learn Bitcoin (13), Timelord2067 (10), JollyGood (7), Lillominato89 (5), Lafu (5), bitbollo (4)
|
|
|
| |
Craft Master |
Hhampuz (76), icopress (64), AB de Royse777 (37), Jayce (25), cygan (12), taufik123 (12), Little_Mouse (5), giammangiato (5), julerz12 (4), mendace (4), I'm shocked that yahoo62278 received 1 vote.
|
|
|
| |
Antihero |
Symmetrick (41), franky1 (26), theymos (23), digaran (14), AB de Royse777 (8 ), JG (6), yogg (5), Paolo.Demidov (4)
|
|
|
| |
Miss Bitcointalk |
Foxpup 🦊 (59), lovesmayfamilis (32), BitcoinGirl.Club (27)
Disruptivas (8 ), suchmoon (7), Becassine (7), Etranger (6), womanderful (4)
|
|
|
| |
Event of the Year |
Mixers banned (48), TalkImg (17), Fake BTC ETF spot (13), 2FA added (10), The beginning of the bull market (4)
|
|
|
| |
Fail of the Year |
Mixers banned (61), CZ (14), Ordinals (11), Drama around Ratimov (7), Ledger (4)
|
|
|
| _________________ | _________________ | |
- List of unaccounted nominees and votes
SPARE, ColdLava40, speeder, satoshi - List of candidates who received 3 or fewer votes
Hero of good: minerjones (3), vapourminer (3), icopress (2), Rikafip (2), hugeblack (2), dbshock (2), PowerGlove (2), qwk (1), bobbyclee (1), Plutosky (1), irfan_pak10 (1), Foxpup (1), Shahzadafzal (1), Ratimov (1)
Golden feather: Hhampuz (3), franky1 (3), Plutosky (3), bitbollo (3), dbshock (3), duesoldi (3), Cyrus (3), 1miau (2), pooya87 (2), icopress (2), babo (2), Shahzadafzal (2), Charles-Tim (2), Loganota (1), cryptobaboon (1), albon (1), stompiz (1), OmegaStarScream (1), mikeywith (1), RickDeckard (1), mv1986 (1), GrosWesh (1), bullrun2020bro (1), Disruptivas (1), Ale88 (1), Mircea Popescu (1), gbianchi (1), Husna QA (1), Rikafip (1), n-nce (1), gmaxwell (1)), BitcoinGirl.Club (1), yahoo62278 (1), hugeblack (1), PowerGlove (1), achow101 (1)
BitcoinTalk Ninja: JayJuanGee (3), dkbit98 (2), o_e_l_e_o (2), ibminer (2), krogothmanhattan (2), EFS (1), darkv0rt3x (1), mikeywith (1), Paolo.Demidov (1), Vod (1), bitbollo (1), babo (1), Husna QA (1), nutildah (1), Shahzadafzal (1), Cyrus (1), minerjones (1), gmaxwell (1), NotATether (1), hugeblack (1), El duderino_ (1), The Sceptical Chymist (1), CryptopreneurBrainboss (1), Hhampuz (1), Foxpup (1), GazetaBitcoin (1)
Bitcoin geek: d5000 (3), conilmionome (3), LeGaulois (3), OgNasty (3), gbianchi (2), hosseinimr93 (2), bitmover (2), Paolo.Demidov (2), FP91G (2), Bthd (1), ABCbits (1), HCP (1), OmegaStarScream (1), seek3r (1), mendace (1), NotFuzzyWarm (1), Ale88 (1), Dbshck (1), Joker_josue (1), Jollygood (1), TryNinja (1), franky1 (1), DaveF (1)
Event of the year: High transaction fees (3), Black Rock (and other BIGs) require spot ETFs (3), Ordinals (3), Bitcoin price movement (2), OTOH Collection Sell in Auction (2), Pie baking contest (2), Farewell, by o_e_l_e_o (2), Change of name from Ratimov to Symmetrick (2), Bitcoin started to hit a new ATH (1), BTC +150% (1), Price back in $40k (1), Increase in the price of BTC (1), Bitcoin is not dead (1), Mining has become profitable (1), apogio's first year on this forum (1), Expected launch of spot ETF (1), Solo BTC block found with Willi974 (1), Celestia airdrop (1), Calabaza (1), Too many mixers getting seized this year (1), Bitcoin mixers are facing a tough time this year (1), ChipMixer (1), Ratimov's fall (1), Joker_josue (1), Bitcoin Economic Forum (1), Ethereum Shanghai upgrade (1), Roobet Art Contest (1), Pizza baking contest (1), BitcoinTalk community award (1), El Salvador's break-even (1)
Fail of the year: High transaction fees (3), ColdKey scam (3), Fake BTC ETF spot approval (3), SEC and ETF deny (2), Imgur images (2), BRC-20 (2), Sinbad seized (2), ChipMixer (2), Cyrus not giving alani a pizza icon after winning 2 Pizza contests (1), SEC approved ETFs (1), Exit ripp by Wwhirlwind with thousands of $ in escrow (1), Exit scams (1), Poll on solving the imgur issue (1), Edwardard (1), Vod licking his boob (1), Forum's fake doc (1), Censorship in the forum (1), Pizza baking contest (1)
Discovery of the year: hugeblack (3), Ale88 (3), Lillominato89 (3), Shahzadafzal (3), criptoevangelista (3), Italian Panic (3), larry_vw_1955 (2), philipma1957 (2), fillippone (2), Turbatuluk (2), giammangiato (2), icopress (2), seek3r (2), mendace (2), Learn Bitcoin (2), AHOYBRAUSE (2), mcdouglasx (2), The Sceptical Chymist (1), o_e_l_e_o (1), NotATether (1), d5000 (1), krogothmanhattan (1), JetCash (1), Ratimov (1), holydarkness (1), Vod (1), Skot (1), Umeridrees (1), Zainmalik75 (1), maxirosson (1), Orpichukwu (1), Coin_trader (1), mv1986 (1), darxiaomi (1), darkv0rt3x (1), sompitonov (1), shasan (1), Best_Change (1), Hatchy (1), Prancheiro (1), darbitmobilerecovery (1)
Spambuster: babo (3), Lillominato90 (3), Jollygood (3), giammangiato (2), mk4 (2), holydarkness (2), Dbshck (1), Learn Bitcoin (1), Joker_josue (1), Invincible49 (1), bastisisca (1), Lucius (1), Chikito (1), Timelord2067 (1), FatFork (1), icopress (1)
Scambuster: babo (3), giammangiato (3), light_warrior (3), dkbit98 (3), 1miau (3), decodx (2), albon (2), examplens (2), Symmetrick (1), PokerPlayer (1), The Sceptical Chymist (1), Rikafip (1), bastisisca (1), mendace (1), Pmalek (1), invincible49 (1), Leviathan.007 (1), mk4 (1)), logfiles (1), Don Pedro Dinero (1), famososMuertos (1), Gladitorcomeback (1)
Craft master: willi9974 (3), GazetaBitcoin (3), JayJuanGee (3), Igebotz (2), bitmover (2), LoyceV (2), Trofo (2), CryptopreneurBrainboss (2), bitbollo (2), Porfirii (1), 1miau (1)conilmionome (1), irfan_pak10 (1), krogothmanhattan (1), CRO2 (1), Maus0728 (1), mcdouglasx (1), zahid888 (1), nomachine (1), Heisenberg_Hunter (1), icalical (1), jstefanop (1), LiquidOptions (1), MoparMiningLLC (1), Darkstar_ (1), mole0815 (1), yahoo62278 (1), o_e_l_e_o (1), PowerGlove (1)
Antihero: mendace (3), duesoldi (3), BetterCallRaul (2), ETFbitcoin (2), BADecker (2), philipma1957 (1), Binance Coin (1), 1miau (1), JayJuanGee (1), GazetaBitcoin (1), Vod (1), conilmionome (1), creep_o (1), R@nda (1), Themepin (1), Kruw (1), Hamza2424 (1)
Miss BitcoinTalk: SmartGold01 (3), mk4 (3), AB De Royse777 (3), Mia Chloe (2), krogothmanhattan (2), BitcoinEXpress (2), SatoPrincess (2), Lillominato89 (2), LoyceV (2), JayJuanGee (2), BitMaxz (1), Majestic-milf (1), seek3r (1), Sarah Azhari (1), tjohej (1), rpietila (1), sheenshane (1), DdmrDdmr (1)
Statistics:- This year we had 186 unique users nominated for 10 categories. Excepting them, some were also nominated as being event or fail of the year. In comparison, last year we had only 166 users being nominated.
- The greatest number of nominations received by a user was 81 (theymos at Hero of Good category). Last year he was also the one with most votes (87) at same category.
- The biggest difference between a first place and a second place was 60 votes (theymos vs fillippone, at Hero of Good category. Last year biggest difference was of 62 votes, between PowerGlove and n0nce, at Discovery of the Year category.
- franky1 tried again to abuse the system, just like last year, by meriting those who nominated him as antihero, in order to have less votes at this category. Similar to last year, his attempts were not counted. Also similar to last year, he "managed" to keep his second place at this category.
- There were still some cases when some votes were denied for breaking the "no-merit rule" (but way less than last year, which is great).
- Votes of SPARE, ColdLava40 and speeder were not counted, as they have less than 50 merits earned.
- Votes for inactive users, such as satoshi, were also not counted, due to their inactivity.
- Some mentions of event / fail of the year were merged all together, as they written with words suggesting same idea.
- Some votes for nominees which had their name spelled incorrectly were merged together (Ratimov & Symmetrick, e_o_l_o_e & o_e_l_e_o etc.)
- The votes for "TalkImg" at Discovery of the Year category were not awarded to Joker_josue, as "TalkImg" was not a forum username. However, this did not stop Joker_josue to win first place at this category.
- The ban of mixers was voted as most important event of the year and also the fail of the year. This should say a lot about how this decision was perceived by forum users.
- Forum's queen seems to be the solitary leader at Miss BitcoinTalk category, winning first prize for 3 years in a row now Same is true also for TryNinja, which won for last 3 consecutive years the Bitcoin Ninja category. Furthermore, o_e_l_e_o kept winning at Bitcoin Geek category for 4 years in a row -- WOW!
Made with 💗 for the Bitcointalk public. |
|
|
|
Poor fillippone, still waiting for the tits pics! fillippone be like:  |
|
|
|
From the pictures you posted the box looks the same as any regular Ledger Nano X. Other versions have different boxes to be able to tell them apart without opening them [...]
The barcode is the European Article Number, it's a number used to identify a product. Unfortunately, it only shows as a Ledger Nano X. [...]
I believe that this is probably what you claim, as you got it directly from them. But for anyone else there's no way to know, or to prove to anyone else that it's a special version, without opening it. I understand your point. And it makes sense. For such cases (involving trust / lack of trust) an escrow can be used too. I don't mind working with an escrow, if it's one from this list, as I trust most of them. So in case you are interested in this product we can work things out in a way or another. Please let me know. |
|
|
|
Great job, DS! Thank you for this additional effort
you made a small typo here, the topic belongs to or was created by fillippone and not by 1miau funnily enough, you have entered it correctly above under 'Translations IN PROGRESS:' Oooops, thanks cygan! Just fixed this. as far as my translations of this topic are concerned, i will most likely start in mid-march or early april... Whenever you can, no rush here |
|
|
|
A new translation has been added to OP: With this occasion, the Urdu becomes the seventh language in which all my topic are translated. For obvious reasons, I am more than proud about this! JunaidAzizi, thank you for this collaboration and for the patience and efforts you did in translating all these topics.
Let’s say Gazeta industrialised my idea and pushed it to the limit.
I am an amateur; he is a steamroller in the translation business (or every business he is involved in, as far as I know). Awwww, such words make me blush, amico mio! Thank you... I did not know my thread will have such success... but I am glad to see these essays translated so many times... And yours, of course, are just so useful for many people thus I am also very glad to see them translated in other languages... For me it was a great honor to translate all your topics!
GazetaBitcoin you are doing well in the forum by making local users to be active in their local boards and in the translation threads. Since when I did the translation for you, I have not visited this thread to see how it is. And it is today I am visiting to see my transactions and others. I have been very active in fillippone translation thread. I really appreciate your for given me the opportunity to translate your work. It is an honor to me. Thanks for moving along with the local board participants. Thank you, Agbe! It was a pleasure to collaborate together and I am more than glad to see you involved in translating fillippone's words as well... |
|
|
|
[...] اس خاص ٹاپک کو ترجمہ کرنے کا تمہارا بہت شکریہ جنید عزیزی ،جو کہ روز البریچ کے غیر منصفانہ ٹرائل کے آگہی بڑھانے کے لیے مختص ہیں۔ بہت سے لوگ اس کو ملزم مانتے اسکے کیس کے بارے میں جانے بغیر، یہ آسان ہے الزام دہئ کی جاے،مگر جب یہ ناقابل یقین ڈاکومنٹری دیکھتے تو آپ سمجھ جاتے ہے کہ یہ سب چیزیں اتنی سادہ نہیں ہے۔اس کیس پر قبضہ کرنے کے لیے ایجنسیاں ایک دوسرے کے خلاف لڑ رہی ہے، ڈی اے ای کے ایجنٹس سلک روڈ پر بی ٹی سی کو چرا رہے ہیں، روز کے مستند شدہ گواہی کو عدالت میں پیش نہیں کیا جا رہا ہے، استغاثہ کی جانب سے غیر مستند شدہ ثبوت عدالت میں لائے گئے اور جج نے اسکو تسلیم کر لیا اور اس کا تعین کر لیا کہ روز کو مثال بنایا جائے۔یہ سب اور اس سے بھی زیادہ اس ڈاکومنٹری اور ٹاپک میں سمجھ سکتے ہیں۔
اس سب کے بعد، ہمارے پاس ایک آدمی جو دو بار سزائے موت اور چالیس سال کا بونس ( کس طرح ایک شخص اس طرح کا سزائے موت پائےگا)بغیر پےرول کے امکانات کے سر انجام پائے گا، ایک ویب سائٹ چلانا جو اس کا پہلا جرم ہیں، حالانکہ اس ار ۲.۰ اور ۳.۰ کے انتظامیہ اور کالے مارکیٹ والے پکڑے بھی گئے جیل بھی ہوئ اور پھر رہا بھی ہو گئے۔کیا یہ صحیح انصاف ہیں؟ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
