So... thank you very much again to keep on for me, If I understand I need to go to protonmail ( so i think i will put this name in google an I need to create a new account) It's protonmail.com , which nowadays forwards you to proton.me . You can create a free account on https://proton.me/mail/pricing . After recovery, you'll need a secure new wallet to send your Bitcoin to. Have you thought about that yet? |
|
|
|
I understud that if I give to you all my password DO NOT do that! If you post your wallet data anywhere in public, your funds will most likely get stolen. User o_e_l_e_o offered to help you. If you want his help, and if the amount is low enough for you to risk it and trust him, you should send him a PM. Or use a more secure method of communication, like Protonmail (this adds encryption without requiring technical knowledge). |
|
|
|
These guys are master at scamming for sure. I would not agree, it is the work of an amateur who does not know that a seed can have more than 12 words, and also that there is something called a "private key". Some more serious "hacker" would make a little more effort and expand the base of possible users. Still, coming up with this scam is original, and thus "a great idea". There will always be people who don't understand the importance of keeping their seed phrase offline. |
|
|
|
It's annoying because if the network goes out after you click the Post button, then not only will the message and the subject be erased, but also you can't even use the back button to go back to the editing page, because that's gone too. I've saved my text a few times by quickly copying it while the page wasn't loading after I clicked "Post". Usually I just hit Preview after typing a few lines, to prevent losing my post. |
|
|
|
I have not too much experience in providing escrow. This is slightly concerning, although you can't really gain experience without doing it. Have you read Best practices for Bitcointalk escrow providers? I've seen bad mistakes made by "highly trusted" escrows in the past. Add the case where a hacked account got a $1000 loan from you without signing a message, and I'm even more concerned about your attention to details acting as an escrow. Please be careful  |
|
|
|
I see he also changed his password and email today...
~
It's interesting that after all this circus he remained in the same campaign Now all that's left is changing the payment address for his signature campaign  |
|
|
|
CBDCs are just the next step in total control. This is what all observers are looking forward to happening, although it may not seem to me like a new version of money without problems. The implementation is going to be interesting. In The Netherlands, we have the "OV chipkaart" for 14 years now. It's kinda like a digital wallet, but only for public transportation. There's a central database, but each chipkaart works stand-alone, I think it works without continuous internet connection. It could also be bought anonymously, so one of the first thing people did, was hack it: add balance without paying for it  That could of course be prevented by connecting to a server for each transaction, but that reduces the use case. Luckily (lol), ECB has only been working on this for many years, and plans to keep researching this for many more years to come. (and thus an infinite number of them can be produced) I can't imagine a central bank and government implementing this in any other way. By the time they're done, the topic title can be changed to "100% of money doesn't exist". |
|
|
|
So, your whole plan is to whitewash your reputation as cheaply as possible? Why would anyone believe anything the scammer says at this point? |
|
|
|
Somewhere I read Ratimov is his last name. Ironically, I only read that after his name change. That means the privacy argument for changing his name backfired. |
|
|
|
I would like to know your opinion regarding the dominance of the value of the dollar in the currency market despite the presence of uncontrolled currencies such as Bitcoin. My opinion is simple: I don't know. It's unlikely for the dollar to last forever as a reserve currency, and I don't think it's likely for governments to accept anything (gold or Bitcoin) that they can't control. CBDCs are just the next step in total control. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing!
|
|
|
|
I am surprised that your outbox spanned upto 125 pages. I'm surprised it's only 125 @OP: my method is Search for "e", by user Royse777. That shows almost all posts in my Inbox. I check the date of the post I'm looking for, and go to the same date in my Outbox (that takes a few clicks). I usually find the post there. If you're looking for a user who never sent you a post, you're out of luck Another idea: download all pages. Use browser.altClickSave (note that I haven't tested this) and you run through your 125 pages in 3 minutes. Do a local text search, and keep the data for next time. |
|
|
|
|
The trick is to navigate forward again after you accidentally clicked "back". At least that's what works on my browser (most of the time). But since it doesn't work all the time, I avoid it as much as possible. Or open a post-link in a new window, that way there is no page to go "back" to.
|
|
|
|
Was it so hard for him/them to send email only to members who already have account with leftover balance, instead of asking everyone to send their private information? You mean he'd reach 100% of the customers instead of being able to say "you had your chance and didn't take it"? |
|
|
|
This is .... weird: Please be aware that after this 30-day withdrawal window, we will not be processing any further withdrawal requests. ~ 1. First name, Last name (if you are KYC verified)
2. Username (request will be ignored if the username does not exist)
3. Email address (request will be ignored if the email does not match)
4. Refund Amount (approximate balance is acceptable)
5. Wallet address (we will process only in the cryptocurrency you have) What happened to using account credentials for withdrawals instead of emails? What happened to contacting your customers instead of writing about it months later on a third party forum? Could it be someone else gained access to the account and is now collecting personal information? |
|
|
|
It looks like users lose their Donator status when they get banned. See Alwaysmining's profile. I didn't know that. |
|
|
|
This forced all people to request dollar withdrawals from banks. Since the banks, of course, did not have enough dollars, they resorted to the government, which decided that no citizen could withdraw more than $200 or perhaps less The more I think about this, the crazier the whole concept of "money" is. We went from gold to paper certificates, after which people found out they could no longer exchange their paper certificates to get back their gold. Then we went from paper certificates to a number on a screen, and now people can't even exchange that number on the screen back to the paper certificate! And with all this, people have totally forgotten it used to be gold instead of a number on a screen. Long story short: this is why I'm in Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
If we can't find common ground there, it seems this can only be settled by a 3rd party call. LoyceV and yahoo are both high ranked DT members with Top 10 community inclusions. They’ll make a call here and we will agree to that call.
LoyceV or yahoo will then check if both of us will play by the rules of that call. That sounds a lot like being a kindergarten teacher. I'm not doing that. I've made my point too many times already: ignore each other, and move on. You don't even have to wait for the other guy to do this, either one of you can abandon this drama at any moment. That's what I tried to do but because there's really nothing more I can add, but somehow it keeps coming back to me. So, I'll accept either call, be it the one from yahoo already or if LoyceV decides to offer his solution as Switzerland. I'm all for making your own call.
unwatch |
|
|
|
Ratimov changed his username, now he is Symmetrick  He keeps surprising me. I'm impressed If the @OP change the subject to "Should Ratimov/Symmetrick be in DT1?" does it kills the purpose of changing username?  It depends: Why are you guys posting the old names of people who clearly needed their names changed for privacy reasons? Obviously any data posted online is going to be quickly archived somewhere, but that doesn't mean that your highlighting/reposting of it has no effect. In some cases you may literally be putting lives in danger. If you were investigating a scam or something, that'd be different, but you seem to just be indiscriminately & recklessly dredging up data that would best be forgotten. Ratimov could argue he changed his username for privacy reasons. Lol. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
