volatility does not always go with low liquidity. Its not the problem for leverage traders that ETH goes up and down 30% in one day if you can open/close 1 milion $ position at close to 0 spread. The problem is when your stop-loss or even worse margin-call closes pushing price few % down because of zero liquidity.

@OP
It depends on leverage, position size, proportion of real trades and fake trades (avoid shady exchanges), volatility. Mostly I would not leverage trade coins below $500M daily volume.

I think it is also worth to mention that we have 6 green months straight. We had only 1 so long strike ... april-sept 2012 and now we are entering the best quarter for bitcoin? Damn. I doubt we will see 10 green months straight but who knows. I hope to see more alt action ... to let me dump my bags back to btc before the true king will start to do 10k candles.

Now tell me please how is it possible to get rect if you, as big company, buy btc (without leverage) using 1-5% of your reserves as part of well diversified portfolio. I'm not saying that everyone will go all in now. Just small portion to be able to announce it to gather hype.

Microstrategy put all their money into bitcoin and even borrow 1B$ to buy more. Investors see this negatively?? By pumping stock price 7 times?

I wonder how you will elaborate this.


Buybacks are not 2021 case only.

"In the late 20th and the early 21st century, there was a sharp rise in the volume of share repurchases in the United States: US$5 billion in 1980 rose to US$349 billion in 2005. Large share repurchases started later in Europe than in the United States, but are nowadays a common practice around the world.[4]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Share_repurchase

So buybacks are with us for long time. Recession is not the answer. Possibility to profit by CEOs at the expense of the managed company is the answer.

Once again. I'm not saing that insitutions will FOMO to bicoin to earn on bitcoin long term price grow. They will FOMO to bitcoin to profit on their own shares. Buy $4B of bitcoin, MC of you company grows $6B

It will be rational decision. I'm not saying here that institunions will fomo into bitcoin to gain on bitcoin pump. They will FOMO into bitcoin to gain on their shares pump. As I showed on macrostrategy example. You have $4B bitcoin, your company value grow by $6B

Check out this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5327971.msg56696242#msg56696242

IMO institutional investors will push BTC price to unimaginable numbers. Not $130k as JPMorgan estimates. Not even 1M$. Much higher. Retail invesotrs will play almost no role in this pump.

We all know what buybacks are. A situation in which company decides not to invest in the development - in better machines, better technology, improve efficiency but to buy their own shares. What for? Mostly to boost price since the decision of buybacks is made by CEOs that own big chunk of shares, they get a part of the payout in shares, they get bonuses in shares, they can buy shares at discount. This situation is very common and is performed on a huge scale:

"Biggest Buyers
CNBC lists the ten companies with the largest share repurchase announcements made in 2018 through February 15. They are listed below along with their: stock performance year-to-date, over the past year through early trading on February 20, and the amount of buybacks announced:

Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO): $25 billion buyback
Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC): $22.6 billion buyback
PepsiCo Inc. (PEP): $15 billion buyback
Amgen Inc. (AMGN): $10 billion buyback
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), the parent of Google: $8.6 billion buyback
Visa Inc. (V):$7.5 billion buyback
eBay Inc. (EBAY): $6 billion buyback
Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT): $6 billion buyback
Mondelez International Inc. (MDLZ): $6 billion buyback
Lowe's Companies Inc. (LOW): $5 billion buyback"
https://www.investopedia.com/news/10-stocks-poised-outperform-record-buybacks/

How this apply to bitcoin?

"The move brought the company's total holdings to roughly $5.26 billion.
MicroStrategy's bitcoin was purchased at an average price of roughly $24,214 per coin."
"The firm's bitcoin holdings were worth roughly $5.26 billion as of March 11's price per coin. Saylor's firm acquired its bitcoin for some $2.211 billion at an average price of around $24,214 per bitcoin."

https://markets.businessinsider.com/currencies/news/michael-saylor-microstrategy-bitcoin-purchase-cryptocurrencies-digital-assets-2021-3-1030179587

So they invested 2 billion $ into bitcoin (they borrowed 1 billion to do so) and and earned 3 billion $ thanks to it.

Microstrategy marketcap pumped from $1Bilion to $7Billion. Earning 3 billion $ on speculations (not from selling services) pushed Microstrategy marketcap by $6Billion ! Having 5 Billion $ in bitcoin (1B is borrowed, so 4B$) push your company stock value by 6B$! CEOs of every single company will sooner or later realize that decision to invest even a fraction of company reserves will push price of their shares better than buybacks. They will not even care about price. The bigger the better since more hype they will have from bigger and bigger bitcoin hype. They won't care because profit for CEOs will go from pump on their stock not from bitcoin price change.

The fact that something pumped 10x, 50x or 1000x in short term during "bubble of everything" does not mean that it is strong fundamentally. I'm not saying Wasir is a bed exchange, but its completely different class of assets compared to BNB. Wasir is an exchange that operates for India citizens, while binance is world leading crypto exchange that became an industry leader after few months of existence. BNB has also BSC - chain with the biggest traffic (few times bigger than ETH).

Fair point but... gold is used not only as safe haven but also in jewellery, Electronics.

I think they also did not take "lost bitcoins" into consideration. I bet that bitcoin is now deflationary. Currnt inflation after fork is only 1.6%. Most likely the amount of lost bitcoins is bigger than 1.6% of supply annually.

So you have problems with memory. You even quoted my post in which i put current circulating supply:



So yea. Great burn. Awesome. They had 134,901,580 CAKE 16 days ago... they have  143miilions CAKE now. +10M in 16 days. +7% in 16 days. " Obviously it was because PANCAKE coin burn ". Yea ... Obviously. Obviously they burned 40% supply XDXD Obviously they were able to buy back 90M coins worth $1.6B XD seriously ... nothing raised your doubts here?


Proof? No marketcap dump (MC= price *supply ) So we should dump 40% on this chart if they in fact burned 40% supply. We didn't. We have MC ATH without price ATH.



Good luck with your investments if your researches are as bad as this one. Looks like your knowledge is inversely proportional to your confidence

Being ETH compatible is a great advantage. Thats the main reason why BSC is the biggest chain now. Because it was faster, cheaper than ETH (such as tron, eos and tones of others) but also ETH compatible that allowed it to use ETH infrasctruscutre that ETH was building for years.

And what ERC20 token? What high fees? We are talking about pancake swap and BSC network (binance smart chain).


Because your coins are not on ETH. They are on IDENA network. Just transferred to IDENA address that exist on ETH as hotbit deposit address.

You can try to get therm back if there were much of them. As Idena is ETH compatible it is possible that hotbit will use their eth private key connected to your deposit address and use it on idena chain. Did same mistake months ago. I get this response:

"2. In order to retrieve your mistakenly deposited tokens, we would have to conduct relevant operations such as extra installation or upgrade on the software of our wallet, the import and export of the private key and so on. Due to the fact that only those staff with very high authority are allowed to conduct relevant operations and that the whole process has to go through very strict risk control verification process, such operations require huge amount of time, labor cost and risk control cost. It might take three to six months to retrieve your assets. Please do be patient.
3. Due to the strict risk control verification process, you need to pay 0.3 ETH by original sending address（ ） that you transferred this transaction mistakenly to switch back the coins. The transerred address is 0x5c0e7D5D2c3f244083eA00a8c6b17c42120ac632 and then send TXID to us so that we can check it for you. Attention please: Due to the strict risk control verification process, we can only send your assets back to your original sending address（ ） later."

But you know why we both made same mistake? Because hotbit has bug in their website that sometimes does not refresh deposit address. You go to deposits and you see USDT (ERC-20) deposit address, you change it to idena and page should refresh showing new address. Sometimes it does not. You see IDENA, you see address, you do a deposit, coins are gone. Be carrefour and always check if address did refresh.

You can do anything you want with your smart contract. You can even code a price curve that will fallow a mathematical formula established by you. The more you sold the bigger the price is. You just need a UI for investors, good programmer and a smart way to attract investors (good marketing)

Activity on bridge is pretty nice. Everyone is testing it. There is currently 69k IDNA out of which 37k is locked in liquidity pool. Can't wait to see how it will be chainging in next 2 weeks. We still need official pancake listing from pancake team. possible syroup pools or farming.

It was created as meme coin in days when there was not that much projects. Collected great community, good devs, and is now a better product with better adoption than 99.99% of "serious coins". As I stated (funny you did not refer to that):


6 years on battlefield. Always osculating around BTC price. Always 25-100 sat. Its not high because musk is on doge. He started to shill few months ago... not 6 years. Musk is on doge because doge is stable to BTC, with good community, is widely used and has no centralized identity behind.


Here you proof you need to learn about economy more. 14M daily. 5B annually. Seams a lot ... but its not about number of new coins in terms of wealth dilution. Its about % of inflation. 129B is doge circulating supply. 5B is only ~4%. BTC inflation before last halving was 3.6%. Do this calculation with DBC pleace. How much coins will this Supernode mine compared to circulating supply.


I dumped my doges ~60 sat. Will buy back at 25 again. As I said. Its short term overvalued compared to BTC. But i would be more comfortable being exposed to MUSK dump rather than being exposed to DBC team dumping theirs no 0 liquidity, 0 volume market.

Once again. Good research about AI token is not based on marketing moves that team is doing. AI tech that this team promised to deliver is (most likely) not dependent on platform its released on nor on 15% burn. And this AI tech is responsible for 99% long term value. Researrch this AI tech, compare it with FET, AGI, OCEAN, VLX and other competitiors. But compare AI tech not irrelevant, in long term, things.

You seams to be offended by my post. I'm not saying project is dead. This might be good gem. I just shared my thoughts. But it looks like you did only partial research and get overexcited about insignificant things. You should be excited about this AI tech. What it is capable to. Because that's what this coin is all about. And calling something worth investing only because other products that are not worth investing in your opinion are evaluated higher is not the best investment strategy.

1 - "1 and 2 are good questions for the team, let's see what is their answer. Doubt it is just marketing. SUpply is too high, so burn is wellcomed. And Polkadot's one is way better in many fields than Neo's blockchain, so not surprising."

Why you think its good they switched to DOT if you don't even know if its not "marketing only" reason.

I don't care about burning 15% of coins when only 30% of supply is in circulation. Burns have value if they are cyclical and come from the profits generated by coin. Not when devs created too much coins, cant find buyers, price is dying so they burn coins that they know they wont be able to sell anyway. You know what i'm talking about. 3B coins in circulation, 3 mln $ daily volume (on top of hudge pump) and 7B coin to dump ~~100M$. Impossible to dump. This burn has negligible value.



People underestimate doge. Price is too high currently. I agree but its not eveluated that high only because of Musk tweets.

Doge:
1 - was very stable against BTC for years.



6 years ... ~25 sat on average with many pumps as soon as price dumped. If I was banned from having bitcoin (for unknown reason) ... i would swap to DOGE as soon as price would dump to 20-25 sat.

2- DOGE has huge community and no centralized identity since first devs abandoned project (just like bitcoin was abandoned by satoshi)

3- Doge is one of 3 most used coins on crypto casinos and similar sites

4- Doge is one of 5 most often available coins if you want to use crypto as payment

I have few more.

Because of all of above I think I'm one of first people that dare to call DOGE a digital silver (if we consider bitcoin to be a digital gold). Not litecoin, not etherum.

Similar thread opened few days ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5323776

To avoid writing same thing twice i will just drop it my quote where there.



Its x4 in 2 months not x8 in one month. I think you researched different coin.

Maybe he has a tool that auto change HTML file adding 4 zeros at the end of his position size? Everything is possible.


It means that we has at least 20M and is able to pay 0.075% * 20M = 15k$ in fees just to make a youtube video and shill his $20 trading course. That's super unlikely.

Pretty decent pump. We are now back to 12 cents from 19 cents so it looks like solid correction, good jump in especially that this is top 500 CMC project. The only problem. Little to 0 volume compared to volatility.


1- Why they jumped to DOT? Marketing only?
2- Where are those 15% comes from if DBC did not launch its product yet? Isn't it mint to burn event (marketing only)?
3- testing mainnet - is it enough to be evaluated at $40,893,968? IDK
4- "Supernode elections ongoing marketing, white paper update, team expansion, website update .. hidden gem... remember where you heard it first!" - after 3 years ?

Looks exacly like marketing stunt. Sad to say that but it looks to me that majority of green organisations and green movements are only corpo vs corpo tool or marketing tool.

Bitcoin is not scalable enough to hold more load. Bitcoin should remain as digital gold. Thats enough to push its adoption and price higher and higher. Bitcoin does not need hyped technologies that will only clog the network.

Let ETH to be a smart contract chain for rich people focused on decentralization and BSC a smart contract chain for people focused more on cheap prices. We dont need anything else. We dont need bitcoin to be a "everything coins"