Absolutely not.

BNB is honestly one of the more developed ecosystems, but I don't think that there is much growth potential left in them at all.

I think that it is self-evident that more people are moving to newer chains like Fantom and NEAR Protocol and leaving behind BNB. Binance itself is also getting saturated as it is not growing too much either, so it's certainly something to be concerned about.

I think that it'll ultimately come down to how many games Philly can win before the end of the season.

If they drop a few games they can slip 1-2 places in the rankings quite easily, and Philly would become the 4th-5th seed instead of the 3rd, which can seriously hurt their chances.

The fact that they lost to the Nets in embarassing fashion is honestly not helping either.

That is very odd.

It seems a bit misleading to say that "we are partners with licensed game providers" as that makes it seem like that they are claiming they are licensed themselves.

It's like those firms which claim that some company is one of their partners when in reality they just use their service as a client. But yeah, the fact that they don't require any sort of KYC is definitely a sign that they are not licensed. Otherwise they will be compelled by law to do so in most jurisdictions.

100% agreed, especially when it comes to BSC tokens that have just launched.

I think that it is imperative that people realise a lot of metaverses out there are created by nothing other than people trying to turn a quick profit by riding the market wave, and that's exactly what is happening right now.

A lot of projects starting with meta- don't even have anything to do with the metaverse. And those who do rarely have a functional one.

Well, the crypto market as a whole is always moving in unison (to a certain degree).

I think that you have to realise despite the fact that people think bitcoin is dead, it is still the first and foremost thing that comes up to the public's consciousness when you mention the idea of crypto. So its price action dictates how much money is flowing into crypto overall.

I think that this trend will improve as a matter of time though, you're not going to see as much correlation between BTC and alts going forward because how much alts have developed.

This is essentially the principles of +EV betting.

It comes with risks and you need to make sure that you still manage your bankroll correctly, because bad beats can happen even if you are doing everything right.

And don't think that this is the magic thing that will ensure you never get caught. If you bet and win consistently and show that you have an edge, most casinos/sportsbooks are still going to catch on as a matter of time regardless of how well you conceal your activities.

What chain are they on?

You could possibly try to bridge your coins over to another chain with lower fees, or use a native DEX which have much lower fees compared to centralised exchanges.

You could also try to find a swap partner here p2p on the bitcointalk forum, or even try a swap service like Changenow or Changelly (note that both of these platforms have had issues in the past, so only use with small amounts).

It's not surprising whatsoever.

Drake's endorsement has been covered by mainstream media and Stake is probably raking it in right now as a result. The sponsorship is probably worth millions per year for Drake.

I think it's a win win for both parties involved, although people do need to be careful with celebrity endorsements in general - not all are legitimate. In this case, it is one of the rare instances where a big name celebrity is actually endorsing a legitimate operation. 

Let's not jump the gun here.

I think that there are certainly a lot of improvements that could be made when it comes to the traditional/crypto gambling industry, voluntary self exclusion being one of the things that never seems to get enforced 100% of the time.

Note that this is not always the casino's fault, as players often try to circumvent these measures themselves.

But yes, media depiction of gambling is almost always negative and these fringe cases really paint the industry in a bad light. Hopefully this changes.

Yeah, i'm not sure either.

It wasn't even like that the Nets was doing well prior to this game. They were way below .500 in the last 20 games coming into this one.

I think that it's probably just all the rumours and drama having built up over the past few months releasing. KD with another very efficient performance, he's not going to let Ben Simmons down haha.

For the most part, no.

However there are a few collections that give you a bit of utility and I think may be worth investing in.

The usual stuff like Cool Cats, Azuki etc. may have seen significant price action but I honestly cannot see them going anywhere and becoming anything more than just a status symbol. They will die down inevitably when the next fad comes into town, just like the ICO craze in 2017.

Well done on making it so far efialtis!

If running the site is overwhelming then I think you should definitely try to delegate more tasks etc. Burnout is real man, take it easy.

Your site has blossomed into one of the most comprehensive and unbiased reviewers of crypto casinos, and mad respect for that. The mediation centre to handle casino disputes is certainly a very interesting initiative. I personally think having such a trusted brand back your casino would be a really great marketing strategy for any newcomers onto the scene.

Seems like a bit of a far fetched idea right now.

Axie is definitely not going to be in the Top 10 - it's mechanics rewards early adopters heavily and I don't think that there is going to be a lot of incentive for later comers to the party.

P2E is overhyped as hell.

Avalanche does have a lot of potential but no way I think it'll flip both BTC and ETH on a market cap basis, just because of the fact that it is much younger and less mature - and have much less integrations.

That sounds like a lot, until you realize that the revenues generated by centralized casinos far exceed that figure on a daily basis.

I do agree that there is some utility when it comes to metaverse based casinos, but I feel like that until everyone is fully immersed in that reality, there is not going to be a whole lot of demand for them on aggregate and there's not going to be liquidity available.

Some disruption is needed here but I don't see any viable alternatives so far.

Are you looking at the actual L1 token or you're looking to yield farm instead?

If actual L1, then I think that SOL has a lot of potential because of the fact that it has such fast transactions and low fees. FTM also is a good bet, I wouldn't bet on ETH with a low budget just because of the low growth potential.

If you're farming, then I'd definitely farm on FTM's spookyswap or something similar - they offer really good APYs even on stablecoins.

I think that the underlying technology will be long-lasting.

However, certain projects in the space are obviously overhyped and have no future. E.g. avatar NFT projects.

These projects offer no discernible utility and its value is solely propped up by the fact that there is a greater fool willing to pay more for the token rather than the previous person. Don't get sucked into this hole right now.

This is incredibly bad advice.

I think that the value of LUNA is pretty much solely dependent on the state of Anchor protocol and how much revenue is being generated for clients there.

As I've said, I have serious doubts about a) the health of the UST peg and b) the sustainability of yields on Anchor. I certainly wouldn't bet my money on it that these 20% yields are going to persist, and unless some other protocol comes popping up on Terra there's not going to be as much demand for the token anymore.

These are all "fake utility".

It is clear that at this stage, DOGE is nothing but an overhyped meme project that is bound to die as more people understand what it actually is and its lack of utility. The price is declining rapidly, and I think that it will breach less than $0.1/DOGE.

Definitely not something that you want to be in for the long run. There has been no development activity otherwise or any effort to legitimize the coin by any means.

Yeah, Harden fits really well with Embiid and both seem to be happy to move on from diva teammates.

However, with Harden he has a track record of starting really strong and then fizzling out as his relationship with the front office deteriorates. So definitely don't hold unreasonable expectations for him.

They can really make a run if Tobias Harris is contributing this year.

Well, this is untrue.

The value of USDT and USDC is solely dependent on the actual USD value, which is obviously in perennial decline.

Unless you have a good reason to demand fiat exposure, these are not safe havens by any means. Sure, it can counter volatility in the short run, but you no longer have the ability to hedge against a fiat collapse.