^^^ rofl
Epic analogy.

LMAO.

I believe *I* am the 'CryptoFag' referred to by the oh-so-clever use of substituting the word 'devil' in my username for the homophobic slur 'fag'.

That's because it isn't a cloud mining website.

LAWL, the butthurt is strong in this one.

Lol, sure, sounds legit.

No, not really. The page itself says how the chart is constructed if you'd take the time to actually read.

As much as you'd love to be throwing some shade on the math, you still utterly fail to show the 'Unknown' figure is increasing sufficiently with the raised hashrate you mention.

Scrypt.cc has sold at least 500GH/s of Scrypt mining. This means 500GH has to be present in the Scrypt coin networks that is not accounted for by known pools.

The estimation for the pool numbers at any given time of the day is never going to allow that 500GH to fit anywhere.

Show me where the 'Unknown' amount is increasing beyond a few dozen GH.

I routinely check that figure and it is the Chinese pools mostly adding the extra hashrate to the total LTC network amount.

Yes but before you begin a whole new tidal wave of stupid, there is only about 60GH of total Scrypt coin networks outside of Litecoin.

Urgh! Again with the stupid.

When I say that the extra hashrate doesn't appear in the 'Unknown' section I mean it is accounted for by increases in the KNOWN POOLS.

FFS. . ..

Check it out for yourself:

https://www.litecoinpool.org/pools

https://www.litecoinpool.org/charts

Clue: The extra hashrate that appears isn't in the 'Unknown' section.

:head-desk:
:head-desk:
:head-floor:

Which part of "The only space for Scrypt.cc's hashrate to fit is in the 'Unknown' section" don't you understand?



The extra hashrate is already accounted for in known mining pools, mostly Chinese mining pools, by the way.

Ignoring your appalling use of racist epithets, your assertion is still false. You cannot claim that informing people as the fraudulent nature of Scrypt.cc is only valid so long as I then provide an alternative 'good' investment for them to put their money into.

What is it with people demanding that they be told the 'secrets' to investing? The 'secret' is that you do some fucking research yourself you lazy bastards.

No investment is without risk, it is whether you are able to be fully informed as to what the risks are that counts towards any decision to invest.

If you look at my 'trust' profile you will see I dealt with user Pcfli and bought a few of the very first Innosilicon A2 Scrypt miners from him in May of last year. He offers good prices on ASIC miners and very reasonable hosting fees.

Even if you cannot afford a whole miner yourself, you could get together with others and do a 'group buy' and agree on what to mine and when, distributing the mining income accordingly. That's if you can be trustworthy enough to each other.

But, TBH, mining is rarely that profitable, so you would need to make sure you can at least run through the numbers before you commit to ensure you don't risk ending up with less than what you start with.

As for development projects to invest in, no, as I said already most people here aren't the type who contribute usefully to them and are, more often than not, a demanding pain in the ass. You'll need to do your own research if you want to sort the wheat from the chaff.

Absolutely categorically, NO. I have never 'invested' in Scrypt.cc nor any other scam cloud mining site. I have experience with actual mining, with actual hardware, bought from actual people, hosted at actual data centers and operated by me remotely to hash where I choose.


In promising cryptocurrency projects, where people are actually working to create something useful. No, I have no interest in telling you which ones they are, before you ask. People who throw money at obvious scams in expectation of high returns are usually the ones yelling at development teams of genuine coin projects that the market price is dropping because they aren't pumping out enough announcements for their liking after buying half a bitcoin's worth and believing it then gives them entitlement to demand immediate price rises be made to happen.

Development takes time and effort and cooperation, so short-term 'ROI'-seekers are not particularly helpful to the process.

Do me a favour then, so I can stay undercover and complete my secret mission of buying all those Cheep 'KHS' nomnomnom. . .etc. etc.

I need you to disprove the math that shows Scrypt.cc is lying about their mining.

Otherwise I can't possibly hope to raise the market after all this secretive buying I've been doing. It seems I did too much of a good job in 'FUD' spreading because I 'went over to the other side' too far and actually told some whopping great truths that I'm having trouble countering now.

So, as I said, be a dear and disprove the math I used to prove Scrypt.cc is lying about their mining. You only need click on my sig to find it.

Once you've disproved it then I can do a 180 and suddenly announce that Scrypt.cc has totally *NOT* been mathematically proven to be lying about their mining and the market will MOOOOOOOON!!!!

Don't tell anyone I said that, though.

*taps nose*
Just between you and me.

*snorfle*

*cough*

Sure, yeah, that's what we're doing. Darn it, you caught us all out. I'll just go and delete all those posts in the thread I made linked in my signature where mathematics proves that scrypt.cc are lying about their mining and I'll totally recant everything I have said, while ignoring the mathematics which prove scrypt.cc are lying about their mining because, hey, cheep 'KHS' nomnomnom etc.

Is Cryptsy still running that hyper-inflationary staking wallet?

You know, to protect the network. Because apparently PoS coin networks are stronger the larger the amount of the 'interest' earned is. /snark

@rrocket66 Your lack of understanding about the total hashrate for scrypt is quite apparent. Go to the thread linked in my signature where I explain it clearly that it is the 'unknown' small hashrate of a handful of GH that is where scrypt.cc has to fit because the other pools are mainly Chinese.

Citation or STFU.

You don't even know what you are asserting with that post. It sounded good as you were typing it and reading it to the audience in your head, right? Pro-tip: It's laughably absurd to claim I am changing my position when my position has not budged one iota because it is based on mathematical fact, objective reasoning and secular morality.

You, however, are a scumbag who is whining at me for showing you to be the scumbag you are.

I know, my point is that you have a terrible attitude about wanting to take advantage of people who are being ripped off so you can profit from their misfortune and you accuse me of not being 'normal' for disagreeing with that corrupt morality of yours.

You are not a decent human being.