2. This part contains 2 small typos: "[...] or you receive Bitcoins sent from exchanges. This coins is unlinkable [...]"
- it should be "bitcoins" instead of "Bitcoins" (when you refer to the currency "bitcoin" term should be used; "Bitcoin" is used for when referring to the network)
- "This coins is" should be changed with "These coins are" Thanks, this has been fixed.  Glad I could help here 1. Topic title indicates an incorrect fee: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5‰
The fee is 1-5%, not 1 - 5‰. This is not actually a typo. In the section in which our thread is located, there are many other threads whose names contain unusual Unicode characters. And we just wanted to find some kind of non-repeating symbol for the thread that would convey the essence and look quite unusual. I don’t think that anyone in real life constantly encounters this symbol (thousandths of a percent), so we considered it reasonable to add it to the name of the thread. I understand that you looked for an out-of-ordinary symbol but, at same time, take into consideration that "‰", just like "%", is a mathematical symbol. Practically, in your topic title you are stating that you are charging fees 100 times smaller than in reality.Then afterwards, within the thread, you are stating fees 100 times higher than those mentioned in topic title: We charge from 1% to 5% of the amount + 0,0007 BTC 1-5% is 100 times greater than 1-5‰ and this may raise some (unpleasant) discussion at some point. My friendly recommendation is to forget about the "fanciness" of "‰" and use the correct symbol representing your fees, which is "%". This may be a long shot, but I've seen users tagged on this forum for far less that that. You never know who will read this and see that topic title states something then below other amounts are stated and from this someone could leave you an unpleasant feedback... It's up to you how you'll proceed, I just gave you my two cents. |
|
|
|
iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2, GazetaBitcoin Thank you very much for taking the time to localize our thread! You are very welcome! It was a pleasure to do the translation. I hope the threads you translated will be no less active than our main thread! Let's hope so! Oh and about your request from the translated topic, I already replied you there: there is a link toward your original thread (and also one nominating you as the author) Please look again. I would send you a like (merit), but unfortunately I don’t know how often I can do this since at the moment I see “0” Don't worry about that You'll can do it after you'll receive more merits.
I also take this opportunity to let you know about 3 small typos I notices inside the original Webmixer thread: 1. Topic title indicates an incorrect fee: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5‰ The fee is 1-5%, not 1 - 5‰. It should look like this: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5% 2. This part contains 2 small typos: "[...] or you receive Bitcoins sent from exchanges. This coins is unlinkable [...]" - it should be "bitcoins" instead of "Bitcoins" (when you refer to the currency "bitcoin" term should be used; "Bitcoin" is used for when referring to the network) - "This coins is" should be changed with "These coins are" I hope this helps. |
|
|
|
Mulțumesc din nou pentru traducerea firului nostru (apropo, am menționat asta în firul principal). A fost placerea mea Dar ai putea pune un link către versiunea în limba engleză a firului în bara de navigare? Am pus, este chiar a doua linie a topicului: |
|
|
|
In addition, I've updated my code in the OP as what's been still there until now was still for the old version. It's updated now. Can you pinpoint the changes, please? Thus I make sure I also add them to the Romanian translation. I've just changed the code part: | Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating)  *** | Works without JS? | Rated by | | ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _________________________________ | ____________________ | ________________ | | xxx | Yes / No (xx/2022) / Yes / No (xx/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | x / 10 Points | Yes/No | Your name |
[table]
[tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][url=xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/2022) / Yes / No (xx/2022)[/td]
[td]Yes (09/2019)[/td]
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes/No[/b][/td]
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr]
[/table] I come back to this post as I finally had some time to investigate the needed changes for the Romanian translation of OP. However, I don't see any change that I should make... This is how Romanian translation looks like: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5268520. 1miau, are you so kind, please, to help me a little with those changes that I should do? |
|
|
|
with this letter (dated november  , 16 democratic and republican members of congress call on president Joe Biden to withdraw the us extradition request against WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange This was, probably, a move that US secret services did not anticipate. People point the finger toward Biden but I believe that behind him, all decisions about Julian are taken by secret services. The Guardian also informed about this and, as far as I see, it may be the heaviest action pro-Assange from recent past. Indeed, some may point the finger that behind the letter stays Marjorie Taylor Greene, which is supporter of Trump, but this should not affect too much the fact that 16 congressmen signed the letter. Let's hope for the best... |
|
|
|
Thank you for sharing this, cygan! And I apologize for the delayed reply but I completely forgot about it. Indeed, it's hard to believe that Hal was Satoshi. I read many articles about Hal and also multiple statements he made and he seemed very honest... Besides, after I read his post from the forum I became convinced there is no chance for him to be Satoshi. The post in question is this one and it's a must read, from my perspective: Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney). I also recommend to everybody to merit that post, as it is, in a way, Hal's legacy... |
|
|
|
Ce dragut! Mi-ai adus un zambet pe fata Si mie Mda, se pare ca cineva s-a gandit sa "traga la rapundere" un website in ideea ca poate ca in spatele lui e vreun copil care o sa se sperie si o sa se dea de gol. Na, ca n-a fost sa fie   E posibil sa fi fost si asta, sa fi incercat autoritatile marea cu degetul... In acelasi timp, e posibil sa fi fost si un bug de birocratie. In orice caz, este de urmarit ce se va intampla nu neaparat maine (16 noiembrie) cat, mai ales, dupa... Nu cred ca vor sta nici autoritatile cu mainile-n san totusi. |
|
|
|
Guys, thank you for all your efforts in reporting those websites. And, seeing that one site is down it means there are some chances to have the other sites taken down as well... However, I believe there are higher chances to take down the fake Telegram groups. So I kindly ask you to not forget to report those groups as well: Fake channel: Fake group: https://t.me/+9-b0IbSBkNhlNTkx Fake telegram channel: Fake telegram group: https://t.me/+w2Dzbpg_dCMxMmYx Please send the reports to abuse@telegram.org and /or to https://t.me/notoscam. |
|
|
|
|
Intr-adevar, nici HODL nu e usor... iti trebui nervi de otel. Imi amintesc, de exemplu, de perioada de dupa explozia de pret din 2017, cand BTC ajunsese la 20.000$, apoi a scazut, in decurs de 1 an, pana pe la 3000$. Daca nu ma insel, prin ianuarie 2019 era 3000$. Foarte multi s-au fript atunci, vanzand in pierdere si neintelegand ceva foarte simplu: cat timp pastrezi monedele, nu esti pe minus. Pe minus esti abia dupa ce le vinzi.
Pe de alta parte, 1miau vorbeste din perspectiva rigurozitatii germane. Acest mod ordonat de gandire este cunoscut intregii lumi, de aici si expresia. Pentru un om "bine pe mental" nu este greu sa mearga pe HODL -- cel putin, nu mai greu decat sa faca tranzactii zilnice, unde are sanse mai mari de a pierde.
Din fericire, nu m-am numarat niciodata printre cei cu "maini slabe", asa ca si eu am mers pe HODL de cand ma stiu.
|
|
|
|
What I don't understand is why he needs to say anything about leftover money. It's a question asked by OP and it's a question which stays on the tip of the tongue of many other users, be them ex-CM participants or not. |
|
|
|
If you read carefully WEB503's post, you can see that the author of the current translation is not receptive. As a result, updating the current translation can not be done. The second translation will not look precisely as the first one, therefore it can not be considered a duplicate. A duplicate would be a copy-paste of the first one. In my experience I was once contacted by a Nigerian user which wanted to translate a topic of mine from those which I listed here. I explained to him to make sure he follows my stated rules or else I will not take his translation in consideration. He agreed. One of the rules was to send me a preview before publishing the translation and wait for my approval. As I expected (he had a low rank), he made a mess of a translation. And he also published it without my consent. So I rejected the existence of that translation. Later, it was translated by someone else and the new user made a good translation thus I allowed him to publish it. That means that in Nigerian local board there are 2 translations for that topic of mine. One is a mess and one is good. Nobody suffered any punishment for publishing the second translation.
Other than that, WEB403 please din here the Romanian translation of your topic: 📌 [banned mixer] - Anonimitate Maximă 🤖 Comision 1 - 5‰. |
|
|
|
I would not like that my post to look like some pressure placed on purpose on DarkStar_'s shoulders, but I believe that, at least, he should come up with a resolution for the funds he is keeping. The situation is even more intriguing, as the funds remaining after CM was seized were moved on August 18th to another address, which holds 50 BTC. The entire amount moved was 1.30807482 BTC. CM's address used for payments was 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty. At same time, this address also hold some fork coins, such as 1.99 bcash for instance (I did not check for other fork coins, but I believe they are also available). In any case, the amount is low. At least as long as the 1.3 BTC were kept inside the same address I thought that DarkStar_ has some plans with them and, perhaps, he would take a decision at a later time and come up with a few words about his decision. But seeing the funds were moved and there is still just silence from his side -- this brings a lot of questions... I will repeat myself -- I don't want this to sound as an extra pressure for DS_. Perhaps he also does not know what to do with the money. And, at same time, I believe that is a very trustworthy forum user. But a few words from him would be nice. I am coming back on this thread, as it seems that DarkStar_ became to be sort of active again. Maybe not in term of posts, but I see that he also merited some users recently, inside his loans thread. In case he did not see this topic while he was inactive, maybe he'll see it now... Perhaps, for more visibility, it would be better if OP would also change topic title from " The fate of the leftover fund" to " The fate of the leftover fund from ChipMixer / WhirlWind" (although the part about Whirlwind has been solved). |
|
|
|
It's a feature, not a bug  That still does not explain some glitches... Look, for example, at the image posted by logfiles above: Why does it show an invisible user which became part of DT...? |
|
|
|
Autor: 1miauTopic original: Trade vs. HODL - avoid traps
În fond, știm cu toții cât de valoros este bitcoin, așa că avem nevoie să ne protejăm și, pe cât posibil, chiar să ne sporim cantitățile deținute. Însă, când facem aceste lucruri, mai multe capcane ar trebui evitate. Una dintre aceste greșeli constă în a crede în ideea eronată că puteți mări profiturile în bitcoin prin activități sigure de tranzacționare. Tranzacționare vs. HODL Fundamentele Bitcoin sunt propice pentru HODL, deoarece numărul monedelor este limitat la 21 milioane. Valoarea bitcoin ar trebui să crească pe termen lung și HODL reprezintă cea mai sigură cale de a obține profit. Riscul este scăzut iar șansele de succes sunt mari. Însă trebuie să fim răbdători și să preferăm câștigurile pe termen lung în locul celor rapide, dar mai riscante. Analiza tehnică este riscantăUnii afirmă că tranzacționarea pe baza analizei tehnice este o metodă sigură de a face bani – nu este adevărat, deoarece este ceva foarte riscant, mai ales pe termen scurt (tranzacționările zilnice). Dacă analiza tehnică ar fi predictibilă, atunci ar fi mai ușor să luăm un credit, să dam banii unui trader “profesionist”, iar acesta ar face profit. Fiți atenți și nu mușcați astfel de momeli, sunt țepe! Dacă analiza tehnică ar fi o cale sigură de a genera profit, toți ar fi milionari. Un programator ar putea scrie în cod aceste “modele de analiză tehnică” și ar putea tranzacționa pe baza acestora. Însă un astfel de program nu există, din cauză că nu funcționează. Analiza tehnică nu este predictibilă și nu generează venituri sigure. Așa explică și xkcd: analiza tehnică este mai mult o pseudo-știință:  https://xkcd.com/2101/Mergeți pe HODL! Când practicăm HODL, beneficiem de avantajul oferit de raritatea bitcoin. Numărul monedelor este limitat la 21 milioane. Și la fiecare 210.000 blocuri recompensele (minerilor) se înjumătățesc, iar monedele nou create scad la aproximativ fiecare 4 ani. Prin HODL pur și simplu profităm de raritatea bitcoin, deoarece bitcoin este un activ bun de a fi păstrat. Prețul ar putea fi volatil acum, însă pe măsură ce tot mai mulți oameni vor deține bitcoin, prețul ar putea deveni mai stabil – crescând și cererea pentru bitcoin privit din perspectiva potențialului de a păstra valori. Ar putea dura câțiva ani până când vom vedea niște profituri decente, întrucât prețul bitcoin s-a mișcat în cicluri de câte 4 ani, însă până acum HODL s-a dovedit a fi ceva sigur (și contribuie și la eliminarea volatilității prețului bitcoin). Pe scurt: Mergeți pe HODL, nu tranzacționați!
Traducere realizată la inițiativa: |
|
|
|
Autor: WEB503Topic original: 📌 [banned mixer] - Maximum Anonymity 🤖 Fees 1 - 5‰
/en/][banned mixer] este o unealtă de încredere, creată pentru anonimizarea BTC. Interfață intuitivă cu 3 moduri de mixare, .Mixer, Precise, Max Anonymity. grație cărora primiți monede curate de la diverse case de schimb. Nu păstrăm jurnale + oferim scrisori de garanție, astfel că beneficiați de un nivel de anonimitate de 100%. .
|
| | ➥ Fără înregistrare, fără jurnale / toate datele sunt codificate.
➥ Ștergere automată imediată a datelor clientului / datele pentru solicitările de mixare sunt șterse în 168 ore.
➥ Singura dovadă de curățare folosită de serviciul nostru este scrisoarea de garanție, care rămâne la client.
|
|
| | După ce monedele clientului ajung la noi, acestea sunt divizate în cantități aleatorii și sunt trimise la cele mai mari case de schimb. Primiți înapoi monede BTC curate (nivelul de curățare depinzând de modul de mixare utilizat). Primiți fie monede de la clienții noștri care au beneficiat de avantajul oferit de modul cu anonimitate maximă sau primiți monede BTC trimise de casele de schimb. Aceste monede nu pot fi corelate cu identitatea clientului și sunt rezistente la toate uneltele de deanonimizare.
|
|
| | ➥ Pentru a iniția curățarea, tranzacția voastră trebuie să aibă o confirmare din partea rețelei.
➥ Durata depinde de modul utilizat, însă ține de obicei între 2 și 6 ore.
➥ Adresa de primire este valabilă timp de 7 zile (168 ore). Toate plățile realizate ulterior vor fi ignorate.
|
|
| | ➥ Aplicăm un comision de 1% - 5% din sumă + 0,0007 BTC
➥ Suma maximă depinde de modul de anonimizare ales - 1 sau 50 BTC.
➥ Suma minimă care poate fi curățată este de 0.001 BTC, toate sumele mai mici fiind considerate donații.
|
|
| ____________________ | |
|
|
|
|
We need some advice. Is it allowed according to the forum rules to ask someone else to make a local translation of a thread if a translation already exists? The problem is that the user who translated the thread into Russian did not update the informative links in the Russian-language OP, although our manager reminded him of this. Yes, this can be done and it would not break forum rules.
Duplicate messages are prohibited, but if it involves translating a text modified beyond recognition, it's unlikely that the translation can be considered a duplication of the original text. There is no rule for a duplicate translation The only rule stating anything about duplicate posts states, in fact, that translations are permitted: 12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards (except for re-posting topics in the local language boards if they're translated [...]
Other than that, I would also want to inform WEB503 that I'll make a Romanian translation of this thread. |
|
|
|
Let me duplicate my post so that this definitely does not go unnoticed. Dear friend, please don't forget also about unijoin.fun: So we’re now left with Unijoin(dot)pro and the newly identified unijoin(dot)fun, I believe if we put all efforts the same way we did for .plus we can get the same result. Perhaps you can edit your post (and also the post you made inside the campaign topic) and include unijoin.fun as well in the request? |
|
|
|
Se pare ca birocratia este gaunoasa peste tot in lume si vine de hac si autoritatilor, nu doar " plebeilor". Conform unei postari a celor de la eXch, se pare ca instiintarea de a se prezenta in instanta are serioase probleme, intrucat nici macar nu are un destinatar precis  At this time it's not even clear whether they addressed their request correctly, since our legal company name isn't specified in the request. They have addressed a court order to a string "exch.cx" which makes unclear whether it was addressed to a domain name, a website, a host or someone wearing a T-shirt with "exch.cx" written on it. Mai mult, chiar daca eXch a informat autoritatile despre aceasta eroare, nu au mai primit niciun raspuns intre timp. Iar prezentarea in fata completului de judecata ar trebui sa aiba loc pe 16 noiembrie. In orice caz, pe langa birocratia penibila, motivul lor de neprezentare in fata curtii mi se pare genial: I must also mention that going to any court physically is out of question for us since our team is currently located on a desert island which was the closest habitable location after a boating accident and there are currently no transportation options available for getting to the mainland. Thanks satellite broadband and autonomous energy sources we will be able to remain here for some time. It's a nice place after all. |
|
|
|
Well done also on your donation to Simplex, I discovered this service recently thanks to a fellow bitcointalker and I'm very pleased! Just curious, how did you find out that eXch donated to SimpleX? However, I'm really surprised to see that the team behind Simplex uses Binance's services And how did you got to find that too? iwantmy10000acrescourtyardpaidwithbtctoo, you are always surprising At same time, I would like to recommend the services offered by SimpleX to any user looking for private instant communications. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
