Bitcoin Forum
June 08, 2024, 06:35:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 »
2021  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: January 03, 2015, 07:50:19 PM
Asian birthrate is higher than the USA, especially if you exclude Latinos.

The white portion of the USA and especially Europe has the same fertility problem but worse...The whites are no longer procreating

The Americans have this huge Latino albatross dead weight.

Take a closer look at the demographics. Asian birthrates are only higher in poor countries. In every country or city where Asians have become wealthy their birth rates have plummeted. In the US for example the Asian birth rate is lower then that of Caucasians. The table below is US fertility rates by ethnicity.


Caucasian birth rate have declined but only slightly and they are still very high compared to Europe and elsewhere. The demographics of Hispanics are also declining towards US norms and Illegal mexican migration may be turning down.



Hispanics are largely Catholic and family oriented. They are certainly not a fifth column. The US is capable of successfully absorbing them.  The US has nothing like the challenges faced by Europe in this arena.

If you compare the current demographics of the US with that of any any other wealthy country they compare quite favorably. The US has its share of problems but to the degree that demographics are destiny it is well positioned. For this reason and others I believe the US will eventually decouple from the rest of the West where the overall picture is much grimmer.

The West has this huge population of entitled boomers who expect a high lifestyle and will demand it politically and through socialism.

The socialism is egregiously high and increasing towards a catastrophic end in the West, whereas it is at a very low level in Asia.

I agree with the current trajectory of socialism in the west but disagree with your faith in Asia. As demonstrated so well by Japan when Asian countries become rich their fertility plummets and they become socialist. China looks set to follow the same path. Poor countries like the Philippines may have low levels of socialism now but will that really last?

The immigration will flung wide open with the Asian union in 2015, ... The tide will turn into a massive exodus once the critical mass of all the factors (enumerated throughout this post) has reached the apex just before 2032.

The next several decades are likely to be Asian ones. However, if Japan is any sort of template for Asia in general it's golden period will be relatively brief.


Just as every empire before it, the USA will be a shell of its former self. Then it will adjust and a century or so later, it may be poised again to rise.

Just wait until the global economy collapses from 2016 until at least 2020. Then you will start to see the true nature of the USA as it really is now.

No doubt the West including the USA is in for a world of hurt going forward. However, the long term fundamentals of the US remain more favorable than the rest of the rich world and it will therefore recover faster. I see no evidence that Asia has any special resistance to the illness afflicting the west. If anything they may be more susceptible.

I will leave you the last word.
2022  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: January 03, 2015, 07:05:55 AM
CoinCube, you are in for a rude awakening....

I agree that Asia will become the financial center of the world and likely remain there for our lifetimes. It is hard to beat a 4:1 population advantage. Absolute numbers matter in the short run. In the long run, however, what matters is growth.

Asia has shown itself to be acutely venerable to the sterilizing effects of the modern world. Long term 2150 I expect the USA to once again surpass China as the demographics remain in the USA's favor. When China ends it's one child policy it will not change much. China is now firmly on track to mirror Japan. Like Japan it will have its boom and get rich and old. Uniformity of language, and law are advantages. Uniformity of genetics is very much a losing competitive strategy.

Of all rich world countries the USA has proven most resilient to the worldwide decline in fertility. Its underlying openness and success in assimilating immigrants are also powerful long term advantages. The USA also has fewer of the harder to assimilate immigrant groups compared to europe.  

Knowledge workers will want to live in communities with other knowledge workers. People want to live in big cities. That is not going to change in the near future. Knowledge workers are likely to gather in the large cities where other knowledge workers live. Diverse places where all ethnicities feel welcome will have a leg up as they can attract from a wider pool. West coast of the USA will likely do especially well as it draws in people from all of Asia.

I recently rented a small home in a large city in Washington state so I could enroll my children in the very strong schools there. The elementary school my kids enrolled in is a public school and I was surprised to find that it is 60% Asian. The Asian knowledge workers are currently flooding the west coast. I do not see that trend reversing.  

The USA will suffer from the growth of socialism like everywhere, but it will remain a relative safe haven compared to most other countries. China and India may have more knowledge workers but their culture does not allow them to thrive. That is the reason the Ph.D's in China are living in the slum and why they are moving to the USA if they can. It also happens to be the reason my kids public elementary school is 60% Asian.
2023  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: January 03, 2015, 05:05:24 AM
But I think by 2032 (perhaps as early as 2024), China and Asia will fracture away from control and emerge with bottom-up high performance in the Knowledge Age.
...
China and Asia will rise, because they have more human capital and their economies aren't burdened with the political dead weight of an aging population that is not able to make the waterfall transition and $trillions of promises to boomers.

Asia may peak in 2030s but that peak looks to be transient and fleeting. The US Census Bureau predicts that China’s population will peak in 2026. At that point its labor force will shrink, and its over-65 population will more than double over the next 20 years, from 115 million to 240 million. It will age very rapidly. Only Japan has aged faster. By 2030, China will have a slightly higher proportion of the population that is elderly than Western Europe does today.

China's population is expected to stay relatively flat over the coming years peak at around 1.4 billion around 2026 and decline to around 1.3 billion by 2050. In contrast the US is expected to grow from 0.31 billion today to 0.4 billion in 2050. In 2050. The US will be the younger and growing country and the boomers and their pensions will be long gone.

https://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/ (US 2050 Population Projection)
http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/informationGateway.php (China 2050 Population Projection)



the knowledge workers will run away from the USA when it turns draconian when the economy implodes after 2016 and the totalitarian expropriation of wealth goes into hyperdrive.

I disagree in fact I think you have this backwards. The US is best positioned to resist/slow the advance of socialism. Its strong libertarian streak will help as will its open source and IT movements which will work to mitigate government strangulation of needed technology. Its ethnic diversity is also protective as there is good evidence that ethnic diversity creates a natural resistance to the progressive creep of the welfare state. Ethnically homogenous countries are more vulnerable.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2006/10/diversity_or_the_welfare_state

Agreed china is likely to throw off communism eventually but when they do their aging population, ethnic homogeneity and tradition of respect for elders will rapidly take down the road to a European style welfare state. Rather than flee the US the current influx of IT and knowledge workers will accelerate as knowledge workers flee their home countries for the flawed but relative safety of the US.  
2024  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 31, 2014, 04:43:10 AM
Your philosophical argument above is an oversimplification in that statism is itself natural.

What is unnatural is the Tragedy of the Commons when the statism grows beyond the Dunbar limit that human tribes were historically equipped to live in. In the primitive, post-paleozoic, hunter-gatherer time period, natural forces (feedback loop) prevented statism from outgrowing the Dunbar limit.

All I am proposing is we use technology to restore the feedback loop, i.e. to give the individual sovereignty to opt out of non-local community taxation. Thus restoring our Contentionism. We will not be anonymous in our local communities where our physical presence is.

I envision local, townhall direct hands on government (where you know every body within your Dunbar number limit) will be the surviving and thriving form of limited government that I envision will be enabled and sustained by the paradigm I promoted in my prior 3 posts.
I can dream can't I?

It is a beautiful dream.

It can even do the community welfare more optimally.

Contagion I believe we are in agreement.

However, as we discussed previously socialism is likely to overshoot before it stabilizes in diminishing role. Anonymity is unlikely to rise sufficiently fast enough to limit this overshoot. The near term future (our lifetimes) will probably consist of a progressive and unrelenting move towards centralized one world government.  

my thesis is that knowledge isn't fungible and can't be financed, thus it really can't be centralized and controlled and thus the government must eradicate the Knowledge Age if the government is to survive. In short, there is war ahead and only one side can survive. If the government wins, humanity loses.

I hope there is no war. If anonymity and cryptocurrency actually grew fast enough to limit the overshoot of socialism then such a conflict might be inevitable. However, if it grows more slowly then such a conflict need not necessarily occur.  

It is better not to attack a doomed but still strong system in a frontal assault. A superior choice is to quietly prepare for a transition to be implemented when that system is on its deathbed. Communism was not defeated by the west it defeated itself. Similarly socialism will not be defeated by anonymity it will defeat itself. Anonymity and cryptocurrency are simply tools to accelerate, smooth and facilitate the transition to a predetermined outcome. I believe the coming socialist overshoot is a necessary prerequisite for the transition to a better system. The road we are on may end at your dream but it winds through NWO.
2025  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 31, 2014, 02:13:05 AM
ultimately boils down to two different issues and a single solution won't work for both.
Anonymity is a shield, not a sword; it will be used to protect innocents and criminals equally in the same capacity. Since there are so many more innocent people potentially in need of protection from oppression/coercion than there are criminals who would use anonymity as an advantage, the societal cost/benefit ratio of anonymity is heavily slanted in favor of the innocent members of society.
Tracking the financial history of every person like some kind of "overseer" may reduce these types of crimes but potentially at the highest cost imaginable.

I agree 100%. However, it is theoretically possible that in some distant future, a future where government is tamed and no longer a threat the cost/benefit ratio will flip and it will be in society’s best interest to tame anonymity to the point where it can be breached in the event of crime. Hence my remarks that I hope we someday progress to the point where we outgrow the need for anonymity. I do not expect that future to exist in the next several generations if ever.    

That's another advantage of anonymity... What exactly would the state "come down hard" on when the state would be unable to determine if the anonymous instrument had been used at all by a specific individual or business? The function of anonymity is to protect the user from the state or any other third party who desires to control or restrict market freedom... They may as well write laws against it, but those laws would be no more enforceable or provable than writing a law against "impure thoughts." The only way to prove that the law had been violated would be by confession or personal record since true anonymity would leave no useful evidence behind...

It is easy for government to crush or at least severely suppress an anonymous currency in the physical economy. Attaching long prison times for accepting payment in said currency and then sending out lots of undercover agents who try to buy things would do the trick.

It is in the digital realm, however, where the seller does not have to physically deliver goods but can anonymously deliver data/analysis/programming that anonymity becomes very difficult for governments to deal with.  The thesis is that overtime this digital/knowledge economy will grow to dominate the overall economy while the physical economy progressively shrinks into relative insignificance.

Firstly, I philosophically do not agree that which is natural is a cost for society. I believe the antithesis is the truth, which is that statism attempts to enforce unnatural outcomes[2], which is huge cost on society because nature always wins in the end.
But more saliently, as usual is appears you don't view the issue holistically and only look at one of the vectors that the new paradigm changes.

I agree that my analysis of the negative vector of crime is not holistic and does not weigh the potential gains of anonymity. However, it would be disingenuous to claim that all vectors introduced by anonymity are positive ones. When looked at holistically I agree the overall benefits of anonymity outweigh the costs. Nevertheless there are costs. It is the responsibility of those seeking to introduce new vectors into society to analyze their negative aspects and (to the degree possible) mitigate them.  

Your philosophical argument above is an oversimplification in that statism is itself natural. It arises spontaneously from any group of interacting individuals. Statist suppression of behavior deemed aberrant or detrimental to group survival is also natural and spontaneously occurring. Over time on a macro level statism can and sometimes does dictate what is natural. If statist pressure is significant enough and maintained over a long enough time horizon aberrance is reduced and in certain instances can even be driven to extinction.

I envision local, townhall direct hands on government (where you know every body within your Dunbar number limit) will be the surviving and thriving form of limited government that I envision will be enabled and sustained by the paradigm I promoted in my prior 3 posts.
I can dream can't I?]

It is a beautiful dream.
2026  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Oil hits new low as Opec price war deepens slump on: December 31, 2014, 12:16:41 AM
$57 by Dec. 31, exactly as Armstrong had predicted...

A useful data point if it can be confirmed. He predicted this when exactly and where. The two links were posted on December 29th and December 30th.
2027  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 29, 2014, 02:27:57 AM
So let Armstrong have his NWO bullshit...I can't believe he is this dumb... Either he knows this, or is just incredibly fucking naive.

As with so many things with Mr. Armstrong there is insufficient information to make an informed judgment. I would not be at all surprised if his prediction of a downturn in late 2015 is correct although I would note that others are also predicting the same. He also is obviously intelligent and has a firm grasp of ancient history. In regards to his claim to be a market oracle, however, and his offer to sell investor’s access to his spectacular AI that can predict the market I remain skeptical.      


Contracts shouldn't be designed to require the courts for restitution. This drives collectivism as you duly noted.

There will always be a need for dispute resolution and mediation in contracts. It is impossible to fully remove this need. Although it is certainly possible to mitigates the state’s role via private judges/arbitrators the best that can be achieved here is minimization.  

Pedophilia, rape, murder, assassination have been going on since Mesopotamia. Communications were always anonymous in the past. You want a 666 control system to try to stop what has always existed and you will get instead your nirvana of megadeath.

Anonymous internet communication doesn't make it more difficult to hunt down individuals as compared to the way it was done before the internet. There was always anonymous money and transactions in the past. Whereas, if we give the State the power to make all transactions trackable in the imminent switch over to digital currency, we will surely all die in megadeath 666.

Two separate issues here. 1) Is there a social cost to adding unbreakable anonymity in monetary transactions? 2) Is the cost worth the benefits?

It is true that such crimes are ancient ones. However, it is also true that the creation of a marketplace where such activities can be financed in absolute anonymity will lead to an increase in said activity.  

Ask yourself this question. If everyone in the world was suddenly gifted with your current understanding of fiat, cryptocurrency, socialism and its dangers would you want anonymity in a world currency? The answer in my opinion is no. In such a admittedly very unrealistic scenario there would be no need for anonymity as the populace would vote to dismantle the foundations of fiat based socialism. There would be no justification for facilitating the aberrant social behavior that unbreakable anonymity helps hide.

Now obviously that is a completely unrealistic scenario. However, I believe it demonstrates why the long term solution to this problem is education and where that fails natural selection. Anonymity is a useful means to protect individuals until society progresses to the point where it can be safely set aside.

Internet anonymity is nothing like burying gold coins. It doesn't have to be cumbersome nor cost more (but there is a lot of programming work that needs to be done to make it so). It doesn't have to decline the velocity of money and can in fact increase the velocity which has been collapsing, by providing an outlet for the private sector to grow and interrupt without the oppression of the State.

Perhaps but this has yet to be proven. Certainly nothing that exists today meets this criteria. The state is likely to come down hard on an anonymous cryptocurrency if it starts to gain traction. That alone will increase the cost of using it.
2028  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 29, 2014, 02:19:02 AM
Resources pushing out from the centre? Care to elaborate? Sounds like sunlight, or some low-entropy state bathing everyone with excess energy, in which case the flow should be instantaneous unless there's friction. You seem to be complaining that the friction doesn't start at the skin of the organism, rather it starts somewhere outside, feeding a layer of bureaucratic fat. IMO a much bigger disruption than 3d printers and related individual knowledge creation tools, would be a breakthrough with domestic LENR/cold fusion/whatever ultra-safe and abundant energy that bypasses the oil and gas giants. Then you get your reversal.

This was amusing blablahblah but also vacuous and noncontributory.
2029  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: December 29, 2014, 01:20:37 AM
The problem is the progressive growth of socialism...
What is needed is a negative feedback mechanism to check this growth. Perhaps a combination of sound money, elimination of fractional reserve, and outlawing government debt would be sufficient? In such a system the government would actually have to tax for every new program creating the potential for true opposition from those opposed to taxes.
Quote from: contagion
Money is a language for exchanging value. In open source we are saving in acquired (personal and collective) knowledge and reputation, thus a language of value exchange.
Proof-of-work solved the Byzantine Generals Problem so in theory inverted the location of power in a monetary system moving it from the collective center to the individuals at the ends of the network, leaving only dumb protocol agents in the center — the end-to-end principle.

The individuals unleashed from that horrific Iron Law, are now free to vote with their value to walk away from initiatives (e.g. Paypal or Coinbase loaning in Bitcoin fractional reserves offchain) that debase the knowledge value in a decentralized cryptocurrency.

This is why I am so interested in cryptocurrency. In theory cryptocurrency has the potential to restore sound money. It also makes fractional reserve more difficult and obvious.

US history provides a living example that the forces that drive socialism are not easily checked. In the 1830s we had sound money (gold), no government debt, no taxes (except tariffs on foreign imports), and after no central bank. Compared to the government of today it was a libertarian dream. Yet despite these advantages and despite a constitution specifically written to limit government we morphed into what we are today.

Quote from: Andrew Jackson veto of the Maysville Road Bill 1830
Through the favor of an overruling and indulgent Providence our country is blessed with a general prosperity and our citizens exempted from the pressure of taxation, which other less favored portions of the human family are obliged to bear.... How gratifying the effect of presenting to the world the sublime spectacle of a Republic of more than 12,000,000 happy people, in the fifty-fourth year of her existence, after having passed through two protracted wars — one for the acquisition and the other for the maintenance of liberty — free from debt and all her immense resources unfettered!

There will always be forces that seek to debase sound money, initiate fractional reserve, and encourage government debt. These actions are all highly profitable to individuals and special interests while their cost is distributed over society as a whole.  This is the Iron Law as mentioned above and essentially a tragedy of the commons scenario with the commons being sustainable government.         
2030  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 23, 2014, 02:06:54 PM
every single law would be in a civil contract format, no law shall be forced on anyone, based on the anarchist voluntarist principles.
...
Its just that easy

I think that you severely underestimate the potential in the human race

Sorry BitcoinFreak12 your world fails for the same reason that communism fails (an utter misunderstanding of human nature).

The communists had a beautiful dream too. If only the workers of the world unite and throw off their chains and we will all have such an abundance of goods. Development with be unfettered with productive forces so great everyone's needs will be met. From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs. A perfect world.  Roll Eyes

Starry eyed blind faith in the wonders of human benevolence and potential will lead you right where it took the communists... megadeath and Stalin.
2031  Other / Politics & Society / Re: WHO and UNICEF Secretly Sterilizing Women in Poor Nations? on: December 22, 2014, 12:10:56 PM
Doesn't sound like proof for me.

A confirmed finding of hCG in the vaccine is definitive proof. However, it is possible that the catholic doctors are lying or that the lab was incompetent. That is why I left the ? in the topic title.

The preponderance of the currently available evidence, however, is strongly on the side of the catholic doctors.


This should be a pretty big story by rights I think.  In fact, 'Google news' has no entries since the beginning of the month, and information on what happened after the joint investigation was supposed to have occurred is interestingly quite MIA.  That in and of itself is suspicious to me.  It's not the first time I've seen such a thing recently.  Me thinks that the free flow of information problem is being successfully addressed and/or news outlets are being brought well to heal.

I agree and would be very interested to know how this was accomplished.
2032  Other / Politics & Society / Re: WHO and UNICEF Secretly Sterilizing Women in Poor Nations? on: December 22, 2014, 11:52:10 AM
It's a speculations. Do you have the proof?
Right now in kenya birth rate are very high.

There should never be beta hCG in a tetanus vaccine. If it is there then the vaccine is not a simple tetanus vaccine. The catholic bishops claim they sent six samples of the vaccine for testing to labs in south africa and all came back positive for beta hCG.

The dosing patter is also highly suspicious. The tetnus vaccine is typically administered to infants of both genders and not limited to women of childbearing age. The burden of proof in this case is on the WHO to prove they were administering the traditional vaccine. The deafening silence from the WHO is quite telling. Why have they not explicitly and publically denied the doctors claims? Someone is attempting to mislead the public here. Do you think that is the catholic doctor's association or the WHO?

If this is confirmed it will trigger a major backlash against all vaccinations in poor countries. Thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of people may die from easily preventable diseases.
2033  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 22, 2014, 04:25:43 AM
I will admit that my argument that the decline in population growth is primarily due to contraceptive use and not related to the state and socialism is significantly undermined by the following.

The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

Quote
According to LifeSiteNews, a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
 
The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.
 
The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.
 
The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen

Some background medical information. The tetanus toxoid provokes a strong and immediate immune response in humans. It has historically been conjugated with other agents to make vaccines against those agents. For example Haemophilus influenza a leading cause of childhood meningitis does not produce much of a protective immune response when given to children by itself but when injected along with the tetanus toxoid it produces a powerful and protective immune response. Similarly it is possible to provoke an immune response to other things by attaching them to the tetanus toxoid.

Notably it is possible to make a pregnancy vaccine by coupling the tetanus toxoid to Beta hCG.
Beta hCG is the same molecule measured in over the counter urine pregnancy tests and is required to sustaine early pregnancy. By coupling the tetanus toxoid with beta-hCG you can create antibodies to hCG that prevent pregnancy.

This "vaccine" was developed in 1997 and is called the HSD-hCG. As of 1997 this prevented pregnancy for 6 months but required booster shots every six months as the vaccine lost effect as the immune response died down.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9083611

Furthermore according to thinktwice.com there have been similar "tetanus vaccination campaigns" in both Mexico, Nicaragua, and the Philippines. What is very odd about these campaigns is that they are reported to only target women between the ages of 15 and 45. Men and children are reportedly not vaccinated.

The traditional tetanus vaccine is administered primarily to children. Below is the recommended dosing schedule for the tetanus vaccine which is called TDaP because it is coupled with Diphtheria and Pertussis.

DTaP vaccine recommended dosage.
1.   First dose at 2 months
2.   Second dose at 4 months
3.   Third dose at 6 months
4.   Fourth dose at 15 to 18 months
5.   Fifth dose at 4 to 6 years
6.   Sixth dose is recommended at 11 years
7.   Tetanus booster is recommended every 10 years thereafter next dose recommended age 22

It makes no sense to administer a tetanus vaccine only to women age 15-45. It is young children who are most at risk from tetanus and both women and men are equally at risk.

Also damming is the surprisingly vague WHO statement that was released as a result of this controversy.
http://outbreaknewstoday.com/who-statement-on-tetanus-vaccine-there-is-no-hcg-hormone-in-tetanus-toxoid-vaccines-74153/
The statement basically says that the tetanus vaccine is safe and does not contain beta hCG. But reading between the lines this statement is not an explicit denial. What is claimed by the bishops to have been administered is not the tetanus vaccine but something entirely different the antifertility vaccine HSD-hCG. The statement issued by the WHO does not deny that HSD-hCG was given to Kenyan women. There also seems to be a strange lack of interest by the Kenyan government.


I have also let the message board distract me way too much and will try to go quiet for a while.  
2034  Other / Politics & Society / WHO and UNICEF Secretly Sterilizing Women in Poor Nations? on: December 22, 2014, 04:16:07 AM
The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

Quote
According to LifeSiteNews, a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
 
The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.
 
The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.
 
The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen

Some background medical information. The tetanus toxoid provokes a strong and immediate immune response in humans. It has historically been conjugated with other agents to make vaccines against those agents. For example Haemophilus influenza a leading cause of childhood meningitis does not produce much of a protective immune response when given to children by itself but when injected along with the tetanus toxoid it produces a powerful and protective immune response. Similarly it is possible to provoke an immune response to other things by attaching them to the tetanus toxoid.

Notably it is possible to make a pregnancy vaccine by coupling the tetanus toxoid to Beta hCG.
Beta hCG is the same molecule measured in over the counter urine pregnancy tests and is required to sustaine early pregnancy. By coupling the tetanus toxoid with beta-hCG you can create antibodies to hCG that prevent pregnancy.

This "vaccine" was developed in 1997 and is called the HSD-hCG. As of 1997 this prevented pregnancy for 6 months but required booster shots every six months as the vaccine lost effect as the immune response died down.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9083611

Furthermore according to thinktwice.com there have been similar "tetanus vaccination campaigns" in both Mexico, Nicaragua, and the Philippines. What is very odd about these campaigns is that they are reported to only target women between the ages of 15 and 45. Men and children are reportedly not vaccinated.

The traditional tetanus vaccine is administered primarily to children. Below is the recommended dosing schedule for the tetanus vaccine which is called TDaP because it is coupled with Diphtheria and Pertussis.

DTaP vaccine recommended dosage.
1.   First dose at 2 months
2.   Second dose at 4 months
3.   Third dose at 6 months
4.   Fourth dose at 15 to 18 months
5.   Fifth dose at 4 to 6 years
6.   Sixth dose is recommended at 11 years
7.   Tetanus booster is recommended every 10 years thereafter next dose recommended age 22

It makes no sense to administer a tetanus vaccine only to women age 15-45. It is young children who are most at risk from tetanus and both women and men are equally at risk.

Also damming is the surprisingly vague WHO statement that was released as a result of this controversy.
http://outbreaknewstoday.com/who-statement-on-tetanus-vaccine-there-is-no-hcg-hormone-in-tetanus-toxoid-vaccines-74153/
The statement basically says that the tetanus vaccine is safe and does not contain beta hCG. But reading between the lines this statement is not an explicit denial. What is claimed by the bishops to have been administered is not the tetanus vaccine but something entirely different the antifertility vaccine HSD-hCG. The statement issued by the WHO does not deny that HSD-hCG was given to Kenyan women. There also seems to be a strange lack of interest by the Kenyan government.
2035  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Devastation on: December 21, 2014, 11:18:09 PM
Fractional reserve banking is not without its advantages. If high reserves on deposits were made mandatory, banks would need to charge a huge spread on their loans to ensure that the return on capital is acceptable.
Untrue nothing prevents banks from making a conservative living via time deposits.

That is false when you consider all the externalities. It is only true isolated in vitro (in theory), not in vivo (in reality).

Not only do you not consider the opportunity cost of being eaten by larger fish when not being the one who captures the power vacuum of the Realpolitik (by creating fractional reserves, etc.), but you also don't consider the fact that when all money is loaned, then the money supply must increase at the aggregate level of interest in the economy, else the debt can't be paid. So mathematically those are two reasons that fractional reserves must exist and will always exist.
...
I had already explained my only hope on a solution to this dilemma, which is based on the concept that the masses will always be wrong and must be sacrificed by creating new frontiers for those who sit higher on the bell curve of evolutionary IQ. The banksters think they sit higher on the evolutionary IQ, but I think they would perish in a terminal spiral Dark Age without the knowledge creators who create the technological frontiers that renew humanity.

(missed this post earlier)

Even in the extreme case of a world with a completely fixed money supply (absolutely no inflation) loans could still be made without fractional reserve if the enterprise was productive enough. Someone with a good business idea could make a profit and pay back the loan. Obviously money in such a world could not be debt based fiat as it is today.

I agree there would be a very strong push by large actors to capture the system and revoke any prohibition on fractional reserve in such a world. Those same forces sunk the Chicago plan in the 1930s in favor shifting all the debt obligations onto government. As the masses are currently blind to the economic forces at work a prohibition of fractional reserve currently impossible.  

Quote from: contagion
Thus the people are blind to the mechanism which is enslaving them and reducing their prosperity. Thus, since they will not change the mechanism, centralization of governance will grow stronger from the current financial crisis, and will diminish only when the involved organisms perish.

The masses will either learn or perish and be replaced by wiser masses. Hopefully that process will involve a lot more learning and education and a lot less perishing. I can think of little reason why our wiser and more educated descendants will tolerate fractional reserve.

Major social changes take time and generations to accomplish. From the time when the first modern state Iceland abolished slavery in 1117 to Saudi Arabia which abolished slavery in 1962 it took over 800 years to largely eliminate the practice. Hopefully eliminating fractional reserve won't take that long. In the short run we can only watch the current trajectory play itself and protect ourselves from the fallout. To this end OROBTC's advice above is excellent.
2036  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 21, 2014, 09:44:42 PM
(The post below was copied from http://www.theburningplatform.com/2014/12/11/should-you-believe-what-they-tell-you-or-what-you-see/)

SHOULD YOU BELIEVE WHAT THEY TELL YOU OR WHAT YOU SEE?

The BLS reported 321,000 jobs added in November and the unemployment rate at 5.8%. Jobs are plentiful, based upon these statistics.

A skeptical critical thinking individual might ask a few questions or point out a few inconvenient facts the government purveyors of propaganda might not want us to ponder:

The non-manipulated, non-seasonally adjusted number of jobs in November FELL by 270,000. The BLS added 600,000 jobs as an adjustment to achieve the headline grabbing result.
If the jobs market is so good, why is the labor participation rate at a 30 year low of 62.8%?
Since 2007 the number of working age Americans has risen by 17 million, while the number of employed has risen by less than 1 million, but the unemployment rate is about the same.
Why would almost 14 million working age Americans leave the labor force since 2007 if the economy is booming and jobs plentiful, with 1.2 million leaving in the last 12 months?
Why would payroll tax receipts be flat with last year if millions of new jobs have been created?
If the country has really added 8 million jobs since 2010, how could real median household income FALL by 2.3%?



According to the government reported figures, the economy hasn’t been this strong since 2007. GDP has supposedly grown at greater than 4% over the last two quarters.

Anyone who is sentient knows consumer spending accounts for 68% of GDP. Capital investments that lead to long term prosperity continue to decline as a percentage of GDP from 20% in 2000 to 16% today. We’ve chosen consumption and financialization over savings and investment. This fact leads to some observations:

If GDP has actually grown by 20% since 2008 how does this correlate with a 6.9% decline in real median household income?
GDP has been goosed by a $69 billion increase in government spending, with the majority going to the military industrial complex. ISIS has been a godsend for our GDP and arms dealer profits.
GDP was increased retroactively by $500 billion last year based on a new way the government accounts for intangibles.
The surge in consumer expenditures over the last two quarters has been in the purchase of services. The higher costs for Obamacare are a boon for GDP. Are they a boon for your bank account?
The trade deficit has fallen as exports of petroleum products have temporarily provided a boost to GDP. The collapse in oil prices will reverse that trend rapidly.

According to the quasi-governmental mouthpieces at the Conference Board, consumer confidence is near a 5 year high, reflecting what should be robust spending.

So we are told by the representatives of corporatism that we are confident about the economy and the future. How does that measure up to the facts on the ground:

Black Friday weekend sales collapsed by 11% versus the previous year. As the pundits tried to blame it on on-line sales (10% of total retail sales), Cyber Monday also proved to be a dud.
If the average person is confident about the future and happy with their economic circumstances, why did they just vote to throw out the bums in November?
If consumers are confident, why have real retail sales, excluding subprime debt goosed auto sales, been flat for the last three months and up only 1% in the last year?
If consumers are so confident, why are credit card balances still $138 billion BELOW where they were in 2008? If all these new jobs are being created why is credit card debt lower than it was in mid-2010? Maybe consumers are so desperate they are using credit cards to pay utility and tax bills and not using them for frivolous Chinese crap at big box retailers.
The increased spending at grocery stores and restaurants is driven by food inflation, not foot traffic. Discretionary spending at furniture, electronics, and sporting goods stores is flat.
Department store sales continue to fall. Sears and JC Penney teeter on the verge of bankruptcy. Delia’s is liquidating and Radio Shack isn’t far behind. The major chains have completely stopped building new stores. The great bricks and mortar unwind relentlessly plods forward. In addition, online growth is stalling as states implement sales taxes.

According to the government, the deficit was ONLY $483 billion in 2014.

This is a real doozy. Obama has been touting how he has cut the deficit through his wise management of the budget. This is where government accounting is used by apparatchiks to mislead the public and obscure the truth. A few pertinent facts are always left out by the politicians touting deficit reduction:

Because of the budget impasse in 2013, the Federal government stopped updating the national debt on a daily basis, but we know from when they started counting again, the debt went up by $2.3 billion per day. Therefore, the national debt on October 1, 2013 was approximately $17.038 trillion. On October 1, 2014 the national debt was $17.875. Therefore, the national debt went up by $837 billion in 2014. Just a smidge higher than the reported deficit of $483 billion.
Interest is not paid on reported deficits. It’s paid on the national debt, so the massaged, manipulated and made over deficit is meaningless. The national debt was always slightly higher than reported deficits, but in the last few years the deviation has grown to a Grand Canyon size.
The deficit number has been artificially lowered by nothing other than accounting entry hocus pocus. The Federal Reserve increasing its balance sheet to $4 trillion out of thin air creates approximately $80 billion of phantom interest profits that are paid to the Treasury. Why don’t they increase their balance sheet to $40 trillion and eliminate deficits all together?
The biggest accounting scam is Fannie and Freddie. Just as the Wall Street banks have created fake profits through accounting entries regarding future losses, Fannie and Freddie have gone the extra mile in helping fake deficit reduction. These bloated insolvent government run pigs required a $187 billion taxpayer bailout in 2009. Amazingly, when you allow criminals to value their assets at whatever they choose, phantom profits flow like honey.
These two horribly run institutions of fraud “generated profits” of $129 billion in 2014 which were “paid back” to the Treasury. That is four times more than Apple or Exxon’s profits during a non-existent housing recovery. Why are their stocks trading at just over $2 per share if they are generating vastly more profits than they were in 2007 when their stocks were north of $70 per share? It’s because the profits are fake. Everyone knows it, but the Federal Deficit is reported $129 billion lower because these insolvent entities pretended to pay the taxpayer back. Accounting entries do not reduce deficits. Spending less than you generate in revenues reduces deficits.

According to the government, we’ve experienced a strong housing recovery since 2010.

The supposed housing recovery storyline continues to be beaten like a dead horse by the Wall Street media (CNBC) and the shills at the NAR. Anyone with a functioning brain (eliminates CNBC bimbos, hacks, and Ivy League economists) can see there has been no real housing recovery:

The 24% rise in home prices (Case Shiller Index) since the 2012 low has been nothing more than a Wall Street hedge fund/Federal Reserve scheme to elevate prices and make Wall Street bank balance sheets less insolvent. Wall Street banks withholding foreclosures from the market while Wall Street hedge funds (Blackstone) use free money from the Fed to buy up housing and rent it out to former homeowners has enriched the .1% while destroying the dream of home ownership for millions.
The percent of first time home buyers remains near record lows, while speculators, flippers, hedge fund managers, and rich Chinese businessmen make up a record number of purchasers. The fact this is a fake housing recovery is proven by mortgage applications to purchase a home sitting at 1995 levels and 30% below 2009 recession lows. Maybe the fact real median household income is also at 1995 levels, real wages keep declining, and labor force participation is at 1978 levels has something to do with real people not being able to purchase a home.



Even with the artificial hedge fund demand, existing home sales are lower than 2013 and languishing at 1999 levels. They are still 25% below 2005 levels, despite the lowest mortgage rates in history. New home sales are a disaster, with no appreciable increase in two years. Apartment construction has far outpaced single family housing construction. After a five year housing recovery, new home sales languish at levels seen at the bottom of our last six recessions. New home sales are 65% below the 2005 peak and at levels seen in the early 1960’s when there were 130 million less people living in the country.



According to the corporate media, the auto market is hitting on all cylinders with annual sales of 16.4 million, the highest since 2006.

Pretending to sell automobiles to people without the means to pay you for the automobile is always a good business idea. Of course, when you have Ally Financial and the rest of the Wall Street banking cabal doling out 7 year 0% loans and subprime auto loans like candy, it’s easy to move inventory. The temporary boost to GDP by issuing more bad debt always works out in the long run. Right?

If the auto business is booming why have GM profits fallen from $9.2 billion in 2011 to $5.4 billion in 2013, and on course to fall to $4 billion in 2014? Record levels of channel stuffing produces sales gains, but no profits. Why is their stock 25% below its 52 week high and lower than it was in 2010 when it was IPO’d after being rescued by Obama?
If the auto business is booming why are Ford’s profits falling by 35% versus last year and lower than they were in 2010? Why is their stock price 16% below its 52 week high and still 20% below its 2010 price?
Auto loan debt is at an all-time high of $950 billion, up 33% since 2010 when the Fed, Wall Street, and the political class in the fetid D.C. swamp decided they needed new debt bubbles in auto loans and student loans to jump start our moribund economy.
There are 65 million auto loans outstanding, and the average debt now stands at $17,352. Over 30% of auto “sales” are actually leases. The rest are financed over an average of 65 months. Virtually all new car sales are nothing more than 3 to 7 year rentals. It’s amazing what easy money from the Fed can produce.
Over 31% of all new auto loans this year were to subprime borrowers. They now account for 36.5% of all outstanding auto loans. You become a subprime borrower by defaulting on previous debt obligations. In a shocking development, auto loan delinquencies surged by 13% in the last quarter, with subprime loan delinquencies skyrocketing by 18%. When has issuing billions of debt to subprime borrowers ever caused problems before?
Only a University of Phoenix African Studies major is more of a subprime risk than the millions of ecstatic Escalade drivers cruising around our urban ghetto paradises. The average student loan debt is now $33,000. Until the Obama administration went Keynesian, student loan debt was primarily in the private sector. When Obama entered the White House total student loan debt was $620 billion and delinquencies totaled $50 billion. There are now $1.3 trillion of student loans outstanding, with the Federal government accounting for $830 billion and guaranteeing a large portion of the rest. Delinquencies have skyrocketed to $125 billion, as another taxpayer bailout beckons.

According to the corporate mainstream media pundits, the plunge in oil prices from $100 per barrel to $61 per barrel is unequivocally good for the economy. The shale oil boom has worked its magic and happy times are here again.

Sometimes you have to wonder whether the highly educated spokesmodels on the corporate mainstream media are really as vacuous and clueless as they appear or whether they are just paid to look pretty and mouth the corporate line. They seem incapable of comprehending the unintended consequences of various events. The collapse in oil prices is one of those events.

There is no doubt that lower oil prices will lower the price of gas for the average American. Estimates say they will save $368 per year, which can be spent elsewhere. The highly paid shill economists who declare this will boost spending seem to be math challenged. Retail sales figures include gas stations. What isn’t spent there will be spent in another category, most likely healthcare or groceries as prices in both areas continue to escalate. It’s a zero sum game. No new spending will occur.
The worldwide supply of oil has only increased marginally over the last few years. The U.S. shale boom has been offset by declines elsewhere (Libya, Iran, Mexico). The reason for the collapse is the same reason for the 2009 collapse – worldwide demand is contracting. Europe is in a depression. Japan is in a depression. Russia’s economy is contracting. China is decelerating rapidly. The U.S. demand is flat. The implications of another global recession after five years of central banks printing trillions of fiat currency are alarming to say the least.
The cost to extract shale oil and transport it to a refinery capable of processing it is high. Honest analysts will tell you that a price of $70 to $80 is required to breakeven. Most companies don’t build breakeven into their plans. Bakken shale oil sells at a discount of about $14 per barrel due to the difficulty of extraction, transport, and processing. It is now selling for $47 per barrel. The number of permits for new rigs fell by 40% in November when oil was still selling for $75 per barrel. Do you think permits for new wells will fall at a price of $61 per barrel? Capital spending by the energy industry accounted for 33% of all capital spending in the last few years. I’m sure some other industry will pick up the slack. Right?
It seems the shale oil boom has resulted in a few jobs being created since the 2010 recession trough. In fact the states where fracking is prevalent have accounted for all the job growth in the nation. I wonder if a shale oil bust will have any employment implications. There are 9.3 million jobs related to the energy industry across the country. The plunge in oil prices created by Saudi Arabia in the 1980s created a depression in Texas which contributed to the S&L crisis. This plunge will reveal who has been swimming naked in the high yield bond market and derivatives market.



These are just a few examples among a multitude of lies. Others include: stocks aren’t overvalued, gold isn’t money, inflation is good for you, and ISIS terrorists are an imminent threat to your way of life. Every feel good story fed to the masses by the oligarchs running this shitshow we call America is no different than the propaganda doled out by other infamous totalitarian regimes throughout history. We believe things because we’ve been conditioned to believe them. The crony capitalist oligarchs are intelligent enough to invent theories to explain how the world should work, but not intelligent enough to interpret their models correctly. When they act on their theories (Keynesianism), their actions appear to be those of a lunatic. Despite all evidence refuting their theories, their arrogance and hubris lead them to destruction. The collective insanity of this world is almost too much for a rational thinking person to grasp. The extremely wealthy men operating in the shadows will use every means at their disposal to retain power, enhance their wealth, and crush dissent.

Quote
“Being a card carrying member of the privileged class means never having to say I’m sorry, much less ‘not guilty.’  Power is doing what you want when you want, and consequences are for everyone else. Or perhaps these titans of modern industry and the halls of power are at heart just good natured bumblers, who in a genuine belief destroy lives and crash economies, while pursuing insane ideological assumption put forward by vested interests, all the while stuffing their pockets, and crushing all dissent with the political skills of a Machiavelli and the ruthlessness of Al Capone.” – Jesse

The two party system is nothing but a ruse designed to keep the people believing they have a say in how things are run in this country. Both parties support the military industrial complex. Both parties support the militarization of police forces around the country. Both parties support the mass surveillance of its citizens. Both parties do the bidding of their rich corporate and special interest benefactors. Both parties favor deficit spending for eternity. Both parties believe the government should expand its role in our everyday lives. Both parties do the bidding for and protect the Wall Street interests who really run this country. No more proof is needed than what has occurred over the last five years, as criminal Wall Street bankers were rewarded for their malfeasance with trillions of dollars from taxpayers and their puppets at the Federal Reserve. While we were allowing ourselves to be distracted, amused, entertained, and indebted, the oligarchs were busy conducting a silent coup.

Quote
“Let’s be clear about this, the oligarchs are flush with victory, and feel that they are firmly in control, able to subvert and direct any popular movement to the support of their own fascist ends and unslakable will to power.

This is the contempt in which they hold the majority of American people and the political process: the common people are easily led fools, and everyone else who is smart enough to know better has their price. And they would beggar every middle class voter in the US before they will voluntarily give up one dime of their ill-gotten gains.

But my model says that the oligarchs will continue to press their advantages, being flushed with victory, until they provoke a strong reaction that frightens everyone, like a wake-up call, and the tide then turns to genuine reform.” – Simon Johnson

The oligarchs have had a good run. The system cannot be reformed from within. The corruption runs too deep. The system is broken and can’t be fixed. There is no doubt in my mind that a collapse approaches which will make 2008/2009 look like a walk in the park. The anger, blame and retribution will sweep away the existing social order and replace it with something new. It will be up to the people to decide what happens next. We were warned two centuries ago by a wise man. Hopefully, we’ll get a 2nd chance.

Quote
“However political parties may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.” – George Washington
2037  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 21, 2014, 08:03:45 PM
When the State removes the effects of the free market and attempts to establish women as equal to men (which they are not), then fertility and society collapse. Watch 2016 onwards the horrific outcome...

I agree that women are not equal to men. Women are more compassionate, more loving, more social, and more self sacrificing. A strong argument can be made that they are the superior subgroup.

You fell for propaganda. It's pretty much the other way around or equal in some cases. They are not more compassionate and loving, I would say they are... more violent. Self sacrificing? I mean where do you get this stuff, Hollywood?

Men, women, and murder: gender-specific differences in rates of fatal violence and victimization. Journal of Trauma 1992
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1635092

Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports data on homicides in the United States between 1976 and 1987 was analyzed.
Although women comprise more than half the U.S. population, they committed only 14.7% of the homicides noted during the study interval.
2038  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 21, 2014, 07:20:09 PM
Most pandemics occur when a pathogen jumps a species barrier to a new host (humans) that are not adapted to it. Such a process should be random and follow a Poisson distribution. The expected time between pandemics should therefore follow an exponential distribution. I am skeptical of the validity of a cyclical model predicting a definitive pandemic date.

It is not likely random because I explained how it was likely man's economy that caused the Black Death, because of the overconcentration of fleas and squalor in proximity to humans, because over the overpopulation meant less than a subsistence wage for agriculture meant the Industrial Age did not occur yet meant that squalor was worse
,,,
Have you looked at the overcrowded, inhumane way we farm raise poultry and other farm animals?


I agree that that economic collapse and overpopulation could lead to worsening squalor increased contact with infected animals and increased chance of a pathogen jumping the species barrier. If economic collapse and downturns occurred cyclically that could introduce a cyclic increase in jump probability and the Poisson distribution would not hold.

However, all that would mean is that there would be times of increased risk of a pandemic and times of lesser risk. A higher probability is no guarantee that such a pathogen will jump. The Jump itself would still be a random process. It seems ridiculous to me for anyone to claim there is definitively going to be a pandemic in 2018. The only way to know that with certainly would be if you were the one introducing the pandemic.  

You are citing the obvious first-order effect and not the generative essence. What leads to massive use of contraceptives? It is when women are supported by the State so they don't have to worry about who is going to provide for them.

The state is not responsible for all problems. Desire for and obtaining sex has been the driving evolutionary force behind successful reproduction for the history of our race until about 60 years ago. Suddenly around 60 years ago sex and reproduction decoupled.

In a heartbeat the primary selective driver of human evolution became irrelevant. The drop in population fertility you are seeing is simply the result of a large portion of humanity suddenly finding themselves biologically unfit in our new environment. People who do not actively want children simply no longer reproduce. These individuals are a substantial portion of the population and are now being selected out. Give it several generations eventually most everyone will want children most men will hate condoms and many women will find the pill makes them sick. Humans will adapt as all life does.

(they State even legislating them to receive preferential treatment in school, workforce, and marriage), so they can have affairs with bad boy losers and use contraceptives with their enslaved, good boy beta-male husbands so they force their slaves to financially support the children he didn't know he didn't procreate.

Women have a strong preference for hypergamy. It is only the reality of the market that they can't support themselves that causes them to behave and serve a man to raise a family.

Its easy to confirm paternity with a simple genetic test. Certainly there has been a power shift towards woman over the last several decades. When women were forced to be subservient to men and had no access to birth control they had very limited  choice about the number of children they had. Now given the choice many are opting to forgo childbirth altogether. Those that do will be selected out of the population leaving a world where most women want children.

This process is not going to reverse. For men and women who want families it is important to recognize that the human race is currently being subjected to a mild form of sterile insect technique. Choose your mate wisely.
  
When the State removes the effects of the free market and attempts to establish women as equal to men (which they are not), then fertility and society collapse. Watch 2016 onwards the horrific outcome...

I agree that women are not equal to men. Women are more compassionate, more loving, more social, and more self sacrificing. A strong argument can be made that they are the superior subgroup.
2039  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 21, 2014, 06:20:06 PM
And I think that you severely underestimate the potential in the human race.See without the dark ages, organized pedophilia promoting and money laundering religions, and government maffia thugs, we`d be better of as a human race, if none of these would have happened, then by now we would live in an utopic society with flying cars, 100% ecologic enviroment, 500 years lifespan, no famine, no sickness,world peace etc.

BitcoinFreak I think you would gain some insight from studying the failures of Athenian democracy. Theirs was a decentralized government similar to the ideal you are proposing. Random groups of citizens directly voted on all laws. It had severe and significant problems.  

Today's world is much more complex than the world of Athens time. It is significantly harder for the common man to understand all issues and vote intelligently. What you have proposed is essentially the Athenian style of democracy scaled up from 30,000 thousand to billions. The system was unstable at 30,000. I agree with contagion and bigtimespaghetti above. Such a system would lead to paralysis, and chaos.
2040  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? on: December 21, 2014, 03:55:38 AM
OTOH, government is the most egregious human trafficker, bribing our women (with inequality employment laws, welfare, subsidizing hypergamy, and divorce battering ram) to ignore men forsaking child rearing (birth rates have collapsed in Western nations where government is > 50% of the economy) and conscripting our men to kill each other in silly wars.

http://blog.jim.com/economics/the-future-belongs-to-those-that-show-up/


This is more likely the result of the widespread use of contraceptives.

Quote from: Wikipedia
Beginning in the 1960s, the Japanese used more condoms per capita than any other nation in the world.

Is H7N9 the next pandemic?

Armstrong's highly accurate cyclic computer models predict the peak of a global pandemic to occur in 2019.


Most pandemics occur when a pathogen jumps a species barrier to a new host (humans) that are not adapted to it. Such a process should be random and follow a Poisson distribution. The expected time between pandemics should therefore follow an exponential distribution. I am skeptical of the validity of a cyclical model predicting a definitive pandemic date.
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!