OP, lever-pressing rats distracted by pretty graphics asides, please explain the financial backend of this system.

If it functions like a ponzi it will be marked as such.

Public Service Announcement -
This is just another Ponzi Scam
Do Not Invest!

Those who choose to post of their participation
support or encouragement for this scam will
be tagged with negative trust for proving
they wish to help the scammers operate this
Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen
from other users. Thereby proving they are not
trustworthy forum members.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

Faucets do not make anything like enough of a return to be offering the kind of referral commission this scam is.

They want to encourage referrals because they will need new money to be constantly deposited otherwise the ponzi collapses and the OP runs with all the coins.

WTF is so hard to understand? Just because bitcoin is an open-source decentralised network you think that nobody should hold anybody to account for their toxic behaviour?

So if your neighbour, who has just moved in and you know nothing about, pisses on your lawn and yells, "Freedom of choice, motherfuckers!!!" you don't think it is appropriate to inform your community that your new neighbour is a dirtbag who cares not for the society he is part of?

Freedom of choice is not freedom from the consequences of that choice.

Yes and done.

Of course the sequence of events matters!

If you log in to a Dice site, make a deposit of BTC and roll, you have no idea whether the wins/losses of the people before you will mean you will find yourself fortunate enough to be joining in at the best time in the algorithm or the worst. Your wins and losses are not knowingly dictated by the players before you, although they are a factor, the players before you have no way of knowing how their playing will affect your playing.

If you join a Ponzi and send money in, you then have to seek out other people and convince them to send money in so that you don't end up being the user who doesn't get paid. The purpose of joining the scheme is to *not* be the mug who doesn't profit, so you have to post encouraging words in their threads to rustle up some other people who, through your post, will be encouraged enough to send in their money, resulting in some of their money being shared with you.

Your profit comes, not from a provably-fair algorithm unaffected by other players but, instead, a mathematically unsustainable process of finding other people to take the fall for you.

I take it back, you ain't playing dumb at all.

BwaaahAAAhaaAAAAhaAAAA!!!!

You're so stupid you don't even get how stupid you are for posting this believing yourself to be smart!

'Sides, thought you were putting me on ignore, cowboy? What happened, the butt-hurt ache too much not getting just one more stab at trying not to make a laughing stock of yourself? You'd have been better off remaining silent and thought a fool, than opening your mouth and removing all doubt.

Now I *know* you ain't so dumb, this is just playing dumb.

If you send money to an online dice site or casino and pull the lever to see if you have won you don't depend on the players after you being convinced to send money in, in order for you to profit.

Next!

Are you genuinely this stupid or are you just pretending to be?

Ponzis and regular gambling aren't the same thing. No matter how desperate you are to bitch and whine, it is a false equivalence.

Straw man fallacy.


Ad hominem repetition.

You really suck at this.

Demonstrating the above behaviour proves you are untrustworthy, therefore you will be marked as such.

Whining about how the world isn't fair doesn't make your scumbaggery any less repugnant.

Ahaaaaaa! There we have it, for all your bollocks about claiming to genuinely want to understand the situation you're just fucked off that ponzi collaborators are being held to account for their actions. Stamping your feet and screaming until your face turns blue won't magically turn your bullshit post into valid argument.

Now, now. Less of the racist epithet, please.

Urgh! These socks are getting so tiresome.

Fine, OP, whichever version of the usual idiot you are, let's break it down for you:

If you access BCT through TOR, you will probably get the same message. It doesn't mean you're a scammer, it means the IP of the exit point you are accessing the forum through has been flagged for previous dodgy behaviour. Should all users be banned from using BCT if they unfortunately come from the same IP address as a scammer?

Besides, the point is still moot as highlighting the untrustworthy behaviour of others does not assuage your own. This argument point is thus rendered invalid.

It is not forum policy to police the discussions. It is down to us, the community. The forum has already tried to shovel the shitpile of likely-ponzi threads into that sub-forum, this does not equate to tacit support for those scams. This argument point is thus rendered invalid.

Says you, based on what? Your own devious plans to farm trust for dishonest purposes, perhaps? Projection much? See? We can both make bullshit speculation. So fuck you on that one. This argument point is thus rendered invalid.

I have no fucking idea what assertion you even think you're making here. This argument is thus rendered invalid.

This thread is just another bullshit piece of sock-puppetry. When will you idiots learn that unless you actually have a cogent argument all you're doing is displaying how you couldn't logically reason your way out of a wet paper bag.

Charisma? Odd way to spell, "bullshit promises of easy riches".

Uhuh, sure. Quick! Load up one of your other socks so you can post a supportive and equally-chock-full-of-fallacy post for yourself, I mean 'completely different user' of course!

Buh-bye, dimwit. While you're stood still trying to figure out how to open the door to perform a truly epic rage-quit-slam on your way out, how about you actually read the utterly absurd statement you wrote:

I believe it is you who is supposed to propose a reasoned counter to my 'Point 3' assertion, something you have failed to do. Simply typing the words, "You are wrong" doesn't actually do anything to support your position unless you back it up with the necessary words describing why I am wrong. Those words needing to not consist of logical fallacy, of course.

In posting your support for a ponzi in a ponzi-scam thread, you are hoping for what, exactly? Could it possibly be that you wish to encourage others to participate so that they send their money in after you and that you will receive a share of their deposit from the scammers? Yes, that is exactly what it is. Eventually the scam *will* collapse because of math, leaving a number of people having lost their money.

You don't want to be the one who doesn't get paid, fact.
You post in ponzi threads to hopefully make sure other users are the ones who don't get paid, fact.
Your lack of shit-giving for other users losing their money in order for you to get paid is undeniable proof of the scumbag you are, fact.

Awwww, more tone complaint? Because that's always a reasonable counterpoint, isn't it? "I haven't got an objective argument against your assertion so I will complain that I don't like the way you said it and pretend that equates to a reasoned counter."

I didn't dismiss them out of hand, I dismissed them for being the fallacious bollocks they are. As I said, though, if you're too dumb to be able to see the fallacies within your own rambling diatribe, I'm not going waste energy on trying to raise your IQ.