 Bitcoin has already won , seeing these numbers and how it managed to increase every year for the best is just the beginning of the journey . Sadly a lot of people are trying to fight this by trying to spread FUD whenever bitcoin or cyrptocurrencies in general faces dips , not taking in considerations how many achievements have been made and how many profit did people already generate . People who are afraid of bitcoin are afraid of loosing their power , because the power lays where the money exists and if the money goes through a tool that sends away that third party in the process of storing wealth , power will not be reachable any more and the people behind the concept of banks such as the Roschild family won't be in control anymore .. Bitcoin isn't just money , it's an ideology and a anti establishment movement , it's a way of practicing our freedom and it'll never be taken away from us as long as we believe in it and try to drive it's whole environment forward . Now shift the months around a bit and you have ups and downs in contrast to what the image would like to portray. I think that Bitcoin still has a lot of way to go, and in order for it to mantain the top position in markets through this bearish sesso, proposed features for it should not remain stagnant. Bitcoin hasn't won in my opinion. It's always remarkable that it stays on top but it's a never-ending fight to keep that as is. |
|
|
|
|
Movement from that wallet doesn't mean much. It could be them just trying to place funds in different places for safety purposes, perhaps upgrading wallet tech. Whatever it is, I think it is worth to wait other than speculate. Is there any evidence that it was intentrd for sale? I think not.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course you can get rich with crypto, but the extent of getting rich is limited to what a market can absorb. Bitcoin is the most notable case because it's market had a huge rise while volumes were super big. Meaning they early adopters could have gotten rich simply by cashing out.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I would be interested to know what's up with that service. Perhaps if OP can direct a vouch account my way I could write and post an honest review for his service. Sounds interesting to be honest but I would like to see proof.
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is, speculation doesn't have a positive market mood so the sentiment moves the price down. Bitcoin is largly moved by speculation when it comes to it's price. Market forces is what it is at the end of the day.
|
|
|
|
|
It's more real in the sense that it is a system for money that does not support debt. This is something that Bitcoin was upholding as a principle from the beginning. It's basic for calling it a cash system. Money in cash for support no Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
Why care about the price of a single coin itself when you can just divide it down or trade with different more divisible or lower value currency. I think hat in reality it's the total cap and circulation rate that matter more than anything else to all those coin's values.
|
|
|
|
|
It is mostly speculation that moves crypro prices and Bitcoin is the biggest case for rbst. It's price was singing when transaction fees were making the payment options for it unusable, so it's evident that people don't care much about utility to actually go.anf buy BTC bon exchanges.
|
|
|
|
And so, why are so many ethereum tokens of ICOs allowed to have their announcement in the altcoin section? Is that because mods are not diving into looking into each individual case to enforce the definition? I guess that'd be the case. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, BUT, many posts in the altcoin announcement board involve a token, especially those that are about ICOs. Provided that token generation events for the distribution of ICO coins involve a token I think it'd be better to have ICO threads all under the tokens board.
No?
|
|
|
|
Theymos sure is one of the most creative forum admins.  Nice one. I hope this will stay around forever. It sure is an impartial way to work out a ranking system. But what happens if I post 100 images and 100x times the words thanks and sir in the background color of a post? |
|
|
|
|
meh...
I don't think that it'd make any difference. The use of blockchains as an industrial tool was a Sisyphean task anyway. If you make a blockchain scalable, you lose immutability, and if you do not want to compromise on immutability it's a futile database. While this law might impact certain potential uses of the blockchain, its use in crypto is already embedded and can not be hindered in any way.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that people came into this being well aware of the risks. The issue with BTC is that it is highly volatile, with exchanges for it worldwide. Large volumes are under unregulated means of exchange. It's all based on demand and speculation is a driving force. People should have never invested what they couldn't afford to lose in BTC and yet some did. They now have to take losses but who's to blame really?
|
|
|
|
If you go to the altcoin announcement board you'll see many ICO announcements. The Tokens board is a child of the aforementioned board and its description reads: "Announcement threads for tokens, which are altcoin-like things built on top of other cryptocurrencies. " So why aren't all ICO ANNs moved there? |
|
|
|
Just like the subject.. is that scam?? because i want to invest in but seems like im being nervous to getting scam.. if you guys have proof Withdraw from this bot please Screenshoot it and sent to me..
THX you
Yes, any investment schemes on telegram is most likely a scam. Scammers love that platform to create automated bots to make money for them because it is anonymous, and it makes the user more comfortable since he thinks that he's actually chatting with somebody. Probably cheaper than an entire website as well. I've seen several HYIPs being hosted on Telegram with a automated bot. None of them are legit. What you're describing seems like a ponzi/HYIP as well, just using cloud mining as their cover story. Even legit cloud mining is unprofitable, let alone scam ones that will just rip your money off you. Pretty much covers the case completely. The fact that Telegram even allows bots is absurd. People have been gathering in telegram like it's the only way to communicate and this has been making it a honeypot for ICO scammers. It's just so easy to target the right crowds through it, anonymously as well... That's an opportunity hard to miss for scammers. |
|
|
|
|
There are well-meaning teams working on raising funds through the ICO project and you can't be 100% certain that if a team does not to post on bitcointalk they're a scam.
However, if it's a conscious choice to avoid this forum it might be because they're trying to avoid criticism or can't save face when faced with questions. It'd always be recommended to any ICO team to at least try and have a presence in this forum. Bitcointalk is the heard of cryptocurrency communities. Everything crypto goes through here so if an ICO avoids this forum it leaves a bad taste in a potential investor's mounth.
If the concept is good and the team truly believe in their goals, then it'd make sense to focus their efforts in reaching the community through bitcointalk.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh wow. I did not expect any european authority to jump in with such bold actions. Sadly or not, there's no way to enforce this fully though. Companies that work with crypto operate online for the most part so far and they can easily avoid this by changing their company registration to an offshore one. This is lost business for the EU.
Further, this hinders the growing market for crypto securities by larger, EU based, licensed organizations. Some startups might be put on pause just by that decision alone.
|
|
|
|
i think is better than enemy +1 to 2 mh
Doesn't seem worth a 2% fee Why would you say that? I don't really like that it's not open source but saying that the 2% fee doesn't make it worth it to use over a 2Mh/s improvement doesn't make much sense. +2Mh/s is well worth 2% unless that's the total improvement for a rig with >100Mh/s.  |
|
|
|
|
I think that in the long run, it's riskier to hold those rewards. I'd only hold a portion even if I believed in a project's potential. However, in the event that the token doesn't get listed in a big exchange following the ICO, I think that it'd be worth waiting for a better exchange listing if it has been announced. If there's no announcement it could be judged by volumes as exchanges like to list tokens with big volumes and activity.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
