Yeah, thanks for the confirmation.

Anyhoo, back on-topic and reasonable discussion-land, the point is that this thread is clearly to do with people who already have received these Titan miners from KnC and are not getting any support from KnC. That they have made the effort to try and improve on their situation through developing it further is not 'supporting' KnC, it is that they are supporting themselves following KnC's shoddy delivery.

You think your unhinged paranoia in complaining that they are supporting KnC by actually using the miners they've already paid for makes any sense?

Would you prefer they not switch them on? Who would that benefit?

Aren't you needed over in the scrypt.cc thread as SpanishSoldier to try and desperately pump that also-failing criminal ponzi-based scam?

Must try harder, simply asserting that people who keep exposing your fraudulent scams are in the pay of competing services, fraudulent or otherwise, doesn't actually pass the smell test and frankly makes you come across as a desperate shill running out of ideas to ensnare more suckers into 'investing' in his criminal scams.

He left out the intergalactic shape-shifting space lizards.

Meth is one hell of a drug.

Thanks, Legendary member, that's super-helpful in the fight against these scams for you to continue 'only' posting about the payouts you are receiving.

Still waiting on a reply to my previous post to you:

I blame Vod for the OP's 'Blame Vod' button page not loading anymore.

I blamed Vod once and he turned me into a newt.

I got better though.

What a complete and utter load of hysterical bollocks. I have already reported the success I had with engaging LPC Law, winning the case and then engaging a collection agency (DCBL) to enforce the judgement, which resulted in Alpha paying the full judgement amount within a matter of days.



It cost me nearly GBP900 for the whole process but that was covered by the judgement amount being made for the full claim, plus interest, plus my expenses. Maybe some of you are simply too dumb to work through the process needed and so you want to start throwing your toys from the pram and blaming other people for your failure to deal with this properly.

FightAlpha have done more to help people get on with recovering their funds than any other person or group in this thread, so I'd suggest you rethink the possible motivation its detractors might actually have.

Ever thought that jorgefernandez IS Alpha? Now there's food for thought!

Firstly, I'm not conceding anything as I certainly have never implied that QS's fraudulent behaviour warranted life imprisonment without parole, which is what I assume you intended to type, and I doubt anybody else has, either.

Secondly, If that was, indeed, the 'point' of your original post then you have actually just conceded I was right to state that you were attempting to downplay the seriousness of the fraud by way of your reductio ad absurdum reference to life imprisonment as punishment. In claiming that a lack of complaint posts being made by his unwitting victims is somehow evidence of the 'lesser' seriousness of the crime you are showing that your 'point' was solely to downplay the seriousness of the crime.


Fact is the *only* reason the discussion of his proven and admitted fraudulent actions continue to warrant clarification and confirmation as to the evidencing of Quickseller's dishonesty is due to his personality-disorder-laden OCD rants against other members, along with his persistent attempts to deny the simple fact that his proven and admitted dishonesty renders him untrustworthy, ergo, he cannot complain about receiving negative trust for being proven and admittedly dishonest.

If he would shut the fuck up and show a little maturity about having been exposed as the deceitful and dishonest person he is then these type of whiny threads he keeps creating wouldn't invite continued 'clarification' of his deceit and dishonesty for others to better understand just how absurd and irrelevant his complaints are.

I didn't say that, you did. The fact that it is extremely suspect for anybody to be taking the same bullshit deflection attempt as QS suggests a motivation that isn't necessarily linked to sock-puppet accounts of QS. That is only one possible explanation.



Right, so simply claiming you're not trying to downplay anything is perfectly reasonable a response after having posted an 'observation' that is a deflection from the real issue of QS having fraudulently conned his customers. What other value would you like to insist the content of your post be taken as, if not to suggest the issue isn't serious or relevant unless defrauded customers are posting about it?

I did ask what amount of BTC you'd consider it reasonable to trade with when your trading partner is acting as the Escrow without your knowledge? It is, of course, a rhetorical question as it is asinine to suggest any amount of money is 'ok' to risk with a fraudulent escrow.

As has been said, self-Escrow is no Escrow at all.

Again . . . The Fuck?

QS has already admitted to self-escrowing a number of deals. Stop trying to deflect from the issue.

Anyone else find it rather suspect that BCX keeps trying to down-play QS's proven and admitted fraud?


Oh lookie, more attempts to down-play the proven and admitted fraud.

It doesn't matter a jot whether you want to claim that nobody can say how people might have felt, the fact is you committed a fraudulent act and are, therefore, untrustworthy.

Stop trying to deflect from the issue.

The fuck? What has that got to do with anything?

He defrauded people out of money by conning them into paying for a service they did not receive.


How would you feel if we did a trade and I tricked you into paying for an escrow service where you later found out I had acted as the escrow using an alternate forum account? Would you think, "Well the deal went through so, you know, that escrow fee I paid doesn't matter"?

How many trades would you be happy to do like that?

How big of a trade would you be happy to do like that?

What's the limit of BTC you'd be happy to risk doing a trade where you pay for escrow but you aren't getting it?

How would you feel about doing, say, a trade worth 100BTC where you pay for escrow but you aren't getting it?

Is there a number you consider to be the limit of how much you'd be happy to risk on this?

Are you dumb or just playing somebody who is?

The point is that a person is paying for a service you have conned him into thinking he is getting when he is not.

Fraud.

Sure, because when I pay for travel insurance and I don't fall sick on holiday it is perfectly fine if the insurance company never actually had me covered even when they said they did. They haven't stolen the insurance premium I paid, right?

QS, you routinely display signs and symptoms of serious personality disorder, the above is but one of them.

What don't you get? Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, gives a flying fuck if you 'blame' BadBear or not, the ONLY issue is that you lied about having been banned for your own gain.

Dishonesty and deceit are your trademark.

Despite what you keep attempting, which is to deflect attention away from the fact you are provably untrustworthy, the only person you are convincing is yourself and your sock-puppet accounts.

Are you on medication? If you are you're either not taking the required dosage, you're mixing them with other drugs, or you need your prescription reviewed, urgently.

If you are not on medication, you need to be in order to have a chance at controlling this erratic and compulsively dishonest behaviour of yours, otherwise whatever ails you on this forum is going to become exponentially more self-destructive in your real life over time.

It would appear that this weekend saw a flurry of rather suspect posts attempting to float the "maybe it isn't a scam" turd.

My favourite was: Because that totally makes sense, right?

Although I did chuckle at the guy who asked that the title be changed to reflect the fact it is a scam, you know, to help people out in case they mistakenly believe scrypt.cc isn't an already-proven fraud. Where do these numpties suddenly appear from after all this time?

Uhuh, sure, like I've got that much time to spend on this account as I do *and* all those others? But deflection is all you have I guess, as evidenced by your further response below.

I don't give a shit about payment proof, as I've explained it isn't evidence of anything.

You know something? I haven't even bothered looking up Bit-X, because it isn't something that pings up on threads with people pointing out obvious scam-flags, like you get with cloudmining.website and scrypt.cc and clouminr.io and all the other obvious-ponzi-is-obvious fraudulent operations.

I'll go take a quick look now.
*paused*
*done*

Bit-X could well be a *really* elaborate scam, I mean *really* *really* elaborate to the degree that they have the largest ASIC hardware manufacturer in the world partnering up with them and yet they still end up fucking everybody over in the long run.
Other than, perhaps, the risk of fractional mining, exactly what can be deduced about them that is sufficiently shady to warrant a confident -ve rating?


So, as I said, you can't keep deflecting on to other issues as though the act of deflection answers the question, it doesn't. All it does is make you look either stupid, dishonest or both.

Are you ready to concede that your repeated use of cloudmining.website's payment history serves as NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER as to whether they are actually mining?

Oh, hello, GermanGiant/SpanishSoldier/RussianRaibow

*waves*

What a surprise to see you popping up to defend your criminally fraudulent scam operation.


By all means, please explain to me how your scam's regular payment history, which you so love to tout as being evidence of legitimacy, is *any* different from, say, Bernie Madoff, who made sure his ponzi-based scheme was able to pay out reliably for more than thirty years, with regards to such being evidence of anything?

Don't forget the ever-lulzy: http://joshgarza.brandyourself.com/

You *do* know this is not a legitimate cloud mining service, right? That it's just the usual ponzi-based scam, yes?

I'm assuming you'll say you do know this, which leads me to my next question:

As a 'Legendary' member your opinion of various aspects of this industry will carry much more weight, do you not think your effusive comments about this fraudulent scheme will most likely encourage others to join it and eventually result in many many people losing their savings when it eventually runs for the "We wuz haxxored!!!!!!11!!!" door and takes their money?

You may say that you are merely reporting on the numbers you are getting out of it but, if so, why would you so willingly continue posting just about your gains and no cautionary caveat to other members about the reality of the situation? Especially considering that, if you are really receiving a steady rate of payments out of their system and into your local wallet (because scam-side balances don't count), it is *highly* likely to be because you are such a high ranking member here and they want to make sure you report positively on them.